Barack Obama, our next President

[Realtime]

Nuculur option wrote:

<quoted text>
You're wrong. Is this more of you rspeculating, as you did when you said Lanza used a handgun to kill the children??
You believe all sorts of crap you hear from your right wing sources.
But it's still crap.
You'll see in 2014.
"But the president's signature health care plan has become so fraught with politics that whether governors agreed to set up the exchanges has fallen mostly along party lines.
Such partisanship is largely symbolic because if a state opts not to set up the exchange, the Department of Health and Human Services will do it for them as part of the federal program. That would not likely be well-received by Republican governors, either, but the law forces each state's chief executive to make a decision one way or the other."

It's been explained on this and other threads, Flacko is once again a day late and dollar short.

The federal government will set up the exchange, the result is that the nation moves closer to single payer. Some of the (R) governors are pussyfooting around because they face reelection in 2014. The ACA is the law of the land at least until Obama moves on and by then it will be too late to repeal the entire thing. It's my guess that by 2016 the American voters will have discovered enough value in the system to ignore the right wing nonsense.

[OldRaider]

Waxman wrote:

<quoted text>
Not interested...
Take the hint, libtard...

Hey, you're cheating waxturd! You said you weren't going to talk to me.

I wonder what the odds are that this moron marches goober or jimmy out to hide behind one of his multiple personalities to cover his lie and talk to me?

[EasyEed]

flack wrote:

<quoted text> It will never get 2/3 of the states.

"flack"
Actually to be ratified by 3/4 of the states.
Peace

[Nuculur option]

flack wrote:

<quoted text> Hey dingleberry I said they can set up the exchanges but they don't have the power to make you buy insurance or tax you if you don't.

And I said you're wrong.

Based on your track record, I'm certain I'm right, because gas isn't $5, and the economy is doing just fine, thank you, and all your other predictions have been proven wrong!!

----------

""Individual Mandate (ObamaCare Sec. 5000A(a), Pg. 126)
&#61623; Was upheld by the Supreme Court as a tax on June 28, 2012
&#61623; Requires that, beginning in 2014, nearly all Americans purchase ObamaCare-compliant insurance
plans or pay a heavy fine (see Fines below)(ObamaCare amend. to Sec. 5000A(c)(1) & (2), Pg. 791)
&#61623; Individuals who are forced to purchase insurance plans through State Exchanges (see below) in
order to be compliant with the Individual Mandate, in many cases, will be purchasing plans that
impose the Abortion Premium Mandate (see below)
&#61623; The Individual Mandate requires people to pay for what the HHS mandate covers (because the HHS
Mandate applies to all plans) and also requires all individuals in certain plans to pay the Abortion Premium

----------

State Exchanges
&#61623; ObamaCare requires states to set up “exchanges” by January 1, 2014 – government-operated health
insurance markets, if they want to receive federal subsidies (ObamaCare Sec. 1321 (b), Pg. 68)
&#61623; Families (of 4) who earn $92,000 or less will receive federal tax credits which subsidize their plan if
they purchase from a State Exchange (Reconciliation Act Sec. 1001(a), Pg. 3)
&#61623; States are therefore incentivized to create these approved exchanges or forgo receiving federal
subsidization for their citizen’s health care
&#61623; If a State does not establish an approved exchange, the federal government has the option of setting
up an exchange in that state which will most likely provide for abortion even in states where
abortion coverage is illegal.(ObamaCare Sec. 1321 (b) & (c), Pg. 68)
&#61623; ObamaCare sets as the default that State Exchanges will cover abortion even in states where
abortion coverage is illegal. It gives the State the option to pass a law to opt out of the coverage,
and it also details how that law can be terminated or repealed.(ObamaCare Sec. 1303 (a)(1) and (2), Pg. 779)

----------

The individual mandate was upheld by the Supreme Court.

It doesn't matter who sets up the exchange.

You're looking for a loophole that doesn't exist.

[Nuculur option]

Realtime wrote:

<quoted text>It's been explained on this and other threads, Flacko is once again a day late and dollar short.
The federal government will set up the exchange, the result is that the nation moves closer to single payer. Some of the (R) governors are pussyfooting around because they face reelection in 2014. The ACA is the law of the land at least until Obama moves on and by then it will be too late to repeal the entire thing. It's my guess that by 2016 the American voters will have discovered enough value in the system to ignore the right wing nonsense.

Thanks, Realtime.

THe nitwits grow increasingly desperate by the hour.

[Waxman]

OldRaider wrote:

<quoted text>
Hey, you're cheating waxturd! You said you weren't going to talk to me.
I wonder what the odds are that this moron marches goober or jimmy out to hide behind one of his multiple personalities to cover his lie and talk to me?

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109686/quotes

Zzzzzzz....

[OldRaider]

Nuculur option wrote:

<quoted text>
You took the bait hook, line, and sinker, nitwit!!
I posted that with the intent of drawing you out, and it worked perfectly, Mr judge-it!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I love stupid people like you!! So easy to make fools of!!
Thanks for playing, Mr Mo Ron!!
ROFLMAO at your stupidity!!

I'll bet he still doesn't realize what you did to him. Although, Not Surprised, has a theory that waxturd is a masochist and enjoys being made a fool of and deliberately makes himself look stupid. I'm starting to think that may be the case.

[flack]

EasyEed wrote:

<quoted text>
"flack"
Actually to be ratified by 3/4 of the states.
Peace

Is it? I wasn't sure. That would be even harder.

[Nuculur option]

Saturday night!!

I'm outa here.

You shut-ins have a nice evening!!

HAHAHAHAHA

[Waxman]

Anyone see Hillary during the hearing the other day acting like she cared about the four people who died in Benghazi (pout, pout)?

Here is what one of the dead seals father said:

"Woods says that shaking President Obama’s hands at his son’s memorial service was “like shaking hands with a dead fish.”

Hillary is a cold fish too. The woman is a machine.

[flack]

Nuculur option wrote:

<quoted text>
And I said you're wrong.
Based on your track record, I'm certain I'm right, because gas isn't $5, and the economy is doing just fine, thank you, and all your other predictions have been proven wrong!!
----------
""Individual Mandate (ObamaCare Sec. 5000A(a), Pg. 126)
&#61623; Was upheld by the Supreme Court as a tax on June 28, 2012
&#61623; Requires that, beginning in 2014, nearly all Americans purchase ObamaCare-compliant insurance
plans or pay a heavy fine (see Fines below)(ObamaCare amend. to Sec. 5000A(c)(1) & (2), Pg. 791)
&#61623; Individuals who are forced to purchase insurance plans through State Exchanges (see below) in
order to be compliant with the Individual Mandate, in many cases, will be purchasing plans that
impose the Abortion Premium Mandate (see below)
&#61623; The Individual Mandate requires people to pay for what the HHS mandate covers (because the HHS
Mandate applies to all plans) and also requires all individuals in certain plans to pay the Abortion Premium
----------
State Exchanges
&#61623; ObamaCare requires states to set up “exchanges” by January 1, 2014 – government-operated health
insurance markets, if they want to receive federal subsidies (ObamaCare Sec. 1321 (b), Pg. 68)
&#61623; Families (of 4) who earn $92,000 or less will receive federal tax credits which subsidize their plan if
they purchase from a State Exchange (Reconciliation Act Sec. 1001(a), Pg. 3)
&#61623; States are therefore incentivized to create these approved exchanges or forgo receiving federal
subsidization for their citizen’s health care
&#61623; If a State does not establish an approved exchange, the federal government has the option of setting
up an exchange in that state which will most likely provide for abortion even in states where
abortion coverage is illegal.(ObamaCare Sec. 1321 (b) & (c), Pg. 68)
&#61623; ObamaCare sets as the default that State Exchanges will cover abortion even in states where
abortion coverage is illegal. It gives the State the option to pass a law to opt out of the coverage,
and it also details how that law can be terminated or repealed.(ObamaCare Sec. 1303 (a)(1) and (2), Pg. 779)
----------
The individual mandate was upheld by the Supreme Court.
It doesn't matter who sets up the exchange.
You're looking for a loophole that doesn't exist.

It's a tax. The guy on the radio said that the way the law is written the federal government has no authority to tax you or a business or to force you to buy insurance. The authority in the bill is given to the states and if the states don't participate than there is no way to make you buy insurance or pay the tax. Take it up with him and CBS Radio news. I wish I knew his name but they were talking about something else that I wasn't much interested in so I didn't catch it.

[flack]

Nuculur option wrote:

<quoted text>
And I said you're wrong.
Based on your track record, I'm certain I'm right, because gas isn't $5, and the economy is doing just fine, thank you, and all your other predictions have been proven wrong!!
----------
""Individual Mandate (ObamaCare Sec. 5000A(a), Pg. 126)
&#61623; Was upheld by the Supreme Court as a tax on June 28, 2012
&#61623; Requires that, beginning in 2014, nearly all Americans purchase ObamaCare-compliant insurance
plans or pay a heavy fine (see Fines below)(ObamaCare amend. to Sec. 5000A(c)(1) & (2), Pg. 791)
&#61623; Individuals who are forced to purchase insurance plans through State Exchanges (see below) in
order to be compliant with the Individual Mandate, in many cases, will be purchasing plans that
impose the Abortion Premium Mandate (see below)
&#61623; The Individual Mandate requires people to pay for what the HHS mandate covers (because the HHS
Mandate applies to all plans) and also requires all individuals in certain plans to pay the Abortion Premium
----------
State Exchanges
&#61623; ObamaCare requires states to set up “exchanges” by January 1, 2014 – government-operated health
insurance markets, if they want to receive federal subsidies (ObamaCare Sec. 1321 (b), Pg. 68)
&#61623; Families (of 4) who earn $92,000 or less will receive federal tax credits which subsidize their plan if
they purchase from a State Exchange (Reconciliation Act Sec. 1001(a), Pg. 3)
&#61623; States are therefore incentivized to create these approved exchanges or forgo receiving federal
subsidization for their citizen’s health care
&#61623; If a State does not establish an approved exchange, the federal government has the option of setting
up an exchange in that state which will most likely provide for abortion even in states where
abortion coverage is illegal.(ObamaCare Sec. 1321 (b) & (c), Pg. 68)
&#61623; ObamaCare sets as the default that State Exchanges will cover abortion even in states where
abortion coverage is illegal. It gives the State the option to pass a law to opt out of the coverage,
and it also details how that law can be terminated or repealed.(ObamaCare Sec. 1303 (a)(1) and (2), Pg. 779)
----------
The individual mandate was upheld by the Supreme Court.
It doesn't matter who sets up the exchange.
You're looking for a loophole that doesn't exist.

Hey dingleberry reread your post again. There is something missing. Bet you can't figure out what it is?

[Waxman]

Nuculur option wrote:

Saturday night!!
I'm outa here.
You shut-ins have a nice evening!!
HAHAHAHAHA

You just laughed at all your fellow libtards here, dope.

[Anonymous of Indy]

flack wrote:

<quoted text> It will never get 2/3 of the states.

the Republicans will go along with the Democrats and at the same time make it look like the Republicans are working with Democrats politically which is to the Republicans benefit to do so because the Republicans know the Democrats are going to hang themselves politcally again which I believe the Democrats have already done the way they are pushing their Gun Control legistlation just like they did in 1994 with the passage of 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban sponsered by Dianne Feinstein(D-CA) and Joe Biden(D-DE) which the Democrat Party paid politically for and Harry Reid knows Politically that the Democrats like Dianne Feinstein are like a cancer to the Democrat Party.

[Waxman]

Only old people and dorks call 5:30 "Saturday night!!"

8PM maybe, 5:30??

Haha!

[Chicagoan by Birth]

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>
No, they have a healthy and educated population that benefits Canadian society as a whole.
You, are an anti American traitor.

You know next too nothing aboot the Canadian population or the way they live?? That's nothing new from someone who lives in subsidized housing north of Miami..

[lily boca raton fl]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
The reason for the Senate confirmation procedure is to install officials that are mutually acceptable to both sides, even if they tilt to one side. This is part of our system of checks and balances.
For example, John Kerry will be confirmed as Secretary of State with little opposition, but Bernie Sanders would probably fail to receive approval for that post.
Obama has persisted in nominating highly partisan individuals who are unable to obtain Senate confirmation, such as nominating attorneys who represent unions to the NLRB, an obvious conflict of interest.
The courts are right to slap Obama upside the head for violating the Constitution.

We shall see, that 3 member panel are all Republican appointees; it's not over.

[lily boca raton fl]

flack wrote:

<quoted text> It's a tax. The guy on the radio said that the way the law is written the federal government has no authority to tax you or a business or to force you to buy insurance. The authority in the bill is given to the states and if the states don't participate than there is no way to make you buy insurance or pay the tax. Take it up with him and CBS Radio news. I wish I knew his name but they were talking about something else that I wasn't much interested in so I didn't catch it.

Probably that coroner in CT who said that the children were not killed by an assault weapon. Remember him? Whatshisname?

[RealDave]

OUTTA Here wrote:

Impeach this Chicago porch ape now!

Yet another right whiner racist f*ck.

[RealDave]

Waxman wrote:

<quoted text>
OK - then go ahead and explain the difference between climate change and glowbull warming libtard.
I'll give you a hint:
It changed to "Climate Change" after it was revealed you on the left were cooking the books and lying.
You should have said you will stick with stupid. That would be an accurate statement.
Yes, I realize they mean different things, but now you never hear the lying left use "glowbull warming" - that is the real difference.
You on the left are simply using a new way of scaring people and Al "Jazera" Gore is using the new words in his huckster routine.

Hint: The climate change is being caused primarily by the global warming.

You really are as f*cking stupid as every says.