Unless, the pollicy favors foreign workers over American workers.<quoted text>
reliable sources have to be reliable in the eyes of more than just those who visit the site.
Is the Daily Caller reporter's interruption of the president of the United States a sign of the deterioration of civility, the deterioration of the media in general, or the deterioration of respect for the office of the presidency?
All three of them, unfortunately. A reporter for the conservative website interrupted the president while he was giving a statement at the White House about immigration. The reporter, identified as Neil Munro, asked Obama why his policy favored "foreigners over American workers."
Where to start, with the infractions committed here? First of all, that's not really a question. It's an advocacy statement,
... blah... blah... blah... more ducking and dodging misinformation bullshit... blah... blah... blah...
truth for the reader. The motive was all about being aggressive and obnoxious for its own self-promoting sake.
Many people, in our increasingly ill-mannered world, have simply lost the ability to distinguish between speaking truth to power and just being a jerk. And unfortunately, being rude and being a jerk gets a lot of people attention in the media. The fact that the perpetrators are benefiting from negative attention doesn't even seem to bother them, and that's even more pathetic.
We forgive criminal activity and allow foreigners to work while at the same time we pay Americans to not do the work they are here doinog.
The key word is "workers".
Yes, it is a legitimate question. The Obama promoted policy favors foreign workers over American workers.
What was Obama's answer?
Probably something like the ludicrous phony party line mantra you post here.
Unless Obama dodged and danced like a New Orleans street tap dancer to avoid answering that question.
Speaking of which....
I do believe Mrs. Tourette would like to know the answer to the first question. How about you helping her out and answering these questions:
Obviously, someone using the authority of the president issued orders to the AC-130 and Force Recon units to ignore their default orders and hang the Americans in Benghazi out to dry while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill them on real-time video.
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American embassy security detatchment in Benghazi while the real time video was being watched in the White House, and orders came from the White House for the AC-130s and the Force Recon Marine units to ignore their default orders to respond to an attack on the embassy in Libya?
(Thus, who in the White House gave the order for the Americans to be hung out to dry in Libya while the White House watched Al Qaeda kill them on the real time video; and why did Obama lie for two weeks trying to cover up the Al Qaeda terrorist attack on the United States when the real time video of the 7-hour battle that was watched in the White House proved the Obama explanation an obvious lie?)
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
So far, nobody on Earth has answered these questions.