Barack Obama, our next President

[John Galt]

Death of Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
Like I said, the women made it through jump school at about the same rate as the Marines. That's been my experience, you have some other experiential basis for your opinion?

The problem isn't jumping, it's what they do after they hit the ground in a combat situation.

But let's give it a try and see what happens when the shit hits the fan.

[Not SurpriZedObamama]

Not Surprized wrote:

<quoted text>
Nostrilis Waxballs, the turd that just wont flush.
Nostrilis Waxman/Floriduuuh/NotSurpriZed Obamama aka known as the stalker "WAXTURDS", topix troll clusterfvck, same troll-multiple id's==Delusional army of one.
fake new yawk,loulee rat mouth fl, Barney Frank (anyone from Temecula, CA), fake Dem, Lt Dan, LOL, lily's children, LOL, Floriduh, Nobama, fukutu, Ignoramus, Liberals Eat Feces, DEM idiots, Billy Carter,, Warturds, CAE, Fetch N Stepinit, Rectal Liberal, Commie DemocRATs, Wartime, Billy C, Groucho, FUBO, King George, Patrick, Democrats are Fascists, Gay Ghost, VAGITARIAN, Jimmy, Bronach, Pete, King George, bailout my duck, PTBW Forever, Sally Fourth, The Real Truth, WorthlessWhore, Louise, Cheryl

Friday's Rejected Woman #4 LOL

[Patriot]

“Death River”: Radiation detector goes over limit — 430,000 Bq/kg of cesium!

Title:“Death River” Over 30&#956;Sv/8 Over 400,000 Bq/Kg of Radioactive Cesium
Author: guardianofmiyagi
Date Aired: June 10, 2012
Date Published: Jan 25, 2013

Video at link: http://enenews.com/death-river-radiation-dete...

----

Sheds more light on why a "...cover of lead..." was placed over "wickedness". http://niv.scripturetext.com/zechariah/5.htm vs 7-8

[Lily Boca Raton Fl]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
"Smart meters" are not just for eliminating meter readers, but for invading your privacy to record your usage patterns. Like catching pot farmers.

Can't they do that anyway?

[Not SurpriZedObamama]

Not Surprized wrote:

#18127 Oct 17, 2009 Sounds Paranoid To Me wrote: She changed her name bacause she was being stalked by Waxman. The poster stalking her got her private information and published it for the world to see on this forum. That is why he was banned. So she changed her name. I observed the whole incident from the start. Not only did he publish her information but continued to stalk and harass her. Can you understand why she would change her name now?
sunnycali wrote: Would you report someone HERE to the moderators if they were giving out YOUR personal information?
17602 Oct 15, 2009 sunnycali wrote:
Again, if someone posted YOUR private information would you just sit there and say, "way to go - that's freedom of speech in action?" And I mean information that included your home address and phone number. You would do nothing? If the answer is that you would do nothing then you apparently care little for your family.
17603 Oct 15, 2009 sunnycali wrote:
So if someone were giving out your personal information you would not report that person? If someone were using extremely obscene language you would not report that person? This has absolutely nothing to do ideology. I don't have any problem with free speech. I don't have any problem with people of any political bent expressing their opinions. I DO have a problem with people violating the most basic terms of decency. Oh, and I would report someone if I saw them breaking into YOUR house. Or abusing a member of YOUR family. I guess you and I are different in that respect. And I'm very sorry for that. Not for me but for you.
#58531Reply » Jun 9, 2010
Devin wrote: Waxman, you are a known stalker, you've been sactioned by Topix on several occasions. You are the poster child for keeping certain presonal information unrelated to the debate to one's self. Come on now...... What's your purpose why aren't your focusing on the issues of the debate, the 1995 Budget Impass?.... stay with the issue of the debate which is more than enough dialogue with individuals like yourself... didn't you ever warn your children about relating personal information over the internet about themselves?.. it's an employed security feature....
<quoted text>
Devin wrote:
NOW...... ROFLMAO... I do believe that's a Denial.........
You were a big man spewing that bull shyt, ROFLMAO didn't Topix spank your azz for general harassment......... You were a big man in threatening and posting that woman's information....... now you're in denial........ or outright lying about your activities....
POS ........ ROFLMAO
Then you should feel free to solicit someone's personal information....... "I Dare you"........ ROFLMAo
You "Ain't" Forget........ROFLMAO
Devin wrote:
<quoted text>
Devin
Hampton, VA
Did you or did you not harass that Woman with Threats of violence, Yes or No..... inquiring minds what to know...... ROFLMAO
Answer that question "Big Man"...... Show us again how Rational you are ...... ROFLMAO

Friday's Rejected Woman #5 LOL

[Nuculur option]

Again you lie.

Go back and read what you originally wrote, nitwit.

If Obama's out to destroy capitalism, he's not trying very hard, as the markets have risen in every year of his Presidency.

You shouldn't bring up things that you are clueless about.

You do it often, and I make you pay the price.

Have you ever owned a stock?? Likely not.

Name two indicators that indicate a stock might be a good value.

This will be fun!!

TSM wrote:

<quoted text>
Nuculur I didn’t say the Stock Market wasn’t an indicator!! What I did say is that Liberals/Democrats have attack Capitalism (Stock Market) for the past four years as “Evil” This is a Stock Market that overcame Obama’s onslaught to Destroy “ Capitalism” Obama get Zero Points!!

[shinningelectr0n]

Salami wrote:

Will Bobby Jindal be our next president? Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal sharply criticized his own party on Thursday for its narrow focus on Washington-based budget battles. http://gusbur.info/bobbyjindal

He's looking for a leadership position in the party.

Opening your mouth real wide is how it's done.

[John Galt]

Homer 2016 wrote:

Newark Mayor Cory Booker Helps Rescue Freezing Dog
While out working on a story in freezing New Jersey, a reporter and camera crew from New York station WABC-TV noticed a dog left out in the cold.
Hours later, when they passed by again and saw that the dog was still outside, they decided to take the issue to Twitter, and the mayor.
Reporter Toni Yates tweeted Newark Mayor Cory Booker and WABC. In the tweet, she applauded Newark for its heat help, but added,“Make pet owners get their dogs out of the cold.”
In another tweet, she wrote that she asked the block captain to “do something, call someone,” but doubted he would.
People began re-tweeting the messages, and soon enough the mayor was on the scene with the shivering dog.
“This is brutal weather. This dog is shaking really bad and you just can’t leave your dogs out here on a day like this and go away and expect them to be OK,” the mayor told WABC.“Hypothermia on any animal including a human animal will set in pretty quickly. So this is very sad. You can just feel the dog shaking pretty badly.”
Booker picked up the dog and put it into the back of a police car.
“If you’d crank up that heat, I’d appreciate it,” he told the police officer.
Booker, 43, called the dog’s owner and told them it was unacceptable to leave the dog outside in the freezing weather, WABC reported.
The owners said they were in Queens, N.Y., and did not know that Cha Cha had gotten outside. They said it was an accident and thanked the mayor for saving the dog, a new mother.
Booker, who’s exploring a run for U.S. Senate, later tweeted the reporter,“Because of you that dog was rescued. Thank you for reaching out. Thank u for your kindness.”
This is not the first time Mayor Booker has come to the rescue.
Booker returned home one evening in April to find flames shooting out of his neighbor’s home. A woman screamed that her daughter was still inside.
The mayor and two of his security detail ran inside to rescue the woman, who Booker said he had known for years. He carried her out of the building over his shoulder and the woman was treated for smoke inhalation and released.
http://news.yahoo.com/n-j-mayor-cory-booker-h...
This frickin' guy is everywhere. Me thinks a big future is ahead of him.

Hillary may be thrown under the Cory Booker bus in 2016, a possible Obama surrogate.

Booker is acceptable to Goldman Sachs.

[OzRitz]

OldRaider wrote:

<quoted text>
He logs on with different names. Interesting that you right wingers claim to be experts at seeing through conspiracies and lies in Washington but can't see an obvious fraud right under your nose. Or, do you choose to ignore a scam if it supports your agenda. Obviously waxturd has been loading the judge-it system for months. This is trivial except that it points out the hypocrisy of folks like you that pick and choose truth.
Now, let me ask again, do you think ten people awarded waxturd brilliant judge-its for his post this morning?

Well perhaps by their standards "I just took a dump" deserves 10 brilliant judge it's. After all 90% of their posts amount to the same thing.

[shinningelectr0n]

PDUPONT wrote:

<quoted text>
You don't know what I do for a living imbecile, you're just making baseless assumptions as usual.
At least I go out and work for a living. Do you?

Those bright yellow Knee-Pads are a dead giveaway, PeeDePoop.

[Nuculur option]

Waxman wrote:

<quoted text>
If Ead is is obsessed with the sockpuppetier Ghost, then why is it that Ead makes one post/comment and Ghost end up making about six in response,$hitforbrains?

So now you're saying Ed is one of your sockpupppets!!

It figures, he has all the stupidity you show us every day.

[Not Surprized]

[QUOTE who="Waxman/Waxturds "]<quoted text> I live in a large house with a lot of rooms and computers and also have redundant communication providers. When you grow up and if you become successful, maybe you too could have the same luxuries.
Do you hate people that have more than you?[/QUOTE]

Waxman wrote:

It is over. Obama is toast.
Only 17 days until we celebrate and the USA ends this experiment in socialism.

http://www.topix.com/forum/news/2012-presiden...

LMFAO!

#18127 Oct 17, 2009 Sounds Paranoid To Me wrote: She changed her name bacause she was being stalked by Waxman. The poster stalking her got her private information and published it for the world to see on this forum. That is why he was banned. So she changed her name. I observed the whole incident from the start. Not only did he publish her information but continued to stalk and harass her. Can you understand why she would change her name now?
sunnycali wrote: Would you report someone HERE to the moderators if they were giving out YOUR personal information?

17602 Oct 15, 2009 sunnycali wrote:
Again, if someone posted YOUR private information would you just sit there and say, "way to go - that's freedom of speech in action?" And I mean information that included your home address and phone number. You would do nothing? If the answer is that you would do nothing then you apparently care little for your family.

17603 Oct 15, 2009 sunnycali wrote:
So if someone were giving out your personal information you would not report that person? If someone were using extremely obscene language you would not report that person? This has absolutely nothing to do ideology. I don't have any problem with free speech. I don't have any problem with people of any political bent expressing their opinions. I DO have a problem with people violating the most basic terms of decency. Oh, and I would report someone if I saw them breaking into YOUR house. Or abusing a member of YOUR family. I guess you and I are different in that respect. And I'm very sorry for that. Not for me but for you.

#58531Reply » Jun 9, 2010

Devin wrote: Waxman, you are a known stalker, you've been sactioned by Topix on several occasions. You are the poster child for keeping certain presonal information unrelated to the debate to one's self. Come on now...... What's your purpose why aren't your focusing on the issues of the debate, the 1995 Budget Impass?.... stay with the issue of the debate which is more than enough dialogue with individuals like yourself... didn't you ever warn your children about relating personal information over the internet about themselves?.. it's an employed security feature....

<quoted text>
Devin wrote:
NOW...... ROFLMAO... I do believe that's a Denial.........
You were a big man spewing that bull shyt, ROFLMAO didn't Topix spank your azz for general harassment......... You were a big man in threatening and posting that woman's information....... now you're in denial........ or outright lying about your activities....
POS ........ ROFLMAO
Then you should feel free to solicit someone's personal information....... "I Dare you"........ ROFLMAo
You "Ain't" Forget........ROFLMAO

Devin wrote:
<quoted text>
Devin
Hampton, VA
Did you or did you not harass that Woman with Threats of violence, Yes or No..... inquiring minds what to know...... ROFLMAO
Answer that question "Big Man"...... Show us again how Rational you are ...... ROFLMAO

[Realtime]

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
You're using to much electricity, think I'll raise your rate or turn off your air conditioner.
"Smart meters will also eventually enable utilities to raise and lower the price of electricity based on demand, allowing consumers to adjust their power use accordingly. So, for example, on hot summer days when power demand is high, consumers would save money by waiting until evening to run the dishwasher. If this causes them to reduce their overall usage, it should also lower their bills. Someday, smart air conditioners might be programmed to respond to these signals as well, "

I'll be as dead as dicks nuts by then, you too! Worry about sht that can actually happen during your lifetime.

[Death of Tenzing]

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
You're using to much electricity, think I'll raise your rate or turn off your air conditioner.
"Smart meters will also eventually enable utilities to raise and lower the price of electricity based on demand, allowing consumers to adjust their power use accordingly. So, for example, on hot summer days when power demand is high, consumers would save money by waiting until evening to run the dishwasher. If this causes them to reduce their overall usage, it should also lower their bills. Someday, smart air conditioners might be programmed to respond to these signals as well, "

Sounds pretty good to me. Of course if I wanted privacy and autonomy I'd just make my own electricity. If I was a paranoid nitwit I'd just sit around whining about it.

[Homer 2016]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
That (the one-term concept) would make Hillary even less viable as a candidate, particularly to get the Democrat nomination.
The Democrat nominee in 2016 will be selected by Obama.

I hadn't realized you were a Democrat, sounds like you have their pulse on this. Who could believe Reagan would last 8 years? I still cannot get over the fact that Bush was elected twice. I'm thinking Hillary then Cory Booker at the rate he is saving people/animals, Christie would give them a run for their money with any other Repub DOA.

[shinningelectr0n]

RUSH10ME wrote:

<quoted text>And who the hell ever heard of some one being a "wide reciever" on a baseball team??

Or in the locker room showers:>

[John Galt]

OldRaider wrote:

<quoted text>
Obviously someone like you that is easily duped by FOX and Limbaugh has no inkling about what criteria to use in evaluating the credibility of a source of information. I pay attention to everything, that's why I'm harder to fool. You, on the other hand, are happy to live in your blissfully ignorant fantasy land ignoring red flags that are waved in your face. You deserve to be in bed with waxturd and his phony judge-its.

If you judge the validity of a post by the icons, well....what can we say about you?

[Realtime]

jiminy cricket wrote:

<quoted text>
PETA too often loses its credibility, sadly enough.
When I retire, I'd like to do volunteer work but with community outreach to those in need.
I'd love to volunteer at an animal rescue too but the humane society would be too hard for me to take.
I love people who rescue animals - all types.

Well, there's the nude modeling end where you don't actually have to see the animals but only the photographers.

[Homer 2016]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
This is the heart of the Obama fiscal policy. It may seem like a joke to you, but it is particularly devastating to senior citizens who depend on earnings from their savings. This policy forces senior citizens to become more dependent on the government.
On the other hand, higher interest rates would blow the roof off the federal budget and deficit.

I wasn't joking. The rates have been reduced and reduced and reduced since the Reagan years(ugh, him again)

[Not SurpriZedObamama]

Not Surprized wrote:

<quoted text>
<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/news/2012-presiden...
LMFAO!
#18127 Oct 17, 2009 Sounds Paranoid To Me wrote: She changed her name bacause she was being stalked by Waxman. The poster stalking her got her private information and published it for the world to see on this forum. That is why he was banned. So she changed her name. I observed the whole incident from the start. Not only did he publish her information but continued to stalk and harass her. Can you understand why she would change her name now?
sunnycali wrote: Would you report someone HERE to the moderators if they were giving out YOUR personal information?
17602 Oct 15, 2009 sunnycali wrote:
Again, if someone posted YOUR private information would you just sit there and say, "way to go - that's freedom of speech in action?" And I mean information that included your home address and phone number. You would do nothing? If the answer is that you would do nothing then you apparently care little for your family.
17603 Oct 15, 2009 sunnycali wrote:
So if someone were giving out your personal information you would not report that person? If someone were using extremely obscene language you would not report that person? This has absolutely nothing to do ideology. I don't have any problem with free speech. I don't have any problem with people of any political bent expressing their opinions. I DO have a problem with people violating the most basic terms of decency. Oh, and I would report someone if I saw them breaking into YOUR house. Or abusing a member of YOUR family. I guess you and I are different in that respect. And I'm very sorry for that. Not for me but for you.
#58531Reply » Jun 9, 2010
Devin wrote: Waxman, you are a known stalker, you've been sactioned by Topix on several occasions. You are the poster child for keeping certain presonal information unrelated to the debate to one's self. Come on now...... What's your purpose why aren't your focusing on the issues of the debate, the 1995 Budget Impass?.... stay with the issue of the debate which is more than enough dialogue with individuals like yourself... didn't you ever warn your children about relating personal information over the internet about themselves?.. it's an employed security feature....
<quoted text>
Devin wrote:
NOW...... ROFLMAO... I do believe that's a Denial.........
You were a big man spewing that bull shyt, ROFLMAO didn't Topix spank your azz for general harassment......... You were a big man in threatening and posting that woman's information....... now you're in denial........ or outright lying about your activities....
POS ........ ROFLMAO
Then you should feel free to solicit someone's personal information....... "I Dare you"........ ROFLMAo
You "Ain't" Forget........ROFLMAO
Devin wrote:
<quoted text>
Devin
Hampton, VA
Did you or did you not harass that Woman with Threats of violence, Yes or No..... inquiring minds what to know...... ROFLMAO
Answer that question "Big Man"...... Show us again how Rational you are ...... ROFLMAO

Friday's Rejected Woman #6 LOL