Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1274196 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

pens_make_us_dum

Conway, AR

#836461 Jan 10, 2013
Comedy alert!

Irony?

Nope...liberals!!!!

'Union bosses won't allow their office workers to unionize'

http://americanglob.com/2013/01/09/for-the-li...

Hahahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#836462 Jan 10, 2013
pens_make_us_dum wrote:
<quoted text>
Again...tv man...
Who made the PEOPLE TAKE THE MONEY...
Who said they did not have to pay it back?
no one made them. they just made it so easy that you would have looked stupid for not taking the money.

and there was that guarantee of a booming economy that never came to pass. now who was it that made that failed prediction? a democrat?

so the Bush premise was....how could anyone get hurt?
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#836463 Jan 10, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
documented....
Statement of Administration Policy: H.R. 1461 - Federal Housing
Finance Reform Act of 2005
The Administration strongly believes that the housing GSEs should be focused on their core housing mission, particularly with respect to low-income Americans and first-time homebuyers. Instead, provisions of H.R. 1461 that expand mortgage purchasing authority would lessen the housing GSEs' commitment to low-income homebuyers.
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php...
wanna guess who sponsored it?
The House bill, the 2005 Federal Housing Finance Reform Act, would have created a stronger regulator with new powers to increase capital at Fannie and Freddie, to limit their portfolios and to deal with the possibility of receivership.
Mr Oxley reached out to Barney Frank, then the ranking Democrat on the committee and now its chairman, to secure support on the other side of the aisle. But after winning bipartisan support in the House, where the bill passed by 331 to 90 votes, the legislation lacked a champion in the Senate and faced hostility from the Bush administration.
Adamant that the only solution to the problems posed by Fannie and Freddie was their privatization, the White House attacked the bill. Mr Greenspan also weighed in, saying that the House legislation was worse than no bill at all.
Oxley isn’t too happy about all the criticism Congress is getting for letting Fannie and Freddie get too big.
“All the hand wringing and bedwetting is going on without remembering how the House stepped up on this,” he says.“What did we get from the White House? We got a one-finger salute.”
http://www.salon.com/2008/09/10/greenspan_bus...
wouldn't it be nice if the right wing bloggers/FOX would tell the whole story?
That pretty much sums it up__Carol and her new bff will continue attempting to hawk their bizzaro world version of events though.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#836464 Jan 10, 2013
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
I already proved you the fool on that one.
Your old, weak butt against against a tank. Hardy-har-har.
It didn't work for the Syrian rebels, didn't work for the Russians.
American deliveries through Lend-Lease amounted to $11 billion in materials: over 400,000 jeeps and trucks; 12,000 armored vehicles (including 7,000 tanks); 11,400 aircraft and 1,75 million tons of food.
We basically provided the Soviets with an economy during WWII. We provided over 50% of their needs to fight Hitler.
And your weak attempt to bring in a timeline is proof of how weak your line of BS is.
We provided Russia with an entire economy during WWII, while theirs was in total collapse.
What did Stalin's purges have to do with anything, other than your disjointed attempt to wiggle out of your lies??
Armed civilians stand zero chance against any paramilitary or military force.
For you to think otherwise only proves what a fantasy world you live in.
You're an old, gay man. You wouldn't stand a chance.
What colour is the sky there??
You obviously have no idea of the scale of the war between Russia and Germany.
And, you have no idea of the schedule of delivery.
Here's your facts again:
Delivery of supplies didn't peak until 1944. The vast majority of the equipment you reference was delivered after this time. At this time the Germans had already been defeated and were in full retreat from Russia. Here's the significant events again:

German defeat at Stalingrad winter 1942-43.
(Americans land in Morocco, Brits get run out of Libya and retreat to Egypt)
(US Navy Adm King in 1941-2, opposed the introduction of convoys. Few ships making it successfully to Minsk, most being sunk in the middle of the Atlantic.)
(In the Pacific, Japan bombs Calcutta, India; Japan bombs Darwin, Austrailia; Americans win Guadacanal; Americans win Buna, New Guinea; Brits begin guerilla war in Burma)

Last German counter-offensive Kursk, Belarus, to stop the Russian advance on all fronts July-August 1943. It becomes a foregone conclusion Russia will defeat Germany.
(Americans adopt the convoy system and the supplies to Russia rise above a trickle.)
(Allies in Sicily. No allied boots on the ground on the entire continent of Europe.)
(U.S. begins submarine warfare against Japanese shipping, Japanese end their occupation of the Aleutian Islands)

If you had any real knowledge of events, it will be obvious to you from history that at the time it became a foregone conclusion that Russia was going to defeat Germany and had already pushed the German army back to the border of Belarus with Eastern European countries and had them in headlong retreat, the amount of supplies from the United States to Russia equaled a mere trickle.
The amounts you reference are almost all that was delivered after Russia had beat the Germans, and had them in headlong retreat on all fronts, and the battle lines criss-crossed the Soviet Union-Eastern Europe border.

You are not only an ignorant dupe, you are an idiot.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#836465 Jan 10, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, another Dumbass right whiner. Oh wait, it the same f*cking uninformed right whiner Dumbass.
So salaried people don't work.
The last time I turned in a time sheet was with a summer job as a kid.
I guess you're still there.
You still didn't answer the question Davey Boie, just blowin' smoke, as you always do?? You do the Yeahoo proud, you're almost as good, not quite almost??
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#836466 Jan 10, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>That pretty much sums it up__Carol and her new bff will continue attempting to hawk their bizzaro world version of events though.
here's a good one.

Text: President Bush's Acceptance Speech to the Republican National Convention

"Another priority for a new term is to build an ownership society, because ownership brings security and dignity and independence.

Thanks to our policies, home ownership in America is at an all- time high."

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles...

'our policies'
brown eyes

Christiansburg, VA

#836467 Jan 10, 2013
President James Knox Polk was 11th President of the United States of America. Polk was last strong pre Cival War President. Polk led the nation to a victory in the Mexican-American War. Which gave the United States most of it's [resent Southwest. GF008 Safer World 2013

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#836468 Jan 10, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
major? no more so then Bush.
if it makes you feel better, he was just continuing with the same program that Clinton started. but no one forced him to do it. and you wingnuts keep talking about Dems, but for 6 years Congress was republican and they did nothing. but if you want you can try to demonstrate how dems treated Bush like republicans now treat Obama. that will be a guaranteed hoot.
Don't forget Chrissy Dodd, and Chucky Schumer expounded in Congress that there was no problem with the Savings & Loans??
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#836469 Jan 10, 2013
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>Don't forget Chrissy Dodd, and Chucky Schumer expounded in Congress that there was no problem with the Savings & Loans??
you mean they said something?

omg, people talking about stuff causes other stuff to miraculously happen! or not!

if that's the case, there's a whole bunch of Bush quotes that you don't want to hear.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#836470 Jan 10, 2013
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>You still didn't answer the question Davey Boie, just blowin' smoke, as you always do?? You do the Yeahoo proud, you're almost as good, not quite almost??
What question was that, dickhead.

You said Obama did not turn in a time sheet.

He did work in the private sector.

You want to argue that point or do you want to argue that only people who turn in time sheets work.

Make up your mind.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#836471 Jan 10, 2013
A producer behind a popular gun enthusiast YouTube channel was found dead with a single gunshot wound to the head at his business last week.

Police in Georgia are investigating the apparent homicide of Keith Ratliff, a 32-year-old Franklin County resident.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/09/keit...

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#836472 Jan 10, 2013
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
What question was that, dickhead.
You said Obama did not turn in a time sheet.
He did work in the private sector.
You want to argue that point or do you want to argue that only people who turn in time sheets work.
Make up your mind.
BS Davey Boie, Where and when did Barack Hussein Obama ever 'work'? The guy is a freeloader and always has been.
brown eyes

Christiansburg, VA

#836473 Jan 10, 2013
The Internal Revenue Service was established in 1862. Created in 1871 as the Bereau of Internal Revenue and then changed it's name to Internal Revenue Service in 1953. The IRS uses a variety of information returns including 1099 forms, to facilitate business's reporting of transaction information. GF008 Safer World 2013

Since: Nov 11

United States

#836475 Jan 10, 2013
carol wrote:
Why we are where we are today.

~Nobody checked the hundreds of millions of packaged loans carefully enough.
~Government regulation was scaled back - nobody in a position of authority overseeing process to insist loans were made according to standards.
~Banks made them to homeowners and quickly resold them to people on Wall Street who sold them again to investors.
~Everyone assumed somebody else was minding the store but nobody was scrutinizing these loans.
~Loans were made to people who should never have been approved in the first place and mortgage companies and investors profited immensely from those loans, temporarily.
In one word: liberals wanted lazy ghetto minorities liberals to own the "American Dream" as part of their fantasy utopia where every one is happy thanks to the liberals ideas of fairness!!!

Every time Liberals try to force their "fairness utopia" on us we get screw!!!

Fidel Castro, after 50 years, is still implementing his fairness utopia on the idiots liberals Cubans!!!
brown eyes

Christiansburg, VA

#836476 Jan 10, 2013
Old US saying this my rifle this is my gun. This is for fighting this is for fun. LOL Safer World 2013

Since: Nov 11

United States

#836477 Jan 10, 2013
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>And inflation. Over forty years, housing market prices have increased times 19 in some areas. Not doubled, tripled or quadrupled, but ninteened. An economy spiraled to TOTALLY out of whack, fueled primarily by nothing more GREED, brought on by plague like waves of a LACK of ANYthing redemptive at the heart of Americas backbone no doubt!
Once again: Liberal's "unintended" consequences bite them in their butt!

Liberals never learn because there is no gray matter between their ears.

Since: Nov 11

United States

#836478 Jan 10, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>And where will the money come from to pay for what he needs to do?

You clowns can't even answer the simplest question. How do you expect anyone to aake anything you say seriously.

How about it? Answer this question.

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

You do know that if this question isn't answered, the government collapses and the existence of the United States ends, right?

So, where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
Liberals will steal it from the rich!!!

As if the rich could pay for all their lazy ghetto liberal friend's life styles!!!

Since: Nov 11

United States

#836479 Jan 10, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>Ok, dufus....

It was a foregone conclusion that the United States was going to invade Japan and physically defeat it without consideration of the cost, in either US lives or Japanese lives. It was anticipated that there would be in excess of one million American casualties, and this was not a deterrent.
So, please tell us what your estimate is of the number of Japanese that would be killed when the United States invaded Japan and physically crushed the country.
10 million? 20 million? 30 million?
Then, compare that to the number of people killed by the two bombs that convinced Japan to surrender and end the war.

Well? How many Japanese lives were saved by the use of the two bombs?
... it's a simple arithmetic problem, dufus. What's your answer?
Who throw the bomb? A descent Republican or a brainless liberal democrat scum?

Hint: Democrats interned Japanese citizens and founded the KKK.

Since: Nov 11

United States

#836480 Jan 10, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>Damn. I don't believe it. We have here a person who knows everything. I guess I've been asking the wrong people to answer these questions.

Ok, manifestly dominant know-it-all, answer these two questions:

Where exactly was Obama during the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi while the real-time video was being watched in the White House?

And;

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?

A location is required to answer the first question, and a source of money is required to answer the second question.
And who gave guns to the Mexican Mafia?
dems are retards

Lansing, MI

#836481 Jan 10, 2013
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>BS Davey Boie, Where and when did Barack Hussein Obama ever 'work'? The guy is a freeloader and always has been.
he is a racist pig from the scums of chicago, the blacks think he is the greatest president when is a a traitor to this country,

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 4 min Dr Guru 196,813
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 17 min Red_Forman 6,394
The Amazing Cashew 48 min OH Im NUTS 1
Get an online store. Earn $$$$ (Jun '13) 1 hr Shaiilesh 2
abby8-27-15 1 hr tiredofit 12
Florida sheriff is similar to Sheriff Apairo. 1 hr Hahaha Good 1
Song Title Game (Dec '11) 2 hr boundary painter 1,208
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 hr RACE 100,626
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages