Now, just tell me you are a hunter also, Please..... We missed that in the play book. And nobody need anything but a bee bee gun in order to hunt after you libs have banned hunting anything larger than a sparrow.<quoted text>
How do you know if Bill Clinton doesn't have to worry about thugs breaking into his house or raping his wife and daughter? If anything, he'd be more of a target for some nutjob.
**Do you have data on that? How "much" more does he have to worry? Where do you draw the line? Should a psychiatrist be allowed to have guns in the house? What about ER docs that get daily threats from another future Obamacare recipient because he is not going to give out any Oxy's after patient "lost prescription" 4 hours earlier?
<btw, I have nothing to do with this link so don't blame me>
Rape is not sex.
Why do you have to worry about being a target? Do you live in a bad neighborhood? Have lots of enemies? Deal drugs?
*What is the requirement? Do I have to justify to YOU why I need a weapon in my house? Or is it sufficient to tell you it is spooky to meet another Obama voter in town that is threatening to shoot me and rape my wife and kids because I did not give him drugs in the ER twice in a row? No, because you wouldn't care anyways. YOUR solution is to call the cops (done) so they can come and "gather evidence" after I am dead, right? Or are YOU going to come and stand outside my house in case they take their threats seriously? Otherwise, interesting you are asking about dealing drugs. I guess I have done extensively in the pasty. After all, I have been handing out pain killers and candy forever, mostly against my wishes, but you know, "patient satisfaction" scores are printed and published for each "provider" you know, so we had to play the game.
No single person has ever said that they love the idea of children being killed by drones, that's a flat out lie.
**This is my EXACT recollection of what one of your ideological buddies told me yesterday. "So what"? "They kill kids"? So you are worried about kids that belong to our enemy, but not about our own school children"? NOnsense talk from your side. You libs are only anti-war until YOUR leaders get the power. Then it is all warfare, killing own citizens (even Bush didn't do that, I guess he hadn't gotten around to it yet), shipping guns ILLEGALLY to other countries' criminals so they can kill people there and you can create another hoax about the second amendment.
We have no control over the use of drones; they are an alternative to troops on the ground; does anyone love the idea? Absolutely not.
** "no control"????? "alternative to troops on the ground"? So it is fine for you to kill children as long as we get a terrorist or two, right? You don't want the political burden of our own soldiers getting killed, so you do as Weasley Clark did: Bomb from high altitude and if you kill an enemy or two, fine, but other things are just "collateral damage", right?.
I am antiwar all the way and anti gun.
**Get out of here?? You may not (at the moment) personally have any firearms, but you worship the autocracy and would have no problem waging war against your own citizens to take their guns away, right? Oh, I forgot, they are not citizens any more right? Just "traitors"?
Finally, how can you call yourself "anti-war" and then saying it is better to drop a drone over a village where one terrorist is, risking multiple children and other innocents to die that it is to simply leave them alone. So you are not anti-war, but "anti face-to-face war". It's not war as long as you don't se dead kids on TV is it? You liberals are all the smae and your anti-war talk of past is just the same as anything else you say: L-I-E-S and nothing but L--I--E--S.