Barack Obama, our next President

There are 20 comments on the Nov 5, 2008, Hampton Roads Daily Press story titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#851035 Jan 31, 2013
OldRaider wrote:
<quoted text>
Idiocy= Doing (asking) the same thing over and over and over and expecting a different result.
You forgot to put content into your post. I'll help you. Here's the post again. There are questions in the post. If you can answer the questions, please do so. To date, nobody on Earth has been able to answer these questions:

While you're copy-and-pasting stuff, how about looking at the definition of "projection" as used by psychologists. Then, look in the mirror for evidence.
Now, back to the questions you've been running away from for... what is it now... almost 4 weeks?
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American embassy security detatchment in Benghazi while the real time video was being watched in the White House, and orders came from the White House for the AC-130s and the Force Recon Marine units to ignore their default orders to respond to an attack on the embassy in Libya?
(Thus, who in the White House gave the order for the Americans to be hung out to dry in Libya while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real time video; and why did Obama lie for two weeks trying to cover up the Al Qaeda terrorist attack on the United States when the real time video of the 7-hour battle that was watched in the White House proved the Obama explanation an obvious lie?)
And, finally;
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
So far, nobody on Earth has answered these questions.
Jimmy

Newington, CT

#851036 Jan 31, 2013
OldRaider wrote:
<quoted text>
Idiocy= Doing (asking) the same thing over and over and over and expecting a different result.
Ol' Whitebearde Ratface shows up and the judgeit war begins. Looks like you lose again, moron.
dem

Chicago, IL

#851037 Jan 31, 2013
OldRaider wrote:
<quoted text>
Idiocy= Doing (asking) the same thing over and over and over and expecting a different result.
fkoff hillbilly

You mean insanity, insane dumbfk

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#851038 Jan 31, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
You've tried that one before DB and it's just as much a lie as the first time.
Barack Obama passed the Illinois bar and was licensed to practice law on December 17, 1991.
http://www.iardc.org/ldetail.asp...
He was employed as a lecturer at the University of Chicago Law School from 1993 to 2004.
He was also an partner at Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland from 1993 to 2004.
www.ibtimes.com/yes-president-obama-has-worke... ...
That he never saw the inside of a courtroom is a baseless assertion on your part and irrelevant. The majority of lawyers working for large firms don't go into court but leave it to litigators who specialize in that part of the business.
Not only are you a liar DB, you're an incompetent one.
You're an idiot DB!
LOL. Attempting to access your link returned the message "illegal operation" to me. Still, there is no proof Obama ever passed the bar or ever appeared in a courtroom as a lawyer.

Show us the results of Obama passing the bar.

Name the cases where Obama argued in a courtrooom.
Date - location - docket number - client/plantiff

... got a problem there, dont' you?
That's because Obama never passed the bar and has never even seen the inside of a courtroom as a lawyer.
Well, you can tell us about the... how did Obama's handlers call this... "management" lectures to ACORN that was supposedly his "private practice" experience.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#851039 Jan 31, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL. Attempting to access your link returned the message "illegal operation" to me. Still, there is no proof Obama ever passed the bar or ever appeared in a courtroom as a lawyer.
Show us the results of Obama passing the bar.
Name the cases where Obama argued in a courtrooom.
Date - location - docket number - client/plantiff
... got a problem there, dont' you?
That's because Obama never passed the bar and has never even seen the inside of a courtroom as a lawyer.
Well, you can tell us about the... how did Obama's handlers call this... "management" lectures to ACORN that was supposedly his "private practice" experience.
I have posted links in the past proving Obama passed the bar &that he practiced in a courtroom.

Either you are the dumbest person on the planet or just the biggest liar.

My God.
RUSH10ME

Gloucester, VA

#851040 Jan 31, 2013
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
fkoff hillbilly
You mean insanity, insane dumbfk
I just dont know whats worse being from Chicago or being from Bumpass!

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#851041 Jan 31, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You forgot to put content into your post. I'll help you. Here's the post again. There are questions in the post. If you can answer the questions, please do so. To date, nobody on Earth has been able to answer these questions:
While you're copy-and-pasting stuff, how about looking at the definition of "projection" as used by psychologists. Then, look in the mirror for evidence.
Now, back to the questions you've been running away from for... what is it now... almost 4 weeks?
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American embassy security detatchment in Benghazi while the real time video was being watched in the White House, and orders came from the White House for the AC-130s and the Force Recon Marine units to ignore their default orders to respond to an attack on the embassy in Libya?
(Thus, who in the White House gave the order for the Americans to be hung out to dry in Libya while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real time video; and why did Obama lie for two weeks trying to cover up the Al Qaeda terrorist attack on the United States when the real time video of the 7-hour battle that was watched in the White House proved the Obama explanation an obvious lie?)
And, finally;
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
So far, nobody on Earth has answered these questions.
Again you are a liar.

I posted a link of the Pentagon Benghazi timeline showing Obama in a meeting at the White House.
forks_make_us_fa t

Oklahoma City, OK

#851042 Jan 31, 2013
To a 47%'er....gun control is easy...

Just ask California...

Cal unable to collect guns from 19,000+ felons and mentally ill...

http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/...

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#851044 Jan 31, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
How about this:
The Constitution defines our government as a civillian government.
There are not two sets of rights in the Constitution, one set for civillians in government, and a different set for civillians not in government.
Therefore, any gun law passed applies to every civillian in the country equally.
If all that is allowed is single-shot .22 rifles, then that is all that is allowed to any civillian in and out of government.
Unless, you can show us the text in the Constitution that describes two different sets of rights; one set for civillians in government, and a different set of rights for civillians not in government.
What you really want is a police state, don't you?
Nope. Not gonna happen. Eric Holder and Janet Napolitano get AR-15s with 20 round clips, the American people get AR-15s with 20 round clips.
Police & law enforcement are granted rights that other citizens do not.

So what.

Can I go get a court order to search your home?
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#851046 Jan 31, 2013
Jimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you still confined to sponging off your kids? As much as you have been lying, Democrat, an 80+ year old does not just pick up and move away from his kids. Are you driving your daughter and her family nuts yet?
Now don't you worry that big fat empty head LOSER, I'm welcomed everywhere I roam, but I do sense your delemma. ENVY is a terrible price to pay for your own major and obvious short comings. Again LOSER.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#851047 Jan 31, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
It really seem slike you really want to answer this question:
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/...

Are you too stupid top read this. Evidently because I posted it yesterday & you are still the ignorant fool .

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#851049 Jan 31, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Lot's of luck getting any action on that....
Barney Frank can throw his male page off his New York hotel balcony and run a male prostitution racket out of his house and be the Chairman of the House Financial Services Committee because he's a Democrat.
Menendez f**k*ng children doesn't quite come up to that, so don't expect any action from any Democrat.
Vitters - re-elected. Hired prostitutes from his cell phone on the House floor.
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#851050 Jan 31, 2013
Not Surprized wrote:
WAXTURDS TROLL ALERT!!!!
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
WAXTURDS Sockpuppets making their morning rounds!!!!
Must be really tough being old Waxballs an obvious delusional loser. One can only imagine how embarrassed what few family members that will even acknowledge that idiot.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#851051 Jan 31, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
It seems you really want to answer this question:
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
http://www.cbpp.org/cms/...
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#851053 Jan 31, 2013
Former RNC Boss: GOP Risks ‘Permanent Minority’

Jim Gilmore, a former chairman of the Republican National Committee, says the GOP is quickly becoming a “permanent minority.”

“I don’t think the party dies immediately,” Gilmore says.“It’s not going to just disappear like the Whigs did, since there is so much law that supports the two-party system. But Republicans will be locked into a permanent minority at the national level unless we seriously rethink our approach.”

Gilmore, a former Virginia governor, spoke with National Review Online on Wednesday. He says he and other longtime Republican leaders have been privately fretting about the GOP’s future since Mitt Romney’s defeat.

“The world has changed beneath us,” Gilmore says.“Shrillness and extreme language are driving away the voters who could help us build a majority. We’re not speaking to them as reasonable conservatives. Republicans have to decide if they want to govern or play ideological parlor games.”

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/339277/f...

it's not hard to see why denial is the ongoing theme at FOX. and here.

denial will not get a republican back into the WH. try....accountability. and yes, your own as strange as that may be to you wingnuts after 4 years of Bush denial.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#851054 Jan 31, 2013
discordian wrote:
<quoted text>
Not buying it davey. Have you parked your car yet? Sold it?
If not I blame you directly for everything you say is going on with AGW. it's your fault.
Like most right whiners, you are dumber than sh*t.

No one is calling for zero emissions. We need to reduce these.

I have reduced mine.

We all were at fault for not paying attention. Now that we know, only dumbf*cks like you don't care.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#851055 Jan 31, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Start by cutting all government salaries by 10%.
Then cut them another 10% next year.
Bet you will still have people lined up for government jobs.
Great plan.

The better employees will go into private industry & we will be stuck with employees not as skilled or knowledgeable.

You can tell you never ever owned or managed a business.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#851056 Jan 31, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you the same guy from earlier? You wanted proof that the stock market is being propped up. i gave it to you. i've discussed enough about my personal finances on here and my opinion of stocks in general. Even gave Dave a link on how he could cheaply invest in the stock market. If you want to continue making things up and changing the discussion do it with someone else.
Proof is not opinion from a "economist" who runs a blog.

Since: Nov 09

Pharr, TX

#851057 Jan 31, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
You forgot to put content into your post. I'll help you. Here's the post again. There are questions in the post. If you can answer the questions, please do so. To date, nobody on Earth has been able to answer these questions:
While you're copy-and-pasting stuff, how about looking at the definition of "projection" as used by psychologists. Then, look in the mirror for evidence.
Now, back to the questions you've been running away from for... what is it now... almost 4 weeks?
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American embassy security detatchment in Benghazi while the real time video was being watched in the White House, and orders came from the White House for the AC-130s and the Force Recon Marine units to ignore their default orders to respond to an attack on the embassy in Libya?
(Thus, who in the White House gave the order for the Americans to be hung out to dry in Libya while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real time video; and why did Obama lie for two weeks trying to cover up the Al Qaeda terrorist attack on the United States when the real time video of the 7-hour battle that was watched in the White House proved the Obama explanation an obvious lie?)
And, finally;
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
So far, nobody on Earth has answered these questions.
You never answered where you were while Benghazi was going on. Obama should not have been involved any more than you. It was the job of on site military and State Department people.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#851058 Jan 31, 2013
Retaking the Faith-Based Initiative

Republican defeat last year was largely due to the party’s disproportionate focus on fiscal policy while ignoring the concerns that absorb the day-to-day lives of women, minorities, and other sectors of the electorate with little affinity for the GOP. The right long ago abandoned “compassionate conservative” issues out of disgust with the overall concept and contempt for the White House Office of Faith Based Initiatives that arose from it. But this has proven to be a huge political error—and more importantly, a policy error.

....As the right abandoned compassionate conservatism, social and religious conservatives, who had played a key role in Bush’s reelection, grew dismayed at the subordination of their issues to fiscal and national-security policy. In the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections, they did not vote in as large numbers as in 2004, resulting in decisive Republican losses.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articl...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 8 min Guru 187,297
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 40 min Patriot AKA Bozo 52,844
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 1 hr Ratloder 69,683
Word (Dec '08) 2 hr Red_Forman 5,202
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 3 hr Whiny1 5,904
Ask Amy 4-25-15 5 hr Kuuipo 2
Dear Abby 4-25-15 9 hr PEllen 1
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]