Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1236174 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#853718 Feb 4, 2013
the comments are way too good....

"Karl Rove has no shame. How he can continue to position himself as an expert in the Republican Party and slap the word "conservative" on his works is appalling. After the mess he spearheaded in helping Obama get reelected, he should save us all a lot of misery and retire. I nearly puke when I see him on Fox now.

Furthermore, there is nothing conservative about a small handful of money men trying to consolidate power and control what goes on in each state. I thought Obama took the prize for hubris but I think Rove has just about matched him. This will get ugly, but the war is on.

Finally, what a mistake the 17th Amendment was. Senators are supposed to represent their state, not Karl Rove."

"Sean Hannity, if you are reading this, please stop fawning over Karl Rove. The guy is a failed "Architect," and a wolf in Conservative clothing. Since you claim to be a Conservative Sean, please have people on your show who are actually Conservatives."

"...."The people who brought us No Child Left Behind, Medicare Part D, TARP, the GM bailout, Harriet Miers, etc., etc., etc.'

You mean just about every conservative here and in the country who voted for Bush not once, but twice?"

http://www.redstate.com/2013/02/04/thank-god-...

yes, twice.
9MM Straight Up

Lexington, KY

#853719 Feb 4, 2013
Personally, I hope this proves once and for all he's anti American, and is the enemy from within.
He deserves what he gets.

The USA is down the tubes because pieces of shit like him, the clintons, panetta and others.

Liberals in the media are the catalyst and the hollywood-tyoes are the funders. All deserve slow and painful lives and deaths.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#853720 Feb 4, 2013
History 101 wrote:
<quoted text>
Mine was one of the top ten ranking public universities.
LQQkie what else I found on the overnight shift. Carol attended the University of Illinois (late sixties early seventies era). Illinois is of course a BIG TEN university and might even rank in the top ten in certain subject matter* but definitely not Education at Bachelors level.

For those of you who missed reading Carol"s college era drama the first twenty times she posted it, she was married to husband #1 at that time and came to believe that all her uber liberal professors and instructors picked on her because of her religious views.

* U of I Urbana has one of the best intel science PhD programs in the nation__definitely top ten perhaps top two but that area of study was not yet created when Carol was there. Hah, those were the days of key punch cards.
neanderthal

Oklahoma City, OK

#853721 Feb 4, 2013
new hammer time wrote:
<quoted text>
and your point is/
None of my hairy a-hole relatives tore up the place after we won a SuperBowl...

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#853722 Feb 4, 2013
History 101 wrote:
<quoted text>
That is exactly the point. Obama NEVER gets asked tough questions. He RARELY even has press conferences.
Even Chris Matthews opened up a segment by accusing Barack Obama of behaving "like the campaign never ended" asking:
"What`s the president up to? Is he doing what he does well? Is he simply sticking to his strengths? Or is he trying to bypass what he sees as a problem area, meaning the national press corps?"
Matthews even suggested that the folks at Thursday's Internet town hall were "self-selected" much like a "Potemkin village".
This is what people who aren't hiding in the shadows can see with perfect clarity.
Even Matthews was willing to step into the light for a minute. It probably blinded him though. Don't think he likes the light too much.
Its too late, he already won re-election. Its not likely he'll hold any other elected position in this country again. What's the point to all of this? You're never going to be able to prove you were right because we'll never see what Romney would have done as President. So, are you just going to spend the next four years being wrong about being right?
Jimmy

United States

#853723 Feb 4, 2013
So NotSurpriZed wrote:
<quoted text> Not Surprized! ROTFLMAO!
ROFLMAO!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#853724 Feb 4, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
Thank God for American Crossroads and the Conservative Victory Project
American Crossroads is creating a new Super PAC to crush conservatives, destroy the tea party, and put a bunch of squishes in Republican leadership positions. Thank God they are behind this. In 2012, they spent hundreds of millions of rich donors’ money and had jack to show for it.
It is interesting though. The people who brought us No Child Left Behind, Medicare Part D, TARP, the GM bailout, Harriet Miers, etc., etc., etc. are really hacked off that people have been rejecting them. In 2012, about the only successful Republican candidates were the ones who directly rejected the legacy of these people.
So now they will up their game. They don’t like being shut out. They blame the tea party and conservatives for their failure to win primaries. They’ll now try to match conservatives and, in the process, call themselves conservatives.
I dare say any candidate who gets this group’s support should be targeted for destruction by the conservative movement. They’ve made it really easy now to figure out who the terrible candidates will be in 2014.
....The Conservative Victory Project, which is backed by Karl Rove and his allies who built American Crossroads into the largest Republican super PAC of the 2012 election cycle, will start by intensely vetting prospective contenders for Congressional races to try to weed out candidates who are seen as too flawed to win general elections.....
The problem will not be the weeding out. Certainly some candidates should be weeded out. Todd Akin should never have gotten the nomination, but tea party groups in Missouri were too divided to rally against him. Weeding out candidates will not be the problem. The problem will come when conservatives do rally and Karl Rove disagrees. In calling his group the “Conservative Victory Project” he intends to lend a veneer of conservative credibility to candidates who may not be in the same way the Bush Presidency tried to create “big government conservatism.”
Count me out.
http://www.redstate.com/2013/02/04/thank-god-...
“big government conservatism.”
and now they start to admit that Bush actually did screw it up? but, but, Democrats, 2007, blah, blah, BLAH!
whatever you nutjobs have been told is the truth....they will not be teaching FOXbot to your children. get a grip on reality.
Dufus, you still haven't answered these questions:

Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American embassy security detatchment while the real-time video was being watched in the White House?

In other words, where was Obama when the White House issued the orders to hang the Americans in Benghazi out to dry while they watched Al Qaeda kill them on real-time video?

And;

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

A simple location will suffice for the first question.
A simple source of money will suffice for the second question.

“"festivus lentel"”

Since: Feb 13

Eastern Oregon

#853725 Feb 4, 2013
But, I realize you are partially correct, DB, I am ig-nor-rant of zee noble south when seen through your bleary eyes. I know only zat if you want to see retarded people executed, or dragged behind pickup trucks until they fall a-part, one does not book a trip to zee Berkshires, non, mon ami?
Jimmy

United States

#853726 Feb 4, 2013
new hammer time wrote:
<quoted text>
and your point is/
On his head.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#853727 Feb 4, 2013
History 101 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, for heaven's sake. If you're going to be a part of this discussion, at least go back a page or two or try and keep up.
I already posted this not 30 minutes ago...the video and the transcript and even excerpts where Obama mentions the video 3 separate times.
http://www.mstarz.com/articles/5205/20120925/...
I saw the speech when it happened. Don't you keep up with any current events?
Dumb question, I know.
Its likely that I was at work when he spoke, don't you work?

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#853728 Feb 4, 2013
OldRaider wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you denying that congress doesn't have to approve money spent by the government? Get some help on this because you obviously don't know the correct answer.
... goddam idiots....

What I am doing is asking a question. Here it is again:

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

A simple source of money will suffice for the answer.
forks_make_us_fa t

Oklahoma City, OK

#853729 Feb 4, 2013
OldRaider wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you denying that congress doesn't have to approve money spent by the government? Get some help on this because you obviously don't know the correct answer.
You forgot about...

Obstructionist Harry and closed door deals....
Jimmy

United States

#853730 Feb 4, 2013
I speak like a true weasel...
I made the assertion, that I, a weasel am of no importance. So here we go again:
Jimmy da Weasel can't show us where anyone of importance who takes him seriously!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#853731 Feb 4, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Hillary Clinton was a lock for 2008.
How did that work out?
I suspect about as well as its worked out for the Republicans shuffling the also-rans to the top of the ticket. In 2016 should we expect a Clinton/Gingrich matchup? That's just got too much historical irony to be plausible.
NWaxman

United States

#853732 Feb 4, 2013
None of my hairy a-hole relatives tore up the place after we won a SuperBowl...
new hammer time

Richmond, VA

#853733 Feb 4, 2013
Jimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey genius libtard,
Did you tell us how the government of Afghanastan supporting the terrorists responsible for the deaths of 3,000 people on 911 wasn't related to national security?
thats a lie......the country most responsible for those 9-11 terrorists is non other that BUSHES kissing OIL partners from SAUDIA ARABIA. the only thing that poor azz country afganistan is responsibe for is continuously moving the opium trade to its destination. the american drug lords and republican SUPER PACS in the gov't needed to get their hands on that money so they could affect the elections here in america.
they did rather well.....bush got elected a 2nd term.
forks_make_us_fa t

Oklahoma City, OK

#853734 Feb 4, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>LQQkie what else I found on the overnight shift. Carol attended the University of Illinois (late sixties early seventies era). Illinois is of course a BIG TEN university and might even rank in the top ten in certain subject matter* but definitely not Education at Bachelors level.
For those of you who missed reading Carol"s college era drama the first twenty times she posted it, she was married to husband #1 at that time and came to believe that all her uber liberal professors and instructors picked on her because of her religious views.
* U of I Urbana has one of the best intel science PhD programs in the nation__definitely top ten perhaps top two but that area of study was not yet created when Carol was there. Hah, those were the days of key punch cards.
Meanwhile....

Lowland gorrillas all over the Congo are flinging poop and beating on their chests...

“"festivus lentel"”

Since: Feb 13

Eastern Oregon

#853735 Feb 4, 2013
Can we not, at leest, agree zat zee stoo-pid people are more likely to be "southern" and zee smart people more likely to be Northern? Ees this so hard for you to.. how you say.. Grasp?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#853736 Feb 4, 2013
continuing the GOP slap fest...

Rep. Justin Amash (R-MI) on Monday swiftly denounced Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) for a joke about Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad that the former Republican presidential nominee made on Twitter.

After McCain faced accusations of racism for a tweet in which he alluded to Ahmadinejad as a monkey, the senior Arizona senator told his critics to "lighten up." Amash reacted with surprise to the original tweet before telling McCain to "wisen up" and stop making "racist jokes."

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/g...

oh my. that's going to leave a mark.
Truth is no SIN

Bronx, NY

#853737 Feb 4, 2013
new hammer time wrote:
<quoted text>
lets compare romney and mccain.....they both lost to obama obams
YOU are A PLANTATION DWELLER THEY ARE NOT PRESIDENTS CLOWN

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
amy 6-2 11 min Kuuipo 5
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 15 min Rogue Scholar 05 189,842
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 20 min Earthling-1 53,586
abby 6-2 58 min Sublime1 12
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr Newt Gingrinch 99,595
News Former U.S. House Speaker Hastert indicted on f... 3 hr Drifter 46
Word (Dec '08) 5 hr Red_Forman 5,253
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]