What level of collateral deaths is acceptable for you son?<quoted text>
What do YOU prefer? A gunman shooting at you with several kids there and you with no arms destined to die OR having a gun with the chance that a miss may hit someone else that would have been killed by the gunman to begin with.
How is your presidents "collateral damage" with kids in Pakistan? Can you tell me how many kids he has to kill in order to get to one "terrorist"? Seems like the only ones who are TRULY in favor of collateral damages when it counts is you liberals.
Don't confuse a conflict with civil events. If you think such conflicts in Pakistan is bad, then by all means you should spout off against it... just like cons should have regarding iraq.
Instead, they simply made money off the event, thanks to bushie.
And btw, if you really feel Obama isn't your president, you're free to leave for a better country with a better system.