Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
784,781 - 784,800 of 1,095,989 Comments Last updated 3 min ago

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851964
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

Jean wrote:
<quoted text>
Dave - you mentioned you lived in NJ a while back. Is the Butler area nice?
never lived in nj

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851965
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

11

11

9

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
The suicide bomber was OUTSIDE the embassy, dickwad. No Americans were killed or injured.
Obama has killed more of the Al Qaeda leadership than Bush. Dumbass.
It looks like Al Qaeda is bombing us again as if they are on a schedule, just like it was when Clinton was president before Bush and Chaney kicked the shit out of them.

Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American embassy security detatchment in Benghazi while the real-time video was being watched in the White House?
(You can answer the question of why Obama lied for two weeks trying to cover up the Al Qaeda terrorist attack on the US later.)
Jane Says

New York, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851966
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

9

Jean wrote:
<quoted text>
Dave - you mentioned you lived in NJ a while back. Is the Butler area nice?
you think Real Dave goes outside?
TSM

El Paso, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851967
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Remember the Lie’ Obamacare affordable’ report release today by IRS: Cheapest Obamacare Plan Will Be $20,000 Per Family, Unions that supported Obamacare now Scrambling to deal with increase cost, reduce benefits , since Obamacare passed 20 million still uninsured it’s getting Ugly!!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851968
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Not the dot com bust. Wow a blip on the stock market.
And really, what kind of moron cuts taxes at a time of war.
Perhaps you can reference revenue figures to back your billshit up:

http://www.usgovernmentrevenue.com/revenue_hi...

Then explain to us what the Democrats did to that declining 0.16 (that's zero point one six) trillion dollar deficit after they took control of all the purse strings of government in January, 2007.
Did you say they increased the deficit ONE THOUSAND GODDAM PERCENT?

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851969
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Obviously , your Communist mentors are filling your small head with lies.

Clinton Vetoed two Welfare Bills before signing the thire.

His Veto was never overridden.

Bow, it's obvious that only Communists could have missed this fact.

Question for you is;

Who are your Marxist Communist handlers, and why do you believe what they tell you??

You've made a fool of yourself there with your wild eyed lies and Comunist propaganda.

Here's the FACTS, something you're completely unfamiliar with:

----------

"1996 Welfare Reform Bill -- Just the Facts

by Barry D. Bowen

President Bill Clinton twice vetoed the welfare reform bill put forward by Newt Gingrich and Bob Dole. Then just before the Democratic Convention he signed a third version. Some liberals were upset. Conservatives continued to sell the line that Clinton did not believe in welfare reform.

Conservative and moderate democrats argued that Clinton stood fast against extreme welfare reforms before signing the best compromise he could extract from Gingrich/Dole.""

----------

I caught you in yet another lie, Dweeb.

This is getting old.

You lie, I demolish the lies.

Keep it up, Commie Traveler.
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
To correct the erroneous information you received in your indoctrination session, Clinton vetoed the welfare reform legislation, and Congress had to override his veto.
At the time, there was no need for radical spending cuts because there was nothing wrong with the size of government then, thanks to a Republican Congress.
That's not true today. The Democrats have needlessly created a Godzilla of a government that obviously needs to be put on a diet and have gastric bypass surgery and liposuction and appendages cut off and... etc., etc., etc.
There is no part of the government the Democrats created that doesn't need to have drastic cuts made.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851971
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Building a lunar base with a 3D printer
Maid lily

Pompano Beach, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851972
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Jean wrote:
<quoted text>
Dave - you mentioned you lived in NJ a while back. Is the Butler area nice?
He didn't LIVE in Butler; he WAS a butler.
Truth is no SIN

Bronx, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851973
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Downward Spiral of the US Economy
US economy contracted in fourth quarter of 2012
The Commerce Department on Wednesday reported that the US economy contracted in the fourth quarter of 2012, the first decline in the country’s gross domestic product (GDP) since the second quarter of 2009, the final three months before the official end of the recession.

The report, showing a decline at an annual rate of 0.1 percent between October and December, stunned Wall Street and government economists, who were expecting a growth rate lower than the 3.1 percent recorded in the third quarter of last year, but still well above zero. The consensus projection was for an increase of 1.1 percent.

The dismal report on the US economy follows downwardly revised estimates for world economic growth issued this month by both the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The Commerce Department statement reflects the impact on the US of stagnation and decline in major centers of the world economy as well as the lack of any genuine recovery in the real economy of the United States.

The major factors in the plunge from slowdown to outright contraction were a sharp decline in government spending, centered in a 22 percent drop in defense spending, a pronounced drawdown in business inventories, and a 5.7 percent fall in US exports. While the scale of the declines in government spending and inventories may not be repeated in coming months, the drop in exports reflects a marked slowdown in global economic growth that shows no signs of ending.

The 17-nation euro zone is in recession and is expected to contract further in 2013, Britain is also in recession, Japan’s economy is barely growing, and growth in the so-called “emerging economies” of China, India and Brazil is decelerating. The result is a decline in markets for US exports, which fell for the first time since the beginning of 2009, the low point of the world recession.

For all of 2012, the US economy grew by 2.2 percent, according to Wednesday’s report. While a slight improvement over the 1.8 percent growth rate for 2011, this pace of economic expansion is far too slow to significantly lower the unemployment rate, currently at 7.8 percent. For that to occur, the US would have to enjoy growth of more than 3.0 percent over a sustained period.

In its biannual Global Economic Prospects report, issued January 15, the World Bank cut its projection for US growth in 2013 to only 1.9 percent.

The Obama administration sought to downplay the Commerce Department report. Alan Krueger, the chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, blamed the contraction on temporary factors such as the sharp drop in military spending, uncertainty in the run-up to the January 1 “fiscal cliff,” and the impact of Hurricane Sandy, which struck the East Coast in late October.“Both international trade flows and inventory accumulation could have been affected by disruptions caused by Hurricane Sandy,” he said in a statement.
Jean

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851974
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
The suicide bomber was OUTSIDE the embassy, dickwad. No Americans were killed or injured.
Obama has killed more of the Al Qaeda leadership than Bush. Dumbass.
I said "people killed" Dumbo. Learn how to read, idiot.

Yes, Obama is respopnsible for more deaths, I agree, including innocent people, Dumbass. In case you don't get it, killing more people does not equate to success. It actually can exacerbate the problem, Dumbass.

Since: Nov 09

Pharr, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851975
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
It looks like Al Qaeda is bombing us again as if they are on a schedule, just like it was when Clinton was president before Bush and Chaney kicked the shit out of them.
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American embassy security detatchment in Benghazi while the real-time video was being watched in the White House?
(You can answer the question of why Obama lied for two weeks trying to cover up the Al Qaeda terrorist attack on the US later.)
No sane person would think that the President of the United States of America should be the person overseeing the security details of the hundreds of embassies we have around the world, moot question.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851977
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

You left out factual content.

Like how Bush was asleep at the helm when Al Queda attacked the USA, in an attack on our soil that was worse than Pearl Harbor.

Surely you mean Al Queda killed 3,000 people in the WTC before Bush realized Al Queda existed!!

Had Dubya listened to the FBI, CIA, or Clinton's team, 9-11 would not have happened.

But he didn't, and it did!!

Why was Bush never put on trial for failing to protect our Nation??

Why do you continue to defend a failed President, the worst in American History, according to most Americans??

And you remain blissfully ignorant!!
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
It looks like Al Qaeda is bombing us again as if they are on a schedule, just like it was when Clinton was president before Bush and Chaney kicked the shit out of them.
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American embassy security detatchment in Benghazi while the real-time video was being watched in the White House?
(You can answer the question of why Obama lied for two weeks trying to cover up the Al Qaeda terrorist attack on the US later.)
Jean

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851978
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text> never lived in nj
liar

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851979
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Nuculur option wrote:
Obviously , your Communist mentors are filling your small head with lies.
Clinton Vetoed two Welfare Bills before signing the thire.
His Veto was never overridden.
Bow, it's obvious that only Communists could have missed this fact.
Question for you is;
Who are your Marxist Communist handlers, and why do you believe what they tell you??
You've made a fool of yourself there with your wild eyed lies and Comunist propaganda.
Here's the FACTS, something you're completely unfamiliar with:
----------
"1996 Welfare Reform Bill -- Just the Facts
by Barry D. Bowen
President Bill Clinton twice vetoed the welfare reform bill put forward by Newt Gingrich and Bob Dole. Then just before the Democratic Convention he signed a third version. Some liberals were upset. Conservatives continued to sell the line that Clinton did not believe in welfare reform.
Conservative and moderate democrats argued that Clinton stood fast against extreme welfare reforms before signing the best compromise he could extract from Gingrich/Dole.""
----------
I caught you in yet another lie, Dweeb.
This is getting old.
You lie, I demolish the lies.
Keep it up, Commie Traveler.
<quoted text>
I guess the indoctrination session to give you frauds the new party line about Al Qaeda bombing us as if they are on a schedule again, like it was when Clinton was president and before Bush and Chaney kicked the shit out of them, has ended.

Ok. What's the new party line mantra to explain Al Qaeda bombing us like they're on a schedule again?

And, where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American embassy security detatchment in Benghazi while the real-time video was being watched in the White House?
(You can answer the question about why Obama lied for two weeks trying to cover up the Al Qaeda terrorist attack against the US later.)

And;

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

And;

Why is Al Qaeda able to bomb us as if they are on a schedule again?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851980
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

OldRaider wrote:
<quoted text>
No sane person would think that the President of the United States of America should be the person overseeing the security details of the hundreds of embassies we have around the world, moot question.
The President is the CEO of the government and is responsible for setting overall policy and assuring that his chain of command follows up on the details.

The current occupant of the White House is a lazy bastard who is too busy socializing and campaigning to carry out the responsibilities of the office.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851981
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Nuculur option wrote:
You left out factual content.
Like how Bush was asleep at the helm when Al Queda attacked the USA, in an attack on our soil that was worse than Pearl Harbor.
Surely you mean Al Queda killed 3,000 people in the WTC before Bush realized Al Queda existed!!
Had Dubya listened to the FBI, CIA, or Clinton's team, 9-11 would not have happened.
But he didn't, and it did!!
Why was Bush never put on trial for failing to protect our Nation??
Why do you continue to defend a failed President, the worst in American History, according to most Americans??
And you remain blissfully ignorant!!
<quoted text>
Because Bush actually arrested one of the hijackers before the 9/11(2001) attack, idiot.
Jimmy

Newington, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851982
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

OldRaider wrote:
<quoted text>
No sane person would think that the President of the United States of America should be the person overseeing the security details of the hundreds of embassies we have around the world, moot question.
True, but no sane person would think that the President of the United States of America would not know immediately when one is being attacked in todays age of technology, moron.

You are an idiot.
Jimmy

Newington, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851983
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

4

Nuculur option wrote:
You left out factual content.
Like how Bush was asleep at the helm when Al Queda attacked the USA, in an attack on our soil that was worse than Pearl Harbor.
Surely you mean Al Queda killed 3,000 people in the WTC before Bush realized Al Queda existed!!
Had Dubya listened to the FBI, CIA, or Clinton's team, 9-11 would not have happened.
But he didn't, and it did!!
Why was Bush never put on trial for failing to protect our Nation??
Why do you continue to defend a failed President, the worst in American History, according to most Americans??
And you remain blissfully ignorant!!
<quoted text>
Oh look - this due is as bad as the birthers.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851984
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

flack wrote:
<quoted text> It's just a damn shame!!!
Yes, we know how you hate to see the DOW hit 14,000 for the first time since 2007, the year Bush crashed the economy!!

Wasn't that Dubya fellow President then?? The guy who destroyed our economy??

Dow stands at 13,997 at this moment.

3 points from the significant 14000 level!!

Now let's see you nitwits attack capitalism some more, telling us how the Capitalists are all wrong, the market is really at 6,000!!

C'mon, Flake, you're as dumb as Emaam. Let's see you say something truly ignorant again!!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#851985
Feb 1, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

flack wrote:
<quoted text> Typical libtard response when the facts don't fit the template.
finding it hard to me make look the fool?

talk is cheap.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••