Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#844441 Jan 22, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
The state has the right5 to regulate it's own waters.
The waters beyond the state's boundaries the federal government has the right to regulate.
There are multiple laws passed by Congress that dictate how these regulations will be applied.
One such law is the EPA guidelines.
Another such law gives the Exeucitve Branch of government the authority to issue offshore leases in waters beyond the state waters boundary.
By law passed by Congress, the Chief Executive has the authority to regulate lease sales and conditions in federal waters.
The Chief Executive also has the authority to regulate lease sales and conditions on federal lands - which is why exploration of federal lands has dropped to just about zero since Obama took office.(He's saving that oil so he can give it to China, idiot.)
Now, back to the point, dufus.
The president does not have the authority to issue edicts to the population. The president has no authority outside the Executive Branch of government. Thus, no executive order can have authority outside the Executive Branch of government.
The only valid commands to the population must come in the form of a law passed by Congress and enacted in accordance with the Constitution.
Thus, any executive order from Obama giving any command to anyone or anything outside the Executive Branch of government isn't worth the paper it is written on.
If Obama had ever read the Constitution at least once in his life, he'd know that.
Did you just admit that there was an executive order banning offshore drilling in some areas?

I think you did.

So,what executive order from Obama are you talking about?

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#844442 Jan 22, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>The EPA was proposed by President Richard Nixon and began operation on December 2, 1970, after Nixon signed an executive order.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_En...
Perhaps I should have said "existing environmental regulations" instead of referenceing the actual agency that was later formed to enforce those regulations. Sorry for the oversight.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
LooTER SHooTER

United States

#844443 Jan 22, 2013
Hey Raider ?
ILl sell you my Case Dozer... 45 thousand ! Has low hours on it !

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#844444 Jan 22, 2013
We still haven't heard form the Democrats on these issues.
Here's the questions again the Democrats are running away from like scalded dogs:

Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the real-time video was being watched in the White House?

And;

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

So far, the Democrats have made some ludicrous proposals:

Tax the so-called "rich" who don't even have that much in earnings if you taxed them at 100 percent;

Economic canibalism. Tax/seize existing assets as earnings, something directly from Das Kapital;

Create an alternate government funded by the Executive Branch violating the Constitution and minting trillion dollar coins to give to the Federal Reserve, who gives the Executive Branch real money to pay for the unconstitutional alternate government (the only constitutional government requires that Congress be in full control of all spending and borrowing);

And, giving parts of states of the United States to China in exchange for payment on their part of the debt.

Are you idiots insane?

So, where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#844445 Jan 22, 2013
Homer 2016 wrote:
Does anyone remember Sarah Palin and all her stupidity?
I thought she was going to be a rising star in the Republican Party.
Is the right to keep and bear arms the same as the right to own arms?- Homer 2016
Bears have the right to have arms; helps them catch fish and stuff.

SP seems to be history! We can be grateful for that.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
forks_make_us_fa t

Bentonville, AR

#844446 Jan 22, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Who's the biggest polluter in the US?
Yep, the government y'all want to regulate pollution.
Who capped BP's liability for the Gulf oil spill? In a free market BP would have been held completely liable and would likely have been driven into bankruptcy. Why does the US government sacrifice US citizen's lives, health, and property to protect a negligent foreign corporation's profitability?
This is the part where idiot liberals blame Bush....
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#844447 Jan 22, 2013
Jimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
If you want to play that game, seazeball, likewise for the NAZI Party being socialist and left.
Here's the guy that tried to kill Hitler:
Count von Stauffenberg was a political conservative, a zealous German nationalist and a Roman Catholic.
"the term "Third Reich",[9] and advocated an ideology combining the nationalism of the right and the socialism of the left."
"the right-wing Volkish nationalist supporters of the Nazis moved to the new German Völkisch Freedom Party, leaving the north's left-wing Nazi members, such as Joseph Goebbels retaining support for the party.[52]"
so you can explain why Nazism was supported by leading capitalists and right wingers in the US?
Jimmy

Newington, CT

#844448 Jan 22, 2013
carol wrote:
My computer has been acting awful funky the past few days. Might not be posting much today until I get to the bottom of the problem.
Might just need a "computer enema" or something to clean out the crap.
Update & run your virus scan - can also download & run Malwarebytes (free, safe & good).

http://www.malwarebytes.org/products/malwareb...

CCleaner also works well for clearing out tons of junk files.

http://www.piriform.com/ccleaner (also free, safe & good).

Stay away from Democrat websites.

Judged:

10

10

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#844449 Jan 22, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
You are a f*cking idiot.
First of all, the students are LEGAL aliens when they come to our colleges & universities.
Second they currently leave when they can not become legal after college.
Third, we would enable them to be legal if they wanted to stay.
There is not "illegal" anything.
Why do we need educated aliens when we have over 300 million goddam people here and the most expensive education system in the world ready to educate them?
Being here should be an opportunity to an alien, and not a requirement for us.

Why do we have the most ignorant workforce in the industrialized world, while at the same time we have the most expensive education system in the entire world?

You're an idiot.
GhostofRaygun

Russellville, KY

#844450 Jan 22, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>The EPA was proposed by President Richard Nixon and began operation on December 2, 1970, after Nixon signed an executive order.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_En...
By no means am I a tree hugger. But I do remember in the 70s the joke was fish in the Hudson River don't swim they walk across it. To this day it is a health risk to eat fish from the nearby Green River because of the Mercury and PCBs that were dumped in before the EPA was formed. If you want to know what the US would look like without an EPA just look at China. Street lights on during the day due to all the air pollution.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#844451 Jan 22, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Who's the biggest polluter in the US?
Yep, the government y'all want to regulate pollution.
Who capped BP's liability for the Gulf oil spill? In a free market BP would have been held completely liable and would likely have been driven into bankruptcy. Why does the US government sacrifice US citizen's lives, health, and property to protect a negligent foreign corporation's profitability?
One answer: politics; and, unless and until the money is ever removed from politics then this will continue.
Nothing is perfect; however, without some regulations, the corporations would be able to pollute and burn and ravage every forest, stream, river, coastline for profit.
While I understand your point; who is to say that BP would have been completely liable? Furthermore, bankruptcy is never an end to an entity, it is a rebirth; just ask Mitt and Da Donald.
Large multi national corporations would protect themselves accordingly, i.e. go bankrupt and not pay the damages and reopen the next day under PB.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#844452 Jan 22, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do we need educated aliens when we have over 300 million goddam people here and the most expensive education system in the world ready to educate them?
Being here should be an opportunity to an alien, and not a requirement for us.
Why do we have the most ignorant workforce in the industrialized world, while at the same time we have the most expensive education system in the entire world?
You're an idiot.
Why should we have foreign students obtain their education here and then leave? Is it not better to encourage them to remain here?
carol

Orlando, FL

#844453 Jan 22, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
How can you be in such denial? Why are all the southern states red now?
Those are rhetorical questions since this has been shown to you many many times, you just refuse to accept that your party actively sought to bring southern racists rebelling against the Democratic Party into the Republican Party and that's where they've stayed until today and that's why the southern states are red.
You just don't tell the whole story.

Northern and Western Democrats supported civil rights as did Republicans. However, major civil rights bills in the 1950s and 60s generally depended more on Republican than Democratic support in Congress.

Conservatives in the GOP were split at the time – few lent their support to the Thurmond/Wallace/Bull Connor faction which was almost exclusively the province of the Democrats but some objected on other grounds to the pace and methods used to push civil rights, most famously Barry Goldwater’s opposition to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 on constitutional grounds (Goldwater had supported other civil rights measures and would again). But those were disagreements about tactics and not outcomes.

Today, the old Dixiecrat resistance is thoroughly discredited. Most conservatives today want no part of the objections raised by Goldwater and his allies at the time.

The Nixon-era institution of affirmative action and the 1970s controversies over school busing remains much more controversial. Very few of the racially charged issues of the past 47 years had anything to do with legal equality for African-Americans.

On the GOP side, a number of the old Dixiecrats, led by Thurmond himself, switched parties. Ex-Dixiecrats like Thurmond and Jesse Helms abandoned their prior support for segregation along with the party they had left behind.

It's just that liberals can't seem to figure out which is worse. The entire Southern bloc of Democrats voting against civil rights since the Civil War up until the mid 1960s or Nixon voting for busing to keep peace in the south even though he was against it personally.

Or two Dixiecrats leaving behind the Democrat Party to join the side of Republicans changing their views on segreation in the process and Robert Byrd belonging to the KKK.

You can't dismiss an entire legacy of Southern Democrats because of an election strategy by Republicans to win the Southern states based on family values and gun ownership rights.

Or one controversial vote by one Republican president who did more to advance civil rights than any Democrat.

You just can't. If blacks can turn their backs that quickly on the party who had steadfastly been loyal to them because of one vote over busing, they need to take a long and hard look at the party who would have oppressed their rights to this day if the Southern bloc of Democrats had gotten their way.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#844455 Jan 22, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
so you can explain why Nazism was supported by leading capitalists and right wingers in the US?
Progressives. I've told you all for years not to get stuck on that right/left bullshit. There are progressives in both parties. Keep ignoring this at your own peril.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#844456 Jan 22, 2013
Jimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
Update & run your virus scan - can also download & run Malwarebytes (free, safe & good).
http://www.malwarebytes.org/products/malwareb...
CCleaner also works well for clearing out tons of junk files.
http://www.piriform.com/ccleaner (also free, safe & good).
Stay away from Democrat websites.
It was probably the white supremacy sites she frequents.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#844457 Jan 22, 2013
Jimmy wrote:
<quoted text>
Update & run your virus scan - can also download & run Malwarebytes (free, safe & good).
http://www.malwarebytes.org/products/malwareb...
CCleaner also works well for clearing out tons of junk files.
http://www.piriform.com/ccleaner (also free, safe & good).
Stay away from Democrat websites.
Yes both of those are great. I use them both.
Jimmy

Newington, CT

#844458 Jan 22, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
so you can explain why Nazism was supported by leading capitalists and right wingers in the US?
Can you explain where you got that notion from? Do that and then I will respond. You seem to make a lot of stuff up, so let's see what you've got before I waste my time on you.
forks_make_us_fa t

Oklahoma City, OK

#844459 Jan 22, 2013
47%'ers....don't remember their history....

80 NY State school districts had rifle teams in 1975...

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/338167...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#844461 Jan 22, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps I should have said "existing environmental regulations" instead of referenceing the actual agency that was later formed to enforce those regulations. Sorry for the oversight.
now I understand what you were saying and you are correct.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#844462 Jan 22, 2013
Fiscal Footnote: Big Senate Gift to Drug Maker

By ERIC LIPTON and KEVIN SACK

Published: January 19, 2013

WASHINGTON — Just two weeks after pleading guilty in a major federal fraud case, Amgen, the world’s largest biotechnology firm, scored a largely unnoticed coup on Capitol Hill: Lawmakers inserted a paragraph into the “fiscal cliff” bill that did not mention the company by name but strongly favored one of its drugs.

Senators Max Baucus, left, and Orrin Hatch, in June at a Finance Committee meeting, have received contributions from Amgen.

The language buried in Section 632 of the law delays a set of Medicare price restraints on a class of drugs that includes Sensipar, a lucrative Amgen pill used by kidney dialysis patients

The provision gives Amgen an additional two years to sell Sensipar without government controls. The news was so welcome that the company’s chief executive quickly relayed it to investment analysts. But it is projected to cost Medicare up to $500 million over that period.

Amgen, which has a small army of 74 lobbyists in the capital, was the only company to argue aggressively for the delay, according to several Congressional aides of both parties.

Amgen has deep financial and political ties to lawmakers like Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Republican of Kentucky, and Senators Max Baucus, Democrat of Montana, and Orrin G. Hatch, Republican of Utah, who hold heavy sway over Medicare payment policy as the leaders of the Finance Committee.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/20/us/medicare...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 7 min Hey U 50,660
Amy 10-24 1 hr RACE 16
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr _Zoey_ 4,800
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr WelbyMD 179,478
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 5 hr Wolverine33 654
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 6 hr Ratloder 68,672
Rattlesnake Logic 8 hr i need a bump to 22
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]