Barack Obama, our next President

[OldRaider]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Any objection by Obama to the Iraq War was not noticed by anybody because Obama was still in Illinois working for the machine.
Obama is the ultimate political opportunist.

Because it wasn't covered on FOX News doesn't mean it wasn't noticed. And, it doesn't matter if he was in Illinois or on the moon, he had the courage and wisdom to speak out against an unprovoked and unpaid for war that he is now helping our country recover from.

[John Galt]

martinezjosei wrote:

Lawrence O'Donnell has a recommendation for President Obama on Inauguration Day: get rid of the Bible.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2013/...

Lawrence O'Donnell has a recommendation for President Obama on Inauguration Day: get rid of the Bible.

On Thursday, the MSNBC host reacted to news that Louie Giglio — the pastor selected to deliver the benediction at Obama's inauguration — had withdrawn from the ceremony over an anti-gay sermon he gave in the 1990s. O'Donnell said that Giglio had been "quoting the Bible," and that "homosexuality is a sin in the Bible."

He guffawed at the White House statement about its search for Giglio's replacement. "In other words, we will ensure that whoever delivers the benediction rejects the same parts of the Bible that President Obama rejects and most Democrats reject, even though every word of the Bible is the word of God,” O’Donnell said.

“As I've pointed out... no one accepts all of the teachings of the Bible," he continued. "Still, the president, following one of our most absurdest traditions in the government that invented the separation of church and state, will put his hand on this book filled with things he does not believe — filled with things that no one in the United States of America believes — and with his hand on this book he will recite the oath of office."

He suggested an alternative to Obama: swearing in on one of his daughters. "Now, wouldn't it be better if the president's hand was on the shoulder of one of his daughters, suggesting that he was honoring the oath of office as much as he honors Sasha and Malia?" O'Donnell asked.

[TSM]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>

The Bush lie was to use & exaggerate only intel that might indicate that Sadam had WMD programs while ignoring & hiding the intel that he did not.

RealDave are you saying that Albright, Hillary, and Bill all lied about’ WMDs’ and what exact Intel did Bush exaggerated about? Now let’s not forget the Intel given to Bush administration came from the Clinton administration!!

[Lincoln]

John Galt wrote:

The Gresham's Law of political discussion has destroyed this forum, which is now filled with childish scumbags who have no interest in serious discussion, instead wallowing in personal insults and pornography.
Have fun talking to each other, or more likely to yourselves.

It comes and goes,
false Carols seem a major problem.

[teenie_ball_eate r_ghost]

Grey Ghost wrote:

<quoted text>
I adhere to your great teaching and sound common sense judgement oh Great one.

The only thing you adhere to is sex with mules!

[OldRaider]

martinezjosei wrote:

Lawrence O'Donnell has a recommendation for President Obama on Inauguration Day: get rid of the Bible.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobileweb/2013/...

Great idea. Why take an oath on a book of fairy tales?

[Grey Ghost]

martinezjosei wrote:

<quoted text>
And he attacks Libya for no reason!!!
Actually for oil!!! The same train he accused Bush of, LOL!!!
See? Liberals are low life, brain dead hypocrites!!!
Obama said we need to help Lybia for 300 fears but Syria is ok to kill 20,000 because Syria has no oil.
See?
Obama shuts down drilling for oil in United States but then gives billion to his controller George Soros to drill in Brazil.
Obama shuts down the keystone oil pipe so George Soros can keep using his polluting trains to move oil and become rich.
See? Liberals like you are easy to fool.
George Soros owe 2 billion in taxes but is forgiven by your incompetent community agitator.
See? Liberals are easy to fool. Especially BLACK liberals!!!

All you rightwing fools would have handicapped stickers on your cars if retardation test were given. Programmed minions, the lot of you.

[Nuculur option]

carol wrote:

<quoted text>
Problem for you is they did. Look up Leon Panett's response when asked directly if the information gleaned from waterboarding led in part to the discovery of bin Laden.

I present testimony from the CIa and you tell me to lok something up.

You lost.

Time for you to give up with the stupidity.

Wateerboarding is of no value. Torture is useless, as people will make up stories to tell you things you want to hear.

I'll bet you would call Jesus a murderer if you were waterboarded just once, only for a minute.

[Grey Ghost]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
New Yorkers get what they deserve for electing leftwingers.

Based on that idiocy, then maybe that explains why most the red states are the worst off.

[Grey Ghost]

John Galt wrote:

The Gresham's Law of political discussion has destroyed this forum, which is now filled with childish scumbags who have no interest in serious discussion, instead wallowing in personal insults and pornography.
Have fun talking to each other, or more likely to yourselves.

That's no way to talk about your family members even though they have all disowned your lying incredible stupid azz.

[Atmore Al]

Grey Ghost wrote:

<quoted text>
All you rightwing fools would have handicapped stickers on your cars if retardation test were given. Programmed minions, the lot of you.

Bumpass...LOL

[Grey Ghost]

maddmaxx7 wrote:

<quoted text>
Still dodging the tough questions I see.
Your excuse for Obama is lame, we know what he said then, we know what he's spewing now, he's a hypocrite with no credibility, nothing Obama says has any actual meaning, he's dishonest and corrupt.
He has no intention of doing anything except driving us into bankruptcy.

Real Americans,[unlike your programmed ignorant azz] believe and they just proved it...Numbnuts.

[lily boca raton fl]

maddmaxx7 wrote:

<quoted text>
Still dodging the tough questions I see.
Your excuse for Obama is lame, we know what he said then, we know what he's spewing now, he's a hypocrite with no credibility, nothing Obama says has any actual meaning, he's dishonest and corrupt.
He has no intention of doing anything except driving us into bankruptcy.

This from the poster who said "where's Lee Harvey Oswald when we need him"

You have no credibility; you are here just to shyt disturb and insult and threaten the life of the President of the United States.

[VeganTiger]

Truth is no SIN wrote:

OBAMA should remember he did not win 100% of the vote what does he think the election means he dictates to 47% of AMERICA FOH Majority Rule is not DEMOCRACY

Majority rule IS democracy, however, this is a constitutional republic just for the reason of not doing the same mistakes as others. Now we got a populist monarch in The White House hell-bent on destroying the Republic THROUGH democracy.

It is a historical imperative that an overactive executive branch can only go one way. Once the executive branch takes over and neither the legislative nor the economic arm is willing to oppose it, there can only be a brutal dictatorship awaiting. Humans are simply too unreliable to be given such vast amounts of power upon a few hands.

Just turned in medical license in one of the states I am licensed. Not playing this game any more. Heading out of the country with my wife and kids for a couple of months to do some thinking. GodBless good American people..

[Nuculur option]

All you do is tell lies!!

Read it and weep, nitwit!!

""The direct warnings to Mr. Bush about the possibility of a Qaeda attack began in the spring of 2001. By May 1, the Central Intelligence Agency told the White House of a report that “a group presently in the United States” was planning a terrorist operation. Weeks later, on June 22, the daily brief reported that Qaeda strikes could be “imminent,” although intelligence suggested the time frame was flexible.

But some in the administration considered the warning to be just bluster. An intelligence official and a member of the Bush administration both told me in interviews that the neoconservative leaders who had recently assumed power at the Pentagon were warning the White House that the C.I.A. had been fooled; according to this theory, Bin Laden was merely pretending to be planning an attack to distract the administration from Saddam Hussein, whom the neoconservatives saw as a greater threat. Intelligence officials, these sources said, protested that the idea of Bin Laden, an Islamic fundamentalist, conspiring with Mr. Hussein, an Iraqi secularist, was ridiculous, but the neoconservatives’ suspicions were nevertheless carrying the day.

In response, the C.I.A. prepared an analysis that all but pleaded with the White House to accept that the danger from Bin Laden was real.

“The U.S. is not the target of a disinformation campaign by Usama Bin Laden,” the daily brief of June 29 read, using the government’s transliteration of Bin Laden’s first name. Going on for more than a page, the document recited much of the evidence, including an interview that month with a Middle Eastern journalist in which Bin Laden aides warned of a coming attack, as well as competitive pressures that the terrorist leader was feeling, given the number of Islamists being recruited for the separatist Russian region of Chechnya.

And the C.I.A. repeated the warnings in the briefs that followed. Operatives connected to Bin Laden, one reported on June 29, expected the planned near-term attacks to have “dramatic consequences,” including major casualties. On July 1, the brief stated that the operation had been delayed, but “will occur soon.” Some of the briefs again reminded Mr. Bush that the attack timing was flexible, and that, despite any perceived delay, the planned assault was on track.

Yet, the White House failed to take significant action. Officials at the Counterterrorism Center of the C.I.A. grew apoplectic. On July 9, at a meeting of the counterterrorism group, one official suggested that the staff put in for a transfer so that somebody else would be responsible when the attack took place, two people who were there told me in interviews. The suggestion was batted down, they said, because there would be no time to train anyone else.""

----------

bush ignored the warnings, which were numerous.

I just gave you the proof.\\Now shut up and go stand in the corner.

TSM wrote:

<quoted text>
RealDave are you saying that Albright, Hillary, and Bill all lied about’ WMDs’ and what exact Intel did Bush exaggerated about? Now let’s not forget the Intel given to Bush administration came from the Clinton administration!!

[lily boca raton fl]

maddmaxx7 wrote:

<quoted text>
Powell is a racist, like you. He's also a liar, like you.
Show me were one demorat has disavowed leftist scum like the Black Panthers who advocate killing white children,

Oh yes, the famous Black Panthers, they're coming to take your dyck, I mean gun away. Go hide sucka

[Nuculur option]

He must be doing a great job.

To have an idiot like you attack him is proof.

maddmaxx7 wrote:

<quoted text>
Still dodging the tough questions I see.
Your excuse for Obama is lame, we know what he said then, we know what he's spewing now, he's a hypocrite with no credibility, nothing Obama says has any actual meaning, he's dishonest and corrupt.
He has no intention of doing anything except driving us into bankruptcy.

[Atmore Al]

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>
This from the poster who said "where's Lee Harvey Oswald when we need him"
You have no credibility; you are here just to shyt disturb and insult and threaten the life of the President of the United States.

Bumpass...have another drink...LOL

[Atmore Al]

lily boca raton fl wrote:

<quoted text>
Oh yes, the famous Black Panthers, they're coming to take your dyck, I mean gun away. Go hide sucka

Your upbringing in "da hood" it be showin...LOL

[Grey Ghost]

maddmaxx7 wrote:

<quoted text>
The proof of the harmful policies of the left/libs from the last 4 decades are in every big city ghetto, full of crime, drugs, fatherless children, poverty and despair.
Liberals own it and you are a liberal, take your share of the blame.

But your party has been in power most of those years????