It was important to educate dem on the meaning of a mandate when he was obviously a bit confused.<quoted text>
You're such an idiot!! You have to go back over 30 years to find what you want??
Set the trap, in wanders Lorac!!
Lesee now, Bush lost the popuplar vote in 2000 by 500,000, and won the electoral college 271-266, a mere five votes.
It took the Supreme Court to install him. The same Supreme Court your new BFF calls 'dysfunctional'
It's all perspective, isn't it??
Obama won 332-206 in electoral votes,band roughly 5 MILLION more popular votes.
Compared to Bush, Obama won a resounding mandate over Rmoney!!
Keep bringing up stupid comparisons.
I'll continue to make you look stupid.
Actually, uyou'll make yourself look stupid, I'll merely point it out!!
Yes, Obama won. But it was a lot closer than most of you want to admit. That is not a mandate. In fact, it only proves the country is still very much divided and it is Obama's responsibility and duty to bring us together by representing all of us - not just the selected few who put him over the top.
And it's certainly not a mandate for him to become an even more narcissitic bully.