Too much Shock Top again??
Of course it sounds reasonable to you.
That's because you're an idiot.
You're a woman, too. Apparently as stupid a woman as the one who wrote this unConstitutional Bill.
Rapes are investigated and prosecuted when the woman reports it. Takes a matter of hours, not months.
To assume a woman can't have an abortion until after the rapist is found guilty is just another way of controlling women's reproductive rights.
Now you explain how an investigation would take so long as to allow a fetus to develop and even become a legal issue concerning the rape.
These idiots want to force the woman to carry the baby, likely past the point where an abortion is legal.
More of the Republiclown 'War on Women' that you idiots deny, but which cost you the recent elections, as women voted for Democrats in huge numbers.
We've seen the scurrilous attacks on women today from your wingmates.
Your response indicates you're as retarded as they are.
You're a typical Republiclown woman, just like Carol. Condemning a woman to carry an unwanted criminal pregnancy is immoral and illegal. As the courts will determine.
You think you nitwits would have learned, after Judges threw out all of the Voter ID crap you tried to push to keep poor people and minorities from voting.
You're one sick mf'er, lady.
Your example is more of the stupidity you project about everything else.
Just try and tell me you haven't been drinking. "racist babies"?
The terms of the legislation, which was brought up by a woman, sound reasonable to me.
“Tampering with evidence shall include pressuring or facilitating an abortion, or compelling or coercing another to obtain an abortion, of a fetus that is the result of criminal sexual penetration or incest, with the intent to destroy evidence of the crime.”
A guy rapes a 15 year old girl, then convince her to have an abortion so he can deny it.