Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
pens_make_us_dum

Norman, OK

#836069 Jan 9, 2013
Stephen Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you saying you're a Democrat?
?...the democrats that put up rape tents and crap on police cars...

Those democrats!!!!
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#836070 Jan 9, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Abortions are 52.4% white, 47.5% non-white.
http://www.statehealthfacts.org/comparebar.js...
That could be close, it proves my statement correct, actually two if you were measuring those referenced as others.

Assuming that they are measuring race of mother__once again tricky for there are Hispanics and Native Americans in those figures.

It's not my subject__talk to Carol__I'm finished.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#836071 Jan 9, 2013
Stephen Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
Spoken like a man who has never been there. Besides, my original point of comparison was with texas. Are we sure we want to go down that road?
Isn't New England the source of most of the firearms purchased? I'd say that's a very thriving industry these days.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#836073 Jan 9, 2013
Evolution Less Accepted in U.S. Than Other Western Countries, Study Finds

This chart depicts the public acceptance of evolution theory in 34 countries in 2005. Adults were asked to respond to the statement: "Human beings, as we know them, developed from earlier species of animals." The percentage of respondents who believed this to be true is marked in blue; those who believed it to be false, in red; and those who were not sure, in yellow.

A study of several such surveys taken since 1985 has found that the United States ranks next to last in acceptance of evolution theory among nations polled. Researchers point out that the number of Americans who are uncertain about the theory's validity has increased over the past 20 years.

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/bigph...

World's greatest country.

too bad the rest of the world doesn't agree.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#836076 Jan 9, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I understand you and Obama have never read the Constitution, so I'll give you just a little bit about the kind of government it defines:
The Constitution prohibits the president from issuing edicts to the general population. According to the Constitution, the only instructions from the government the population is bound by are in the form of laws that have been passed in accordance with the procedures defined in the Constitution.
In short, nothing Obama orders the population to do is valid. He does not have that authority. He is restricted to issuing orders solely to the Executive Branch of government.
He would have to be in rebellion against the government of the United States to do otherwise.
Obama would know this if he ever even read the Constitution.
so you can demonstrate that no other president has done such a thing?

(excuse, excuse, excuse,(hurry up will ya!))

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#836079 Jan 9, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Ensuring that taxpayer money isn't funding abortions under the law shouldn't upset you if this isn't the case.
The more you protest, the more I want an audit.
You might not mind paying for abortions, but I do, and the law is on my side.
PP performed more than 330,000 abortions last year and received over 500 million in federal funding.
If PP is not breaking the law, then you have no need to worry.
"carol"
Planned Parenthood has dozens of CPA's who work to cook the books to show that no Federal monies are used for abortion/murder. They simply transfer funds. They use Federal funds for services not including abortion. Without Federal funding, Planned Parenthood, would perform just as many abortions/murder. They would simply cut back on legitimate services. Abortion/murder is Planned Parenthood's reason for being.
Peace

Since: Jan 13

Windsor, Ct.

#836081 Jan 9, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Who is "we"?
People who think like you were executed by the Nuremberg Tribunal.
The military is obligated to disobey unlawful orders, regardless of the source.
"We" is "our government." As opposed to "your government," which, I guess, by definition doesn't exist yet? As far as who's going to gas you, I think it's safe to say you've pissed off enough smart people sufficiently that I assure you there will be a long line. So, here's the fundamental question: in a fight who do you want on your team, the smart kids or carol? As for the military, who cares? I mean who really cares? These are people that'd be working at McDonalds otherwise, did they suddenly become enlightened? Besides, even if they did decide to support your team that'd just mean you'd have to pay them and which of you is going to do that?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#836084 Jan 9, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
He's gay.
it's all really the same when looking at the end result.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#836086 Jan 9, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
You'd be eating Alpo instead of cock.
but isn't Alpo horse cock?

let's ask Galt.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#836089 Jan 9, 2013
Stephen Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
What history, carol? Which history are we trying to change? What about DB? HE keeps calling it, "Russia," and that's not what it was called? Is he changing "history" too? Or doesn't it matter when one of your clients gets a little revisionist bug up his ass?
Ok, Hows 'bouts the Union of Soviet Socialist Republic...

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#836090 Jan 9, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
I understand you and Obama have never read the Constitution, so I'll give you just a little bit about the kind of government it defines:
The Constitution prohibits the president from issuing edicts to the general population. According to the Constitution, the only instructions from the government the population is bound by are in the form of laws that have been passed in accordance with the procedures defined in the Constitution.
In short, nothing Obama orders the population to do is valid. He does not have that authority. He is restricted to issuing orders solely to the Executive Branch of government.
He would have to be in rebellion against the government of the United States to do otherwise.
Obama would know this if he ever even read the Constitution.

sonic ducking and dodging:
so you can demonstrate that no other president has done such a thing?
(excuse, excuse, excuse,(hurry up will ya!))
If you care to make some sort of justification as to why Obama should be allowed to be a dictator, then, by all means, make a reference to precedent. Tell us about who set that precedent, how it was set, and how Obama is merely doing it because... how do you idiots like to say it... "Bush did it, too."

Tell us about the precedent Obama is following.
What president issued edicts directly to the population?

... this should be good.

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#836091 Jan 9, 2013
GhostofRaygun wrote:
<quoted text>From taxes. Next question.
"ghostofraygun"
Taxes, you must want more? The bloated Federal Government spends/wastes every dollar it collects. In fact for every dollar spent the government collects only $0.62 cents. Is that how you run your household?
Peace
KMA
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#836093 Jan 9, 2013
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>That could be close, it proves my statement correct, actually two if you were measuring those referenced as others.
Assuming that they are measuring race of mother__once again tricky for there are Hispanics and Native Americans in those figures.
It's not my subject__talk to Carol__I'm finished.
Not really, because the non-white statistics include other than blacks.

Blacks are 13% of the population, 17% of live births, and 36% of abortions, meaning that the black abortion rate is nearly three times the national average.

Proving once again that Planned parenthood is carrying forward with Margaret Sanger's plan for black genocide.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

#836094 Jan 9, 2013
Stephen Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
"We" is "our government." As opposed to "your government," which, I guess, by definition doesn't exist yet? As far as who's going to gas you, I think it's safe to say you've pissed off enough smart people sufficiently that I assure you there will be a long line. So, here's the fundamental question: in a fight who do you want on your team, the smart kids or carol? As for the military, who cares? I mean who really cares? These are people that'd be working at McDonalds otherwise, did they suddenly become enlightened? Besides, even if they did decide to support your team that'd just mean you'd have to pay them and which of you is going to do that?
... now, this is humorous.

If they are so goddam smart, why do they need us to gove to them everything they need? Why can't they do like all the people they are smarter than and get for themselves what they need, like everyone who works for a goddam living?

... idiot.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#836095 Jan 9, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
If you care to make some sort of justification as to why Obama should be allowed to be a dictator, then, by all means, make a reference to precedent. Tell us about who set that precedent, how it was set, and how Obama is merely doing it because... how do you idiots like to say it... "Bush did it, too."
Tell us about the precedent Obama is following.
What president issued edicts directly to the population?
... this should be good.
executive order to wiretap citizens of the US without a warrant. Bush.

Since: Jan 13

Windsor, Ct.

#836099 Jan 9, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
In case you had a problem reading the written English language, here are the questions again. Notice there is a question mark at the end of the sentence, as has always been the case:
Where exactly was Obama when the White House was watching the real-time video of the 7-hour battle between Al Qaeda and the stripped-down American security detatchment in Benghazi?
And;
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
Got an answer? To date, nobody on Earth has been able to answer these two questions.
Sigh. Ok, I'll put it another way. Your first "question" is best answered with another question: where "exactly" was he supposed to be? In the john? Making a cheese sandwich? Bowling? See? It's like your question only there's more question marks at the end of mine. Realtime video? And how, pray tell do we know this? Was there one of the Fox people there shouting "Lights, camera, action?" Did we intercept the signal from the bad guys' drones? Did we have one of our own flying over? We did? The whole time? Is there one over my house now? How many fingers am I holding up? Was that the only "real time" video coming in or was there any other place in the world that night? apparently time stood still for you folks and the President is to be faulted for not being tuned to the channel you wanted him to be tuned to when you wanted him to be tuned to it? I'm picturing the President in his underwear sitting in a big room surrounded by video screens on every surface which are projecting every place in the world at the same time under his watchful and studious eye... maybe he was watching American Idol? that's important, right? Or... maybe.. it was just you folks tuned to every station in the world that day... hoping something bad would happen... yeah, I think I like my answer. Do you? I even put a question mark at the end like you did!

Now, um, what was the question? Oh, yes, "Where will the money come from for Obama's government?" Well, here again, you've already tilted the table hoping to control the balls running down it and direct them towards the pocket you wish them to go in. Here's how I know that: "Obama" doesn't have a government, "we" do. So he doesn't have to pay for anything, "we" do. It's kind of how things work. You don't have to agree with it, but you DO have to help pay for it. It's in the Constitution, check it out.

“Behave Yourself”

Since: Jul 07

Fort Worth, Texas

#836100 Jan 9, 2013
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Wanna see me blow a smoke ring out of my snatch?
Oooh, I love it when a chick talks dirty!

Since: Feb 08

Spokane, WA

#836101 Jan 9, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's see...
I stated that Stalin had been one of the worst mass murderers in history.
You opened your ignorant mouth with the worn-out party line that it was the US that armed Stalin.
Then, the discussion of the timeline began, dufus.
Stalin began his purges in 1935, the war didn't start until 1939, the Lend Lease Act happened in 1940, aid to Russia didn't peak until 1944 after Germany had been defeated on all fronts and run out of Russia.
... dufus.
You need to get checked for Alzheimer's
"DBWriter"
Actually "nutsucker" should be checked for dementia. He is crazy as a loon. He has delusions of grandeur.
Peace

Since: Jan 13

Windsor, Ct.

#836102 Jan 9, 2013
DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
... now, this is humorous.
If they are so goddam smart, why do they need us to gove to them everything they need? Why can't they do like all the people they are smarter than and get for themselves what they need, like everyone who works for a goddam living?
... idiot.
That's what we are doing.

... moron.
carol

Orlando, FL

#836103 Jan 9, 2013
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"carol"
Planned Parenthood has dozens of CPA's who work to cook the books to show that no Federal monies are used for abortion/murder. They simply transfer funds. They use Federal funds for services not including abortion. Without Federal funding, Planned Parenthood, would perform just as many abortions/murder. They would simply cut back on legitimate services. Abortion/murder is Planned Parenthood's reason for being.
Peace
Like ACORN, you mean?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 9 min Mike 51,280
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 22 min JOEL 71,217
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 25 min Grau 68,908
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr OzRitz 49,310
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 2 hr loose cannon 182,041
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr PEllen 98,873
Dear Abby 12-25 4 hr PEllen 1
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 4:00 am PST

Bleacher Report 4:00AM
Breaking Down Colts' Game Plan vs. Titans
Bleacher Report 5:00 AM
Can't-Miss Picks and Matchup Guide
Bleacher Report 8:09 AM
Breaking Down Bears' Game Plan vs. Vikings
NBC Sports 9:15 AM
Lance Briggs "happy" with Robbie Gould's comments
Bleacher Report11:45 AM
Complete Week 17 Preview for Vikings vs. Bears