Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1234658 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

carol

Orlando, FL

#840559 Jan 16, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, what a find!!
Well, to be fair the car he was chasing and finally shot the back window out of was a Mercedes so there were certainly mitigating circumstances here. Besides, the other guy cut him off and gave him the finger. You have to draw the line somewhere don't you?
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#840562 Jan 16, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not what i'm arguing. The nra has more to do with the rights you praise than obama yet you attack them. Give credit where credit is due. Do you understand now?
who sets the limits on those rights?

oh yeah, it's all Obama.

Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited. From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290....

there's what happens when an assault weapons ban hits the Court.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#840560 Jan 16, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, this is due to the fact that there are so many sicko racist killers threatening their lives since even before he was elected the first time.
Take the Obama children out of Sidwell Friends and the school is still an armed fortress.

Employees and staff in all schools should have the same opportunity to defend themselves.
carol

Orlando, FL

#840561 Jan 16, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not what i'm arguing. The nra has more to do with the rights you praise than obama yet you attack them. Give credit where credit is due. Do you understand now?
Omigawd! You're a bigger retard than I am.

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

#840564 Jan 16, 2013
Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not old enough , I care about the American people, and the millions of elderly that live on it. You're an idiot
I WAS/is smart enough to retire, at 42, without needing social security...
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#840563 Jan 16, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Look whose the jackass; that was the posters post who asked what he said to threaten the presidents life. What a bunch of dunderheads y'all are. Kerrristt.
You made the threat against our beloved leader.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#840565 Jan 16, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
see? you don't attack the issue.
because you have no good answer. you MUST resort to personal attacks.
and if you think that the majority of Americans are going to take that in the way that you nutjobs would like them too, you're sadly mistaken.
and it's cool if we research Mr. Fat Cat Lapierre and get the dirt on his family? and that whole board of directors will be fair game. i bet all of their kids go to public schools. i guess we better find out.....
I will grant that nobody in their right mind would send their children to the public schools in Washington, D.C., but that is unrelated to security, at least from outside forces.

The problem is the objections of the left to other schools providing armed security.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#840568 Jan 16, 2013
We also recognize another important limitation on the right to keep and carry arms. Miller said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those “in common use at the time.”

We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of “dangerous and unusual weapons.”

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290....

let's remember the context....

'It's ok to carry handguns because they're not “dangerous and unusual weapons.”'

just try to dance around that one.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#840566 Jan 16, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
That's not what i'm arguing. The nra has more to do with the rights you praise than obama yet you attack them. Give credit where credit is due. Do you understand now?
I understand and agree. There's no question that the NRA has done more to protect my gun rights than Obama, I've never intended to make that argument. My point is that the NRA has portrayed Obama as an enemy to gun owners, that is simply not true. Many people believe that the NRA speaks for ALL gun owners and that also is simply not true. There are some reasonable restrictions that can be imposed on gun owners that MAY save lives, such as a national background check, 10 max clip and a ban on assault type weapons. Just for the record, G.W. Bush and Reagan were also in favor of banning assault type weapons but never attacked like this.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#840567 Jan 16, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
see? you don't attack the issue.
because you have no good answer. you MUST resort to personal attacks.
and if you think that the majority of Americans are going to take that in the way that you nutjobs would like them too, you're sadly mistaken.
and it's cool if we research Mr. Fat Cat Lapierre and get the dirt on his family? and that whole board of directors will be fair game. i bet all of their kids go to public schools. i guess we better find out.....
Sure, go ahead.

We should also publish interactive maps showing the homes of all members of Congress, all members of state legislatures, and all government employees, together with their salaries.
AmericanMan

Russellville, KY

#840569 Jan 16, 2013
OldRaider wrote:
<quoted text>
Eman you're chasing your tail on this. For months I have pointed out that in four years no one has lost a single gun right while Obama has been president, in fact, many have NEW gun rights. In light of recent abuses, Obama, like many other thinking concerned citizens, has decided that something needs to be done to address this problem. Only an ostrich, the NRA or an idiot would bury his head in the sand and hope that the killings would stop without trying something.
Since Obama has been President the Supreme Court has ruled NO city can ban a Right to own a handgun and Obama has signed into LAW the Right to carry on Federal Lands and on trains.
The problem is this Hatred toward Obama is part of a new American Taliban movement that no longer wants majority rule or free elections.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#840570 Jan 16, 2013
Eman, I'm playing with my waxturd login I use to answer his goober login. Its me Old Raider, on the above post.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#840571 Jan 16, 2013
Republican Honey wrote:
<quoted text>
1)Unemployment under Bush was 3.9% to 6.9%. Ran between 4% to 5% during most of his 8 years. Highest he ever had was 7.4% in 12/08. Obama's went as high as 10.1% in 10/09 and remained over 9% until 2012.
2)Businesses are going bankrupt regularly and cutting back on employees, raises, etc.
3)Obama has submitted budgets but not a single Republican or Democrat has EVER voted for passing one.
4)Obama has had 4 years to make vast changes to cut spending. He has thrown billions to green companies and research. Most every company has either gone bankrupt or on the verge of doing so. All he does is spend with no plans of reducing it.
5)As indicated in #1, unemployment has become an issue under Obama.
Obama is a failure! Four more years will be devastating for all Americans.
1) The recession started in the 4th quarter of 2007 and is the cause of the unemployment. The rate was over 7.5 when he left office. To blame Obama for the effects of the Bush recession is beyond pathetic.

2) Most businesses are doing OK. Corporate profits hit a record in December.

3) The budgets submitted by Presidents are rarely diretly put up for a vote. They typically go to Congress where it the budgets are modified. Congress put up two of Obama's budgets only as apolitical game. An informed person would know this.

4) Stimulus spending has been done by Presidents in the past & is a valid method of fighting recessions. Again, an informed person would know this. You comment on green companies is a blatant lie.

Slashing spending before the economy recovers would plunge us into recession.

5) Why is unemployment even being discussed?? Because Republicans went wild on spending & plunged us into the worst recession in 80 years. Republicans like Boehner, Canter, McConnell & your buddy Paul Ryan.
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#840572 Jan 16, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"moshx"
Did you note "poop" ignored your question as to when is bio/fantasy would be released? Just another of his stories he has to tip toe around. You note how he is always referring to adult diapers? He uses them, he has an attendant who changes said diapers for "poop" several times a day at his rehab center.
Peace
KMA
Hey, you over weight toothless he-she. When you give us all your name and address I will do the same. I have had numerous articles published since I have been on here old clueless one. Your whining is amusing though even if you are a redundant old fool.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#840573 Jan 16, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
NRA....
David Keene
The current NRA president is the former chairman of the American Conservative Union. In 2003, his son was sentenced to 10 years in prison for firing at another driver during a road rage incident.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/01/n...
Is that supposed to be scandalous?
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#840574 Jan 16, 2013
Southwestern Pa. hospital to stop baby deliveries


Posted: Jan 16, 2013 8:58 AM PST Updated: Jan 16, 2013 8:58 AM PST

WINDBER, Pa.(AP)— A southwestern Pennsylvania hospital will stop delivering babies after March 31 because its obstetricians are either leaving or refocusing their practices, and because hospital officials believe they can't afford it based on projected reimbursements under looming federal health care reforms.

The Windber Medical Center, about 60 miles southeast of Pittsburgh, is losing two obstetricians and two others are shifting their focus more to gynecology.

Hospital officials say the population of women of child-bearing age is dropping and that the number of births the hospital would be called upon to perform isn't enough for it to provide the service in the face of lower reimbursements under the federal Affordable Care Act.

The hospital delivered about 200 babies each year since restarting its obstetrics program in 2005.

Officials aren't sure how many jobs will be lost.

brown eyes

Roanoke, VA

#840575 Jan 16, 2013
Message showed fat bald Soprano looking male trying to catch Black Rooster on desk. GF008 Safer World 2013. Was in white muscle shirt.
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#840576 Jan 16, 2013
AmericanMan wrote:
<quoted text>Since Obama has been President the Supreme Court has ruled NO city can ban a Right to own a handgun and Obama has signed into LAW the Right to carry on Federal Lands and on trains.
The problem is this Hatred toward Obama is part of a new American Taliban movement that no longer wants majority rule or free elections.
Does anyone really think that the NRA is concerned about your rights....REALLY...They have only one objective and that is "MONEY" PERIOD. Only total morons and all the Republican's walk the plank for these Gestapo agents. The NRA couldn't care less if all the children in America gets murdered, sad but totally true...MONEY...GREED...And POWER it's the republican way. Plain and simple.

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#840577 Jan 16, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
NRA....
Larry Craig
The former Idaho senator sponsored a 2005 law protecting gun makers from liability in connection with their products being used by criminals. The NRA spent $1.8 million on lobbying Congress that year.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2013/01/n...
ouch.
Is that supposed to be scandalous?

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#840578 Jan 16, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Take the Obama children out of Sidwell Friends and the school is still an armed fortress.
Employees and staff in all schools should have the same opportunity to defend themselves.
You & the NRA. Too stupid to know that Obama being President puts his kids in danger.

Do you f*cking idiots know what a resource officer is??? Did you morons not know that funding for these was included by Obama???

Of course not.

You're all too busy running in circles, flailing your arms & screaming Obama is coming to take your guns.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 34 min FastandFurious 190,309
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 55 min litesong 53,511
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 2 hr Doug77 6,012
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr teachable moments 99,578
News Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 3 hr Graham Cracker 51,760
News Former U.S. House Speaker Hastert indicted on f... 4 hr mrs gladys kravitz 7
have steroidsss in USA 5 hr Nail Alexander 2
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]