Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#850843 Jan 30, 2013
Liberals, lying, and heckling...

'Media Falsely Claims Gun Activists Heckled Father of Murdered Newtown Boy'

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/...
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#850844 Jan 30, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
hey! Google is not your friend!
Did you ever have one? Didn't think so.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#850845 Jan 30, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
instructions?
Sometimes a post is not intended to make you laugh... It is intended to make you think.

You're alone, but happy...
RUSH10ME

Gloucester, VA

#850846 Jan 30, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>You couldn't handle lily even if she came with instructions you moron.
Better if she came with antibiotics and a full face helmet .
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#850847 Jan 30, 2013
Obama just said at his inaugural address that the economy is doing better but today we hear the last quarter took a dive. Democrats just say anything and cherry pick. Doesn't matter if they are clueless or not because clueless people support them.

We're screwed for four more years again.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#850849 Jan 30, 2013
The larger point is precedent.

In our form of Government, we tend to make rules and abide by them.

This one has remained largely intact since 1803. So if you want to change it, at least have the guts to admit it is only to give your side an advantage.

As you've seen, sides change. That's why they stick to precedent. Because if they didn't, the rules for everything would change with each party shift in election.

A good example is the Federal Gov't creating WVa, out of part of VA.\

A clearly un Constitutional move by Lincoln, to steal land from VA to create a new, rump state, WVA.

Everybody is not like WVA. Your state is a falsehood. A breakaway, traitorous move by a few counties of Virginia, and a Union eager to punish Virginia, along came the bogus WVA.

I know of no state with the dishonorable historical record of WVA

Your very existence is the result of an un Constitutional act.
flack wrote:
<quoted text> There is no constitutional right to vote for president. The states can choose their electors anyway they want. Draw names out of a hat, governor's choice, or the lottery. The electors are not even bound to vote the way the state voted. Stay stupid. it fits you well
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#850850 Jan 30, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
hey! Google is not your friend!
My people skills are just fine... It's my tolerance for losers and gun toting idiot liberals that needs work. Not Google...

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#850852 Jan 30, 2013
Why should Lily do your work for you, nitwit??

She said it did.

You have to prove her wrong by pointing out the wording of the legislation that proves her wrong. DUH

You can't argue if you don't know what it says!!

You failed 'Google for Dummies', didn't you??
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
you're a fear monger, lily. Plain and simple. You posted a link to the legislation but have failed to provide the proof of you assertion. Funny thing is that I haven't "argued" about it for a while, just asking for the passage that prevents a woman from getting an abortion. You want it dropped because that passage doesn't exist.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#850854 Jan 30, 2013
You're such a terrible liar.

And you have no problem looking like an idiot.

An awful combination.
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow. After a party line mantra rant like that you probably need to catch your breath. Here's something to read while you are getting your wind back:
Actually, he tells his girlfriend that Zimmerman has already left and he is going to go catch Zimmerman and assault him.
The fight starts after Hoodieman follows Zimmerman and catches up with him and punches him in the nose. No gun is shown yet. Then, Hoodieman knocks Zimmerman to the ground. No gun is shown yet. Then, Hoodieman gets on top of Zimmerman and pins him to the ground. No gun is shown yet. Then, Hoodieman begins bashing Zimmerman's head against the concrete sidewalk.
Now, the gun comes out and Hoodieman is blown to hell.
By the way, Zimmerman is in no way a specimen of a physical animal. He was short and pudgy, and would be obviously weak and not athletic. Only a coward would choose a victim like that.... enter Hoodieman.
... exit Hoodieman.
Note to drug-user drop-out gang-banger wannabes: Don't attempt to bash an obviously weaker man's brains out by banging his head against a concrete sidewalk. Americans have a constitutional right to be armed and they will blow you to hell.

Since: Nov 09

Pharr, TX

#850855 Jan 30, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
You waaay overestimate and overstate things honey, but I am appreciative you think I can do all this. I guess you know that people who are not libtards like you guys can accomplish so much more than you. I do get a kick out of you!
By the way, you might want to put your white bearded poodle back in his dog house. I think he did his business.
You even include references to me in messages to other people! I own you! Admit it, you can't get me out of your head. Sweet dreams puss.
Patriot

Boulder, CO

#850856 Jan 30, 2013
Police State Gone Wild: Couple Facing 60 Days in Jail for Rescuing Injured Baby Deer

The deer “escaped” right before it was schedule to be killed — and yes, I think the couple probably set it free rather than have it killed — the man and woman were charged with unlawful possession of a deer.

http://theintelhub.com/2013/01/30/police-stat...
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#850857 Jan 30, 2013
flack wrote:
Whoa!!! Hillery on Greta last night threw Obama and his posse under the bus!!!! She called him a power hungry liar who has no clue about how to fix the economy. She said Obama and his crew has no clue how the government works and that they are dangerously inept. Where is the MSM talking about this? Why is it almost 6 the next evening before we hear about this.
I guess a link is once again out of the question eh?

How bout you just tell us what to type in per usual.
BIG SurpriZe

Pompano Beach, FL

#850858 Jan 30, 2013
Not Surprized wrote:
<quoted text>
Devin wrote:
<quoted text>
You posted that Woman's personal information on this thread....... you were sanctioned and banned by Topix..... That qualifies you as a Topix Stalker, at least the moderator considers you such......
That's not Devin's assessment, I was here when the moderator warned you, it's not like you've forgotten....... ROFLMAO
The other delusional lunatic, Pelosi was kicked off Topix for the same thing...... ROFLMAO
Devin wrote:
<quoted text>
ROFLMAO....... You posted that Woman's personal information on this thread....... you were banned by Topix..... That qualifies you as a Topix Stalker, at least the moderator considers you such......
Are you saying the Moderator did not come in here and warn you for your anti social behavior in posting that Woman's personal information?
In your delusional mind, this never happened? ROFLMAO, You're a Fraud...... ROFLMAO
ROFLMAO..... It's sad to see a grown man sniveling, whinning and LYING......
Flash us, please...ROTFLMAO!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#850859 Jan 30, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
"Such a monetary policy tool, known as quantitative easing but widely referred to as printing money out of thin air, pushes up stock prices but is powerless to tackle fiscal uncertainty.
"Based on the fiscal cliff and all of the headwinds, the stock market should be at 9,000 and not 14,000," Zell said.
Nevertheless, a combination of Fed stimulus and widespread business uncertainty has investors chasing a limited number of stocks, thus sending the Dow higher than where it should be."
You want to get into bull/bear sentiment??

I mean, we could go bsck and forth with bull/bear analysts, but in the end, I win.

Or you want to use carefully selected opinions??

HAHAHAHAHAHA

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#850860 Jan 30, 2013
when "shall not be infringed" is heckling...

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/...
BIG SurpriZe

Pompano Beach, FL

#850861 Jan 30, 2013
Not Surprized wrote:
<quoted text>
Devin wrote:
<quoted text>
You posted that Woman's personal information on this thread....... you were sanctioned and banned by Topix..... That qualifies you as a Topix Stalker, at least the moderator considers you such......
That's not Devin's assessment, I was here when the moderator warned you, it's not like you've forgotten....... ROFLMAO
The other delusional lunatic, Pelosi was kicked off Topix for the same thing...... ROFLMAO
Devin wrote:
<quoted text>
ROFLMAO....... You posted that Woman's personal information on this thread....... you were banned by Topix..... That qualifies you as a Topix Stalker, at least the moderator considers you such......
Are you saying the Moderator did not come in here and warn you for your anti social behavior in posting that Woman's personal information?
In your delusional mind, this never happened? ROFLMAO, You're a Fraud...... ROFLMAO
ROFLMAO..... It's sad to see a grown man sniveling, whinning and LYING......
You're so cute ... ROTFLMAO!
BIG SurpriZe

Pompano Beach, FL

#850863 Jan 30, 2013
Not Surprized wrote:
<quoted text>
Waxballs resurfaces from the longest dumpster dive in history!! Remember that topix banishment ? Still stalking women and giving out their personal information to the many topix posters roound the world? Better watch your step there Waxbrains, the Moderators are watching, you sick, psycho Stalker. Still spamming threads with macros runescape I see. You're psychotic STALKER if there ever was one.
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/itasca-il/T50 ...
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/itasca-il/T50 ...
#18127
Oct 17, 2009
"Sounds Paranoid To Me wrote:
She changed her name bacause she was being stalked. The poster who was stalking her got her private information and published it for the world to see on this forum. That is why he was banned. So she changed her name. I observed the whole incident from the start. Not only did he publish her information but continued to stalk and harass her. Can you understand why she would change her name now?
sunnycali wrote:
Would you report someone HERE to the moderators if they were giving out YOUR personal information?
17602
Oct 15, 2009
"sunnycali wrote:
Again, if someone posted YOUR private information would you just sit there and say, "way to go - that's freedom of speech in action?" And I mean information that included your home address and phone number. You would do nothing? If the answer is that you would do nothing then you apparently care little for your family.
17603
Oct 15, 2009
"sunnycali wrote:
So if someone were giving out your personal information you would not report that person? If someone were using extremely obscene language you would not report that person?
This has absolutely nothing to do ideology. I don't have any problem with free speech. I don't have any problem with people of any political bent expressing their opinions. I DO have a problem with people violating the most basic terms of decency.
Oh, and I would report someone if I saw them breaking into YOUR house. Or abusing a member of YOUR family. I guess you and I are different in that respect. And I'm very sorry for that. Not for me but for you.
#58531Reply Jun 9, 2010
"Devin wrote:
Waxman, you are a known stalker, you've been sactioned by Topix on several occasions.
You are the poster child for keeping certain presonal information unrelated to the debate to one's self.
Come on now...... What's your purpose why aren't your focusing on the issues of the debate, the 1995 Budget Impass?
.... stay with the issue of the debate which is more than enough dialogue with individuals like yourself... didn't you ever warn your children about relating personal information over the internet about themselves?.. it's an employed security feature..
Please sit up and beg; it's so much more romantic... ROTFLMAO!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#850864 Jan 30, 2013
I enjoy your desperate search to somehow validate your nitwit opinion.

Fact remains that the stock market is a leading indicator, and stocks have done extremely well under Obama.

So, assuming you have any savings, you don't like stocks, so where would you invest??

Bond yields are so low, you lose to inflation.

Have you noticed how Capitalists are huge investors in the stock markets??

Based on your view, they must be crazy, right??

You argued yourself into a pretzel again, Emaam.

I mean, that crazy Rmoney has a ton of money in stocks!! He'll be sorry!!

Good job.
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
"Adjusted For Fed Propping And Inflation, Dow At 5,600
Liberals love to point to the stock market as an indicator of economic recovery. After all, stocks are one of the few asset classes that have recovered. Unfortunately, the market's recovery is a total sham. The Fed, by its own admission, is propping up the market by 50%. This revelation alone takes the actual Dow reading below 7,000. And then there's the relatively high inflation we've been experiencing over the last few years (as a result of Fed liquidity pumping via printing and ZIRP). The government has been telling us that inflation has been essentially non-existent since the financial crisis, but many respected economists have pegged the inflation rate as high as 8% per annum. But let's just assume that it's been running at half of that--4%--since 2008, the last time the Dow reached 14,000. That would mean that 2013 dollars have approximately 20% less purchasing power than 2008 dollars. So, if the absence of Fed propping takes the Dow down to 7,000, the actual inflation-adjusted level is 5,600 (in 2008 dollars).
Here's what 5,600 would look like on a historical chart of the Dow. Notice that the last time the market was at this level was in 1996. But, adjusted for inflation, the Dow at 5,600 in 1996 would be equivalent to the index registering approximately 10,000 today! In other words, the stock market is actually in the toilet, and those who point to it as an indicator of economic recovery are severely misguided."
Misguided...hmmmm

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#850865 Jan 30, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
He's taking the advice of his Admirals.
Surface ships, esp. Aircraft Carriers, are what is referred to as LST's, an older Navy landing ship.
LST stands for 'LONG SLOW TARGET', among other things.
The Chinese likely have a surface to surface missile system, either land based or on a small craft, like a Destroyer.
Did I mention what a Chinese Drone strike,using hundreds of drones, would do to an Aircraft Carrier??
Neutralizing our Aircraft Carriers.
The Navy Jets are helpless against Drones. They're too damn slow to track.
You don't get out much, do you??
Just as the Aircraft Carrier replaced the Battleship, a small missile replaces the Aircraft Carrier.
Surface ships, except for smaller craft, are toast.
The biggest ship in our Navy should be a Tin Can.
<quoted text>
"China achieved a military milestone when its fighter jet landed on its new aircraft carrier in November, extending a modernization bid that’s recorded advances in submarines, cyber warfare and in outer space"

" CNN has obtained detailed photographs of a new stealth fighter being tested in China.

It is the second such stealth fighter China has tested in as many years and appears destined to become the communist nation's future aircraft carrier-based fighter jet, according to weapons analysts."

"Russia intends to strengthen its security on sea with a heavy air-capable cruiser of a new generation. The cruiser is expected to be put to use in the Russian navy in 2020"

"Russia’s T-50 stealth fighter prototype, the first radar-evading warplane outside the U.S. when it debuted in January 2010, is slightly less stealthy than the American F-22 and about equal to the smaller F-35. But in several other respects the new warplane from the Russian Sukhoi design bureau is actually superior to the American models."

i guess folks in Russia and China didn't get the memo.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#850867 Jan 30, 2013
flack wrote:
Continuing to buy $85 billion a month in bond purchases by printing money not backed by anything is insane. That's $1,020,000,000 a year for the last three years plus who knows how much longer. They will never be able to pull all of that fake money out of the market place without a major spike in interest rates. As I've said before we are a ship going down by the bow and the captain (Fed) is still running all engines full speed ahead.
The best part is that everything you've said before was proven to be wrong.

Mark my words.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 18 min mdbuilder 49,306
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 41 min Learn to Read 182,030
Santa Claus delayed in Chicago after getting th... 4 hr ChicagOpinion 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 5 hr ChicagOpinion 98,871
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 9 hr J RULES 71,188
Chicago Pizza Blows 11 hr joey 2
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 11 hr KiMare 51,279
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 1:40 pm PST

NBC Sports 1:40PM
Cutler realizes Bears could be in for changes - NBC Sports
NBC Sports 8:22 PM
Bears re-sign Austen Lane to replace Willie Young
Bleacher Report10:09 PM
Bears vs. Vikings: Breaking Down Minnesota's Game Plan
Bleacher Report 4:00 AM
Breaking Down Colts' Game Plan vs. Titans
Bleacher Report 5:00 AM
Can't-Miss Picks and Matchup Guide