Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
jiminy cricket

Orlando, FL

#848045 Jan 26, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
What economic failure imbecile? You mean like bringing the Dow from around 6500 when he took office to yesterday's 13895.98? Like three years of private sector job growth and record low levels of unemployment claims? New home sales the highest since 2009.
According to your criteria only someone to the right of Heinrich Himmler is a true Republican and even Ronald Reagan wouldn't make the cut.
You're an idiot!
Economist Nouriel Roubini told CNBC:

"The damage will be widespread if we don't have enough job creation and there's not enough labor income. Therefore, there's not enough consumption and consumer companies are going to be depressed. Therefore, the recovery is going to remain weak. The markets are expecting now a robust recovery in the second half of the year. I think the recovery is going to disappoint on the downside."

http://www.cnbc.com/id/43659234

Without jobs, no economic recovery. Ask the former USSR.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#848046 Jan 26, 2013
jiminy cricket wrote:
<quoted text>
Global warming...climate change...same difference.
"We will respond to the threat of climate change, knowing that the failure to do so would betray our children and future generations."
The funny thing is the climate has been changing since the beginning of time. Obama, bless his heart, can't change that.
It's only the same difference to people like you, who d are not smart enough to understand the science.

You believe O'Reilly and Co.

I'll stick with NOAA and the scientists.
jiminy cricket

Orlando, FL

#848047 Jan 26, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice plagiarism, must be why it sounds familiar.
It was the same link posted to Lily.

San José State University
Department of Economics

http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/sovietcol...

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#848048 Jan 26, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
You're wrong. Is this more of you rspeculating, as you did when you said Lanza used a handgun to kill the children??
You believe all sorts of crap you hear from your right wing sources.
But it's still crap.
You'll see in 2014.
"But the president's signature health care plan has become so fraught with politics that whether governors agreed to set up the exchanges has fallen mostly along party lines.
Such partisanship is largely symbolic because if a state opts not to set up the exchange, the Department of Health and Human Services will do it for them as part of the federal program. That would not likely be well-received by Republican governors, either, but the law forces each state's chief executive to make a decision one way or the other."
Hey dingleberry I said they can set up the exchanges but they don't have the power to make you buy insurance or tax you if you don't.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#848049 Jan 26, 2013
The USS Cole pulled into port a little while ago. Better lock up your women folks.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#848050 Jan 26, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
It's only the same difference to people like you, who d are not smart enough to understand the science.
You believe O'Reilly and Co.
I'll stick with NOAA and the scientists.
OK - then go ahead and explain the difference between climate change and glowbull warming libtard.

I'll give you a hint:

It changed to "Climate Change" after it was revealed you on the left were cooking the books and lying.

You should have said you will stick with stupid. That would be an accurate statement.

Yes, I realize they mean different things, but now you never hear the lying left use "glowbull warming" - that is the real difference.

You on the left are simply using a new way of scaring people and Al "Jazera" Gore is using the new words in his huckster routine.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#848051 Jan 26, 2013
TSM wrote:
<quoted text>
Nuculur again Wrong…. More Democrats voted to cut embassy security than Republicans!! Total Vote from Congress: Voting to Cut Embassy Security, 199 Democrats, 163 Republicans Nuculur I agree…Case Close!!
You post crap without links to support what you've said??

How typical.

Why is it that you make up such lies??

If it were true, you'd list the bill and votes. But you pull crap out of your butt, like the Stock Market isn't part of the economy.

BTW, there were several rounds of cuts to Embassy Security since the nitwits took the House in 2011.

So which of the several bills are you referring to??

List the Bill# or AMendment # if you expect to be believed.

There was more than one. DU

It's well known that you'll lie and try to get away with it.

As your stupidity concerning the economy proved.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#848052 Jan 26, 2013
2 Faces of Obama: The Uniter vs. The Let's Punish Them Divider

Realtime

Deltona, FL

#848053 Jan 26, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
You're wrong. Is this more of you rspeculating, as you did when you said Lanza used a handgun to kill the children??
You believe all sorts of crap you hear from your right wing sources.
But it's still crap.
You'll see in 2014.
"But the president's signature health care plan has become so fraught with politics that whether governors agreed to set up the exchanges has fallen mostly along party lines.
Such partisanship is largely symbolic because if a state opts not to set up the exchange, the Department of Health and Human Services will do it for them as part of the federal program. That would not likely be well-received by Republican governors, either, but the law forces each state's chief executive to make a decision one way or the other."
It's been explained on this and other threads, Flacko is once again a day late and dollar short.

The federal government will set up the exchange, the result is that the nation moves closer to single payer. Some of the (R) governors are pussyfooting around because they face reelection in 2014. The ACA is the law of the land at least until Obama moves on and by then it will be too late to repeal the entire thing. It's my guess that by 2016 the American voters will have discovered enough value in the system to ignore the right wing nonsense.

Since: Nov 09

Pharr, TX

#848054 Jan 26, 2013
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Not interested...
Take the hint, libtard...
Hey, you're cheating waxturd! You said you weren't going to talk to me.

I wonder what the odds are that this moron marches goober or jimmy out to hide behind one of his multiple personalities to cover his lie and talk to me?

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#848055 Jan 26, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> It will never get 2/3 of the states.
"flack"
Actually to be ratified by 3/4 of the states.
Peace

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#848056 Jan 26, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> Hey dingleberry I said they can set up the exchanges but they don't have the power to make you buy insurance or tax you if you don't.
And I said you're wrong.

Based on your track record, I'm certain I'm right, because gas isn't $5, and the economy is doing just fine, thank you, and all your other predictions have been proven wrong!!

----------

""Individual Mandate (ObamaCare Sec. 5000A(a), Pg. 126)
&#61623; Was upheld by the Supreme Court as a tax on June 28, 2012
&#61623; Requires that, beginning in 2014, nearly all Americans purchase ObamaCare-compliant insurance
plans or pay a heavy fine (see Fines below)(ObamaCare amend. to Sec. 5000A(c)(1) & (2), Pg. 791)
&#61623; Individuals who are forced to purchase insurance plans through State Exchanges (see below) in
order to be compliant with the Individual Mandate, in many cases, will be purchasing plans that
impose the Abortion Premium Mandate (see below)
&#61623; The Individual Mandate requires people to pay for what the HHS mandate covers (because the HHS
Mandate applies to all plans) and also requires all individuals in certain plans to pay the Abortion Premium

----------

State Exchanges
&#61623; ObamaCare requires states to set up “exchanges” by January 1, 2014 – government-operated health
insurance markets, if they want to receive federal subsidies (ObamaCare Sec. 1321 (b), Pg. 68)
&#61623; Families (of 4) who earn $92,000 or less will receive federal tax credits which subsidize their plan if
they purchase from a State Exchange (Reconciliation Act Sec. 1001(a), Pg. 3)
&#61623; States are therefore incentivized to create these approved exchanges or forgo receiving federal
subsidization for their citizen’s health care
&#61623; If a State does not establish an approved exchange, the federal government has the option of setting
up an exchange in that state which will most likely provide for abortion even in states where
abortion coverage is illegal.(ObamaCare Sec. 1321 (b) & (c), Pg. 68)
&#61623; ObamaCare sets as the default that State Exchanges will cover abortion even in states where
abortion coverage is illegal. It gives the State the option to pass a law to opt out of the coverage,
and it also details how that law can be terminated or repealed.(ObamaCare Sec. 1303 (a)(1) and (2), Pg. 779)

----------

The individual mandate was upheld by the Supreme Court.

It doesn't matter who sets up the exchange.

You're looking for a loophole that doesn't exist.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#848057 Jan 26, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>It's been explained on this and other threads, Flacko is once again a day late and dollar short.
The federal government will set up the exchange, the result is that the nation moves closer to single payer. Some of the (R) governors are pussyfooting around because they face reelection in 2014. The ACA is the law of the land at least until Obama moves on and by then it will be too late to repeal the entire thing. It's my guess that by 2016 the American voters will have discovered enough value in the system to ignore the right wing nonsense.
Thanks, Realtime.

THe nitwits grow increasingly desperate by the hour.
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#848058 Jan 26, 2013
OldRaider wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, you're cheating waxturd! You said you weren't going to talk to me.
I wonder what the odds are that this moron marches goober or jimmy out to hide behind one of his multiple personalities to cover his lie and talk to me?
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0109686/quotes

Zzzzzzz....

Since: Nov 09

Pharr, TX

#848059 Jan 26, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
You took the bait hook, line, and sinker, nitwit!!
I posted that with the intent of drawing you out, and it worked perfectly, Mr judge-it!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA
I love stupid people like you!! So easy to make fools of!!
Thanks for playing, Mr Mo Ron!!
ROFLMAO at your stupidity!!
I'll bet he still doesn't realize what you did to him. Although, Not Surprised, has a theory that waxturd is a masochist and enjoys being made a fool of and deliberately makes himself look stupid. I'm starting to think that may be the case.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#848060 Jan 26, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"flack"
Actually to be ratified by 3/4 of the states.
Peace
Is it? I wasn't sure. That would be even harder.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#848061 Jan 26, 2013
Saturday night!!

I'm outa here.

You shut-ins have a nice evening!!

HAHAHAHAHA
Waxman

Windsor, CT

#848062 Jan 26, 2013
Anyone see Hillary during the hearing the other day acting like she cared about the four people who died in Benghazi (pout, pout)?

Here is what one of the dead seals father said:

"Woods says that shaking President Obama’s hands at his son’s memorial service was “like shaking hands with a dead fish.”

Hillary is a cold fish too. The woman is a machine.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#848064 Jan 26, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
And I said you're wrong.
Based on your track record, I'm certain I'm right, because gas isn't $5, and the economy is doing just fine, thank you, and all your other predictions have been proven wrong!!
----------
""Individual Mandate (ObamaCare Sec. 5000A(a), Pg. 126)
&#61623; Was upheld by the Supreme Court as a tax on June 28, 2012
&#61623; Requires that, beginning in 2014, nearly all Americans purchase ObamaCare-compliant insurance
plans or pay a heavy fine (see Fines below)(ObamaCare amend. to Sec. 5000A(c)(1) & (2), Pg. 791)
&#61623; Individuals who are forced to purchase insurance plans through State Exchanges (see below) in
order to be compliant with the Individual Mandate, in many cases, will be purchasing plans that
impose the Abortion Premium Mandate (see below)
&#61623; The Individual Mandate requires people to pay for what the HHS mandate covers (because the HHS
Mandate applies to all plans) and also requires all individuals in certain plans to pay the Abortion Premium
----------
State Exchanges
&#61623; ObamaCare requires states to set up “exchanges” by January 1, 2014 – government-operated health
insurance markets, if they want to receive federal subsidies (ObamaCare Sec. 1321 (b), Pg. 68)
&#61623; Families (of 4) who earn $92,000 or less will receive federal tax credits which subsidize their plan if
they purchase from a State Exchange (Reconciliation Act Sec. 1001(a), Pg. 3)
&#61623; States are therefore incentivized to create these approved exchanges or forgo receiving federal
subsidization for their citizen’s health care
&#61623; If a State does not establish an approved exchange, the federal government has the option of setting
up an exchange in that state which will most likely provide for abortion even in states where
abortion coverage is illegal.(ObamaCare Sec. 1321 (b) & (c), Pg. 68)
&#61623; ObamaCare sets as the default that State Exchanges will cover abortion even in states where
abortion coverage is illegal. It gives the State the option to pass a law to opt out of the coverage,
and it also details how that law can be terminated or repealed.(ObamaCare Sec. 1303 (a)(1) and (2), Pg. 779)
----------
The individual mandate was upheld by the Supreme Court.
It doesn't matter who sets up the exchange.
You're looking for a loophole that doesn't exist.
It's a tax. The guy on the radio said that the way the law is written the federal government has no authority to tax you or a business or to force you to buy insurance. The authority in the bill is given to the states and if the states don't participate than there is no way to make you buy insurance or pay the tax. Take it up with him and CBS Radio news. I wish I knew his name but they were talking about something else that I wasn't much interested in so I didn't catch it.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#848065 Jan 26, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
And I said you're wrong.
Based on your track record, I'm certain I'm right, because gas isn't $5, and the economy is doing just fine, thank you, and all your other predictions have been proven wrong!!
----------
""Individual Mandate (ObamaCare Sec. 5000A(a), Pg. 126)
&#61623; Was upheld by the Supreme Court as a tax on June 28, 2012
&#61623; Requires that, beginning in 2014, nearly all Americans purchase ObamaCare-compliant insurance
plans or pay a heavy fine (see Fines below)(ObamaCare amend. to Sec. 5000A(c)(1) & (2), Pg. 791)
&#61623; Individuals who are forced to purchase insurance plans through State Exchanges (see below) in
order to be compliant with the Individual Mandate, in many cases, will be purchasing plans that
impose the Abortion Premium Mandate (see below)
&#61623; The Individual Mandate requires people to pay for what the HHS mandate covers (because the HHS
Mandate applies to all plans) and also requires all individuals in certain plans to pay the Abortion Premium
----------
State Exchanges
&#61623; ObamaCare requires states to set up “exchanges” by January 1, 2014 – government-operated health
insurance markets, if they want to receive federal subsidies (ObamaCare Sec. 1321 (b), Pg. 68)
&#61623; Families (of 4) who earn $92,000 or less will receive federal tax credits which subsidize their plan if
they purchase from a State Exchange (Reconciliation Act Sec. 1001(a), Pg. 3)
&#61623; States are therefore incentivized to create these approved exchanges or forgo receiving federal
subsidization for their citizen’s health care
&#61623; If a State does not establish an approved exchange, the federal government has the option of setting
up an exchange in that state which will most likely provide for abortion even in states where
abortion coverage is illegal.(ObamaCare Sec. 1321 (b) & (c), Pg. 68)
&#61623; ObamaCare sets as the default that State Exchanges will cover abortion even in states where
abortion coverage is illegal. It gives the State the option to pass a law to opt out of the coverage,
and it also details how that law can be terminated or repealed.(ObamaCare Sec. 1303 (a)(1) and (2), Pg. 779)
----------
The individual mandate was upheld by the Supreme Court.
It doesn't matter who sets up the exchange.
You're looking for a loophole that doesn't exist.
Hey dingleberry reread your post again. There is something missing. Bet you can't figure out what it is?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr JOEL 71,561
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr wojar 185,148
Mrs. Bush: History will vindicate her husband (Jun '08) 4 hr Just Saying 54,548
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 5 hr femiguy 51,578
Word (Dec '08) 6 hr Moon Rhythm 5,088
mai hindu ladki hu mujhe muslim ladke se shadi ... 7 hr abdul 3
Ask Amy 3-5-15 8 hr Kuuipo 7
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 12:51 pm PST

Bleacher Report12:51PM
Report: 7-Time Pro Bowl LB Briggs Won't Return to Bears
Bleacher Report 2:30 PM
Dan Herron Tendered by Colts, Jerrell Freeman Receives Qualifying Offer
NBC Sports 3:57 PM
Colts tender Jerrell Freeman, Boom Herron, Daniel Adongo
NFL 5:29 PM
Chicago Bears must make Jay Cutler decision soon
NFL 6:30 PM
Report: Lance Briggs will not return to Chicago Bears