Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
Lincoln

United States

#843595 Jan 21, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you not getting this? President Obama doesn't care about more white people having jobs. He cares about white people paying for the sins of the past and believes hardworking black people will understand if they, too, have to make sacrifices for this cause..........
Did you mike this up on your own?
Documentation would be interesting.

You might discuss Mitt Romney and the G H W Bush and G W Bush rather than neurotic attacks on President Obama.

What is positive about Republicans?
There must be something ?
Proud RIGHT Winger

Woodbridge, VA

#843598 Jan 21, 2013
LooTER SHooTER wrote:
LOOK AT THE MILLIONS OF DOLLARS WASTED ON THIS INAUGERATION ! MILLIONS! Just the STAGE WAS 10 MILLION PLUS . Not counting Security.
HE WANTS TO LOOK LIKE THE FURROR !
Why He couldnt have a simple swearing inside the whitehouse?
MILLIONS OF TAXPAYERS DOLLARS !
Waste! Waste Waste !
What KIND OF IDIOT WOULD WANT TO ATTEND THAT FUCKHEADS INAUGERATION ANYWAY?
I dont even want to see that PUKE ON TV !
Id like to see a JUMBO JET FALL FROM THE AIR ONTO THE STAGE AND THE CROWD OF ZOMBIES !
The last part is worng to say, and I am a Republican. It is wrong to wish someone to die, or wish them any harm, just because you don't like them. As much as you don't like him, he's in there. Instead of wishing anything on him. Pray that in the next 4 years he can do good for this country, or at least not make things more worse on us. Hang in there 4 years goes fast.
Lincoln

United States

#843599 Jan 21, 2013
What is positive about Republicans?
There must be something ?
Attacks on President Obama get old from people who cannot defend their vote for Mitt Romney.
Proud RIGHT Winger

Woodbridge, VA

#843600 Jan 21, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
so we send that bill to the RNC?
don't think security would need to be increased because of democrats.
No BOC lol

I am saying there are mean people out there that will harm Presidents,just for the hell of it, or because they don't like them. Ok, even because they're black. I think that is so VERY wrong. I don't care what side you are on, wrong is WRONG.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#843601 Jan 21, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
You just keep getting crazier!!
Of course, you can't show us any proof of this 'document'.
So I guess we'll just have to take your word for this nonsense!!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
You're not smart enough to know that Oil Companies make deals all over the world. Seen what China's invested in Canada?? Far more than they've invested in here.
Does Exxon's deal with Russia mean that Russia has surrendered to America??
Are you that stupid??
(The answer is yes)
<quoted text>
When I broke the truth here that the Democrats pulled a page directly out of Das Kapital as a plan to finance Obama's government, you ignorantly replied it didn't happen, like the good dupe you are. Lo, and behold, after you showed yourself to be ignorant, the Democrats made public their plan to tax existing assets as earnings - right out of Das Kapital.
When I broke the truth here that the Democrats pulled a page directly out of Machiavelli's "The Prince" to finance Obama's government with trillion-dollar coins the Executive Branch could give to the Fed, thus setting up a separate government from the constitutional government described in the Constitution where the House has full control of spending and revenue (borrowing included in revenue), you ignorantly asserted that didn't happen.
Lo, and behold, it's common news now. And, that idea looks like it got shoved pretty far up Obama's ass.
Now, you're faced with another treasonous fact about Obama and the current administration: They plan to give parts of the United States to China in payment for the debt owed to them.
Here's the information you need to research this treason:
In 2009, the United States of America tendered to China a written agreement which grants to the People's Republic of China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain within the USA, as collateral for China's continued purchase of US Treasury Notes and existing US Currency reserves.
The written agreement was brought to Beijing by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and was formalized and agreed-to during her 2009 trip to China.
This means that in the event the US Government defaults on its financial obligations to China, the Communist Government of China would be permitted to physically take -- inside the USA -- land, buildings, factories, etc.- to satisfy the financial obligations of the US government.
Put simply, the feds have actually mortgaged the physical land and property of all citizens and businesses in the United States. They have given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to "take" all of our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt.
Using two front corporations, the China National Offshore Oil Corporation and the State-Owned Assets Supervision as well as the Administration Commission of the State Council, the Chinese Communists have entered into a $570 million deal that gives it a third interest in an oil and gas field in Colorado and Wyoming. What’s worse is that language in the agreement has given the Chinese government the right to a third of ANY NEW oil or gas discovered in areas encompassed by this energy site.

What’s happening here is very obvious. The Chinese are Barack Obama’s loan shark. He can’t begin to pay them back what he has borrowed from them, so they are willing to take oil deals in partial payment.
Obama plans to give to them federal lands next in payment for their share of the debt.
Let's take a look at the Constitution on this...
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...."
Obama will have to give part of a state to China to do this.
We'll be in a nation-wide civil war before Obama is removed as dictator, that's for sure.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Homer 2013

Bethlehem, PA

#843603 Jan 21, 2013
Proud RIGHT Winger wrote:
<quoted text>
The last part is worng to say, and I am a Republican. It is wrong to wish someone to die, or wish them any harm, just because you don't like them. As much as you don't like him, he's in there. Instead of wishing anything on him. Pray that in the next 4 years he can do good for this country, or at least not make things more worse on us. Hang in there 4 years goes fast.
And then provided Hillary is healthy enough in 2016, 4 years of her. Which Democrat do you think will win in 2020? I think by then Republicans will be down to about 40% of the vote unless they turn things around.
Patriot

Longmont, CO

#843604 Jan 21, 2013
Barack Hussein Obama Setting US Up For Attack - Closing Air Defense System on U.S./Mexico Border: Texas & America Vulnerable to Attack from Low Altitude Missiles and Aircraft

Call your Congressmen and Senators immediately and demand that the recent budget cuts do not affect the security of America’s borders. The Federal Government wastes billions of dollars on things they should not even be involved in, but securing our country’s borders is one of the jobs that the federal government is actually supposed to do!

Obama has always pushed massive cuts in the military as part of any budget cuts he will accept in fiscal deals. Obama seems to be getting what he wants, and it will leave America’s borders vulnerable to attacks and other infiltrations.

Air Force’s Air Defense Radar Systems along U.S./Mexico Border will SHUTDOWN on March 15th, 2013

http://www.texasgopvote.com/issues/restore-fa...

http://www.usa.gov/Contact/Elected.shtml

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

“The Intrepid”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#843605 Jan 21, 2013
killtaker wrote:
Why on earth would anyone need a firearm for protection?
you idiot gun lovers got nothing to fear...
"Woman Burned at Gas Station Speaks"
http://www.nbcmiami.com/news/local/Woman-Burn...
There was a girl who did this...

http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/satmar-an...

to another girl at my school several years ago.

I've heard that she's still a scary person and has kids now, too.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#843606 Jan 21, 2013
Welcome to the Grand Illusion

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#843607 Jan 21, 2013
Let's start the week with some unanswered questions the Democrats have been running from like a scalded dog:

Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the real-time video was being watched in the White House?
(A location is required to answer this question)

And;

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
(A source of money is required to answer this question)

As for the second question, the Democrats first tried to use Marxist principles right out of Das Kapital and institute economic canibalism, to tax/seize existing assets as if it is earnings.
That got shoved up Obama's ass.
Next, the Democrats tried to set up a separate government by minting trillion-dollar coins and giving them to the Fed in exchange for money borrowed outside the constitutional requirement that only Congress can borrow money.
That's obviously treason.
Looks like that idea got shoved really far up Obama's ass.

Now, we have a treaty signed by Obama to give parts of the United States to China in exchange for payment to them on the debt.
This treaty was not ratified in accordance with the Constitution.
And, because the United States is comprised of "free states", such a treaty is obviously unconstitutional because it requires the federal government to give part of a state to a foreign country.

So, the Democrats have an agreement with China to give parts of some states to them.
This will certainly start a civil war.

So, the question remains:

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Proud RIGHT Winger

Woodbridge, VA

#843608 Jan 21, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
What is positive about Republicans?
There must be something ?
Attacks on President Obama get old from people who cannot defend their vote for Mitt Romney.
Oh, like you people don't go on attacks. You people are not only twp face, you are a bumch of liar, and what you guys call us, you are yourseles. Shouldn't you be over in Washington Dc right about now kissing the ground Obama walks on? What? Obama Care don't cover transport there? Maybe before you voted, you should have read the fine print.

Since: Nov 09

Pharr, TX

#843611 Jan 21, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
When I broke the truth here that the Democrats pulled a page directly out of Das Kapital as a plan to finance Obama's government, you ignorantly replied it didn't happen, like the good dupe you are. Lo, and behold, after you showed yourself to be ignorant, the Democrats made public their plan to tax existing assets as earnings - right out of Das Kapital.
When I broke the truth here that the Democrats pulled a page directly out of Machiavelli's "The Prince" to finance Obama's government with trillion-dollar coins the Executive Branch could give to the Fed, thus setting up a separate government from the constitutional government described in the Constitution where the House has full control of spending and revenue (borrowing included in revenue), you ignorantly asserted that didn't happen.
Lo, and behold, it's common news now. And, that idea looks like it got shoved pretty far up Obama's ass.
Now, you're faced with another treasonous fact about Obama and the current administration: They plan to give parts of the United States to China in payment for the debt owed to them.
Here's the information you need to research this treason:
In 2009, the United States of America tendered to China a written agreement which grants to the People's Republic of China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain within the USA, as collateral for China's continued purchase of US Treasury Notes and existing US Currency reserves.
The written agreement was brought to Beijing by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and was formalized and agreed-to during her 2009 trip to China.
This means that in the event the US Government defaults on its financial obligations to China, the Communist Government of China would be permitted to physically take -- inside the USA -- land, buildings, factories, etc.- to satisfy the financial obligations of the US government.
Put simply, the feds have actually mortgaged the physical land and property of all citizens and businesses in the United States. They have given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to "take" all of our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt.
Using two front corporations, the China National Offshore Oil Corporation and the State-Owned Assets Supervision as well as the Administration Commission of the State Council, the Chinese Communists have entered into a $570 million deal that gives it a third interest in an oil and gas field in Colorado and Wyoming. What’s worse is that language in the agreement has given the Chinese government the right to a third of ANY NEW oil or gas discovered in areas encompassed by this energy site.
What’s happening here is very obvious. The Chinese are Barack Obama’s loan shark. He can’t begin to pay them back what he has borrowed from them, so they are willing to take oil deals in partial payment.
Obama plans to give to them federal lands next in payment for their share of the debt.
Let's take a look at the Constitution on this...
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...."
Obama will have to give part of a state to China to do this.
We'll be in a nation-wide civil war before Obama is removed as dictator, that's for sure.
See Snopes on this phony claim:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/domai...

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Lily Boca Raton Fl

Boca Raton, FL

#843612 Jan 21, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Saw the movie a long time ago.
It's really no secret Obama is not who many think he is. If they know, they don't care.
He is the President of these United Stares of America, re elected by over 60 million Americans. He will be inaugurated for his second term today; on Martin Luther King Day and the 150th anniversary of The Emanicipation.
A truly glorious and historical day for Americans; who won over corporations.

And you, are a pathetic, bitter, delusional racist woman, so sick and twisted, continually distorting history to the point that you are either a habitual liar or a sociopath. Get help.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Lily Boca Raton Fl

Boca Raton, FL

#843613 Jan 21, 2013
Proud RIGHT Winger wrote:
<quoted text>
No BOC lol
I am saying there are mean people out there that will harm Presidents,just for the hell of it, or because they don't like them. Ok, even because they're black. I think that is so VERY wrong. I don't care what side you are on, wrong is WRONG.
Proud of you
Proud RIGHT Winger

Woodbridge, VA

#843614 Jan 21, 2013
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
We see you, gunner.
Stop acting out.
Jeff will think you're 12 and try and wrestle your pants off
You really need to talk to someone about your sex problem, dude.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#843615 Jan 21, 2013
The Loyal Opposition

By: Erick Erickson

.... The President has done what he set out to do. I cannot be outraged by him doing what he set out to do. I am far more outraged by the Republicans not doing what they said they would do.

We have too many outrage pimps on both sides of the aisle whipping the respective bases into a frenzy and fury against the other side. I don’t have enough time or energy to be outraged about it all. There are things to be outraged by, but not everything, and certainly not with full energy dedicated to every perceived slight and grievance.

What I am finding is that among conservatives there is too much outrage, piss, and vinegar. It makes our ideas less effective. We have become humorless, angry opponents of the President instead of happy warriors selling better ideas. We are not even selling ideas.

Conservatives, frankly, have become purveyors of outrage instead of preachers for a cause. Instead of showing how increasing government harms people, how free markets help people, and how conservative policies benefit all Americans, we scream “Benghazi” and “Fast & Furious.”

We’re off key and off message. We’ve become professional victims dialed up to 10 on the outrage meter. Who the hell wants to listen to conservatives whining and moaning all the time about the outrage du jour? Seriously? Mitt Romney ran a campaign on just how bad things are, but he was rejected by a majority of Americans who felt like he really did not care about them and really had no plans to improve their lives.

Bitching about Benghazi doesn’t do that either.

Be mad at me if you need to. Feel free to express your moral outrage and indignity at me. But then shut up and focus on convincing people not that the President of the United States duly elected by a majority of the American people is a traitor willfully trying to destroy the country, but that our policies will allow people to make the most of their lives and not be dependent on the rising and falling fortunes of Washington, D.C.

Be happy. The anger is unbecoming of the party of Lincoln and Reagan.

And if you must be angry, don’t be angry at a President doing what he set out to do, be angry at a Republican Establishment not doing ... well ... much of anything.

http://www.redstate.com/2013/01/20/the-loyal-...
lol

Winter Park, FL

#843616 Jan 21, 2013
Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
He is the President of these United Stares of America, re elected by over 60 million Americans. He will be inaugurated for his second term today; on Martin Luther King Day and the 150th anniversary of The Emanicipation.
A truly glorious and historical day for Americans; who won over corporations.
And you, are a pathetic, bitter, delusional racist woman, so sick and twisted, continually distorting history to the point that you are either a habitual liar or a sociopath. Get help.
You would be happier and more at home in North Korea, dear.
They love their "Dear Leader" too, just like you love O.

Judged:

11

11

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Lily Boca Raton Fl

Boca Raton, FL

#843618 Jan 21, 2013
Homer 2013 wrote:
Good morning folks. The beginning of another excellent 4 years, peace be with all of you.
Homer going to be nicer on you rightwingtards starting today.
Lol! Carol seems to be heading for electroshock therapy today!!! I love Michelle Obamas new hair style, she looks 10 years younger. Millions of American women getting bangs!!

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Obama is a joke

Emmaus, PA

#843619 Jan 21, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
Let's start the week with some unanswered questions the Democrats have been running from like a scalded dog:
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the real-time video was being watched in the White House?
(A location is required to answer this question)
And;
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
(A source of money is required to answer this question)
As for the second question, the Democrats first tried to use Marxist principles right out of Das Kapital and institute economic canibalism, to tax/seize existing assets as if it is earnings.
That got shoved up Obama's ass.
Next, the Democrats tried to set up a separate government by minting trillion-dollar coins and giving them to the Fed in exchange for money borrowed outside the constitutional requirement that only Congress can borrow money.
That's obviously treason.
Looks like that idea got shoved really far up Obama's ass.
Now, we have a treaty signed by Obama to give parts of the United States to China in exchange for payment to them on the debt.
This treaty was not ratified in accordance with the Constitution.
And, because the United States is comprised of "free states", such a treaty is obviously unconstitutional because it requires the federal government to give part of a state to a foreign country.
So, the Democrats have an agreement with China to give parts of some states to them.
This will certainly start a civil war.
So, the question remains:
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
Good luck trying to get any type of reasonable answer.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#843620 Jan 21, 2013
As President Barack Obama enters his second term, his aides have concluded he likely will fall short on one of his signature promises.

Barring some collectively cathartic Beltway experience, the Obama administration will not usher in an era of post-partisanship. The forces of gridlock continue to have the upper hand, and they will have a tangible impact on the president's tactics and ambitions.

Obama and his aides are neither fretting nor apologizing. Rather, while expressing a continued preference for politics by consensus, they are embracing the need for a more aggressive, even confrontational approach. The president signaled as much by vowing simply to not negotiate with Republicans over raising the debt ceiling. He upped the ante with the introduction of his gun policy reforms, which were more comprehensive than expected.

The message was solidified this past week with the announcement that Obama for America -- the organization that lifted the president to two election victories -- would be converted to a non-profit entity for the express purpose of pushing the White House's agenda in Obama's second term. One senior administration official was practically giddy about the prospect of using the organization's massive email list for policy purposes, admitting the campaign group had failed to do so effectively during the president's first term.

The White House has made similar boasts before, so skeptics have their reasons. But this time, a dysfunctional Washington and a weakened but more dogmatic Republican Party make a combative strategy the best option.

"Obviously, we hoped for something better," conceded David Axelrod, Obama's longtime adviser, in an interview.“And to the extent that the president can do more, he will. But this is largely a function of a decision on the Republican Party to try and thwart him at every turn as a political strategy."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/21/obam...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 5 min WelbyMD 183,889
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr Mister Tonka 98,990
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr Mothra 50,449
How to stop ants. 4 hr joey 4
I Hate my life and mom (Aug '07) 4 hr Silk 1,754
abby 1-26 5 hr j_m_w 71
Amy 1-29 6 hr Julie 10
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:04 am PST

NFL10:04AM
Richardson was suspended for two Colts playoff games
ESPN10:58 AM
Colts won't commit to RB Richardson for 2015
Yahoo! Sports11:49 AM
League conducts nearly 40 interviews into 'deflate-gate'
Yahoo! Sports11:50 AM
NFL: No decision yet on deflated balls
NBC Sports12:54 PM
Grigson goes silent on NFL investigation into Patriots