Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#842223 Jan 18, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
Opportunity knocks but once.
....unless you can play the Race Card, have Liberal Media loyalty and can use taxpayer money to buy off anyone you want to.
That is not capitalistic opportunism but selfish, egoistic, unprincipled exploitation with no regard for others.
You clearly need a water filter in your life. Too much muddy water.
Stop drinking from the toilet, Fool.
lol! Yep! And you people do play the race card and have a blind loyalty to fart news!
dementia

Pompano Beach, FL

#842221 Jan 18, 2013
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
i read that in the bible too.
You can't read.

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#842224 Jan 18, 2013
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
good thinking, tea bag stooge.
lets educate 99.9% of the population to tea bag academic standards(retard)in order to protect the 0.00009999999% that may be killed in a mass killing.
priorities lie?
hee hee
did you just type...

"...0.00009999999% that may be killed in a mass killing."

doooFUSSS!
dem

Chicago, IL

#842225 Jan 18, 2013
killtaker wrote:
<quoted text>even with a world teaming with you 80 IQ affirmative action idiots I have to stick around...

I enjoy f'ing with Liberals to much to wanna leave...
I don't remember giving you a choice?
Listen, nostrilfuckface, you are quite the idiot but your tenacity cannot be denied.
You were probably a punching bag at one point.
dem

Chicago, IL

#842226 Jan 18, 2013
I thought we were having a debate?
Hee hee
Bulls up one with three minutes left over celtics.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#842227 Jan 18, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
As for the other claims, we talked to Dr. Robert Spitzer, a political science professor and the author of "The Politics of Gun Control" and two other books on gun control legislation. Spitzer called the e-mail "a cartoonish view of the complex events" regarding the rise of Nazi Germany, the Cambodian mass killings and the other events that the anonymous author attributes to gun laws. "The people who write these things don’t know comparative politics, they don’t know international relations, they haven’t studied war," Spitzer told us.
http://m.factcheck.org/2009/05/gun-control-in...
FactCheck is a Ultra Liberal Annenberg Project creation. Go fish.

Secondly, Mr. Spitzer is ....who? Another Liberal Academia Creation. Place "Dr." in front of anyone's name and they suddenly begin walking 10' tall and get interviewed by Oprah, Charlie Rose and Larry King, Liberalism's finest.

Crime data rises and falls and when it does, Liberals will always point to gun control measures. Like I said earlier, Data Fudging is a time-honored liberal ploy. Misinterpreting data is a well-worn tool of progressives. Spitzer claims that the email in question is a cartoonish interpretation of a complex issue.
Hee, Hee

Well....muddy the waters, Mr. Spitzer. We recognize you for who you are. Another writer for the Huffington Liberal.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#842228 Jan 18, 2013
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
Baby Killer!
Another outburst of stupidity from the peanut gallery.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#842229 Jan 18, 2013
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
good thinking, tea bag stooge.
lets educate 99.9% of the population to tea bag academic standards(retard)in order to protect the 0.00009999999% that may be killed in a mass killing.
priorities lie?
hee hee
Have you recently taken a good look at America's academic standards in comparison to other country's around the world?

No. Because you are a product of it and can't read above a fourth grade level, your comprehension skills are poor and your only academic achievement was learning how to make change when selling guns and drugs on the playground.

Homeschooling wouldn't have helped you, either, with momma f*cking for food and Daddy Who MIA.

Since: Jul 11

Location hidden

#842230 Jan 18, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
Truth, when told often enough, becomes "...the same ole recycled crap you guys post trying to defend the indefensible" to a Progressive Ultra Left Wing Liberal Socialist Democrat like you.
Truth hurts and that's why it's being used against you. Hee, Hee.
Unfortunately for you, when the gauge is stuck so far to the right the needle is bent, then anything left of that is seen as radical.
What ever happen to opinions that were considered middle ground, does anyone qualify to walk that road now ? Not with current group of Republican's it doesn't. The ones that do represent a more moderate view is drowned out by all the white noise that tea baggers make.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#842231 Jan 18, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! None of your kool aid son. But don't worry. You made your argument of using kids for political purposes quite clear son.
Thanks for showing how to apply it to Roe v Wade!
Hee, Hee. Keep tryin'.

Even a broken clock is right twice a day.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#842232 Jan 18, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Yep! And you people do play the race card and have a blind loyalty to fart news!
You have a sore neck with your yelling up to me all the time. Sorry 'bout that:>

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#842233 Jan 18, 2013
Why on earth would a white man need a firearm to protect himself...

"16-year-old charged with murder of teacher"

http://www.kltv.com/Global/story.asp...

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#842234 Jan 18, 2013
OzRitz wrote:
<quoted text>
Unfortunately for you, when the gauge is stuck so far to the right the needle is bent, then anything left of that is seen as radical.
What ever happen to opinions that were considered middle ground, does anyone qualify to walk that road now ? Not with current group of Republican's it doesn't. The ones that do represent a more moderate view is drowned out by all the white noise that tea baggers make.
The very concept of compromise becomes a laughable idea, a joke, when a Liberal brings it up to use against a Conservative.

Scenario: Lincoln says slavery is wrong. The South says phooey and fires on Ft. Sumpter. Along comes OzRitz complaining to Lincoln that we need to compromise. Otherwise, many people will die.

Meanwhile, Lincoln's freeman black secretary taps you on the shoulder and says "Take your compromise and shove it back into your Liberal love hole. Some things are never to be compromised on but must be fought for for uncompromisingly."

This is where we are today. We have an ego-testicle nutjob in the White House who THINKS he is Lincoln but is acting like a third world tin-horn tyrant. He wants to remove my 2nd Amendment Rights among many others and the OzRitz's of this world are whining about how Republicans just don't want to compromise.

If Satan wants to take you to Hell, is compromise part of your negotiating strategy? Fool.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#842236 Jan 18, 2013
killtaker wrote:
Why on earth would a white man need a firearm to protect himself...
"16-year-old charged with murder of teacher"
http://www.kltv.com/Global/story.asp...
Another solid case for gun control, eh?

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#842237 Jan 18, 2013
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
Another scared old republican
Want dem to help you to the toilet, gramps?
"dim"
Nah, help from you? That is an oxymoron. If you get on my way when I am headed to the can I will just piss on you, you are a piece of shit so piss will fit you perfectly.
Peace
KMA
Liberals Are Idiots

Nashville, NC

#842238 Jan 18, 2013
udicial Watch Files Brief Opposing Government Stonewalling:

Justice Department “has disparaged the public’s right to request records of its government”

(Washington, DC)–Judicial Watch announced today that it filed a brief on January 15, 2013, in response to an Obama Department of Justice (DOJ) motion to indefinitely delay consideration of Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit seeking access to Operation Fast and Furious records withheld from Congress by President Obama under executive privilege on June 20, 2012 (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Justice (No. 1:12-cv-01510)).

Rather than respond substantively to Judicial Watch’s FOIA lawsuit, the DOJ argued in court that the lawsuit should be subject to a stay of proceedings because it is “ancillary” to a separate lawsuit filed by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee against the DOJ. The Court “should let the process of negotiation and accommodation [between the House Committee and the DOJ] run its course, and then decide with the input of the parties whether and how this action may appropriately proceed at that time,” the DOJ argued, effectively abrogating the FOIA. The Obama DOJ even suggested that the Judicial Watch litigation might encourage the Congress to fight harder to get the same documents in separate litigation.

Judicial Watch counters that FOIA demands a response and that its lawsuit is more straightforward than the House lawsuit and ripe for consideration on its merits. A decision on the House Committee lawsuit, meanwhile, could be delayed for months, if not years:

This notion that [Judicial Watch’s] lawsuit is in some way inferior [to the House lawsuit] is simply incorrect.[Judicial Watch] has as much of a right under the law as the House Committee to seek access to records of Defendant. In fact, since Defendant does not challenge [Judicial Watch’s] claim on jurisdictional grounds, it could be reasonably argued that [Judicial Watch’s] right is greater – it is certainly clearer and simpler – than that of the House Committee…Whereas [Judicial Watch’s] FOIA lawsuit is ripe for adjudication on the merits, the House Committee suit could be months, if not years, away from reaching the same stage.
Liberals Are Idiots

Nashville, NC

#842239 Jan 18, 2013
The DOJ also argued that Judicial Watch’s lawsuit might somehow interfere with negotiations between the president and Congress. Judicial Watch countered:“Regardless of any potential resolution in that case, Defendant in this action will still be required to satisfy its obligations under FOIA, including justifying its withholdings.[Judicial Watch’s] lawsuit simply does not vanish if and when the House Committee suit is resolved.”

Judicial Watch concludes:“[Judicial Watch] has a statutory right to the requested records and to have Defendant’s denial of Plaintiff’s FOIA request reviewed by this Court.[Judicial Watch’s] claim is now ripe for adjudication, and [Judicial Watch] is prepared to brief the issues. Defendant simply seeks to delay the date that it must justify its claims of exemption. Defendant has not demonstrated why [Judicial Watch’s] rights should be immoderately and oppressively delayed; it has only disparaged public’s right to request records of its government. For the foregoing reasons,[Judicial Watch] respectfully requests that Defendant’s request for an indefinite stay of the proceedings be denied.”

Fast and Furious was a DOJ/Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)“gun-running” operation in which the Obama administration reportedly sold guns to Mexican drug cartels in hopes that they would end up at crime scenes. Fast and Furious weapons have been implicated in the murder of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry and countless others in Mexico.

Congressional investigators, led by Rep, Darryl Issa, Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, have fought to secure records related to the Fast and Furious program, but the DOJ continues to withhold responsive records from disclosure. On June 20, 2012, President Obama made a highly controversial decision to assert Executive Privilege to shield the DOJ’s Fast and Furious records from disclosure. Executive privilege is reserved to “protect” White House records, not the records of federal agencies, which must be made available, subject to specific exceptions, under the FOIA.

The president’s assertion of executive privilege came just hours before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee voted to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt of Congress for failing to respond to congressional subpoenas for Fast and Furious records. On June 28, 2012, Congress voted 255-67 to hold Holder in contempt.(A number of Democrats joined the vote, while other Democrats, endorsing lawlessness, walked out in protest.) A second vote, 258-95, authorized the pursuit of records through civil litigation in the courts. Moreover, documents uncovered by CBS News seem to indicate that Holder may have perjured himself during congressional testimony, detailing what he knew about Fast and Furious and when.

“It is beyond ironic that the Obama administration has initiated an anti-gun violence push as it seeking to keep secret key documents about its very own Fast and Furious gun walking scandal. Getting beyond the Obama administration’s smokescreen, this lawsuit is about a very simple principle: the public’s right to know the full truth about an egregious political scandal that led to the death of at least one American and countless others in Mexico,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.“The American people are sick and tired of the Obama administration trying to rewrite FOIA law to protect this president and his appointees. Americans want answers about Fast and Furious killings and lies.”

Judicial Watch separately filed a FOIA lawsuit against the ATF seeking access to records detailing communications between ATF officials and a White House official regarding Fast and Furious.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#842240 Jan 18, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
Hee, Hee. Keep tryin'.
Even a broken clock is right twice a day.
lol! In your case since you're missing both arms, you're never right son!
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#842241 Jan 18, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
You have a sore neck with your yelling up to me all the time. Sorry 'bout that:>
lol! You like to think you're king of the hill son. That's what all idiots like you like to believe!

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#842242 Jan 18, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
See, I refute your BS & now you are losing it.
Not losing anything. How did you reach that conclusion?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 min Toj 98,216
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 27 min Kristy 46,633
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 29 min LRS 178,025
Dear Abby 9-17-14 31 min edogxxx 14
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 37 min JOEL 69,371
Amy 9-17-14 52 min ralph 14
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr ward 49,810
Amy 9-16 3 hr Mister Tonka 49
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••