Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
773,401 - 773,420 of 1,101,105 Comments Last updated 7 min ago
carol

Orlando, FL

#838483 Jan 13, 2013
My thought is that at exactly that moment the fundamental flaw in the Constitution will be revealed. The first line reads, "We the People..." and if "we the people" don't want to "owe" 16.5 trillion dollars to various nameless entities not enumerated in the Constitution then the vaunted document tells us clearly what to do about it.

Judged:

11

11

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#838484 Jan 13, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe your first answer. You don't care if Obama is just a cardboard cutout of a commercial to make it appear as if someone's actually president, when the truth is Obama isn't in charge of anything and doesn't have a clue what's happening in government. He's just a prop for dupes.
And, correct me if this is wrong, but the Treasury is 16.5 trillion dollars in debt and doesn't have any money.
So, the question remains:
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
The Treasury can't generate money and is 16.5 trillion dollars in debt. You actually have to identify a source of money.
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
Oh, you want more detail, Treasury gets the money from revenues including the sale of debt instruments.

You schizoidtards need to make up your alleged "minds", is he all powerful bent bringing fundamental change to the US or is he a weak puppet? You've asserted both positions today you schizophrenic little freak.

What do I think he is? I think he's the second coming of Bush and can't understand why you retards don't worship the man. The only real difference between him and Bush is skin color so ...

Judged:

11

11

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Orlando, FL

#838485 Jan 13, 2013
"Well then," you say. "We'll never be able to get credit again after a thing like that!" To which I say, "It was credit that caused the problem in the first place." To which you reply, "Our entire system of government is based on capitalism and credit." To which I answer, "Not any more. From now on we pay cash. You don't like it? You take it up with my friend Lionel."

Judged:

11

11

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Lily Boca Raton Fl

Boca Raton, FL

#838486 Jan 13, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
Ah. Sunday morning. Let's go over the list of things not done this week and see if we can catch up on some things.
Looks like there were two questions that never got answered this week.
And it looks like the same fraud Democrats that ran away from these questions all week are here today.
Do any of you fascist Democrats have an answer to these questions nobody in the world has been able to answer:
Where was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down security detatchment in Benghazi while the real-time video was being watched in the White House?
And;
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
And a bonus question:
When will Obama formally declare a rebellion against the government of the United States and begin writing his own laws to suit his whim?
It is a little humorous that it was the Democrats that used the word "fascist" to insult everything they didn't like, and now it is those same Democrats attempting to replace the constitutional republic with a fascist dictatorship.
Db: short for dumb

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Lily Boca Raton Fl

Boca Raton, FL

#838487 Jan 13, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, you want more detail, Treasury gets the money from revenues including the sale of debt instruments.
You schizoidtards need to make up your alleged "minds", is he all powerful bent bringing fundamental change to the US or is he a weak puppet? You've asserted both positions today you schizophrenic little freak.
What do I think he is? I think he's the second coming of Bush and can't understand why you retards don't worship the man. The only real difference between him and Bush is skin color so ...
Come on, you know he's going to enlist the black panthers to take their dicks, I meant guns away

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Orlando, FL

#838488 Jan 13, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
All right Carol, so how specifically did they profit and what's your source?
Anybody can write a bunch of numbers down.
Perhaps you should do the research yourself?

In the meantime:

Angelo Mozilo, the former Countrywide Financial CEO charged with fraud and insider trading by the Securities and Exchange Commission, had a lot of "friends." The Democratic leadership in Congress just doesn't want you to know their names -- or the details of their loans from Countrywide.

What we know is that Senators Chris Dodd and Kent Conrad were among the VIPs who received sweetheart mortgages under the "Friends of Angelo" program. What we don't know is how many other government officials also received such favors, or what exactly Countrywide expected in return.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1245888655537...

The Portfolio account of Countrywide's VIP loan program names Chris Dodd, early Obama backer Kent Conrad, and Richard Holbrooke as recipients of special loans through the firm's CEO.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0608/F...

Take the log out of your eye.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#838489 Jan 13, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
The subject you're running away from concerns the limit of authority of an executive order.
An executive order has no authority outside the Executive Branch of government. You have to first eliminate the Constitution from government to extend the authority of an execitive order beyond the Executive Branch of government.
Now, try again. This time, stay on topic and answer the post.
Well, dufus, an executive order isn't possible as long as the Constitution defines our government. An executive order is limited solely to the Executive Branch of government.
However, Obama intends to install a fascist dictatorship where he can write his own laws to suit his whim.
How do you feel about that?
Bush's Executive order 2007:

Oct. 20

Executive Order: Protection of Striped Bass and Red Drum Fish Populations

>>>That was limited to the Executive Branch, you ignorant fool??<<<<

----------

Apr. 2

Executive Order: Renaming a National Forest in the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico

Apr. 18

Executive Order: National Mathematics Advisory Panel

Apr. 13

Executive Order: Designating the African Union as a Public International Organization Entitled to Enjoy Certain Privileges, Exemptions, and Immunities.

With 290 Executive Orders, why aren't you accusing Bush of dictatorial overreach??

Because Bush was white, and your virulent racism forces you to condemn everything this black President does.

Go away, racist Dweeb!!

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#838490 Jan 13, 2013
carol wrote:
My thought is that at exactly that moment the fundamental flaw in the Constitution will be revealed. The first line reads, "We the People..." and if "we the people" don't want to "owe" 16.5 trillion dollars to various nameless entities not enumerated in the Constitution then the vaunted document tells us clearly what to do about it.
What you'll do is what you always do.

Whine and gnash your teeth like the fat azzed racist you are.

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
LRS

Shreveport, LA

#838491 Jan 13, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush's Executive order 2007:
Oct. 20
Executive Order: Protection of Striped Bass and Red Drum Fish Populations
>>>That was limited to the Executive Branch, you ignorant fool??<<<<
----------
Apr. 2
Executive Order: Renaming a National Forest in the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico
Apr. 18
Executive Order: National Mathematics Advisory Panel
Apr. 13
Executive Order: Designating the African Union as a Public International Organization Entitled to Enjoy Certain Privileges, Exemptions, and Immunities.
With 290 Executive Orders, why aren't you accusing Bush of dictatorial overreach??
Because Bush was white, and your virulent racism forces you to condemn everything this black President does.
Go away, racist Dweeb!!
LMAO! Sillyazz lil girl.

Judged:

11

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#838492 Jan 13, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe your first answer. You don't care if Obama is just a cardboard cutout of a commercial to make it appear as if someone's actually president, when the truth is Obama isn't in charge of anything and doesn't have a clue what's happening in government. He's just a prop for dupes.
And, correct me if this is wrong, but the Treasury is 16.5 trillion dollars in debt and doesn't have any money.
So, the question remains:
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
The Treasury can't generate money and is 16.5 trillion dollars in debt. You actually have to identify a source of money.
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
You're a boxer??

I'd have figured you're a Miniature Schnauzer.

Or perhaps a Rat Terrier.

But a boxer?? Not a chance.

Boxers are an intelligent breed.

That completely leaves you out.

But it leaves intact your passion for telling big, fat lies.

You midgets really have your self-esteem issues, don't you??

As far as Climate Change, anyone dumb enough to have bet that it would be Romney-Santorum for President, and that they had a chance of winning, is by definition an idiot!!

Judged:

11

11

11

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
GhostofRaygun

Russellville, KY

#838493 Jan 13, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
The core principle of the Constitution, and one of its most brilliant aspects is, it is written so the average person can easily read and understand it. It doesn't need interpretation. It only needs enforcement.
If the Supreme Court says the sky is green, the sky doesn't change color tomorrow. It stays blue. Perhaps Obama will write an executive order changing the definition of "green" and "blue" to make it look like the sky submited to the all-powerful dictatorship. But, that may depend on what the definition of "is" is.
It's obvious the Supreme Court is schizophrenic.
There exists a ruling that any law that is vague or to complex to be understood by the average person is unconstitutional.
How's this for an example of that:
The members of Congress that actually wrote the ObamaKare law stated that their intent was a "penalty" written in the law.
The members of the Supreme Court read the exact same text and concluded that there was a "tax" written in the law.
Now, how on Earth can anyone say this law doesn't fit the requirement of the Supreme Court decision that any law that is vague is unconstitutional?
The authors say "penalty".
The Supreme Court reads that very same law and says "tax".
That is the very definition of vague.
This is just one of the many reasons ObamaKare is unconstitutional.
Since it's so obvious this law is unconstitutional, why is our Supreme Court so disfunctional it can't see this obvious fact?
Agreeing with your ideas and your opinion of how America should be does not mean the the MAJORITY of us are wrong or dysfunctional. Almost every point you make about Obama is exactly the same things that Bush did. So for the many times over I ask were you in such an outrage when during the Bush years he signed EOs to allow spying on citizens without court order? Were you upset when he pushed through a new trillion dollar Medicare drug plan without paying for it? Were you pissed when you found out that thousands of troops had died looking for WMDs that were never there? Did it make you mad when the ATF let guns get away in Mexico during Operation Wide Receiver? Again, where was your outrage back then?

Judged:

11

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Orlando, FL

#838495 Jan 13, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO, Carol and her new bff must have put up a thousand posts each proclaiming the genius of Glenda Beck.
Well, he said in 2010 that he was more interested in the entertainment end of politics than the news end.
Just "proclaimed" his common sense of connecting dots and exposing the liberal media's corruption of keeping people like you in the dark.

And loved his rally in D.C. Loved it. Remember the videos I posted at the time? And how uplifting and moving they were?

Never said he was a genius. Part entertainer...yes, that too.

But since Beck isn't part of the mainstream anymore, it doesn't matter anymore.

Let it go and move on.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Nov 09

Pharr, TX

#838496 Jan 13, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
The core principle of the Constitution, and one of its most brilliant aspects is, it is written so the average person can easily read and understand it. It doesn't need interpretation. It only needs enforcement.
If the Supreme Court says the sky is green, the sky doesn't change color tomorrow. It stays blue. Perhaps Obama will write an executive order changing the definition of "green" and "blue" to make it look like the sky submited to the all-powerful dictatorship. But, that may depend on what the definition of "is" is.
It's obvious the Supreme Court is schizophrenic.
There exists a ruling that any law that is vague or to complex to be understood by the average person is unconstitutional.
How's this for an example of that:
The members of Congress that actually wrote the ObamaKare law stated that their intent was a "penalty" written in the law.
The members of the Supreme Court read the exact same text and concluded that there was a "tax" written in the law.
Now, how on Earth can anyone say this law doesn't fit the requirement of the Supreme Court decision that any law that is vague is unconstitutional?
The authors say "penalty".
The Supreme Court reads that very same law and says "tax".
That is the very definition of vague.
This is just one of the many reasons ObamaKare is unconstitutional.
Since it's so obvious this law is unconstitutional, why is our Supreme Court so disfunctional it can't see this obvious fact?
Look up Article III of the U.S. Constitution. You will find, in part:
The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.
As a strict constitutionalist do you recognize the hypocrisy in your rant against the Supreme Court?

Judged:

11

11

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Chicago, IL

#838497 Jan 13, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>The subject you're running away from concerns the limit of authority of an executive order.
An executive order has no authority outside the Executive Branch of government. You have to first eliminate the Constitution from government to extend the authority of an execitive order beyond the Executive Branch of government.

Now, try again. This time, stay on topic and answer the post.

Well, dufus, an executive order isn't possible as long as the Constitution defines our government. An executive order is limited solely to the Executive Branch of government.
However, Obama intends to install a fascist dictatorship where he can write his own laws to suit his whim.
How do you feel about that?
Hi, greaseball
I'll need you to hand over those guns you use to overcompensate for being a tiny dicked midget.
NOW!

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Orlando, FL

#838498 Jan 13, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
What you'll do is what you always do.
Whine and gnash your teeth like the fat azzed racist you are.
Debil appreciated your response. And making a fool out of you again.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
carol

Chicago, IL

#838499 Jan 13, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>You're a boxer??

I'd have figured you're a Miniature Schnauzer.

Or perhaps a Rat Terrier.

But a boxer?? Not a chance.

Boxers are an intelligent breed.

That completely leaves you out.

But it leaves intact your passion for telling big, fat lies.

You midgets really have your self-esteem issues, don't you??

As far as Climate Change, anyone dumb enough to have bet that it would be Romney-Santorum for President, and that they had a chance of winning, is by definition an idiot!!
He's a mutt.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Cindy

Miami, FL

#838500 Jan 13, 2013
Wow cant believe this discussion started in 08

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
TSM

El Paso, TX

#838501 Jan 13, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush's Executive order 2007:
Oct. 20
Executive Order: Protection of Striped Bass and Red Drum Fish Populations
>>>That was limited to the Executive Branch, you ignorant fool??<<<<
----------
Apr. 2
Executive Order: Renaming a National Forest in the Commonwealth of
Puerto Rico
Apr. 18
Executive Order: National Mathematics Advisory Panel
Apr. 13
Executive Order: Designating the African Union as a Public International Organization Entitled to Enjoy Certain Privileges, Exemptions, and Immunities.
With 290 Executive Orders, why aren't you accusing Bush of dictatorial overreach??
Because Bush was white, and your virulent racism forces you to condemn everything this black President does.
Go away, racist Dweeb!!
Which one of those executive orders infringes on your Rights?

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Atmore Al

Pompano Beach, FL

#838503 Jan 13, 2013
Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
He was white and republican
I see the racist morning cocktails have just kicked in.
brown eyes

Christiansburg, VA

#838504 Jan 13, 2013
If ied's are heard of in afganistan United State Military you are authorized to use clay-mores in enemy hiding spots caves etc. Echo Company. GF008 Safer World 2013

Judged:

11

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 8 min Jacques from Ottawa 177,504
Laser Weapon 500mW Green Dazzler 26 min Use this on you 1
Crack and the Social, Moral, and Economic Decay... 26 min THE CRACKHEADS 1
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 58 min J RULES 69,060
Music Artists A to Z (Feb '14) 1 hr SLY WEST 302
Second man charged in May homicide that left mo... 1 hr reality is a crutch 1
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 hr gcaveman1 46,361
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••