Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Comments (Page 38,577)

Showing posts 771,521 - 771,540 of1,034,153
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835111
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

11

11

11

maddmaxx7 wrote:
<quoted text>
No where have I supported part D. I am merely pointing out the rank hypocrisy of the left who never saw a give away they didn't like..
true, but the same thing can be said about the Right too which is why I have no faith with either the Modern Democrat or Republican Party and I believe the Republicans are going to go along with the Democrats with new gun legistlation.

Since: May 11

Fayetteville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835115
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

12

12

12

maddmaxx7 wrote:
Update for homeo:
"Obama expanded it to include cell phones and the numbers then skyrocketed and that is when the term "Obama phone" was for, the tens (if not hundreds of thousands)of thousands of added cell phones. It was named after him because he created the program but because he expanded it beyond out ability to control it. "
Liar.

Obama did not expand the program.

Cell phones were added before Obama took office. Mainly because it was cheaper than installing land lines in some homes.

You really are quite the dumbass.

Since: May 11

Fayetteville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835116
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

11

10

10

maddmaxx7 wrote:
<quoted text>
A non answer. Pollution might have caused many things, i've yet to be convinced it's caused sporadic warming in selected spots.
Your conclusion was the planet gets warmer after an ice age so therefore we can't have man made global warming.

The overall ave temperature has warmed.

As temperatures warm, some areas will get more arid, some insects will travel north infecting forests & crops, some diseases will take hold where they did not before. Ocean levels will rise. Severe weather can get more severe.

But hey,. you right whines just sit on your fat ass driving jacked up 4x4's & ignoring the science.

Your kids will look back & say " My Dad was such a dumbf*ck".
dem

Chicago, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835117
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

11

10

10

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Liar.
Obama did not expand the program.
Cell phones were added before Obama took office. Mainly because it was cheaper than installing land lines in some homes.
You really are quite the dumbass.
fikoff hillbilly
Truth is no SIN

Brooklyn, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835118
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

NO TEARS for the BLACK YOUTH HUH BARAK Chief Keef’s Step Brother Murdered; Chicago Teen Violence Continues

Since: May 11

Fayetteville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835119
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

maddmaxx7 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you ignorant clown, the dot.com boom was over, we entered a small recession and Bush was forced to deal with the aftermath of 9/11. Then the democrat authored mortgage disaster exploded. In your opinion 9/11 never happened, why is that? Dishonesty is my guess.
Your willful ignorance is tiring.
Obama is getting his $80 billion more from the rich, who's going to make up the other trillion dollars he will spend we don't have.?
And while we went to war & started expanding government, you f*cking idiots cut revenues thru massive unfunded tax cuts, set record earmarks, expanded medicare without funding it, made up a new war.

And keep showing just how stupid you are by blaming the CRA. My God, you people are idiots.

Since: May 11

Fayetteville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835120
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

maddmaxx7 wrote:
Update for homeo:
"Obama expanded it to include cell phones and the numbers then skyrocketed and that is when the term "Obama phone" was for, the tens (if not hundreds of thousands)of thousands of added cell phones. It was named after him because he created the program but because he expanded it beyond out ability to control it. "
Cell phones stareted in 2008,. DUMBASS

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835121
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe in science.
You believe in whatever the right tells you.
Go back to the late 90's & even Republicans believed in global warming & the need to curtail emissions.
Then it became a political issue & the right turned you right whiners into imbeciles. You a shining example.
.
Health issues, dufus. Ozone - UV rays, smog - lung disease, etc., etc., etc.
And, all real scientists believe in global warming. The Earth has been warming since the peak of the last Ice Age, dufus. I don't know anyone who ever contested that.
And, only an idiot thinks they can stop the process. The Arctic Ice Cap is going to disappear, just like it has done in the past Earth's history. It will do so again, and there's nothing you can do to stop it. Then, it will come back again. The Ice Age cycle has not ended, dufus.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835122
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Cell phones stareted in 2008,. DUMBASS
Let's see, who was in control of Congress that wrote the bill that gave the cell phones to the so-called "poor"?
Congress writes the laws, dufus. Here, in the United States, the president can't write his own laws... you know, like ordering private insurance companies to cover birth control pills.... That has to be spelled out in some legislation that is passed by Congress.
You must be another dufus that never read the Constitution... or the applicable law. You and Obama have at least that in common.
cway

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835123
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

Jane Says wrote:
<quoted text>We have a justice system and everyone has a right to a trial, unless they're a fetus. The liberals are killing fetuses for stupid things and not killing these mass murderers. Makes no sense
Ah, a conservative beating the fetus drum as usual.

The problem is, you conservatives don't give a damn about the fetus after it's born. It can rot in an alley for all you care.

If you really cared about the rights of the living, you would have impeached Bush for starting an unnecessary war by lies which got 4,000 on our side killed, and tens of thousands of Iraqis.

Can you spell h-y-p-o-c-r-i-t-e?

I knew that you could.
cway

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835124
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

dem wrote:
<quoted text>
fikoff hillbilly
How intellectual.

And it only took you three hours to come up with it.
Patriot

Longmont, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835125
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Top 10 Most Dangerous U.S. Government Agencies

Monday, January 7, 2013

#10 - Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)- annual budget $8.5 billion: Their record of ignoring environmental damage and the health effects on humans from major events such as 9/11, the Exxon and Gulf oil spills to the worst case, Fukushima, is unparalleled. Rather than investigate and warn of real dangers, they have gone after farmers for dubious claims of water contamination, while treating milk spills as they should have treated oil spills. Even worse, the EPA has concluded that there is no law preventing it from doing "research" on Americans. A recent lawsuit over the EPA's work with airborne pollutants will put this claim to the test in Federal court. Their illegal human experiments could break the Nuremberg Code (source: The Washington Times)...

http://www.activistpost.com/2013/01/top-10-mo...

Also America, the EPA was ruled to be un-Constitutional thus un-Lawful in the early 1970's:
http://www.libertyroundtable.com/2011/02/04/e...

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835126
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

maddmaxx7 wrote:
Update for homeo:
"Obama expanded it to include cell phones and the numbers then skyrocketed and that is when the term "Obama phone" was for, the tens (if not hundreds of thousands)of thousands of added cell phones. It was named after him because he created the program but because he expanded it beyond out ability to control it. "
The Obama Phone?

Q: Has the Obama administration started a program to use "taxpayer money" to give free cell phones to welfare recipients?

A: No. Low-income households have been eligible for discounted telephone service for more than a decade. But the program is funded by telecom companies, not by taxes, and the president has nothing to do with it.

Welfare recipients, and others, can receive a free cell phone, but the program is not funded by the government or taxpayer money, as the e-mail alleges. And it’s hardly new.


History

The SafeLink program has actually been offering cell phones to low-income households in some states since 2008, not beginning "earlier this year," as the e-mail claims. But the program is rooted in a deeper history.

When phone lines were first laid out in the late 19th century, they were not always inter-operable. That is to say the phone service created by one company to serve one town may not have been compatible with the phone service of another company serving a different town nearby. The telecom companies themselves saw the folly in this arrangement, and so in 1913, AT&T committed itself to resolving interconnection problems as part of the "Kingsbury Commitment."

That common goal of universal service became a goal of universal access to service when Congress passed The Telecommunications Act of 1934. The act created the FCC and also included in its preamble a promise "to make available, so far as possible, to all the people of the United States, a rapid, efficient, Nation-wide, and world-wide wire and radio communication service with adequate facilities at reasonable charges.” There was a fear, expressed by telecom companies themselves, that market forces alone might encourage companies to pass on providing service to hard-to-reach places. This would both hurt the people who wouldn’t have service as well as existing customers who wouldn’t be able to reach them. So the new FCC was tasked with promoting this principle of "universal service."

This informal practice was codified when the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) was created as part of the 1996 Telecommunications Act to "ensure all Americans, including low-income consumers and those who live in rural, insular, high cost areas, shall have affordable service and [to] help to connect eligible schools, libraries, and rural health care providers to the global telecommunications network." The USAC includes four programs to serve rural areas, high cost areas, rural health care providers, and schools and libraries. Since 1997, USAC has provided discounted land line service to low-income individuals.(A more limited program to offer assistance to low-income individuals was created a decade earlier; the telecommunications act expanded and formalized it.) According to Eric Iversen, USAC director of external relations, the Universal Service Fund more recently began funding programs that provide wireless service, such as the pre-paid cellular SafeLink program mentioned in the chain e-mail.

The president has no direct impact on the program, and one could hardly call these devices "Obama Phones," as the e-mail author does. This specific program, SafeLink, started under President George Bush, with grants from an independent company created under President Bill Clinton, which was a legacy of an act passed under President Franklin Roosevelt, which was influenced by an agreement reached between telecommunications companies and the administration of President Woodrow Wilson.

Wilson Phones, anyone?

http://www.factcheck.org/2009/10/the-obama-ph...
Nj raider 1

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835128
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

10

9

9

maddmaxx7 wrote:
<quoted text>
calm down you ridiculous old racist geezer, Zimmerman's mother is Peruvian. Now apologize.
You rode the short bus & was in the slow class cuz you sure are slower than a retard eating pancakes smothered in molasses. Who gives a f*** about zimmerman?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835129
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

maddmaxx7 wrote:
<quoted text>
I did research this myself:
Obama has intentionally and willfully lied to the American public, yet idiotic liberals stick by him:
On the evening of January 11, 1996, while Mitt Romney was in the final years of his run as the head of Bain Capital, Barack Obama formally joined the New Party, which was deeply hostile to the mainstream of the Democratic party and even to American capitalism. In 2008, candidate Obama deceived the American public about his potentially damaging tie to this third party. The issue remains as fresh as today’s headlines, as Romney argues that Obama is trying to move the United States toward European-style social democracy, which was precisely the New Party’s goal.
In late October 2008, when I wrote here at National Review Online that Obama had been a member of the New Party, his campaign sharply denied it, calling my claim a “crackpot smear.” Fight the Smears, an official Obama-campaign website, staunchly maintained that “Barack has been a member of only one political party, the Democratic Party.” I rebutted this, but the debate was never taken up by the mainstream press.
Recently obtained evidence from the updated records of Illinois ACORN at the Wisconsin Historical Society now definitively establishes that Obama was a member of the New Party. He also signed a “contract” promising to publicly support and associate himself with the New Party while in office.
Rush and others were right, idiotic Topix libs were wrong, big surprise.
Are you really this stupid or are you just fcking with me?

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835130
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

Waxballs Is Stalking Again wrote:

No need to lie stalker. You were banned for stalking and for spamming topix with your judgit machine, Waxballs. Your lucky you weren't arrested for what you did to that woman you fckn sick bastard. Go back to the cesspool you dragged yourself out of you animal.
Waxballs-Goober resurfaces from the longest dumpster dive in history!! Remember that topix banishment ? Still stalking women and giving out their personal information to the many topix posters roound the world? Better watch your step there Waxbrains, the Moderators are watching, you sick, psycho Stalker. Still spamming threads with macros runescape I see. You're a real honest to God psychotic STALKER if there ever was one. Keep it up maybe the FBI will catch on.

http://www.topix.com/forum/city/itasca-il/T50 ...
http://www.topix.com/forum/city/itasca-il/T50 ...

#18127
Oct 17, 2009
"Sounds Paranoid To Me wrote:
She changed her name bacause she was being stalked. The poster who was stalking her got her private information and published it for the world to see on this forum. That is why he was banned. So she changed her name. I observed the whole incident from the start. Not only did he publish her information but continued to stalk and harass her. Can you understand why she would change her name now?

sunnycali wrote:
Would you report someone HERE to the moderators if they were giving out YOUR personal information?

17602
Oct 15, 2009
"sunnycali wrote:
Again, if someone posted YOUR private information would you just sit there and say, "way to go - that's freedom of speech in action?" And I mean information that included your home address and phone number. You would do nothing? If the answer is that you would do nothing then you apparently care little for your family.

17603
Oct 15, 2009

"sunnycali wrote:
So if someone were giving out your personal information you would not report that person? If someone were using extremely obscene language you would not report that person?
This has absolutely nothing to do ideology. I don't have any problem with free speech. I don't have any problem with people of any political bent expressing their opinions. I DO have a problem with people violating the most basic terms of decency.
Oh, and I would report someone if I saw them breaking into YOUR house. Or abusing a member of YOUR family. I guess you and I are different in that respect. And I'm very sorry for that. Not for me but for you.

#58531Reply Jun 9, 2010
"Devin wrote:
Waxman, you are a known stalker, you've been sactioned by Topix on several occasions.
You are the poster child for keeping certain presonal information unrelated to the debate to one's self.
Come on now...... What's your purpose why aren't your focusing on the issues of the debate, the 1995 Budget Impass?
.... stay with the issue of the debate which is more than enough dialogue with individuals like yourself... didn't you ever warn your children about relating personal information over the internet about themselves?.. it's an employed security feature...

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835131
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

Yippee!

Treasury...

Did an audit!

Look what they found!

"Individuals Who Are Not Authorized to Work in the United States Were Paid $4.2 Billion in Refundable Credits"

http://www.treasury.gov/tigta/auditreports/20...
Patriot

Longmont, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835132
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

Top 10 Most Dangerous U.S. Government Agencies

Monday, January 7, 2013

#9 - Internal Revenue Service (IRS)- annual budget $13.3 billion: Cries of "End the Fed!" continue to get louder, while more people are beginning to wake up completely and couple this with "End the IRS!" In fact, the two were developed together 100 years ago making the private Fed and the government IRS fraternal twins in creating a system of indentured servitude through dollar devaluation and arbitrary tax collection, respectively. The Fed enslaves through stealth, while the IRS uses force to impose itself through ever-expanding regulations and the threat of fines and imprisonment. As the collection division, the IRS rakes in a staggering $2.3 trillion annually. Despite that massive amount, the IRS has a distinguished record of ignoring the shenanigans of major corporations and federal employees, while focusing harshly on the average private citizen and small businesses in particular. Thankfully, there is some momentum toward abolishing the IRS through FairTax legislation. Now would be a good time, as the IRS will be empowered even further when the healthcare overhaul takes effect.

#8 - Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)- annual budget $13.5 billion: Despite massive funding to help people in dire need of assistance, FEMA has failed spectacularly in the cases of Katrina and Sandy, even hindering the ability of people to make it on their own, as gun confiscation was ordered against the population affected by Katrina. The mechanics of offering aid to legitimate victims of Sandy are still being debated by the U.S. government. Additionally, there is a disturbing amount of evidence that suggests FEMA would be instrumental in enslaving large populations following an economic collapse or civil unrest. FEMA centers are now open knowledge and if implemented will likely resemble the squalor and horror that refugees encountered when jammed into the New Orleans Superdome following Katrina.

READ MORE:

http://www.activistpost.com/2013/01/top-10-mo...
proud2bwhite

Richmond, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835133
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Nj raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> You rode the short bus & was in the slow class cuz you sure are slower than a retard eating pancakes smothered in molasses. Who gives a f*** about zimmerman?
you libs all cared untill you found out he wasn't a white guy.

Since: Dec 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#835134
Jan 7, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Fiscal cliff?

No way to save resources?

Crooks everywhere their is free money...

Look what the IRS found...

"...the IRS is fighting a losing battle. Mr. Russell, the Treasury Inspector General, identified 1.5 million additional potentially fraudulent refunds totaling in excess of $5.2 billion that slipped through the cracks..."

http://www.forbes.com/sites/leonardburman/201...

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 771,521 - 771,540 of1,034,153
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

55 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 10 min Atticus Tiberius Finch 167,595
Amy 4-19 21 min cheluzal 5
Abby 4-19 25 min cheluzal 6
Amy 4-18 28 min cheluzal 36
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 28 min ScarletandOlive 96,130
Illinois lawmakers again look to Chicago casino... 29 min Benselys view 1
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 45 min Dusty Mangina 47,063
•••
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••