Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1264193 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

RUSH10ME

Gloucester, VA

#850888 Jan 30, 2013
Not Surprized wrote:
<quoted text>
WAXTURD Sockpuppet!!!
Regular turd period.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#850889 Jan 30, 2013
RealDave wrote:
I watched some of the Congressional hearings on guns.
Why do those against any of the measures such idiots.
LaPierre once again was an idiot. He said criminals don't try to buy guns at gun stores because of the background check. Yet he says we don't need the checks at gun shows. I guess he wants criminals to be able to buy guns at gun shows.
This guy is an idiot. I predict he will be gone within 3 months. Even the NRA must see what a fool he is making of himself & the NRA.
Lindsay Graham. Says you need a 15 round clip in case two people invade your house. What if there are 20 & they have a tank.
And of course, why have any laws because criminals don't obey them. Wow.
That's why Lapierre is head of the NRA, and you sit behind a computer screen, with a six pack? Guess which one is the lowest on the mental scale?

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#850890 Jan 30, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
On the other hand, it's difficult to count all the Kennedy children who had gone to drug rehab and/or died of drug overdoses.
Aren't they billionaires and Christians also?

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#850891 Jan 30, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
So now we shouldn't cut spending??

<quoted text>
That wasn't the discussion. Yawn.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#850892 Jan 30, 2013
Well, you mention 2 new jets, which have what to do with ships??

Other than show your desperation.

That Aircraft Carrier you mention?? It's a Russian discard, purchased from Ukraine in 1998.

It's a show off piece for China, designed to impress it's neighbors.

Here's what our folks said;

""American military planners have played down the significance of the commissioning of the carrier. Some Navy officials have even said they would encourage China to move ahead with building its own aircraft carrier and the ships to accompany it, because it would be a waste of money.

Other military experts outside China have agreed with that assessment.

“The fact is the aircraft carrier is useless for the Chinese Navy,” You Ji, a visiting senior research fellow at the National University of Singapore, said in an interview.“If it is used against America, it has no survivability. If it is used against China’s neighbors, it’s a sign of bullying.”

Vietnam, a neighbor with whom China has fought wars, operates land-based Russian Su-30 aircraft that could pose a threat to the aircraft carrier, Mr. You said.“In the South China Sea, if the carrier is damaged by the Vietnamese, it’s a huge loss of face,” he said.“It’s not worth it.”""

Did you see that thing??

It's like a Carrier Escort, with a ski jump flight deck, no catapult.

a real threat.

HAHA
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
"China achieved a military milestone when its fighter jet landed on its new aircraft carrier in November, extending a modernization bid that’s recorded advances in submarines, cyber warfare and in outer space"
" CNN has obtained detailed photographs of a new stealth fighter being tested in China.
It is the second such stealth fighter China has tested in as many years and appears destined to become the communist nation's future aircraft carrier-based fighter jet, according to weapons analysts."
"Russia intends to strengthen its security on sea with a heavy air-capable cruiser of a new generation. The cruiser is expected to be put to use in the Russian navy in 2020"
"Russia’s T-50 stealth fighter prototype, the first radar-evading warplane outside the U.S. when it debuted in January 2010, is slightly less stealthy than the American F-22 and about equal to the smaller F-35. But in several other respects the new warplane from the Russian Sukhoi design bureau is actually superior to the American models."
i guess folks in Russia and China didn't get the memo.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#850894 Jan 30, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>My people skills are just fine... It's my tolerance for losers and gun toting idiot liberals that needs work. Not Google...
gun idiot toting libs?

oxymoronic.

and i'm not laughing.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#850895 Jan 30, 2013
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>That's why Lapierre is head of the NRA, and you sit behind a computer screen, with a six pack? Guess which one is the lowest on the mental scale?
Lapierre, fer sure!!

That idiots as dumb as a stump.

Almost as dumb as you.

You lose on magazines and backround checks, which 90% of Americans approve of.

Getting your assault rifles will take a bit longer, but it will happen.

Handguns and hunting rifles will be left alone.

Next step is 'smart guns', that need fingerprint recognition.

Solves a lot of problems.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#850896 Jan 30, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
That wasn't the discussion. Yawn.
So why did you post this;

"The new military strategy includes $487 billion in cuts over the next decade...Obama said that the military will indeed be leaner, but the U.S. will maintain a budget that is roughly larger than the next 10 countries' military budgets combined."

You moaned about cuts in defense spending.

Do you seriously believe we must cut our spending but leave defense alone??

Are you quite serious??

Because that's just not gonna happen.

Since: Nov 09

Pharr, TX

#850897 Jan 30, 2013
Wayne Lapierre rejects the concept of background checks even though over 70% of NRA members believe its a good idea. Is there any doubt who the NRA represents? Its not gun owners or sane Americans.$$$$$$ for big business donors.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#850898 Jan 30, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
He's taking the advice of his Admirals.
Surface ships, esp. Aircraft Carriers, are what is referred to as LST's, an older Navy landing ship.
LST stands for 'LONG SLOW TARGET', among other things.
The Chinese likely have a surface to surface missile system, either land based or on a small craft, like a Destroyer.
Did I mention what a Chinese Drone strike,using hundreds of drones, would do to an Aircraft Carrier??
Neutralizing our Aircraft Carriers.
The Navy Jets are helpless against Drones. They're too damn slow to track.
You don't get out much, do you??
Just as the Aircraft Carrier replaced the Battleship, a small missile replaces the Aircraft Carrier.
Surface ships, except for smaller craft, are toast.
The biggest ship in our Navy should be a Tin Can.
<quoted text>
If Chinese drones sank a U.S. aircraft carrier, the U.S. would obliterate China.

But wait, Obama occupies the White House, meaning that the U.S. would apologize.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#850899 Jan 30, 2013
If Menendez is forced to resign, will Christie appoint a fellow Democrat to fill the vacancy?

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#850900 Jan 30, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
So, in your world, if someone makes a claim, others can't ask that they prove what they claim? "She said it did" is all the proof you need? Then why are you always brow beating carol?
Only a dummy would need google when lily provided the link to the legislation. Your daily attempts at childish exchanges bores me. Go play with someone else.
I wasn't involved in the conversation.

But if i was, and Lily said the bill said a woman can't have an abortion, and posted the link, I'd be smart enough to find where she was wrong and point it out to her.

But you whine and ask her to prove it.

Yet you say shit like 'meat comes from Cattle Conventions' and then pretend you never said it after people laugh at you..

Your new 'kind and gentle' emaam is interesting, but it can't erase your sordid past here.

As for Carol, I produce facts that conflict with her FAUX based hatred. The whole commie thing is just sick, so I return fire with how easy it is to attack people.

If you nitwits don't say outrageous things, neither will I.

Until then, expect a vigorous reply.
Patriot

Boulder, CO

#850902 Jan 30, 2013
The Globalists Want Our Guns

Staged Terrorist Attacks? Witness Testifies in Court that the FBI Manipulated Bomb Plot Suspect

It seems that every would-be terrorist attack that the FBI uncovers is actually a plot that was perpetuated by the FBI itself.

This is no conspiracy theory, but admitted fact. The FBI always admits the entrapment process that they lead these suspects to...

http://theintelhub.com/2013/01/30/witness-tes...

SANDY HOOK: A Look Back at a Possible False Flag (Terrorist Attack) With Many Unanswered Questions

http://theintelhub.com/2013/01/30/sandy-hook-...

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#850904 Jan 30, 2013
This from the Topix draft dodger!!

A real military expert.

It would be the end of the world as we know it, idiot.

That's a war that better not happen.
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
If Chinese drones sank a U.S. aircraft carrier, the U.S. would obliterate China.
But wait, Obama occupies the White House, meaning that the U.S. would apologize.
No Surprize

Seminole, FL

#850905 Jan 30, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
gun idiot toting libs?
oxymoronic.
and i'm not laughing.
Ft. Hood~~~ Registered Democrat ~ Muslim

Columbine ~~~ Too young to vote; both families were registered Democrats and progressive liberals

Virginia Tech ~~~ Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff ~ Registered Democrat

Colorado Theater ~~~ Registered Democrat; staff worker on the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street participant; liberal

Connecticut School Shooter-~~~ Registered Democrat; hated Christians; nuculur liberal

Common thread - all of these idiots were Democrats.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#850906 Jan 30, 2013
I guess I missed your investment stories.

And you're afraid to repeat them.

I understand.

You didn't offer any proof, you offered various opinions.

It's actually something that's unprovable, but positive sentiment is the big clue. You deny it, who cares??

Based on what you've posted, you're either a liar or you're deathly afraid of stocks. Many people are, like Nobraina.

Which is it?
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you the same guy from earlier? You wanted proof that the stock market is being propped up. i gave it to you. i've discussed enough about my personal finances on here and my opinion of stocks in general. Even gave Dave a link on how he could cheaply invest in the stock market. If you want to continue making things up and changing the discussion do it with someone else.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#850909 Jan 30, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
Aren't they billionaires and Christians also?
And, God forbid, they invest in stocks!!

HAHAHAHAHA
GOPIdiots

Pompano Beach, FL

#850910 Jan 30, 2013
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>Ft. Hood~~~ Registered Democrat ~ Muslim
Columbine ~~~ Too young to vote; both families were registered Democrats and progressive liberals
Virginia Tech ~~~ Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff ~ Registered Democrat
Colorado Theater ~~~ Registered Democrat; staff worker on the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street participant; liberal
Connecticut School Shooter-~~~ Registered Democrat; hated Christians; nuculur liberal
Common thread - all of these idiots were Democrats.
We're supposed to take the word of a moron? Prove any one of the allegations you make about each of those shooters.
new yawk

Tonawanda, NY

#850911 Jan 30, 2013
The NRA makes large Campaign contributions to both Democratic and Republican Candidates.

The NRA $$$$$$$ represents both parties. No doubt about that.

And "big business" exists, or shall I say, is no respector of party affiliation.

Also, NRA Membership consists of both Democrats and Republicans.
OldRaider wrote:
Is there any doubt who the NRA represents? Its not gun owners or sane Americans.$$$$$$ for big business donors.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#850914 Jan 30, 2013
Common thread;

Another lying Waxturd sockpuppet!!

All gun nuts are Republican, despite your lies.

Nancy Lanze?? Lifelong NRA member. Her and hubby both registered Republiclowns.

Itf you didn't have your lies, all you'd have it your 15 masters degrees that you got in 2 years!!

Oh, and the sockpuppet children, retards all!!
No Surprize wrote:
<quoted text>Ft. Hood~~~ Registered Democrat ~ Muslim
Columbine ~~~ Too young to vote; both families were registered Democrats and progressive liberals
Virginia Tech ~~~ Wrote hate mail to President Bush and to his staff ~ Registered Democrat
Colorado Theater ~~~ Registered Democrat; staff worker on the Obama campaign; Occupy Wall Street participant; liberal
Connecticut School Shooter-~~~ Registered Democrat; hated Christians; nuculur liberal
Common thread - all of these idiots were Democrats.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Dr Guru 194,661
News Lollapalooza day two marked by angst, apathy-an... 1 hr RappersRTHUGS 3
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr budd 54,342
Please SUBSCRIBE to my YOUTUBE channel for awes... 10 hr The Cloud 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 11 hr CrunchyBacon 100,287
News Fatal heat wave 20 years ago changed Chicago's ... 15 hr No8isClassic 8
Can't these people do better? 15 hr Magonigol 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages