Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1251526 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#836718 Jan 10, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Agree on anti depressants. Excersise is a better cure. They make many people suicidal.
BTW, how did she get her hair caught in a conveyor belt? Just wondering.
She has always had waist length hair. She was working at BEST products as jewelry salesman. Don't know if they had them in Florida. Anyway they had a conveyor belt that brought products down from upstairs. She was alone and bent down to pick something up off the floor and her hair got caught in a holler. They said you could hear her screaming all over the store. It had no emergency stop cord. It took a couple of minutes for someone to turn it off. It pull hair and scalp completely off the left side of her head. She almost died. Was never the same woman since. Getting that phone call was one of the scariest things that ever happened to me.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#836719 Jan 10, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> Absolutely Carol. It is always the first step. Brainwashing the low information people first which then spreads upward. Plenty of examples on here to prove the point. Even thou they can see with their own eyes what is wrong they still fall prey to the brainwashing.
Speaking of stupid, you're a nitwit who 'invests for the long term', even though he's convinced Obama will destroy the economy!~!

Now that is the very definition of a moron!!

If you can explain that piece of stupidity, it would be fun to see.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#836720 Jan 10, 2013
roller

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#836722 Jan 10, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
You'll never figure out what I actually DID say. So knock it off. Um-kay?
That is exactly what you said!!

Quit backtracking on your ignorant comments.

Would you like to see it??

Will you admit to it, or create new lies for cover??
brown eyes

Christiansburg, VA

#836723 Jan 10, 2013
Fox News Swamp Fox fox is slang for pretty woman Fox News Agency you are much nicer station thanks. GF008 Safer World 2013
carol

Orlando, FL

#836724 Jan 10, 2013
VeganTiger wrote:
<quoted text>
HE doesn't have to worry about thugs breaking into his house, raping his wife and kid (well, not that I think he has to worry about that to begin with), killing others and doing whatever at the mercy of the perpetrators.
Liberals want to leave everybody at the mercy of the government. At the mercy of people who can pull you over at any time, treat you like crapola and call you a "nut" if you object. I don't know which side the police will be on in the future war, but I find it very hard to believe that they will willingly kill hundreds of thousands of people in order to "disarm" them and avoid more school shootings.
Also, have you guys sen all the liberal politicians that suddenly; are "hunters"? Soon Dennis Kucinich will come out and say he needs to hunt food for himself. I met a guy yesterday who started talking about hunting. It's very easy to make them a fool since you know they are lying and just trying to sweeten the pie. Simply ask them when they hunted last time and where and what. I can guarantee that the need to change the topic will ensue soon. ANd even if they DID hunt, so what?? What does that have to do with the second amendment?? Nothing!!
Liberals are the sour grapes that never go away:
*They always want to tax you more,(YOU of course not them).
*They never fail to tell everybody else what is wrong with them ("racist", "nut", "psycho", "take the meds", "bigot", "white supremacist"), but they never admit any mistakes themselves.
Finally, now liberals :LOVE LOVE LOVE L-O-V-E that Obama is killing kids every day in Pakistan by the drone. I have told this top people who voted Obama and the only thing they say is "they are terrorists", or "you are just mad you looooost"..
When your thugs have disarmed and killed tens of thousands of americans and subjugated the rest, how nasty will you guys become to your new serfs? I don't intend to find out.
Options are limiting themselves by the hour now. The nasty globalists are not going to stop until they have all power and the liberals simply LOVE it
I just love this post. Please re-post it often.
VeganTiger

Spokane, WA

#836725 Jan 10, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny how the 'mainstream media' called the election correctly, while FAUX made complete fools of themselves!!
*Why are you trying to separate Fox from the other ones? Just because Fox is able to fool some more people into thinking they are genuine doesn't mean they are any better. It's great for you to have a fake bogeyman, just know that the channel was especially designed for you libs to get worked up over and for no reasons.
Rove is still recovering from the heart attack he had on-air election night!!
FAUX and Rasmussen were dead wrong. As was Gallup.
*Well, we will never know WHO was "wrong". This appears to have been the last election in America so what does it matter? The funny thing is you guys are so oblivious to realities that you actually think it was a real election between REAL choices. The only serious candidate/option versus Obama was Ron Paul and he was taken out early. Don't come and tell me that he would not have been in a much better position if he had not been stolen away the victory in Iowa. After that, I couldn't care less who became president. You liberals would have been mad and angry no matter who would have won and the ones who voted Romney would have acted the same as they do today. Also, do you for a second think Romney would have done anything different with regards to guns? He is also a globalist servant and would just have found another way, maybe with less upcoming bloodshed during confiscation, but still.

Yet Huffington Post called it for Obama for months leading to the election!

* I know. I still don't understand why we wasted so many millions of money to stage another phony election, when outcome was clear. Your argument confirms my thoughts.

I guess I'd lie if I was as big a loser as FAUXbots are!!
Caere to explain how FAUX could be so wrong??
Or would you rather not think about it??
Yeah, I thought so.
*You know one thing. When you guys wake up after all your enemies are either in jail, dead or have left the country, do you think it will not be YOUR turn? I mean, how will the globalists get their money when only the constituents are left? The paper money you are getting now will probably still be there. Remember the liberals will "never touch SS or medicare". As long as we still have people working for the printing press, you will get your pennies. Just don't get too upset when the wheelbarrow you use to bring your money to the grocery store is stolen while you are inside shopping with the money you brought.
Fort every time a liberal opens his/her mouth they are helping another freedom loving person with making a choice or two. The only question nw is starting to become one:

WHERE TO?

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#836727 Jan 10, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Democrats voted for these wars and the funding of them.
Bush cannot be blamed for warning Congress of the impending housing market collapse nor a Congressional investigation trying to rein it in when more democrats fought against it than republicans.
I do blame republicans for starting to act like democrats at one point.
Unfortunately, now that they have learned their lesson, they are not being given the opportunity to prove it.
The democrats, on the other hand, have had the most power in congress for the past 5 years and still haven't learned the lesson of overspending. They are gladly flushing the economy down the toilet.
Can you get even a little bit close to agreeing with that?
Well, Republiclowns voted for tax increases, so all's even, eh??

BWAHAHAHAHAHA

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#836728 Jan 10, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Carol said that there was no war on Jews.
No she didn't.
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#836729 Jan 10, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
Agree on anti depressants. Excersise is a better cure. They make many people suicidal.
BTW, how did she get her hair caught in a conveyor belt? Just wondering.
I'm betting flake bought her a conveyor belt and mixed crazy glue into her shampoo. What an elaborate scheme.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#836731 Jan 10, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Lily just doesn't get this concept.
No surprise. She thinks Obama is going to fix this mess too.
Yes I know.
Grey Ghost

Partlow, VA

#836733 Jan 10, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
I just love this post. Please re-post it often.
You just might want to lift that empty head from that feeding bin.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#836735 Jan 10, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
I love it when you uninformed dumbass right whiners spout stuff you are obviously wrong about.
1) Obama worked for a private church group as a community organizer.
2) Obama worked for a private law firm as a lawyer.
3) Obama worked for a Private university as a lecturer.
4) Obama was self employed as a author & wrote a couple of best selling books.
Four examples of why you are so uninformed.
My God, are all you right whiners this frickin stupid?
Davey Boie 1 out of 4 'Comoonity Organizer, public money
University of Chicago, publicly financed, funded

Self-Employed Author, That's a prevarication of enormous proportions

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#836736 Jan 10, 2013
flack wrote:
<quoted text> Hate to break the news to you but I'm in full compliance. I don't have to change a thing. I can still put $6000 tax free into my HSA every year too! Sucks to be you!
OK, caught the Flake in yet another lie.

First off, you have said repeatedly that you do not believe in, nor do you have health insurance.

So you can't have an HSA, per law. DUH

----------

""Who is eligible for a Health Savings Account?
To be eligible for a Health Savings Account (HSA), an individual must be covered by a HSA-qualified High Deductible Health Plan (HDHP) and must not be covered by other health insurance that is not an HDHP. Certain types of insurance are not considered "health insurance" (see below) and will not jeopardize your eligibility for an HSA.""

----------
So now you going to admit you actually have a high deductible health plan?? Or double down on your lies??

----------

""I donít have health insurance, can I get an HSA?
You cannot establish and contribute to an HSA unless you have coverage under a HDHP.""

http://hsaed.com/who_can_have_an_hsa_

----------

So, you've obviously lied, Flake.

Question is, which is the lie??

BWAHAHAHAHAHA

If you have an HSA, you MUST have health insurance.

So which is the lie??

(I dearly enjoy catching you nitwits in lies. IT's easy!!)

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#836737 Jan 10, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of stupid, you're a nitwit who 'invests for the long term', even though he's convinced Obama will destroy the economy!~!
Now that is the very definition of a moron!!
If you can explain that piece of stupidity, it would be fun to see.
Actually I don't invest in the market per say. I invest in companies. Long term. In fact now a days I don't invest any new money in it. The only money now is dividends reinvested but that is still a lot. I have found other, safer places to put my money. Which will remain unknown.

“Uzi Does It”

Since: Nov 08

UZILAND

#836739 Jan 10, 2013
The anointed one is inarguably the worst president in US history. Thank goodness that once his term is finished, we won't be seeing another one like this for a long time, ain't nobody that stupid to elect another one like him.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#836740 Jan 10, 2013
carol wrote:
My favorite is the "downward spiral" part, as if there were any further down to spiral if you're married to flack. I mean, that simply MUST be the absolute nadir.
Oh god, this can't be real, and you actually believe you will prevail somehow ...
Your downward spiral includes your buying used, soiled furniture.

Pretty sure you're at the bottom of the spiral, with the rest of America looking down on dumb goobers like you!!

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#836743 Jan 10, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
OK, caught the Flake in yet another lie.
First off, you have said repeatedly that you do not believe in, nor do you have health insurance.
So you can't have an HSA, per law. DUH
----------
""Who is eligible for a Health Savings Account?
To be eligible for a Health Savings Account (HSA), an individual must be covered by a HSA-qualified High Deductible Health Plan (HDHP) and must not be covered by other health insurance that is not an HDHP. Certain types of insurance are not considered "health insurance" (see below) and will not jeopardize your eligibility for an HSA.""
----------
So now you going to admit you actually have a high deductible health plan?? Or double down on your lies??
----------
""I donít have health insurance, can I get an HSA?
You cannot establish and contribute to an HSA unless you have coverage under a HDHP.""
http://hsaed.com/who_can_have_an_hsa_
----------
So, you've obviously lied, Flake.
Question is, which is the lie??
BWAHAHAHAHAHA
If you have an HSA, you MUST have health insurance.
So which is the lie??
(I dearly enjoy catching you nitwits in lies. IT's easy!!)
What do you think catastrophic health insurance is? Some people are brain dead.

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#836744 Jan 10, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Your downward spiral includes your buying used, soiled furniture.
Pretty sure you're at the bottom of the spiral, with the rest of America looking down on dumb goobers like you!!
Have you been drinking again? You must be if you can't tell there are three people posting as Carol. The real Carol and two others. That idiot from Alabama and demwit from Shitcago.
VeganTiger

Spokane, WA

#836745 Jan 10, 2013
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you know if Bill Clinton doesn't have to worry about thugs breaking into his house or raping his wife and daughter? If anything, he'd be more of a target for some nutjob.
**Do you have data on that? How "much" more does he have to worry? Where do you draw the line? Should a psychiatrist be allowed to have guns in the house? What about ER docs that get daily threats from another future Obamacare recipient because he is not going to give out any Oxy's after patient "lost prescription" 4 hours earlier?
http://www.epmonthly.com/whitecoat/2008/02/dr...
<btw, I have nothing to do with this link so don't blame me>

Rape is not sex.
Why do you have to worry about being a target? Do you live in a bad neighborhood? Have lots of enemies? Deal drugs?

*What is the requirement? Do I have to justify to YOU why I need a weapon in my house? Or is it sufficient to tell you it is spooky to meet another Obama voter in town that is threatening to shoot me and rape my wife and kids because I did not give him drugs in the ER twice in a row? No, because you wouldn't care anyways. YOUR solution is to call the cops (done) so they can come and "gather evidence" after I am dead, right? Or are YOU going to come and stand outside my house in case they take their threats seriously? Otherwise, interesting you are asking about dealing drugs. I guess I have done extensively in the pasty. After all, I have been handing out pain killers and candy forever, mostly against my wishes, but you know, "patient satisfaction" scores are printed and published for each "provider" you know, so we had to play the game.

No single person has ever said that they love the idea of children being killed by drones, that's a flat out lie.

**This is my EXACT recollection of what one of your ideological buddies told me yesterday. "So what"? "They kill kids"? So you are worried about kids that belong to our enemy, but not about our own school children"? NOnsense talk from your side. You libs are only anti-war until YOUR leaders get the power. Then it is all warfare, killing own citizens (even Bush didn't do that, I guess he hadn't gotten around to it yet), shipping guns ILLEGALLY to other countries' criminals so they can kill people there and you can create another hoax about the second amendment.

We have no control over the use of drones; they are an alternative to troops on the ground; does anyone love the idea? Absolutely not.
** "no control"????? "alternative to troops on the ground"? So it is fine for you to kill children as long as we get a terrorist or two, right? You don't want the political burden of our own soldiers getting killed, so you do as Weasley Clark did: Bomb from high altitude and if you kill an enemy or two, fine, but other things are just "collateral damage", right?.

I am antiwar all the way and anti gun.
**Get out of here?? You may not (at the moment) personally have any firearms, but you worship the autocracy and would have no problem waging war against your own citizens to take their guns away, right? Oh, I forgot, they are not citizens any more right? Just "traitors"?

Now, just tell me you are a hunter also, Please..... We missed that in the play book. And nobody need anything but a bee bee gun in order to hunt after you libs have banned hunting anything larger than a sparrow.

Finally, how can you call yourself "anti-war" and then saying it is better to drop a drone over a village where one terrorist is, risking multiple children and other innocents to die that it is to simply leave them alone. So you are not anti-war, but "anti face-to-face war". It's not war as long as you don't se dead kids on TV is it? You liberals are all the smae and your anti-war talk of past is just the same as anything else you say: L-I-E-S and nothing but L--I--E--S.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 min Dr Guru 192,253
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 42 min Patriot AKA Bozo 53,986
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr RACE 99,895
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr RACE 6,144
Word (Dec '08) 1 hr RACE 5,325
Dear Abby July 3, 2015 1 hr RACE 5
Amy July 3, 2015 2 hr mrs gladys kravitz 3
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages