Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Read more
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#838918 Jan 13, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
The 1938 Munich Agreement permitting Nazi Germany's annexation of Czechoslovakia signaled that the West was unwilling to oppose Hitler's ambitions.
Yep. A poor practice on their part. Yet, I don't see how it would have prevented an invasion.

You could say the same about Chamberlain and "peace in our time."

But I'm of a differing opinion on that.
Yeah

Mililani, HI

#838919 Jan 13, 2013
VeganTiger wrote:
<quoted text>
Google it. Or read a book. You can find FACTS about this even in a Barnes&NOble book store where the military history books are. Otherwise, you could google both French, Czech or British contingency invasion plans of Ruhr Gebiet in case of invasion of Czechoslovakia. OR you could read the German General staff's OWN evaluation of the risk of reoccupying Rheinland in 1935.
yaaaawn.. I am hitting the bed, Something tells me, I will wake up tomorrow morning having forgotten MORE European history overnight than you will ever be able to absorb. Let's stick to talking about how confiscating 180 million guns from law-abiding citizens is going to run absolutely smoothly with no risk of mass killings or civil war. If Obama can pull this one of without a shot fired, he truly IS more gifted than even Hitler with regards to subjugation.
lol! Dump and run son.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#838920 Jan 13, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! in 2008, I recall bushie saying he wouldn't give a withdrawal date from iraq because it would tip off the enemey. Then presidential candidate Obama and Al Maliki of iraq announced a timetable for withdrawal.
Shortly thereafter, bushie also offer a general schedule of withdrawal.
You people and your political posturing. Sheesh!
Iraq and Afghanistan are two completely different situations.

Iraq has strategic importance and is/was winnable.

Afghanistan has no strategic importance and is not winnable.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#838921 Jan 13, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Yep. A poor practice on their part. Yet, I don't see how it would have prevented an invasion.
You could say the same about Chamberlain and "peace in our time."
But I'm of a differing opinion on that.
The two are the same event, dumbass.
Navy Corpseman

United States

#838922 Jan 13, 2013
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>I know son. In fact, you can take the "YOU LOOT" part out of your claim and you'd be even more accurate!
Your State of Hawaii is doing fantastic in education and taxes!

Excellent job with unenjoyment,and crime!

Colleen Hanabusa(D)dummy!
Forum carlsbad nm

Hobbs, NM

#838923 Jan 14, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey stupid! The mortgage lenders like Countrywide and Indy Mac who made those toxic loans were never under any regulations. Are you all of a sudden a proponent of bigger government?
Why are they toxic? Everyone needs a home.
If our President was doing his job which is to take care
of the people of the US then there wouldn't be any problems.
Governor Martinez of New Mexico wants to keep back all of the
third graders so she can have a raise?
They give the state money for the amount of children that are
attending school.
I loved Catholic school for my kids even
if I had to pay for it. The children learn from workbooks
and they teach them God.
No one knows how high you can climb with him.



PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

#838924 Jan 14, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Perhaps you should do the research yourself?
In the meantime:
Angelo Mozilo, the former Countrywide Financial CEO charged with fraud and insider trading by the Securities and Exchange Commission, had a lot of "friends." The Democratic leadership in Congress just doesn't want you to know their names -- or the details of their loans from Countrywide.
What we know is that Senators Chris Dodd and Kent Conrad were among the VIPs who received sweetheart mortgages under the "Friends of Angelo" program. What we don't know is how many other government officials also received such favors, or what exactly Countrywide expected in return.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1245888655537...
The Portfolio account of Countrywide's VIP loan program names Chris Dodd, early Obama backer Kent Conrad, and Richard Holbrooke as recipients of special loans through the firm's CEO.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0608/F...
Take the log out of your eye.
That's a copout Carol, you put the numbers out so it's up to you, not me to justify them.
In the meantime, The House Ethics Committee investigated these Friends of Angelo loans and Countrywide's VIP unit and found that while it offered quicker, more efficient processing and some discounts, the loans met basic underwriting standards and didnít offer the best deals available in the marketplace.
www.nypost.com/.../friends_of_angelo_probe_en... ...
lol

Winter Park, FL

#838925 Jan 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Afghanistan has no strategic importance and is not winnable.
Oh, not so. There is the opium production, drug routes and oil pipeline routes (and natural resources) that they have secured and want to keep.
Not 'winnable', and sustainable, I'd agree. Being there at all was folly. But staying there is pure folly. But stay we will. For the obvious reasons.
We went to Iraq for nothing but to secure the oil for big mega corporations.
Mission accomplished.
Lincoln

United States

#838926 Jan 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
As stated, I am a fiscal conservative.
Arguments based on region are irrelevant to me.
Abortion is an anchor sinking the conservative cause and those demanding laws against individual behavior are the worst kind of statists.
And, finally, attempts to destroy the public school system instead of improving same are ridiculous.
Abortion is an anchor sinking the conservative cause and those demanding laws against individual behavior are the worst kind of statists.

.... it continues with the religious right in control!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#838927 Jan 14, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, you want more detail, Treasury gets the money from revenues including the sale of debt instruments.
You schizoidtards need to make up your alleged "minds", is he all powerful bent bringing fundamental change to the US or is he a weak puppet? You've asserted both positions today you schizophrenic little freak.
What do I think he is? I think he's the second coming of Bush and can't understand why you retards don't worship the man. The only real difference between him and Bush is skin color so ...
I do believe you're beginning to understand the question. The answer requires a source of money for an answer. You came close to acknowledging that in your post when you said the Treasure gets its money from somewhere. To answer the question, you have to identify the SOURCE OF MONEY the Treasure will receive money from.

And, that fundamental change you intend to bring....
Would that be money growing on trees that the Treasury can use as a source of money?
And, would that be a fascist dictatorship where the furher Obama can write his own laws to suit his ignorant whim?

Not a chance of that happening without killing a few million people, dufus. You really are disconnected from just who is living here in America, aren't you?

You do know that if you continue to push your fascist government onto the American population, you will start a civil war, don't you? You may get your ignorant race war that you think you want.
You do know that when the smoke clears the winners will most certainly hang the losers, don't you?
If it's your neck the noose is being slung around, don't whine. You asked for it, idiot. Take it like a man.
You idiots don't know a paradise when you're living right in the middle of it.
Fundamental change to a system where everyone living in it now can choose their own living standard.... that's a hoot.

See you at the hanging tree, dufus.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#838928 Jan 14, 2013
Let's begin with the unfinished business of last week. There were two questions asked that nobody in the world has been able to answer, and nobody here on this site has answered. The closest anyone came to answering these questions was some link that gave a bunch of no-answers as to the location of Obama, and some other idiot gave the answer of the Treasury as a source of money.
Still, nobody knows where Obama was during the 7-hour battle between the United States and Al Qaeda, and still nobody knows where the money will come from to pay for Obama's government.
The Treasure isn't a source of money. The Treasury is a repository. Additionally, the Treasury is 16.5 TRILLION dollars in debt. There isn't any money there, anyway.
So, let's begin with the questions:

Where exactly was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the United States in Banghazi while the battle was being watched on a live feed in the White House?

And;

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

I'll be out of the ocuntry for a week or so, maybe only 5 days if everything goes well. I'll check the homework of you ignorant clowns when I get back. You ignorant Democrats, try not to fuck things up too much while the grownups are away.

Since: Aug 10

Buffalo, NY

#838929 Jan 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
US registry ships with union labor are non-competitive and needlessly increase costs.
Why do Alaskan cruise ships leave from Vancouver, B.C., and not from a port in Washington?
yeah, that was plain weak and you know it. Go back to your first post on the topic....flat out, blaming unions was a plain stupid thing o say.

Lets see, why do cruise ships leave from Vancouver? Umm, we'll the obvious answer would be geography, since the only wa. Major ports built big evough for a ship that size are hundreds of miles inside puget sound?

You're pathetic. This is why I could never be a conservative...lying bothers me.
Lincoln

United States

#838930 Jan 14, 2013
lol wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, not so. There is the opium production, drug routes and oil pipeline routes (and natural resources) that they have secured and want to keep.
Not 'winnable', and sustainable, I'd agree. Being there at all was folly. But staying there is pure folly. But stay we will. For the obvious reasons.
We went to Iraq for nothing but to secure the oil for big mega corporations.
Mission accomplished.
Afghanistan about keep air bases?

Since: Nov 09

Pharr, TX

#838931 Jan 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Any federal agents that attempt to confiscate weapons from law-abiding citizens are Obama Gestapo and should be greeted accordingly.
We both know that you wouldn't shoot police officers, National Guard or military enforcing the laws of an elected constitutional government. That's just chest beating bar talk. You're a liar.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#838933 Jan 14, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
Let's begin with the unfinished business of last week. There were two questions asked that nobody in the world has been able to answer, and nobody here on this site has answered. The closest anyone came to answering these questions was some link that gave a bunch of no-answers as to the location of Obama, and some other idiot gave the answer of the Treasury as a source of money.
Still, nobody knows where Obama was during the 7-hour battle between the United States and Al Qaeda, and still nobody knows where the money will come from to pay for Obama's government.
The Treasure isn't a source of money. The Treasury is a repository. Additionally, the Treasury is 16.5 TRILLION dollars in debt. There isn't any money there, anyway.
So, let's begin with the questions:
Where exactly was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the United States in Banghazi while the battle was being watched on a live feed in the White House?
And;
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
I'll be out of the ocuntry for a week or so, maybe only 5 days if everything goes well. I'll check the homework of you ignorant clowns when I get back. You ignorant Democrats, try not to fuck things up too much while the grownups are away.
I'm waiting for you to tell us where Bush got his.

Oh Wait, That doesn't matter that Bush doubled the debt, left office with the worst recession in 80 years, a near financial collapse & two quagmire wars.

Its all that evil communist, Marxist, socialist & numerous other "ists" Obama's fault.

You right whiners are dumber than sh*t.

You keep telling us that its all Boehner's fault these past two years, Why the f*ck not ask Boehner where he got his money.

Where was Romney Ryan going to get their's. You didn't care when you voted for them.
Lincoln

United States

#838934 Jan 14, 2013
OldRaider wrote:
<quoted text>
We both know that you wouldn't shoot police officers, National Guard or military enforcing the laws of an elected constitutional government. That's just chest beating bar talk. You're a liar.
He shoot with his computer :-)

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#838935 Jan 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Why stay in Afghanistan one day longer if we announce that we will withdraw by a date certain? The Tol-E-Bon (Obama's emphasis) will just sit back until we leave, picking off American targets of opportunity just for the fun of it. There is no chance that the Afghan government will survive after we leave.
Get serious or get out NOW!
I love it when you righties whine about Afghanistan after Bush declared Bin Laden irrelevant & abandoned Afghanistan to go off to Iraq in a war about oil.
AmericanMan

Russellville, KY

#838936 Jan 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Why stay in Afghanistan one day longer if we announce that we will withdraw by a date certain? The Tol-E-Bon (Obama's emphasis) will just sit back until we leave, picking off American targets of opportunity just for the fun of it. There is no chance that the Afghan government will survive after we leave.
Get serious or get out NOW!
I seriously wonder if McCain were in charge if the US would still be in Vietnam. 54,000 Dead for nothing and you Repubs want to stay in Afghanistan just like McCain said for another 100 years. Those that did not learn from history allowed 4000 Dead troops while looking for WMDs that were never there.
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#838937 Jan 14, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Why stay in Afghanistan one day longer if we announce that we will withdraw by a date certain? The Tol-E-Bon (Obama's emphasis) will just sit back until we leave, picking off American targets of opportunity just for the fun of it. There is no chance that the Afghan government will survive after we leave.
Get serious or get out NOW!
Simply talking to an idiot like you is to minimize ones self, but just as some of us derive pleasure from feeding the monkeys at the zoo knowing full well the possibility of educating you or them is not with-in the realm of achievement. First, a draft dodger such as youself has proven over and over the cluelessness that you possess. Where was your sorry butt while the two dumbest leaders our nation has ever had were leading us into the messes that they left? Your daily diatribe of stupidity is obvious to all but the very dumbest which is the starting point for right wing conservatives.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#838938 Jan 14, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, you want more detail, Treasury gets the money from revenues including the sale of debt instruments.
You schizoidtards need to make up your alleged "minds", is he all powerful bent bringing fundamental change to the US or is he a weak puppet? You've asserted both positions today you schizophrenic little freak.
What do I think he is? I think he's the second coming of Bush and can't understand why you retards don't worship the man. The only real difference between him and Bush is skin color so ...
You are using propaganda labels to indoctrinate people with your poorly described ideas. Let's look into your ideas a little further....

What "fundamental change" are you Democrats promoting?

Fundamental Change number ONE -_________

Fundamental Change number TWO -_________

etc., etc., etc.

Care to put some actual substance into your propaganda bullshit?

If you've been paying attention to events over the past, oh, say, 8 years, you'd know Obama doesn't have a clue about what happens in government.
How about we start with Obama standing immediately behind Christopher Dodd's shoulder in the photo op of the Democrats threatening to fillibister the re-instatement of the Glass Steagall Act. Now, compare that with the statement from Obama immediately after he is inaugurated in 2008 when he states explicitly that "The Glass Steagall Act needs to be re-instated."
He begins his presidency demonstrating to you that he doesn't have a clue what he's been doing in government.
Then we have him sabotaging the US Navy's attempt to free an American from Samali pirates, and forcing a captain of a US Navy ship to disobey direct orders from the White House to save an American from Samali pirates.
Then we have him giving the Queen of England a goddam ipod with him reading from a teleprompter on it as a state gift. Holy shit. How ignorant can you get?
Then we have him declaring himself and all of his subjects to be the subjects of a monarch that rules over a religious kingdom where women are held in sexual slavery and exist for the sole purpose of breeding.
Then we have him shouting over the royal band when they begin playing "God Save the Queen", being so ignorant he doesn't know it has the same score as the American patriotic song "Let Freedom Ring", and obviously objecting to what he ignorantly thinks is the royal band playing an American patriotic tribute to him.
Then we have him ignorantly calling the Cambridge police stupid.

And this is just his first year.

Now, Obama, SUPPOSEDLY being a constitutional lawyer,(who has never even passed the bar or even seen the inside of a court room as a lawyer) being ignorant of the constitutional fact that an executive order only has authority within the Executive Branch of government.

Obama is a candidate for being the biggest fraud ever perpetrated on human society in the history or civilization.

And you think a clown like this is in charge of anything in government?
Perhaps if this were a village in Nigeria, that may be the a possible case. It is unlikely that the country that lifted the entire world out of the stone age is governmed by people that ignorant or stupid.
Thus, Obama is nothing more than an Uncle Tom puppet. He's not in charge of anything. He's nothing more than a virtual cardboard cutout commercial to make it appear as if someone's actually president. If you recall from the book, Uncle Tom was very popular with the black folks.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 8 min red and right 186,889
Word (Dec '08) 1 hr _Zoey_ 5,189
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr _Zoey_ 5,884
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 1 hr TRD 69,608
anybody know Glen Musielak? Glentech? (Mar '13) 4 hr Gary Seven 82
Dear Abby 4-18-15 5 hr mrs gladys kravitz 3
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 7 hr Mothra 52,708
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]