Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1263857 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

dem

Chicago, IL

#843730 Jan 21, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>That's pretty weird in itself, sadly enough.

Why is it only democrats seem to mimic their First Ladies? Remember Jacqueline Kennedy and the hats?

She smoked too. Did you take up smoking?
Looks like the Kenyan flag behind them.
dem

Chicago, IL

#843731 Jan 21, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>When I broke the truth here that the Democrats pulled a page directly out of Das Kapital as a plan to finance Obama's government, you ignorantly replied it didn't happen, like the good dupe you are. Lo, and behold, after you showed yourself to be ignorant, the Democrats made public their plan to tax existing assets as earnings - right out of Das Kapital.
When I broke the truth here that the Democrats pulled a page directly out of Machiavelli's "The Prince" to finance Obama's government with trillion-dollar coins the Executive Branch could give to the Fed, thus setting up a separate government from the constitutional government described in the Constitution where the House has full control of spending and revenue (borrowing included in revenue), you ignorantly asserted that didn't happen.
Lo, and behold, it's common news now. And, that idea looks like it got shoved pretty far up Obama's ass.
Now, you're faced with another treasonous fact about Obama and the current administration: They plan to give parts of the United States to China in payment for the debt owed to them.
Here's the information you need to research this treason:

In 2009, the United States of America tendered to China a written agreement which grants to the People's Republic of China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain within the USA, as collateral for China's continued purchase of US Treasury Notes and existing US Currency reserves.
The written agreement was brought to Beijing by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and was formalized and agreed-to during her 2009 trip to China.
This means that in the event the US Government defaults on its financial obligations to China, the Communist Government of China would be permitted to physically take -- inside the USA -- land, buildings, factories, etc.- to satisfy the financial obligations of the US government.

Put simply, the feds have actually mortgaged the physical land and property of all citizens and businesses in the United States. They have given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to "take" all of our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt.

What’s happening here is very obvious. The Chinese are Barack Obama’s loan shark. He can’t begin to pay them back what he has borrowed from them, so they are willing to take oil deals in partial payment.
Obama plans to give to them federal lands next in payment for their share of the debt.
Let's take a look at the Constitution on this...
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...."
Obama will have to give part of a state to China to do this.
We'll be in a nation-wide civil war before Obama is removed as dictator, that's for sure.

By the way, how's that Democrat plan to establish an alternate government? You know, the alternate government aside from the government established by the Constitution? You do remember that plan for the President to mint trillion dollar coins and give them to the Fed in exchange for real money to fund the Obama dictatorship, in direct violation of the Constitution.

I think if Obama had read the Constitution at least once in his life he'd know this is using the office of president to rebel against the government of the United States.

It would really help if Obama actually knew what was written in the Constitution.
Another big talking kkkoward

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#843734 Jan 21, 2013
Carol is way too stupid to see the truth.

She creates her own reality and wonders why she's the only one who believes in it.

Yet she refuses to admit to the racism in her that's feeding her hatred towards our President.

It would be funny if it weren't so sad.
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
if only that argument would have won the election.
sooner or later you so called conservatives will have to admit that your stated policies are what shot you down.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#843735 Jan 21, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
He was given the oath of office twice by John Roberts in 2009.
He was given the oath of office yesterday by John Roberts, per the Constitution on 20 Jan.
He was given the oath again today, by John Roberts, in front of millions.
So, your oath taken once is a lie.
I have proof of this.
You seem to enjoy making a fool of yourself.
You're quite good at it.
He was given the oath twice in 09 because they screwed up the first attempt. Just like he's screweing up this country. Good Grief!!!
dem

Chicago, IL

#843733 Jan 21, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>Somewhere along the way - between the war on women, the class warfare and the egregious lies on the part of Obama's ad campaigns - we forgot about job growth and economic recovery.

Hope Obama didn't use the phrase "let us continue" in his second inaugural speech like so many second term presidents have done.
Glory hallelujah.
dem

Chicago, IL

#843736 Jan 21, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text>Maybe down there in your old folks home but not around here. 3 million people is not a lot.
It's not?
It was literally the difference between black and white.
Lily Boca Raton Fl

Boca Raton, FL

#843737 Jan 21, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
He was given the oath of office twice by John Roberts in 2009.
He was given the oath of office yesterday by John Roberts, per the Constitution on 20 Jan.
He was given the oath again today, by John Roberts, in front of millions.
So, your oath taken once is a lie.
I have proof of this.
You seem to enjoy making a fool of yourself.
You're quite good at it.
It's just flat out ignorance
carol

Orlando, FL

#843738 Jan 21, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
No, guess not. Go back to what you were doing.
But first at least pick a sermon to watch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =hAYe7MT5BxMXX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Or hear Rev. Wright speak of the "inner Obama" in 2012.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Or this one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Do you believe "white supremecy" drives world policy?

I mean in 2012?
dem

Chicago, IL

#843740 Jan 21, 2013
How many Supreme Court justices will Obama appoint?
Three?
Carol you do know what that means, right?

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#843739 Jan 21, 2013
You broke the truth??

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yet not a single source to suppport any of your 'batshyt crazy' conspiracy theories.

You simply make shit up and present it as truth.

But it is shit, no matter how you package it.

Even the righties here ignore you.

You give wingnuts a bad name!!

I'm done with your stupidity.
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
When I broke the truth here that the Democrats pulled a page directly out of Das Kapital as a plan to finance Obama's government, you ignorantly replied it didn't happen, like the good dupe you are. Lo, and behold, after you showed yourself to be ignorant, the Democrats made public their plan to tax existing assets as earnings - right out of Das Kapital.
When I broke the truth here that the Democrats pulled a page directly out of Machiavelli's "The Prince" to finance Obama's government with trillion-dollar coins the Executive Branch could give to the Fed, thus setting up a separate government from the constitutional government described in the Constitution where the House has full control of spending and revenue (borrowing included in revenue), you ignorantly asserted that didn't happen.
Lo, and behold, it's common news now. And, that idea looks like it got shoved pretty far up Obama's ass.
Now, you're faced with another treasonous fact about Obama and the current administration: They plan to give parts of the United States to China in payment for the debt owed to them.
Here's the information you need to research this treason:
In 2009, the United States of America tendered to China a written agreement which grants to the People's Republic of China, an option to exercise Eminent Domain within the USA, as collateral for China's continued purchase of US Treasury Notes and existing US Currency reserves.
The written agreement was brought to Beijing by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and was formalized and agreed-to during her 2009 trip to China.
This means that in the event the US Government defaults on its financial obligations to China, the Communist Government of China would be permitted to physically take -- inside the USA -- land, buildings, factories, etc.- to satisfy the financial obligations of the US government.
Put simply, the feds have actually mortgaged the physical land and property of all citizens and businesses in the United States. They have given to a foreign power, their Constitutional power to "take" all of our property, as actual collateral for continued Chinese funding of US deficit spending and the continued carrying of US national debt.
Whats happening here is very obvious. The Chinese are Barack Obamas loan shark. He cant begin to pay them back what he has borrowed from them, so they are willing to take oil deals in partial payment.
Obama plans to give to them federal lands next in payment for their share of the debt.
Let's take a look at the Constitution on this...
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state...."
Obama will have to give part of a state to China to do this.
We'll be in a nation-wide civil war before Obama is removed as dictator, that's for sure.
By the way, how's that Democrat plan to establish an alternate government? You know, the alternate government aside from the government established by the Constitution? You do remember that plan for the President to mint trillion dollar coins and give them to the Fed in exchange for real money to fund the Obama dictatorship, in direct violation of the Constitution.
I think if Obama had read the Constitution at least once in his life he'd know this is using the office of president to rebel against the government of the United States.
It would really help if Obama actually knew what was written in the Constitution.

“Amor patriae.”

Since: Feb 08

Eastern Oregon

#843742 Jan 21, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>
Killed Bin Ladin, has been responsible for killing far more Al Qaeda leaders than did Bush Cheney. Cleaning up their total messes was and is not easy as it continues. Hopefully he will next erect a "Wailing Wall" for all on the right to cry and moan daily.
Killing Osama hasn't done sh!t, as Bush fully understood. Al Qaeda is stronger than ever since the wimp took office, they use Obama's vaunting verbosity as a recruiting tool that's led to surrender in Afghanistan, dead Americans in Benghazi and Algeria, and numerous other acts of terror.

If Obama couldn't point to a few gun related episodes, he couldn't point to anything.
Lily Boca Raton Fl

Boca Raton, FL

#843741 Jan 21, 2013
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
Glory hallelujah.
Jill Biden is a beautiful woman

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#843744 Jan 21, 2013
Flake is a stereotype of the dumb truck driver!!

Makes dumb comments, then runs off when they're destroyed.

He's a coward, like most of the wingnuts.
Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
It's just flat out ignorance

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#843743 Jan 21, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Somewhere along the way - between the war on women, the class warfare and the egregious lies on the part of Obama's ad campaigns - we forgot about job growth and economic recovery.
Hope Obama didn't use the phrase "let us continue" in his second inaugural speech like so many second term presidents have done.
He doesn't care about the economy or jobs. These libtards are lemmings.
Lily Boca Raton Fl

Boca Raton, FL

#843746 Jan 21, 2013
Congratulations America!
dem

Chicago, IL

#843748 Jan 21, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text>He was given the oath twice in 09 because they screwed up the first attempt. Just like he's screweing up this country. Good Grief!!!
I just saw your daughter on tv.
She was wearing an Idaho potato sack and no shoes.
carol

Orlando, FL

#843745 Jan 21, 2013
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you watching all these blacks in your capital?
Hee hee
All these blacks would still be Republicans had it not been for the Great Depression and FDR offering them a big government plantation.

Everyone would have been a lot better off if FDR had placed the priority more on the free market and giving it a little more time to fix itself with minimal government assistance.

Now, look where we are. More people on government assistance than any other time in our history - and the numbers are growing.
Nj raider 1

United States

#843747 Jan 21, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
The Boy Messiah has screwed America so bad that generations will suffer but the band plays on and stupid people continue doing stupid things at the inauguration dog & pony show.
WP - New regulations shed light on looming health-care reform costs for businesses: http://tinyurl.com/aqjfmnx
Life just got worse.
At least you admitted it! I knew it took a mixture of a dog(your mom) & a pony(your dad) to create an unknown species like you! I still haven't figured out a name that quite fits you. Podongy!!! There it is!

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#843749 Jan 21, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Somewhere along the way - between the war on women, the class warfare and the egregious lies on the part of Obama's ad campaigns - we forgot about job growth and economic recovery.
Hope Obama didn't use the phrase "let us continue" in his second inaugural speech like so many second term presidents have done.
I couldn't watch it even though I wanted to see my daughter.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#843751 Jan 21, 2013
You can't tell the truth, can you??

'They' didn't screw it up in 2009, John Roberts screwed it up.

And he performed a do-over.

So will your pigheadedness admit that Obama was given the oath of office twice in both elections??

Or will you cling to your stupidity??
flack wrote:
<quoted text> He was given the oath twice in 09 because they screwed up the first attempt. Just like he's screweing up this country. Good Grief!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
how many people think louis farrakhan is an idiot (Mar '11) 28 min reality is a crutch 8
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr Dr Guru 194,552
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 4 hr ritedownthemiddle 54,358
News Fatal heat wave 20 years ago changed Chicago's ... 5 hr VeganTiger 5
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 10 hr Mister Tonka 100,298
Ask Amy July 31 10 hr Julie 6
abby7-31-15 13 hr mrs gladys kravitz 5
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages