Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
Shakalaka

Morrow, GA

#853158 Feb 3, 2013
discordian wrote:
Obama does not care about new jobs, he cares about ideology, nothi ng else. If you don't have a job, tough shit.
"Far more telling are the numbers of “major” rules: those that will cost the private sector $100 million or more each year. We found that 106 such major new regulations have been adopted during the Obama years, compared to 28 under Bush—a ratio of 3.8 to 1. In terms of cost, Obama’s rules imposed some $46 billion in additional annual burdens, compared to $8.1 billion in new costs during the first three Bush years, a whopping 5.6 to 1 ratio.
These numbers should not be surprising: President Obama has hardly been shy about making the case for increased regulation, and the record reflects that. Governor Romney was right to point that out"
Progressives, libs, dems= the new nazis
They'll micro manage us from birth to death
From the way this society is headed, looks like some "micro management" is called for. Republican=the New Mentally Insane

Anytime doing away with assault weapons is called on to prevent these horrific crimes and it is interpreted as a "violation" of your "right to bear arms"...Insanity like this needs to be contained!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#853159 Feb 3, 2013
discordian wrote:
From the leftist NYT's, they are Obama azz smoochers, they wouldn't lie, would they? Face it libs, Obama doesn't care one f ing bit about jobs in the private sector:
Regulatory policy made a cameo appearance in last night’s presidential debate when Governor Mitt Romney took aim at the Obama Administration’s penchant for making rules.
“Regulations have quadrupled,” Romney said.“The rate of regulations quadrupled under this President.”
The assertion led to a mini-controversy this morning over the Obama regulatory record. Left-leaning blogger Andrew Sullivan, Salon.com , and the Huffington Post all jumped in to argue that there has been no such increase in regulation. Obama, in fact, has imposed fewer new regulations than did Bush, they claim.
But they are wrong, and Romney was right.
And for the record, I am always right.
“Regulations have quadrupled,” Romney said.“The rate of regulations quadrupled under this President.”

Which is it?

You're too stupid to see the contradiction.

“"commie obammy"”

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#853160 Feb 3, 2013
I think if liberal lackeys really wanted to work they'd just suck it up and hit the employment center at Walmart.. The fact that they won't just proves they're a bunch of lazy slackers.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#853161 Feb 3, 2013
discordian wrote:
Obama does not care about new jobs, he cares about ideology, nothi ng else. If you don't have a job, tough shit.
"Far more telling are the numbers of “major” rules: those that will cost the private sector $100 million or more each year. We found that 106 such major new regulations have been adopted during the Obama years, compared to 28 under Bush—a ratio of 3.8 to 1. In terms of cost, Obama’s rules imposed some $46 billion in additional annual burdens, compared to $8.1 billion in new costs during the first three Bush years, a whopping 5.6 to 1 ratio.
These numbers should not be surprising: President Obama has hardly been shy about making the case for increased regulation, and the record reflects that. Governor Romney was right to point that out"
Progressives, libs, dems= the new nazis
They'll micro manage us from birth to death
Afraid to cite your Heritage Foundation blog?

I'd be embarrassed too if I were you.

Actually, if I were you I'd just keep my mouth shut to avoid such embarrassment.

“"commie obammy"”

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#853162 Feb 3, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Evidently the majority of voters liked it so you should take it up with them.
Hah! "The majority of voters" huh? I remind you that the Constitution itself is about protecting the rights of the minority. where would Guam be without Constitutional protections.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#853163 Feb 3, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>I really wanted a flying car Tenzing__and one of those mechanical maids. ;)
Nahhh, then you'd just be stuck in flying traffic jams. The Shazam app is way more useful.
Shakalaka

Morrow, GA

#853165 Feb 3, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
“Regulations have quadrupled,” Romney said.“The rate of regulations quadrupled under this President.”
Which is it?
You're too stupid to see the contradiction.
Anyone who believes anything that comes out of Romney's mouth is crazy. That man tell more lies than satan himself

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#853168 Feb 3, 2013
discardian wrote:
I think if liberal lackeys really wanted to work they'd just suck it up and hit the employment center at Walmart.. The fact that they won't just proves they're a bunch of lazy slackers.
Which is it? Obama's not creating jobs or the unemployed are too lazy to go find work?

Talk about low hangin' fruit ...
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#853169 Feb 3, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
You missed that earlier, DJIA up 110% off its 2009 low. Pretty good if you ask me but then again, I'm aware of the non-partisan nature of markets. My ideology doesn't require that I ignore reality.
Your "sources"
Ha!
How about "sauces?" Pretty sure that's bronach, the troll that's been 26 years old since he started posting on topix 8 years ago. Whatever__the fk is appearing on a dozen topix threads and probably several other anons.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#853170 Feb 3, 2013
discardian wrote:
<quoted text>
Hah! "The majority of voters" huh? I remind you that the Constitution itself is about protecting the rights of the minority. where would Guam be without Constitutional protections.
Probably still out in the middle of the Pacific Ocean.

“"commie obammy"”

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#853171 Feb 3, 2013
If you want to hand your stuff over to the government, Tenzing, then you go ahead. I'm keeping all my stuff and I've got guns to make sure it stays put.
Patriot

Boulder, CO

#853175 Feb 3, 2013
The End Game

How the 'Elite' Will Sell Global Collapse To The Masses

Thursday, January 31, 2013

The globalists have stretched the whole of the world thin. They have removed almost every pillar of support from the edifice around us, and like a giant game of Jenga, are waiting for the final piece to be removed, causing the teetering structure to crumble. Once this calamity occurs, they will call it a random act of fate, or a mathematical inevitability of an overly complex system. They will say that they are not to blame. That we were in the midst of “recovery”. That they could not have seen it coming.

Their solution will be predictable. They will state that in order to avoid such future destruction, the global framework must be “simplified”, and what better way to simplify the world than to end national sovereignty, dissolve all borders, and centralize nation states under a single economic and political ideal...

http://www.activistpost.com/2013/01/how-elite...

http://www.activistpost.com/2013/01/better-th...

http://bible.cc/revelation/13-16.htm vs 16-18

http://bible.cc/john/14-29.htm

“"commie obammy"”

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#853176 Feb 3, 2013
discordian wrote:
<quoted text> r u really that stupid? It's from the NYT's, pretty early to be drinking, isn't it?
Interesting and telling that as usual you attack the source rather than the facts. Is that how your liberal debate teacher taught you to do it?
No, actually it's a great time to be drinking. An entire evening is about to be ruined by the ridiculous spectacle of smaller white men being crushed by bigger black ones. I mean it's as if we're celebrating the very thing we spend all day complaining about.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#853178 Feb 3, 2013
discordian wrote:
<quoted text> r u really that stupid? It's from the NYT's, pretty early to be drinking, isn't it?
Interesting and telling that as usual you attack the source rather than the facts. Is that how your liberal debate teacher taught you to do it?
One of us must have been drinking but I don't think it was me. At least I didn't paste a quote from a Heritage blog then deny it:

Regulatory policy made a cameo appearance in last night’s presidential debate when Governor Mitt Romney took aim at the Obama Administration’s penchant for making rules.

“Regulations have quadrupled,” Romney said.“The rate of regulations quadrupled under this President.”

The assertion led to a mini-controversy this morning over the Obama regulatory record. Left-leaning blogger Andrew Sullivan, Salon.com , and the Huffington Post all jumped in to argue that there has been no such increase in regulation. Obama, in fact, has imposed fewer new regulations than did Bush, they claim.
http://blog.heritage.org/2012/10/17/debate-an...

“"commie obammy"”

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#853179 Feb 3, 2013
Sarge wrote:
is it true they are gonna put armed guards at gun ranges now>??
Yes, and at churches too. The trick is to get them while they're praying for more money.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#853181 Feb 3, 2013
discordian wrote:
<quoted text>
No Heritage Foundation here, chumly, you must really be loaded this morning:
Obama Wrote 5% Fewer Rules Than Bush While Costing Business ...
www.bloomberg.com/.../obama-wrote-5-fewer-rul... ...
Oct 25, 2011 – President Barack Obama's “tsunami” of new government regulations looks ... The Obama administration has issued 16 rules to implement the ...
Obama administration cranking out regulations following reelection ...
www.greeleygazette.com/press/...
Nov 12, 2012 – Obama administration cranking out regulations following reelection ... I've ordered a government-wide review, and if there are rules on the ...
Come boy blunder, show us you have an actual spine in that mass of gelatinous goo you call your body.
No Heritage Foundation but the same tactic. There's a difference between regulatory law and statutory law. Your "sources" combine both and attribute them to Obama. If they treated the Bush administration similarly the grotesque growth brought by Medicare "reform", NCLB, and the TSA would dwarf anything Obama's done.

I don't expect you to understand it but its not my responsibility to educate you, that should have been done by your parents and whatever excuse of a school you may have attended.

“"commie obammy"”

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#853182 Feb 3, 2013
Ohhhh....

You take the high road and I'll take the low road..

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#853183 Feb 3, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text> How about "sauces?" Pretty sure that's bronach, the troll that's been 26 years old since he started posting on topix 8 years ago. Whatever__the fk is appearing on a dozen topix threads and probably several other anons.
Sounds familiar, explains a lot. I can't tell that particular quarter of nitwits apart, they all function at the same very low level.

How do you tell a Bronach from a DimNeutron from an Eman?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#853184 Feb 3, 2013
discordian wrote:
<quoted text>
welfare queens are what got Obimbles elected twice, so you must be on the side of welfare queens, not me. Dumbass, try to accuse a staunch republican of wanting the government to bail us out, how long you been pushing that stupid lie that no one believes?
You're the one whining that Obama hasn't created a job for you yet.
TSM

El Paso, TX

#853185 Feb 3, 2013
It’s easy to understand Liberals/Democrats’ philosophy “What’s Good for American is Bad for Liberals” if you need evidence just look how the Liberal Media is trying to Spin this Bad Economic News as Positive!!

Judged:

11

11

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 min Brian_G 46,806
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 4 min Rogue Scholar 05 178,187
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr Frijoles 69,416
Word (Dec '08) 2 hr andet1987 4,733
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 3 hr D-U-H 49,897
Chicago abandons plan to name high school after... 7 hr Mr oH 10
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 8 hr _Zoey_ 4,722
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••