Barack Obama, our next President

[Hi there]

OldRaider wrote:

<quoted text>
Oooooh You really got to waxturd on this one. He gave you 5 instant spams! I'll bet he dumps at least a dozen on you before he's done pouting.

hehe...

[OzRitz]

OldRaider wrote:

<quoted text>
Starting about three hours ago and scrolling through the mornings posts I noticed the judge-it total climbing. As soon as it hit double digits I knew it wouldn't be long before the forum nitwit shows up, then BAM, here you are. What a predictable, pathetic piece of shit.
Ten brilliants for this dumbass post?????

What is sad, he doesn't realize that awarding himself for crap makes all the other posts he rates go to the same level. Meaningless lol, so it's wasted time and energy for no gain, a lot like the Republicans.

[flack]

Anonymous of Indy wrote:

<quoted text>I believe it because the Democrats and the Republicans for years have both wanted & attempted to repeal the 22th amendment and I do believe with Obama currently in office that both parties will jump at idea and both parties know that there wont be any obstructions either since both parites want it.
Twenty-second Amendment to the United States Constitution
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-second_Am...

The states will never go for it.

[flack]

flack wrote:

<quoted text> Yes they can set up the exchanges but the bill gives the fed no authority to require the insurance be bought or to enforce the tax. Seems it's a paper tiger.

That would be the federal government before you get your panties in a wad.

[Anonymous of Indy]

flack wrote:

<quoted text> The states will never go for it.

in today's political climate I bet they would.

[flack]

Anonymous of Indy wrote:

<quoted text>in today's political climate I bet they would.

If I remember correctly it is up to the state governments to ratify or repeal an amendment not the people. Most state governments are republican held right now I believe. It would need 2/3 of the states I think.

[Realtime]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Felons get what they deserve.

Yeah I know, you're going to btch one way or the other aren't you?

[Anonymous of Indy]

flack wrote:

<quoted text> If I remember correctly it is up to the state governments to ratify or repeal an amendment not the people. Most state governments are republican held right now I believe. It would need 2/3 of the states I think.

Right, but the Stupid Party(Republican) as Bobby Jindal has labeled the Republican Party has been for repeal of the 22th amendment too even when Reagan was president which both parties have been for repeal for years. On January 4, 2013, Rep. José Serrano(D-NY) once again introduced H.J.Res. 15 proposing an Amendment to repeal the 22nd Amendment, as he has done every two years since 1997

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-second_Am...

[jiminy cricket]

Nuculur option wrote:

<quoted text>
Obama never mentioned global warming, nitwit.
There is no such term used today.
But you've had your head stuffed up your butt for so long, it's probably the last thing you remember.
Most Americans believe the science. Yu believe the deniers.
Guess which attitude helped win the election??
Your denying lost big time among the voting public.
I think that's part of the 'stupid' that Bobby Jindal and Haley Barbour say your side needs to get rid of.
Sorry that Bobby called you stupid.

Global warming...climate change...same difference.

"We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations."

The funny thing is the climate has been changing since the beginning of time. Obama, bless his heart, can't change that.

[TSM]

Nuculur option wrote:

<quoted text>

----------
Republican cuts to embassy security funding caused Benghazi.
Case closed.

Nuculur again Wrong…. More Democrats voted to cut embassy security than Republicans!! Total Vote from Congress: Voting to Cut Embassy Security, 199 Democrats, 163 Republicans Nuculur I agree…Case Close!!

[flack]

Anonymous of Indy wrote:

<quoted text>Right, but the Stupid Party(Republican) as Bobby Jindal has labeled the Republican Party has been for repeal of the 22th amendment too even when Reagan was president which both parties have been for repeal for years. On January 4, 2013, Rep. José Serrano(D-NY) once again introduced H.J.Res. 15 proposing an Amendment to repeal the 22nd Amendment, as he has done every two years since 1997
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty-second_Am...

It will never get 2/3 of the states.

[Nuculur option]

flack wrote:

<quoted text> Yes they can set up the exchanges but the bill gives the fed no authority to require the insurance be bought or to enforce the tax. Seems it's a paper tiger.

You're wrong. Is this more of you rspeculating, as you did when you said Lanza used a handgun to kill the children??

You believe all sorts of crap you hear from your right wing sources.

But it's still crap.

You'll see in 2014.

"But the president's signature health care plan has become so fraught with politics that whether governors agreed to set up the exchanges has fallen mostly along party lines.

Such partisanship is largely symbolic because if a state opts not to set up the exchange, the Department of Health and Human Services will do it for them as part of the federal program. That would not likely be well-received by Republican governors, either, but the law forces each state's chief executive to make a decision one way or the other."

[jiminy cricket]

PDUPONT wrote:

<quoted text>
What economic failure imbecile? You mean like bringing the Dow from around 6500 when he took office to yesterday's 13895.98? Like three years of private sector job growth and record low levels of unemployment claims? New home sales the highest since 2009.
According to your criteria only someone to the right of Heinrich Himmler is a true Republican and even Ronald Reagan wouldn't make the cut.
You're an idiot!

Economist Nouriel Roubini told CNBC:

"The damage will be widespread if we don't have enough job creation and there's not enough labor income. Therefore, there's not enough consumption and consumer companies are going to be depressed. Therefore, the recovery is going to remain weak. The markets are expecting now a robust recovery in the second half of the year. I think the recovery is going to disappoint on the downside."

http://www.cnbc.com/id/43659234

Without jobs, no economic recovery. Ask the former USSR.

[Nuculur option]

jiminy cricket wrote:

<quoted text>
Global warming...climate change...same difference.
"We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations."
The funny thing is the climate has been changing since the beginning of time. Obama, bless his heart, can't change that.

It's only the same difference to people like you, who d are not smart enough to understand the science.

You believe O'Reilly and Co.

I'll stick with NOAA and the scientists.

[jiminy cricket]

Death of Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
Nice plagiarism, must be why it sounds familiar.

It was the same link posted to Lily.

San José State University
Department of Economics

http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/sovietcol...

[flack]

Nuculur option wrote:

<quoted text>
You're wrong. Is this more of you rspeculating, as you did when you said Lanza used a handgun to kill the children??
You believe all sorts of crap you hear from your right wing sources.
But it's still crap.
You'll see in 2014.
"But the president's signature health care plan has become so fraught with politics that whether governors agreed to set up the exchanges has fallen mostly along party lines.
Such partisanship is largely symbolic because if a state opts not to set up the exchange, the Department of Health and Human Services will do it for them as part of the federal program. That would not likely be well-received by Republican governors, either, but the law forces each state's chief executive to make a decision one way or the other."

Hey dingleberry I said they can set up the exchanges but they don't have the power to make you buy insurance or tax you if you don't.

[flack]

The USS Cole pulled into port a little while ago. Better lock up your women folks.

[Waxman]

Nuculur option wrote:

<quoted text>
It's only the same difference to people like you, who d are not smart enough to understand the science.
You believe O'Reilly and Co.
I'll stick with NOAA and the scientists.

OK - then go ahead and explain the difference between climate change and glowbull warming libtard.

I'll give you a hint:

It changed to "Climate Change" after it was revealed you on the left were cooking the books and lying.

You should have said you will stick with stupid. That would be an accurate statement.

Yes, I realize they mean different things, but now you never hear the lying left use "glowbull warming" - that is the real difference.

You on the left are simply using a new way of scaring people and Al "Jazera" Gore is using the new words in his huckster routine.

[Nuculur option]

TSM wrote:

<quoted text>
Nuculur again Wrong…. More Democrats voted to cut embassy security than Republicans!! Total Vote from Congress: Voting to Cut Embassy Security, 199 Democrats, 163 Republicans Nuculur I agree…Case Close!!

You post crap without links to support what you've said??

How typical.

Why is it that you make up such lies??

If it were true, you'd list the bill and votes. But you pull crap out of your butt, like the Stock Market isn't part of the economy.

BTW, there were several rounds of cuts to Embassy Security since the nitwits took the House in 2011.

So which of the several bills are you referring to??

List the Bill# or AMendment # if you expect to be believed.

There was more than one. DU

It's well known that you'll lie and try to get away with it.

As your stupidity concerning the economy proved.

[Waxman]

2 Faces of Obama: The Uniter vs. The Let's Punish Them Divider

http://www.youtube.com/watch...