Barack Obama, our next President

[TheIndependentMa jority]

brown eyes wrote:

<quoted text>Bayonets and horses and plenty of them is all the United States Military needs no bullets required.

Yeah-and we can send fwee disaster aid coupons to Berlin to rebuild that wall...or was it for supplies for the air drop relief effort...or..wait..even if was Russia that left all that scrap metal in Afghanistan..we can shew how to recycle it!!!!

(is that yew Mr Reagan??)

[pens_make_us_dum]

Publish addresses of gun owners?

Free speech?

Ask these folks...

Prison guards threatened...

http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE9030...

[brown eyes]

TheIndependentMajority wrote:

<quoted text>
Yeah-and we can send fwee disaster aid coupons to Berlin to rebuild that wall...or was it for supplies for the air drop relief effort...or..wait..even if was Russia that left all that scrap metal in Afghanistan..we can shew how to recycle it!!!!
(is that yew Mr Reagan??)

Shh! don't blow my cover. President Obama plans to normalize relations with North and South Korea and tear down the DMZ. The fraulines are so nice in Korea. They demand no more rice. Peace talks already in process.

[TheIndependentMa jority]

pens_make_us_dum wrote:

Publish addresses of gun owners?
Free speech?
Ask these folks...
Prison guards threatened...
http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSBRE9030...

They oughta be sued, for endangering the lives of innocent people!

(and we should borrow some ratings ideas from our neighbor country in the North-because some of the ghetto gutter gangsta CRAP on the tube, has went beyond disgusting these days! WTH ever happened to the AFTER 10 oclock ratings?
LESS EPA radical economic strangleholds BS- More STRAIGHTEN UP slacker-way-too libuhrul FDA!!)

[TheIndependentMa jority]

brown eyes wrote:

<quoted text>Shh! don't blow my cover. President Obama plans to normalize relations with North and South Korea and tear down the DMZ. The fraulines are so nice in Korea. They demand no more rice. Peace talks already in process.

All while Iran continues "forward" with their ignore SALT treaties?

Ehhh, nope, don't think Korea will bite.

YOu been tawrkig to sum dem duhmo types, think we're living in ancient Egypt/Roman times? Fruelines, in Korea? Is that like pralines in olives?

[pens_make_us_dum]

Gun control....

Gun ownership...
Phillipines
4.7 guns per 100

US
88.8 guns per hundred

Gun related homicides:
PI-8.9 per 100,000
USA- 3.3 per 100,000
Source: UN Office of Drugs and Crime.

[brown eyes]

TheIndependentMajority wrote:

<quoted text>
All while Iran continues "forward" with their ignore SALT treaties?
Ehhh, nope, don't think Korea will bite.
YOu been tawrkig to sum dem duhmo types, think we're living in ancient Egypt/Roman times? Fruelines, in Korea? Is that like pralines in olives?

Taxi drivers in Iran have been seen on American television holding up empty plates saying we can't eat nuclear fuel. Iran will accept olive branch and come to the peace table, sanctions are working. Big Isreali Air Force says so.

[TheIndependentMa jority]

brown eyes wrote:

<quoted text>Taxi drivers in Iran have been seen on American television holding up empty plates saying we can't eat nuclear fuel. Iran will accept olive branch and come to the peace table, sanctions are working. Big Isreali Air Force says so.

Go Israel!

Democracy is a wonderful thing.

[brown eyes]

TheIndependentMajority wrote:

<quoted text>
Go Israel!
Democracy is a wonderful thing.

Now you are cooking with grease. I like your viewpoints. I don't care about you Political Party Affiliation.

[OzRitz]

pens_make_us_dum wrote:

Gun control....
Gun ownership...
Phillipines
4.7 guns per 100
US
88.8 guns per hundred
Gun related homicides:
PI-8.9 per 100,000
USA- 3.3 per 100,000
Source: UN Office of Drugs and Crime.

It still comes down to one thing, the denser the population base its best if none of them have guns. Look at England and Japan, two good examples of high density populations on a small land mass that ban guns. The countries that don't, such as some of those high density living South American countries end up with simular stats.
This is the point that gets lost with the gun lobby and this freedom to carry arms BS. When it was drafted, there was no police force, or high tech army and a population that was just a bit over 1% of what it is now on the same size land mass. This is a no brainer to anyone who is not clouded by misinformation & emotional connections to something that puts everyone at a higher risk. That is the real statistic not NRA bs.

[pens_make_us_dum]

OzRitz wrote:

<quoted text>
It still comes down to one thing, the denser the population base its best if none of them have guns. Look at England and Japan, two good examples of high density populations on a small land mass that ban guns. The countries that don't, such as some of those high density living South American countries end up with simular stats.
This is the point that gets lost with the gun lobby and this freedom to carry arms BS. When it was drafted, there was no police force, or high tech army and a population that was just a bit over 1% of what it is now on the same size land mass. This is a no brainer to anyone who is not clouded by misinformation & emotional connections to something that puts everyone at a higher risk. That is the real statistic not NRA bs.

No...look at the PI...

You have a criminal record don't you...

And cannot LEGALLY own a firearm.
Is that it?

[Death of Tenzing]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
New Libertarian platform..."debt does not matter"

No, that was your party that said it doesn't matter.

[Death of Tenzing]

TheIndependentMajority wrote:

<quoted text>
If minimum wage were 11$-12$ an hour, people (with some SENSE anyway) would be a lot better off...providing the economy DEflated some (as is now) in (some)price areas along with it.
(and then the rest could just be adjusted accordingly)

It doesn't work that way, minimum wage just drives inflation. You'll never catch up.

[John Galt]

TheIndependentMajority wrote:

<quoted text>
If minimum wage were 11$-12$ an hour, people (with some SENSE anyway) would be a lot better off...providing the economy DEflated some (as is now) in (some)price areas along with it.
(and then the rest could just be adjusted accordingly)

If you were already making $11-12 per hour, how would you feel about being demoted to minimum wage.

Increasing the minimum wage by that much would be grossly inflationary.

Even rich folks would want more to cover the higher cost of their Big Mac.

[John Galt]

Death of Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
No, that was your party that said it doesn't matter.

You just said the same.

[killtaker]

Obama can't balance a budget...

Here is one possible explanation...

"The Federal Election Commission has just fined President Obama’s 2008 campaign to the tune of $375,000 for basically not having their books in order..."

http://dougpowers.com/

BONUS: Who pays this fine?

[really]

John Boehner....I can't believe how he is treating the residents of New York. There is nothing christian or morally acceptable about him.

[brown eyes]

killtaker wrote:

Obama can't balance a budget...
Here is one possible explanation...
"The Federal Election Commission has just fined President Obama’s 2008 campaign to the tune of $375,000 for basically not having their books in order..."
http://dougpowers.com/
BONUS: Who pays this fine?

The NRA said they liked President Obama so much they would pay for this oversight.

[John Galt]

Death of Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
It doesn't work that way, minimum wage just drives inflation. You'll never catch up.

Don't believe in the myth of the "living wage"?

[brown eyes]

really wrote:

John Boehner....I can't believe how he is treating the residents of New York. There is nothing christian or morally acceptable about him.

He's too busy bar hopping and chasing women.