Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1478399 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

John Galt

Temecula, CA

#851235 Jan 31, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>The problem with all these interesting alternatives is that no one was introducing them as potential policy preferring more of the same including fat executive salaries/bonuses, fat sales commissions all while cherry picking customers.
Mackey, who's most loyal customers are left leaning treehugger types with the taste for $7 per lb free range chicken damaged his company's value with that stupid remark.
OK. We have Realtime in the column opposed to individual choice in medical care.

Since: May 11

Waynesboro, PA

#851237 Jan 31, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
It seems you can't even deduce a simple source of money from that article. All that is required to answer the question is a simple source of money. Who is going to pay?
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
It's a simple question. A simple source of money will suffice for the answer. What is the source of money stated in your reference?
If it's too complicated for you to understand, then why would you realistically expect the average person in the population to understand?
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
See I knew you would run from it.

Pathetic.

Since: Jul 08

We will not go gentle

#851238 Jan 31, 2013
History 101 wrote:
<quoted text>
Since I like you, Homer, I'm going to try very, very hard to help you see the road sign that's right in front of you.
Hillary Clinton said on Greta: "We KNEW there was danger in Benghazi" AND the weapons that were used which "spontaneous mobs" couldn't have possibly gotten their hands on.
Still with me?
She said they knew this BEFORE the attack.
Now don't get distracted...
President Obama went before the UN 2 WEEKS LATER stating the attack was due to a "spontaneous mob" spurred by rage over a video.
So...if the Secretary of State knew this wasn't true and yet remained silent, the President knew too and covered it up.
It's very legible writing on this road sign, Homer. Focus.
How could they know what weapons the mob had in its hands BEFORE the attack? Carol, you ignorant slut, why don't you just offer all your integrity up on a silver platter to the fictional historian Orally, and quit slandering a good public servant with your lies.(We've all seen that you're none too bright, but no one is this mislead without his consent.)
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

#851239 Jan 31, 2013
History 101 wrote:
<quoted text>
IT'S NOT THE DANGER HOMER!!
IT'S LYING TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE TO WIN AN ELECTION!!
I'm at my wits' end trying to make you see this.
You didn't read my entire post: It's a non-story kept alive by rightwing retards.

Since: May 11

Waynesboro, PA

#851241 Jan 31, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Please provide text from the Constitution that says this.
Got a problem there, don't you? It doesn't exist.
According to the Constitution, those civillians in government have the exact same rights as those civillians not in government.
You have to rebel against the Constitution and eliminate the constitutional republic to create the nation where the civillians in government have a different set of rights than civillians not in government.
Show us the text from the Constitution that gives different rights to civillians in government than are given to civillians not in government.
Please state where it says otherwise.
Herstory 202

Orlando, FL

#851243 Jan 31, 2013
History is being made as we speak where a cute, diminutive little Jewish woman in Orlando prepares to sit down on the Debil's big, hairy cock as she vowed only yesterday to do.

A representative from the Guinness book of Records was with the little lady earlier today and took internal measurements with an Apple inflatometer which clearly show that despite her tough talk she's going to have some trouble with this one, Bob.

Thank's, Leslie, I understand the Debil was quoted as saying this morning, "Lube? I ain't usin' no lube on that bitch. She want a piece of me I give her a piece of me." Should be quite a contest. And now here's Laverne with your coastal weather...
Homer 2016

Bethlehem, PA

#851244 Jan 31, 2013
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
stand by while emails fox news for an answer.
They must get a ton of emails, not one rightwinger can think on their own.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#851245 Jan 31, 2013
Homer 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>You never answered my question. Have you joined Homer as a member of the Texas secession movement?
If Texas is allowed to secede, Galt will probably move there. The huge increase in standard of living from not having to pay US income taxes would be irresistible. Unfortunately, Texas would probably need to limit immigration because of the huge influx.

Meanwhile, the US would go bankrupt.
Nj raider 1

United States

#851246 Jan 31, 2013
DBWaiter wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not important. THIS is important.
let's see....
We forgive criminal activity and allow foreigners to work while at the same time we pay Americans to not do the work they are here doinog.
The key word is "workers".
Yes, it is a legitimate question. The Obama promoted policy favors foreign workers over American workers.
What was Omaha's answer?
Probably something like the ludicrous phony party line mantra you post here. Yes, that's probably it, I'm nearly sure.
Unless Omaha dodged and danced like a New Orleans street tap dancer to avoid answering that question.
Speaking of which....
I do believe Mrs. Tourette would like to know the answer to the first question. How about you helping her out and answering these questions:
Obviously, someone using the authority of the president issued orders to the AC-130 and Force Recon units to ignore their default orders and hang the Americans in Benghazi out to dry while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill them on real-time video. Well, obviously.
Where was Omaha during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American embassy security detatchment in Benghazi while the real time video was being watched in the White House, and orders came from the White House for the AC-130s and the Force Recon Marine units to ignore their default orders to respond to an attack on the embassy in Libya?
(Thus, who in the White House gave the order for the Americans to be hung out to dry in Libya while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real time video; and why did Omaha lie for two weeks trying to cover up the Al Qaeda terrorist attack on the United States when the real time video of the 7-hour battle that was watched in the White House proved the Omaha explanation an obvious lie?)
And;
Where will the money come from to pay for Omaha's government?
So far, nobody on Earth - well, there was that one guy in China last year - has answered these questions except for a couple of times previously. Ok, a dozen or more. Alright, alright, I don't want the fucking answers, ok? Anyway, answer the questions. Remember that your answer has to be in the form of a question. Hah! I knew you couldn't answer those questions! Almost nobody has and how many times have I asked? Do you like the sound of fingernails on a blackboard? Why do they call them blackboards when they're white? I like donuts. Why don't they make salsa filled donuts?
You want people to answer your questions thats already been answered numerous times. Hows about you answer these questions?

1. If Obama is negligent & you want his head for the Benghazi, Libya consulate attack, would it be wrong to assume that you already have George Bush's head hanging on a mantel in your game trophy room giving the fact that 7 embassies & consulates were attacked?

2. Did the republican publicly admit their obstructionism to anything the President tried to accomplish? If so, in light of all that obstruction, would you be honest enuff to admit that all the president has accomplish is nothing short of amazing?

How about you answer some questions for a change!
Jimmy

Hamden, CT

#851248 Jan 31, 2013
Homer 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>He did? Do you have the quote? Proof? Or just spewing more of your nonsense.
Now if you said Homer is a liar instead of Homer is a centrist, I would have believed you.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#851250 Jan 31, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
tricky framing!
but he's not a pedophile. and a right wing blog with an unnamed source will not start a Congressional hearing.
not to mention....the source won't talk to anyone but the right wing blog. always a good sign when you're looking for the 'truth'.
OK. Is "child molester" better?

Since: May 11

Waynesboro, PA

#851251 Jan 31, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Post it again, dufus.
The first link returns the message "illegal operation", and the second link returns a message that really means "website not created yet".
Still, there is no proof Obama ever passed the bar or ever appeared in a courtroom as a lawyer.
Show us the results of Obama passing the bar.
Name the cases where Obama argued in a courtrooom.
Date - location - docket number - client/plantiff
... got a problem there, dont' you?
That's because Obama never passed the bar and has never even seen the inside of a courtroom as a lawyer.
Well, you can tell us about the... how did Obama's handlers call this... "management" lectures to ACORN that was supposedly his "private practice" experience.
F*ck you. I posted them before & you just continue posting this line of crap.

You are truly pathetic. Either you are too stupid to learn or a loud mouth liar.

Why do I need to subsidize your salary???? Can't you make a living on your own?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#851253 Jan 31, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Seems this "tipster" is out to get him. Anyone can say anything; do you really think that some so called underaged prostitutes are going to come forward? HA! Sounds like a smear campaign, but this doctor is going to be the one who gets all the heat; he has big IRS liens.
The doctor will probably take a plea deal in exchange for frying Menendez.
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#851254 Jan 31, 2013
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
well i do know you once claimed to suck every dk at your local police department. then tried to make a date with me.
Hmmm, that's not how I remember it. I recall you chickening out. What say you badboi?

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#851255 Jan 31, 2013
RepubliCLOWNS wrote:
<quoted text> I AM LOVING' IT !!!!
Grey Ghost wrote:

"It appears as though Galt like most on the right have way to many missing links. They have been pretty much reduced to feces flingers."

RepubliCLOWNS replies: "I AM LOVING' IT !!!!"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA....

When the feces is flung, do you have your mouth open or are you holding an open Lunch Box?
Jimmy

Hamden, CT

#851256 Jan 31, 2013
Homer 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>You didn't read my entire post: It's a non-story kept alive by rightwing retards.
It was a cover up. You are funny though. A guy with the name of "Homer" calling other people retards.

LOL!
Realtime

Cape Canaveral, FL

#851257 Jan 31, 2013
History 101 wrote:
<quoted text>
Very good, Realtime.
You've blurred your personal lens of reality just enough to see only what you want to see.
It's about the media's complete opposite reaction to the Craig versus Menendez scandals!
If Mendendez were a republican, do you not believe for one second this wouldn't be all over the liberal mainstream news?
We'd better start paying attention. Complacency and apathy, as Chancellor Merkel pointed out to the Germans yesterday on the anniversary of Hitler's rise to power, is exactly how he accomplished it - striking down civil liberties, creating a one-party system and having the media on his side - all the while the Germans were both complacent and apathetic.
Just like we're becoming.
Get your head out of your azz, Larry Craig was arrested and pleaded no contest to the charges.

Given the crazy bastardos previous political/religious commentaries he deserved to be front page center.

When Menendez's accuser steps forward with names, dates and places we'll talk__until then it's only right wing blog bs.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#851258 Jan 31, 2013
History 101 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, okay, right after the dismal Q4 report came out, they first blamed Hurricane Sandy and then blamed Republicans.
When do Democrats ever ask themselves if perhaps THEY are doing something wrong??
Republicans never shift the blame for their own policies on anyone or anything else. That's the difference.
Hate to say it, but only children and those with an adult child-like mentality always place blame somewhere else.
A future Republican nominee needs to be able to claim credibly that he does not represent the second coming of George W. Bush. Right now, Rubio seems to working overtime to confirm that this is exactly what he wants to be. At this point, it’s probably too late for him to stop and reverse course, but it’s interesting that he doesn’t even seem to be aware of the danger. Someone might object that no one will care about the next nominee’s similarities to Bush, but Republican leaders have consistently underestimated how damaging Bush’s legacy is for them. It may not be as much of a problem as it was in 2012, but it will still be a real problem for years to come. If Republicans think the close resemblance to Bush won’t matter, they are kidding themselves.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/lariso...

and the other day i read an interesting fact posted by a conservative economist...

....if we look at projections from the Congressional Budget Office on January 7, 2009 – while Bush was still in office and which do not incorporate any Obama policies – we see that the deficit was projected to rise from $455 billion in 2008 to $1.2 trillion in 2009 under existing law.

The actual deficit for fiscal year 2009 was $1.55 trillion. But the difference was due entirely to lower revenues than expected, not higher spending. Outlays in fiscal year 2009 actually came in below CBO’s projection –$3,518 billion actual vs. a projection of $3,543 billion.

The point is not to assess blame for the deficit; only to emphasize the temporary nature of the historically large deficits of the last few years and show that they did not result from an explosion of new spending initiated by Obama. This is important because Republicans continually make that claim, thus justifying their belief that spending must be massively slashed, especially for entitlements.

Read more at http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2013/01...

more stuff that FOX can't talk about. shifting blame and all that.

Since: May 11

Waynesboro, PA

#851259 Jan 31, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
How about you just tell us. Just give us a location for Obama during the 7-hour battle when orders came from the White House to the AC-130 and Force Recon Marine units to disregard the default orders of supporting Americans when there was an attack on specifically the embassy in Libya.
Just give us a location. All you said was Obama was in some kind of a meeting at 11:00 PM. Where was he during the 7-hour battle?
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American embassy security detatchment in Benghazi while the real time video was being watched in the White House, and orders came from the White House for the AC-130s and the Force Recon Marine units to ignore their default orders to respond to an attack on the embassy in Libya?
(Thus, who in the White House gave the order for the Americans to be hung out to dry in Libya while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real time video; and why did Obama lie for two weeks trying to cover up the Al Qaeda terrorist attack on the United States when the real time video of the 7-hour battle that was watched in the White House proved the Obama explanation an obvious lie?)
And;
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
So far, nobody on Earth has answered these questions.
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/11/09/world/afric...

I keep answering & you keep running away.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#851262 Jan 31, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
If these charges prove to be true, Democrats will force him out.
Unlike Republicans with the "wide Stance" Senator & Vitters.
Unlike Menendez, neither had sex with a minor.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 13 min Dr Guru 233,774
News Obama's farewell speech in Chicago felt like th... 3 hr Geezer 20
Tuesday is Punch Liberals in the Face Day! 5 hr Hoo 2
PUTIN calls democraps "sore loosers." 5 hr Hoo 23
News Chicago immigration rally has message for Trump... 5 hr Hoo 8
Are democrats destroyed? 5 hr Yep 237
Cathryn baker chicago hooker hyd park 6 hr Yep 1

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages