Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1277191 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

God

Chicago, IL

#841538 Jan 17, 2013
American Lady wrote:
AGENDA: Grinding America Down (Full Movie) FREE to watch for a limited time.

http://vimeo.com/52009124

Communists "infiltrating" American Institutions ...
Fk off, birther.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#841539 Jan 17, 2013
John Galt wrote:
If your basement is filling with (debt) water, do you:
a) Turn off the water
b) Pump out the basement, or
c) Raise the ceiling and ignore the water
Well let's see.... if that basement is the port side of a ship and you can't pump it out fast enough, then yes! I'll flood the starboard compartments until I level off!

It's not ideal, but at least you won't capsize!
God

Chicago, IL

#841541 Jan 17, 2013
maddmaxx7 wrote:
<quoted text>, what would the kiddies in your english class say?
They'd probably tell you to quit touching their penis's.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#841543 Jan 17, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Evidently, they never watched the end of a NBA game.
What is the "NBA"?
God

Chicago, IL

#841544 Jan 17, 2013
Grey Ghost wrote:
<quoted text>Thats not really Looter Posting theese its Me.
All of you know that HE IS NOT GAY. but I am.
Hi, Gunner.
brown eyes

Salem, VA

#841547 Jan 17, 2013
Fascism seeks the mass mobilization of the National Community through discipline, indoctrination, and physical training. Believes in political violence and war as a means to achieve national rejuvenation. spirit and vitality. Obama-care nor President Obama is fascist.
GF008 Safer World 2013.
LooTER SHooTER

United States

#841549 Jan 17, 2013
ALL THOSE STUPID GAY COMMENTS YOU ARE RECIEVING ARE NOT ME !
Its that RETARDED PEDIFILE WEIRDO GRAY GHOST USING MY NAME !
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#841555 Jan 17, 2013
maddmaxx7 wrote:
Fleming vs nestor concerned a Bulgarian kicked out of the country. Be that as it may, then if you want the government to continue taking your "contributions" forcibly with no guarantee of a payout, as opposed to taking it private, some people might argue you're an idiot.
I'd be one of them.
In a private account, most Obama voters would withdraw the money to buy lottery tickets, or worse.
God

Chicago, IL

#841556 Jan 17, 2013
maddmaxx7 wrote:
<quoted text>F ing morons are welding the man hole covers shut. Un frikking believable. Any of the LIV's and other assorted imbeciles who attend any Obama coronation dinners should be given "sporks" only.
You stupid tea bag dick.
They have always welded the covers.
Never know when some uneducated right wing kkkhunt will try and harm our president.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#841560 Jan 17, 2013
maddmaxx7 wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm going to assume you'd be happy to replace ALL of todays welfare system with a return to work houses, ala Oliver Twist? Is your name by chance Bumble?
If you dont want work and save too bad its only the individual's fault not societie's fault for lack of ambition and the only ones that want to keep throwing peoples tax dollars at the disfunctional welfare system like it is, is the members of US society that want to be provided for and taken care of besides want to depend on the Federal Government instead of depending on themselves which is the way it was prior to FDR and his New Deal.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#841561 Jan 17, 2013
maddmaxx7 wrote:
<quoted text>
By no definition is it a Ponzi scheme, ur mistaken.
Sooner or later, and probably sooner, the money coming in from workers will be less than the money being paid to those receiving benefits, the definition of a Ponzi scheme.
GlenBeckJumpsThe Shark

Tacoma, WA

#841562 Jan 17, 2013
Glenn gives the audience a look at his vision: Independence Park.

http://www.video.theblaze.com/media/video.jsp...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#841563 Jan 17, 2013
maddmaxx7 wrote:
<quoted text>
By no definition is it a Ponzi scheme, ur mistaken.
get the book called "the The Forgotten Man" by Amity Shlaes FDR knew that Social Security would be paying out more than what revenue was coming in plus remember by law Social Security was never to exceed 1% on the Employer and 1% on the Employee and to mantain the Ponzi scheme the FICA tax had to be raised time & time to maintain the Ponzi Scheme.

The Forgotten Man by Amity Shlaes

http://www.commentarymagazine.com/article/the...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#841565 Jan 17, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Sooner or later, and probably sooner, the money coming in from workers will be less than the money being paid to those receiving benefits, the definition of a Ponzi scheme.
it is that way now the US dont have a workforce paying the FICA Taxes like they did 50 years ago and the only thing that Congress can do is increase the FICA tax on what employers and employee are left which I cant blame any employer looking to offshore to getaway for paying for the Entitlement Society that has gotten out of control.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#841566 Jan 17, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>it is that way now the US dont have a workforce paying the FICA Taxes like they did 50 years ago and the only thing that Congress can do is increase the FICA tax on what employers and employee are left which I cant blame any employer looking to offshore to getaway for paying for the Entitlement Society that has gotten out of control.
The alternative is reducing the benefits and/or increasing the retirement age.

SS is a tax, no more, no less.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#841568 Jan 17, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>Social Security is a Ponzi Scheme operated by the Federal Government.
Is There a Right to Social Security?
By Michael D. Tanner
November 25, 1998
You worked hard your whole life and paid thousands of dollars in Social Security taxes. Now it’s time to retire. You’re legally entitled to Social Security benefits, right? Wrong. There is no legal right to Social Security, and that is one of the considerations that may decide the coming debate over Social Security reform.
Many people believe that Social Security is an “earned right.” That is, they think that because they have paid Social Security taxes, they are entitled to receive Social Security benefits. The government encourages that belief by referring to Social Security taxes as “contributions,” as in the Federal Insurance Contribution Act. However, in the 1960 case of Fleming v. Nestor, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that workers have no legally binding contractual rights to their Social Security benefits, and that those benefits can be cut or even eliminated at any time.
http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/i...
Property Rights: The Hidden Issue of Social Security Reform
One of the most enduring myths of Social Security is that a worker has a legal right to his Social Security benefits. Many workers assume that, if they pay Social Security taxes into the system, they have some sort of legal guarantee to the system’s benefits. The truth is exactly the opposite. It has long been law that there is no legal right to Social Security. In two important cases, Helvering v. Davis and Flemming v. Nestor, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Social Security taxes are simply taxes and convey no property or contractual rights to Social Security benefits.
As a result, a worker’s retirement security is entirely dependent on the political decisions of the president and Congress. Benefits may be reduced or even eliminated at any time. Given the program’s looming financial crisis, benefit cutbacks are increasingly likely. Therefore, the entirely political nature of Social Security places workers’ retirement security at considerable risk. Indeed, Congress has already arbitrarily reduced Social Security benefits of some groups of workers. Moreover, because Social Security benefits are not a worker’s property, they are not inheritable.
In contrast, a privatized Social Security system, based on individual accounts, would provide workers with the benefits and the safeguards of true ownership.
http://www.cato.org/publications/social-secur...
Isn't Socialism just wonderful?

Sends chills down my spine, it does.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#841569 Jan 17, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Well let's see.... if that basement is the port side of a ship and you can't pump it out fast enough, then yes! I'll flood the starboard compartments until I level off!
It's not ideal, but at least you won't capsize!
You've obviously been smacked in the stern one too many times.
Too much poop on the Poop Deck, I'd say.

Flooding both sides of a ship sends you to Davey Jones' Locker, idiot.

Go play with yer rudder.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#841570 Jan 17, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
The alternative is reducing the benefits and/or increasing the retirement age.
SS is a tax, no more, no less.
exactly and we all know what they have been doing which is giving out more than what people paid in and want to raise the Retirement age which personally I have problems with and its not the Federal Governments place to tell people when they can retire and why I have issues with Social Security and why it should be privatized. But I understand why the Republicans wanted to privatize Social Security too because as where social security stands now it belongs to the Federal Governments to spend anyway way they want and we have no property right to it but the problem Bruce Bartlett told why Bush gave up on privatization for people who are currently working right now is because the Federal Government needs every dime it can get its hands on for Social Security to pay for people currently on the entitlement system and the main reason why Social Security privatization died but I think with the econmical problems we got now the Federal Government is going to reduce benefits dramatically but when I dont know because we are heading down the same path as Greece.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#841571 Jan 17, 2013
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
Isn't Socialism just wonderful?
Sends chills down my spine, it does.
Your Right and People believe this Capitalism which they have no clue that its Socialism and Capitalism rejects Social Security and Taxes.
LooTER SHooTER

United States

#841572 Jan 17, 2013
THE BILL OF RIGHTS BELONG TO THE PEOPLE ! NOT TO OBAMA TO CHANGE AND REINTERPRET THE WAY HE SEES FIT !
He has NO regard to the 3 branches of government !
He LIES !
He Manipulates ! He.is
ERODING AMERICA !

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Doctor disciplined for allegedly chastising Chi... (Jul '09) 1 hr thenose 160
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr Joe Balls 196,955
News Arrests made after Two-Month burglary Spree in ... 2 hr fedupcracker 1
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 4 hr Cheftell 70,160
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr Ferrerman 100,649
Clare rios 5 hr Lol dumbaz 2
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 6 hr RACE 1,723
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages