Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
TheIndependentMa jority

East Bernstadt, KY

#837708 Jan 11, 2013
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
I might need 2.
Hmm..lay off the sody-pop lol.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Conroe, TX

#837709 Jan 11, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
Wheelchair golf??
You never were a good liar, Nobraina.
The chance of any Marine associating with a nitwit like you are slim to none.
All you do is create sockpuppets and spread your filth all over Topix.
Yes, if they are American citizens, they will obey the law. Or they will suffer the consequences.
"This is a nation of laws, not of men"
Commit treason, and you will be put to death for it.
I'm very happy to see the President has you shitting in your pants again!!
Prepare for 4 more years of uncontrollable bowel movements.
Your nurses aides will be very busy.
And you'll still be an idiot!!
<quoted text>
I noticed you avoided this post like the plague:

As I see it, the only valid orders from the government to the general population have to come in the form of laws that have been enacted in accordance with the requirements described in the Constitution. The only exceptions to this is described in the Constitution about when the right of habeas corpus can be suspended, that being emergency or invasion, and it has to be justified by the necessity of the public safety.
In short, there is no such thing as a valid order from the president to the general population. It is not possible in the United States.
Or, there is text in the Constitution allowing the president to issue edicts to the general population. I can't seem to find it.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#837710 Jan 11, 2013
You enjoy whining.

You enjoy anything that gets you attention.

I'm certain you enjoy having a couple of Carol's along for the ride.

Problem being, the other Carol's are far smarter than you.
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Frankly, I wasn't paying that much attention.
And I don't recall any one person hijacking the entire forum after stealing your or someone else's name.
There have been several "carol" imposters on here. But they didn't try and hijack the entire forum either.
carol

Orlando, FL

#837711 Jan 11, 2013
Oh my! I'm blushing I'm sure. I just spent the last hour and a half in bed with the Debil and I swear to God I'm a new woman. Leo, we may have had our differences previously but you have NO idea what you're missing! Oh my GOD I had no idea that men could be so... sexy! Ooooooooouhh! I'm spinning a million miles an hour, my senses are on FIRE! I'm ALIVE AGAIN!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Conroe, TX

#837712 Jan 11, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
A Governor working with the President is 'kissing ass'??
Thart's among the stupidest thing you've said here, except when you admitted to being a Herman Cain fan!!
ROFLMAO
You're an idiot with nothing but hatred and ignorance.
Christie will be the next Republiclown candidate for President, you'd better speak well of him, nitwit.
<quoted text>
... yeah. right.... fat chance.
TheIndependentMa jority

East Bernstadt, KY

#837713 Jan 11, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
So, what you're saying is, the government takes all SS income and uses it for everything else, then replaces this with money that is part of the everything else the govenrment uses the SS income to spends on.
Do you ever listen to yourself?
... idiot.
If they kept some of what we've sent to places like..ohhh say...Afghanistan....

weasels.
carol

Orlando, FL

#837714 Jan 11, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I noticed you avoided this post like the plague:
As I see it, the only valid orders from the government to the general population have to come in the form of laws that have been enacted in accordance with the requirements described in the Constitution. The only exceptions to this is described in the Constitution about when the right of habeas corpus can be suspended, that being emergency or invasion, and it has to be justified by the necessity of the public safety.
In short, there is no such thing as a valid order from the president to the general population. It is not possible in the United States.
Or, there is text in the Constitution allowing the president to issue edicts to the general population. I can't seem to find it.
Oh for goodness sakes! Put a sock in it (I just did. HE left me no other choice or just throw the damn sheets away!) I don't want to talk about the Constitution anymore, just an old smelly piece of sheepskin about how a black man is 3/5 of a white man... I can tell you for CERTAIN now that's not true!
carol

Orlando, FL

#837715 Jan 11, 2013
I never SEEN that much semen come out of a man, it's like a firehose! Oh, my, I'm giggling like a schoolgirl I guess.... sleepy now...

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#837716 Jan 11, 2013
Seems every day you come here with a new, stupid question.

Too bad everyone ignores the stupidity that your questions involve.

For a guy who claims to have read the Constitution, it's amazing how much of it you've forgottren or didn't understand.

Just to once again prove what a fool you are, here it is:

""Basis in U.S. Constitution

U.S. presidents have issued executive orders since 1785. Although there is no Constitutional provision or statute that explicitly permits executive orders, there is a vague grant of "executive power" given in Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 of the Constitution, and furthered by the declaration "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed" made in Article II, Section 3, Clause 5. Most Executive Orders use these Constitutional reasonings as the authorization allowing for their issuance to be justified as part of the President's sworn duties, the intent being to help direct officers of the U.S. Executive carry out their delegated duties as well as the normal operations of the federal government: the consequence of failing to comply possibly being the removal from office.""

Bet you didn't complain when Bushie issued his 291 Executive Orders.

You read it right, Bush issued 291 Executive Orders!!

Obama has signed 139 Executive Orders.

Why don't you challenge Bush about Executive Orders, nitwit??

Oh, I forgot. Bush was a White boy. You never complain about what the white boys do, youo racist POS!!
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I noticed you avoided this post like the plague:
As I see it, the only valid orders from the government to the general population have to come in the form of laws that have been enacted in accordance with the requirements described in the Constitution. The only exceptions to this is described in the Constitution about when the right of habeas corpus can be suspended, that being emergency or invasion, and it has to be justified by the necessity of the public safety.
In short, there is no such thing as a valid order from the president to the general population. It is not possible in the United States.
Or, there is text in the Constitution allowing the president to issue edicts to the general population. I can't seem to find it.
Blooming Idiot

Nashville, NC

#837717 Jan 11, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
I think it's great someone else is finally using some common sense. Hanging out with Crhistie must be rubbing off!
Bloombergs spot on, on that one. Those types of painpills were initially intended for end stage cancer patients only-NOT everything else coming and going.
Good for him-better FOR the people-NOT against them!!
More power to THOSE kinds!!
DRUGS ARE TO USE, NOT ABUSE AND YOU
AND BLOOMERG ARE NOT A DR.YOU GUYS TALK THIS BULLSHIT BUT WHEN YOU EVER
HAVE TO HAVE PAIN KILLERS IT WOULD BE A DIFFERENT STORY?THIS BLOOMING IDIOT IS NOW
TRYING TO TELL DR. WHAT TO DO,HOW MUCH COKE YOU SHOULD DRINK??WHAT ELSE????
charlie darwin

Bentonville, AR

#837718 Jan 11, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>I know quite a few that have lost a substantial amount of money in the stock market and in their 401K's since the 2008 financial meltdown.
Winners and losers...

After all we are just animals trying to eek out a living...

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Conroe, TX

#837719 Jan 11, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh for goodness sakes! Put a sock in it (I just did. HE left me no other choice or just throw the damn sheets away!) I don't want to talk about the Constitution anymore, just an old smelly piece of sheepskin about how a black man is 3/5 of a white man... I can tell you for CERTAIN now that's not true!
I take it that you are part of the rebellion against the Constitution, right?
The future is easy to predict. Obama intends to make himself dictator and write his own laws. That is using the office of president to rebel against the government of the United States, you know.
Those that are willing to die to get rid of the Constitution will join his rebellion.
Those that are willing to die to preserve the Constitution will fight against the Obama rebellion.

When the smoke clears, the winners will surely hang the losers.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#837720 Jan 11, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama won because of abortion, free birth control pills, broken promises to Hispanics and Hurricane Sandy.
Romney played it too safe. Unfortunately, for all of us.
point being, Obama won.

And your nitwit lost, due to his 47% comments, lies about Jeep plants, and Cayman Island bank accounts.

Oh yeah, the 'Let Detroit go Bankrupt' played a big part in Rmoney's debacle.

Oh yeah, his support for Richard Mourdoch played a big part in his loss.

In fact, every time Rmoney opened his stupid mouth, it hurt his chances.

You lost. Now have the courtesy to STFU and let the winners govern without interference from th elosers.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#837721 Jan 11, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
... yeah. right.... fat chance.
Better chance than Santorum had of getting the VP nod!!

You really enjoy leaving yourself wide open for ridicule!!

I'm lovin' it!!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#837722 Jan 11, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh for goodness sakes! Put a sock in it (I just did. HE left me no other choice or just throw the damn sheets away!) I don't want to talk about the Constitution anymore, just an old smelly piece of sheepskin about how a black man is 3/5 of a white man... I can tell you for CERTAIN now that's not true!
Carol would know.

Just like Sarah Palin, she loves those big, black firehoses!!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#837723 Jan 11, 2013
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>I know quite a few that have lost a substantial amount of money in the stock market and in their 401K's since the 2008 financial meltdown.
Not if they were conservative, diversified, and avoided panic selling.

For example, the Vanguard Total Stock Market Fund has a 10-yr annual return of 8.5%, spanning the market decline.

Of course, if you invested all your money in General Motors, you got hosed by Obama.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Conroe, TX

#837724 Jan 11, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
Seems every day you come here with a new, stupid question.
Too bad everyone ignores the stupidity that your questions involve.
For a guy who claims to have read the Constitution, it's amazing how much of it you've forgottren or didn't understand.
Just to once again prove what a fool you are, here it is:
""Basis in U.S. Constitution
U.S. presidents have issued executive orders since 1785. Although there is no Constitutional provision or statute that explicitly permits executive orders, there is a vague grant of "executive power" given in Article II, Section 1, Clause 1 of the Constitution, and furthered by the declaration "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed" made in Article II, Section 3, Clause 5. Most Executive Orders use these Constitutional reasonings as the authorization allowing for their issuance to be justified as part of the President's sworn duties, the intent being to help direct officers of the U.S. Executive carry out their delegated duties as well as the normal operations of the federal government: the consequence of failing to comply possibly being the removal from office.""
Bet you didn't complain when Bushie issued his 291 Executive Orders.
You read it right, Bush issued 291 Executive Orders!!
Obama has signed 139 Executive Orders.
Why don't you challenge Bush about Executive Orders, nitwit??
Oh, I forgot. Bush was a White boy. You never complain about what the white boys do, youo racist POS!!
<quoted text>
Executive Orders are confined to being orders given to the Executive Branch of government, dufus. The Executive Branch of government is the entirety of his authority. He has no authority outside the Executive Branch of government, dufus.
And, he cannot issue an executive order that contradicts any law that was enacted in accordance with the procedures commanded in the Constitution.

The only commands from the government the population is required to obey come in the form of laws enacted in accordance with the procedures commanded in the Constitution.
The president doesn't have the authority to issue any order to any citizen. He is only authorized to enforce existing laws that have been enacted in accordance with the procedure commanded in the Constitution.
To do what the Democrats intend to do is exactly attempting to institute a fascist dictatorship.

... you have to be able to define "fascism" to actually participate in the discussion, you know.
brown eyes

Blacksburg, VA

#837725 Jan 11, 2013
Tear . .drops on pages front of book Fox News AlQaeda responded with rap message when called in Tennesse by me.I responded with horses have more fun than anyone except for horses who get to sleep with shoes on. I knew suspect was suspicous am traiined for that. AlQaeda said wanted book of life history to make songs and Dolly Pardon job backstage. NRA listen to shooting victums. GF008 Safer World 2013

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#837726 Jan 11, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Carol would know.
Just like Sarah Palin, she loves those big, black firehoses!!
What did you say about women haters? Come on, cry to davey some more.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#837727 Jan 11, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
It wasn't directed on ALL medicines, just some. Like the ones that the FDA deemed suitable for use for end stage cancer patients ONLY.
That is incorrect. Drugs affected include those commonly prescribed for outpatient surgeries such as breast lump removals and dental implants.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 9 min DonPanic 48,441
mohammedyimer991@gmail.com 25 min bisaka123rut 2
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 31 min Yumpin Yimminy 68,769
Abby 11-23 48 min Mister Tonka 3
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 2 hr Hatti_Hollerand 695
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 2 hr Hatti_Hollerand 4,860
last post wins! (Apr '13) 2 hr Hatti_Hollerand 387
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 4 hr loose cannon 180,634
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 12:21 pm PST

Bleacher Report12:21PM
Hilton Cradles Baby at TD Celebration
NBC Sports12:36 PM
Bears awaken in third quarter, take lead
Bleacher Report12:51 PM
Jay Cutler, Brandon Marshall, Alshon Jeffery's Post-Week 12 Fantasy Reaction
ESPN12:51 PM
Hilton comes through with TD for baby daughter
NBC Sports12:59 PM
Colts swatting away the Jaguars