Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Comments (Page 38,500)

Showing posts 769,981 - 770,000 of1,077,709
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834442
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

19

18

16

Justice Scalia:‘It Will Have to Be Decided’ Whether Gov’t Can Regulate Some Types of Guns

Conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia on Sunday left open the possibility that some types of guns could be regulated by the government, such as assault weapons capable of holding 100 rounds of ammunition.

“What the opinion in Heller said is that it will have to be decided in future cases, what limitations upon the right to keep and bear arms are permissible,” Scalia said on “Fox News Sunday,” referring to the 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. Heller that protected the right to possess firearms.

“Some [limitations] undoubtedly are because there were some that were acknowledged at the time,” he continued.“There was a tort called a “frighting” which if you carried around a really horrible weapon just to scare people, like a head ax or something, that was I believe a misdemeanor. So yes there are some limitations that can be imposed, what they are will depend on what the society understood were reasonable limitations at the time.”

The 76-year-old justice declined to speculate on what that could mean specifically for certain high-powered weapons.

“We’ll see,” he said.“Obviously the amend does not apply to arms that cannot be carried — it’s to “keep and bear,” so it doesn’t apply to cannons, but I suppose there are handheld rocket launchers that can bring down airplanes that will have to — it’ll have to be decided.”

As a constitutional originalist, Scalia said those determinations will have to be made “very carefully” looking within the context of 18th-century history.

“My starting point and probably my ending point will probably be what limitations are within the understood limitations that the society had at the time,” he said.“They had some limitations on the nature of arms that could be borne.”

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/justice-scali...
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834443
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

15

15

15

There are by some estimates, 45 to 47 percent in this country that pay no income tax what-so-ever so that leaves the middle class and rich to pay a majority of taxes. Those at the high end are paying 35 to 40 percent of their income to taxes. Large and small businesses are the job creators in this country and supply most of the jobs in the private sector. So what’s Obama's solution? Let’s tax them some more until it reaches a point where they cannot operate, cannot invest in new equipment or new technology, cannot hire new employees and all at the same time trying to meet Union Demands and NOW OBAMACARE! They will eventually take their business elsewhere or simply close their doors and there is nothing you can do about it. Then what do we have? A government that has nothing coming in by way of taxes except from the middle class. Washington would have to close its doors as well which might just be a good thing!!
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834445
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

15

15

15

maddmaxx7 wrote:
<quoted text>
Fox reports all the news. But I haven't heard from any news source that the gulags are still running, including the leftist Denver Post.
Did you see where the armed off duty cop stopped a massacre in San Antonio? Not on NBC,CBS,ABC,MSNBC you didn't.
Probably didn't get the whole story of the Portland mall shooter either.
Excellent! I find that those who bash Fox News are the same ones being brainwashed by NBC's MSLSD, Soro's Media Matters, The New York Times, The Huffington Post and all the other so-called radical News Organizations!
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834446
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

15

15

15

sonicfilter wrote:
Justice Scalia:‘It Will Have to Be Decided’ Whether Gov’t Can Regulate Some Types of Guns
Conservative Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia on Sunday left open the possibility that some types of guns could be regulated by the government, such as assault weapons capable of holding 100 rounds of -guns/
SonicFilter stop the silly nonsense! People buy guns to collect them just like people collect stamps, coins, knives etc.. etc.. When you start telling people what they can and cannot have then you have a socialist Government. Why don't we make cocaine, meth and LSD illegal? That will surely take them off the streets! Do you think? If banning guns worked, Washington, DC and New York City would be the safest cities in the country. Since 1976, it's been illegal in Washington, DC to own any handguns or to keep any type of gun in your home unlocked and fully assembled. However, Washington, DC is the murder capital of the United States next to Detroit.
New York City has had severe gun control laws since 1911, yet it also ranks among the most dangerous places in the country. In both cities, violent criminals can easily obtain the most deadly weapons on the streets within minutes.

“wake up”

Since: Jan 10

utica ny

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834447
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

19

19

19

brown eyes wrote:
<quoted text>Compare the gun violence in Europe to the United States. Name me one school shooting incident in Europe.
name me one gun that gets up all by it self and shot anyone without a criminal holding it.
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834448
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

22

22

21

sonicfilter wrote:
In the wake of the tragic shooting deaths at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., last month, the National Rifle Association proposed that the best way to protect schoolchildren was to restaurant and gas station. It has not made those countries safer or saner.
...As guns proliferate, legally and illegally, innocent people often seem more terrorized than protected.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/06/sunday-revi...
sonisfilter!! The New York Times is about far left as you can get next to NBC's MSLSD!!
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834449
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

20

20

19

moshx wrote:
<quoted text> name me one gun that gets up all by it self and shot anyone without a criminal holding it.
Moshx! Excellent! Gun Control.... Myths, Lies and downright stupidity!

On 20/20, ABC anchor John Stossel discussed the self-defensive benefits of gun ownership, debunking the myth that "gun control reduces crime."
The segment aired during 20/20's recurring series, "Myths, Lies & Downright Stupidity," based on Stossel's book of the same title.
Citing the recent Federal Appeals Court for DC ruling overturning Washington, D.C.'s ban on gun ownership, Stossel talked to the pro-gun plaintiff
in the case, Tom Palmer, and pointed out that the murder rate in D.C. increased after the city's gun ban:
"Since Washington's gun law passed, the murder rate actually increased, even while America's murder rate dropped.
It's because guns can also save lives, says Palmer, as one saved his years ago in California."

Great Video!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch...
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834450
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

23

21

20

Professor Ayreshire wrote:
SonicFilter stop the silly nonsense! People buy guns to collect them just like people collect stamps, coins, knives etc.. etc.. When you start telling people what they can and cannot have then you have a socialist Government. Why don't we make cocaine, meth and LSD illegal? That will surely take them off the streets! Do you think? If banning guns worked, Washington, DC and New York City would be the safest cities in the country. Since 1976, it's been illegal in Washington, DC to own any handguns or to keep any type of gun in your home unlocked and fully assembled. However, Washington, DC is the murder capital of the United States next to Detroit.
New York City has had severe gun control laws since 1911, yet it also ranks among the most dangerous places in the country. In both cities, violent criminals can easily obtain the most deadly weapons on the streets within minutes.
In Heller, a 5-4 majority, led by Justice Antonin Scalia, held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a gun unconnected with service in a militia, and to use the gun for traditionally lawful purposes, such as in the home for self defense. The decision invalidated the District of Columbia's handgun ban — considered the strictest in the nation — and its requirement that firearms kept in the home be disassembled or have a trigger lock.

However, the majority also said the Second Amendment right is not unlimited, and gave examples of some limits.

"From Blackstone through the 19th-century cases, commentators and courts routinely explained that the right was not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose," wrote Scalia. "For example, the majority of the 19th-century courts to consider the question held that prohibitions on carrying concealed weapons were lawful under the Second Amendment or state analogues."

Nothing in the Heller ruling, he said, should be read to cast doubt on "longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms."

Another "important limitation," explained Scalia, was contained in the justices' 1939 decision in Miller v. U.S. "Miller said, as we have explained, that the sorts of weapons protected were those 'in common use at the time.' We think that limitation is fairly supported by the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of 'dangerous and unusual weapons,' " he wrote. Based on Miller, the Second Amendment does not protect weapons not typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes, such as short-barreled shotguns, he added.

http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNLJ.jsp...

so as you can see, the opinion of a wingnut will have little bearing on a assault weapon ban.
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834451
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

22

22

21

PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Going with the old rape and torture room justification again Carol? Well stupid, they were still in full swing after the invasion under new management and being paid for on our dime.
www.globalresearch.ca/cia...in-iraq-torture-a...
Sadaam Hussein was never a threat to anyone after the first Gulf War nitwit, his army rape torture and ethnic killings going on. It was all about oil.
Only an idiot would think that we did any good for the Iraqi people.
Your beloved Democrats voted to use force in BOTH wars as well! Unlike Bush, their hero Obama did not get Congressional Approval when he took us into Libya and then called for a Stand Down as one of our U.S. Ambassadors was murdered along with other embassy personnel and those that tried to save them!! Bush was in office less than 8 months before 9/11 and it was Clinton's 8 years in office that eased up on National Security! Not taking out Osama when he had the chance and Firing missiles at a baby milk factory did not hack it! Most Americans agreed with George Bush and for taking out terrorist training camps in Afghanistan responsible for almost 4,000 American deaths on 911 but not these clowns! Then we have Iraq and their no WMD's nonsense? What the hell do you call nerve agents Saddam used on Iranians and his OWN people as hundreds of thousands died from it? Kool- aid?? IT'S KNOWN FACT THAT HE HAD WMD'S!! What is so hard to understand that?? What did Saddam do with them? Archeologists many years from now will probably find them buried thousands of feet underground or he simply had them shipped off to Syria prior to the war! Take your pick! Furthermore, Saddam continually violated U.N. Resolutions from the First Gulf War and that in itself gave us every right to go back in!
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834452
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

22

22

20

sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
In Heller, a 5-4 majority, led by Justice Antonin Scalia, held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a gun so as you can see, the opinion of a wingnut will have little bearing on a assault weapon ban.
SonicFilter stop the silly nonsense! People buy guns to collect them just like people collect stamps, coins, knives etc.. etc.. When you start telling people what they can and cannot have then you have a socialist Government. Why don't we make cocaine, meth and LSD illegal? That will surely take them off the streets! Do you think? If banning guns worked, Washington, DC and New York City would be the safest cities in the country. Since 1976, it's been illegal in Washington, DC to own any handguns or to keep any type of gun in your home unlocked and fully assembled. However, Washington, DC is the murder capital of the United States next to Detroit.
New York City has had severe gun control laws since 1911, yet it also ranks among the most dangerous places in the country. In both cities, violent criminals can easily obtain the most deadly weapons on the streets within minutes.

Since: May 11

Fayetteville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834453
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

19

19

19

moshx wrote:
<quoted text> name me one gun that gets up all by it self and shot anyone without a criminal holding it.
Name one source of alcohol that forces itself down the throats of those that drive drunk. We control alcohol sales & consumptions.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834454
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

22

21

19

Professor Ayreshire wrote:
There are by some estimates, 45 to 47 percent in this country that pay no income tax what-so-ever so that leaves the middle class and rich to pay a majority of taxes. Those at the high end are paying 35 to 40 percent of their income to taxes. Large and small businesses are the job creators in this country and supply most of the jobs in the private sector. So what’s Obama's solution? Let’s tax them some more until it reaches a point where they cannot operate, cannot invest in new equipment or new technology, cannot hire new employees and all at the same time trying to meet Union Demands and NOW OBAMACARE! They will eventually take their business elsewhere or simply close their doors and there is nothing you can do about it. Then what do we have? A government that has nothing coming in by way of taxes except from the middle class. Washington would have to close its doors as well which might just be a good thing!!
only 45 to 47 percent?

Reagan wouldn't be happy.

pretty cool how a far right meme actually belongs to the right. but as we all know, our current crop of 'conservatives' will never qualify as historians.
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834455
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

22

22

21

sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
In Heller, a 5-4 majority, led by Justice Antonin Scalia, held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a gun unconnected with service in a militia, and to use the gun for traditionally lawful purposes, such as in the home for self defense. The decision invalidated the District of Columbia's handgun ban so as you can see, the opinion of a wingnut will have little bearing on a assault weapon ban.
Gun Control.... Myths, Lies and downright stupidity!

On 20/20, ABC anchor John Stossel discussed the self-defensive benefits of gun ownership, debunking the myth that "gun control reduces crime."
The segment aired during 20/20's recurring series, "Myths, Lies & Downright Stupidity," based on Stossel's book of the same title.
Citing the recent Federal Appeals Court for DC ruling overturning Washington, D.C.'s ban on gun ownership, Stossel talked to the pro-gun plaintiff
in the case, Tom Palmer, and pointed out that the murder rate in D.C. increased after the city's gun ban:
"Since Washington's gun law passed, the murder rate actually increased, even while America's murder rate dropped.
It's because guns can also save lives, says Palmer, as one saved his years ago in California."

Great Video!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch...
SATANS BIG HAIRY BALLS

Shibuya, Japan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834456
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

maddmaxx7 wrote:
<quoted text>
No one on here is for getting our soldiers killed far from home, I certainly never got a vote. Back before Iraq, if the dems hadn't proven themselves such spineless cowards afraid of being on the wrong side, they would have voted against the wars.
But they didn't and here we are.
SURE YOU IS, AN' SURE YOU DID. YOU VOTED FO' AN EVANGELICAL DRUG BURNOUT IN THE POCKET OF BIG BIDNESS. YOU OWN IT, CRACKER. LEMME TELL YOU WHAT A SPINELESS COWARD IS: IT'S A GROUP OF FRIGHTENED STOOPID PEOPLE WHO START A WAR BY FABRICATING INTELLIGENCE, THEN PROSECUTE IT LIKE THE HAM-FISTED RURAL MORONS THEY IS, THEN LOSE IT AFTER HAVING KILLED THREE TIMES AS MANY PEOPLE AS THE "DICTATOR" THEY WENT THERE TO CONFRONT, THEN THEY COME BACK AFTER HAVING LOST AND NOT PAID FOR THE ADVENTURE AND BLAME THE OTHER GUY. THAT'S WHAT A SPINELESS COWARD IS, SOMEONE WHO WILL LET YOU TAKE THE FALL FOR THEIR OWN INCOMPETENCE.
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834458
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

22

22

22

PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Going with the old rape and torture room justification again Carol? Well stupid, they were still in full swing after the invasion under new management and being paid for on our dime.
www.globalresearch.ca/cia...in-iraq-torture-a...
Sadaam Hussein was never a threat to anyone after the first Gulf War rape torture and ethnic killings going on. It was all about oil.
Only an idiot would think that we did any good for the Iraqi people.
Get a clue!! Some clowns are stuck on this war for oil nonsense! As if they don't drive a car, heat their homes, fly in an airplane, take a train, take a bus? Well I hate to tell you this but they all need oil and there is no way around it until someone comes up with an alternative!! Did we steal someone's oil and if we did, how much? I'd really like to hear your answer? Most wars had nothing to do with oil but had a lot to do with taking out murdering madmen, terrorists, Hitler and I could go on and on but you clowns are stuck on your war for oil nonsense.
holycrapbatman

Morgantown, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834459
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

20

19

19

W Church wrote:
<quoted text>Show me a society that does NOT have a class of people at the top who have
1)Built wealth by taking risk and hard work
2)Inherited wealth
3)Stolen their wealth by taking it from someone else either by military action or by government redistribution
The difference between America and any other country is that everyone here has the opportunity to build weath through their own achievements. And then they can pass it on to their heirs.
Unfortunately, Obama's ideology has a problem with methods #1 and #2 and is transforming America by #3.
What you have posted, "whitey still out for whitey," shows you are held back by your culture. A culture which sat back while letting liberals destroy the family unit by encouraging out of wedlock births. And now you have a majority of single mothers dependent on the government to redistribute wealth. Your only problem is you think the successful should pay more money for this government ghetto-ization program.
The best economic times in America was when not everyone was trying to build wealth and become rich. Most everyone was trying to have a middle class life. Trickle Down started the middle class decline. Then the rich CEOs of 27,000 American factories decided to ship all jobs to China for slave labor.
SATANS BIG HAIRY BALLS

Shibuya, Japan

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834460
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

"BUST A KNIFE IN YOU ASS?" NAH, THAT DON' WORK EITHER...
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834461
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

22

22

21

SATANS BIG HAIRY BALLS wrote:
<quoted text>
SURE YOU IS, AN' SURE YOU DID. YOU VOTED FO' AN EVANGELICAL DRUG BURNOUT IN THE POCKET OF BIG BIDNESS. YOU OWN IT, CRACKER. LEMME TELL YOU WHAT A SPINELESS COWARD IS: IT'S A GROUP OF FRIGHTENED STOOPID PEOPLE WHO START A WAR BY FABRICATING INTELLIGENCE, THEN PROSECUTE IT LIKE THE HAM-FISTED RURAL MORONS THEY IS, THEN LOSE IT AFTER HAVING KILLED THREE TIMES AS MANY PEOPLE AS THE "DICTATOR" THEY WENT THERE TO CONFRONT, THEN THEY COME BACK AFTER HAVING LOST AND NOT PAID FOR THE ADVENTURE AND BLAME THE OTHER GUY. THAT'S WHAT A SPINELESS COWARD IS, SOMEONE WHO WILL LET YOU TAKE THE FALL FOR THEIR OWN INCOMPETENCE.
According to official IRS data, the top 1% of income earners paid $84 billion more in federal income taxes in 2007 than in 2000 before the Bush tax cuts were passed, 23% more. The share of total federal income taxes paid by the top 1% rose from 37% in 2000, before the Bush tax cuts, to 40% in 2007, after the tax cuts.

In contrast, the bottom half of income earners paid $6 billion less in federal income taxes in 2007 than in 2000, a decline of 16%. The share of federal income taxes paid by the bottom 50% declined from 3.9% in 2000 to 2.9% in 2007.

The Bush tax cuts also included a doubling of the child tax credit from $500 per child to $1,000 per child. Because of that, and the 33% cut in the bottom tax rate, nearly 8 million more people dropped off the federal income tax rolls entirely, paying zero federal income taxes. Indeed, under the Bush tax cuts, the bottom 40% of all income earners not only paid no federal income taxes, as a group on net. By 2009, they were being paid cash by the IRS equal to 10% of all federal income taxes.

These Bush tax cuts did not explode the deficit, as Obama and his echo chamber have alleged. By 2007, the deficit was down to $160 billion, less than 15% of Obama’s deficits today. Total federal revenues soared from $793.7 billion in 2003, when the last of the Bush tax cuts were enacted, to $1.16 trillion in 2007, a 47% increase. Capital gains revenues had doubled by 2005, despite the 25% capital gains rate cut adopted in 2003. Federal revenues rose to 18.5% of GDP by 2007, above the long term, postwar, historical average over the prior 60 years. CBO was projecting surpluses to return indefinitely in 2012 through the end of its projection period in 2018.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012...
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834462
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

20

20

19

sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
only 45 to 47 percent?
Reagan wouldn't be happy.
pretty cool how a far right meme actually belongs to the right. but as we all know, our current crop of 'conservatives' will never qualify as historians.
Look it up Clown!! Stop the silly nonsense! Look it up since it's obvious you have the internet!!
holycrapbatman

Morgantown, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#834463
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

19

19

19

Professor Ayreshire wrote:
1 Only in America could the rich people – who pay 86% of all income taxes – be accused of not paying their “fair share” by people who don’t pay any income taxes at all.
2 Only in America could people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when they have a black President, a black Attorney General, and roughly 18% of the federal workforce is black while only 12% of the population is black
3 Only in America could they have had the two people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner, the head of the Treasury Department and Charles Rangel who once ran the Ways and Means Committee, BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor of higher taxes.
4 Only in America can they have terrorists kill people in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash.
5 Only in America would they make people who want to legally become American citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege while we discuss letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just ‘magically’ become American citizens.
6 Only in America could the people who believe in balancing the budget and sticking by the country’s Constitution be thought of as “extremists.”
7 Only in America could you need to present a driver’s license to cash a check or buy alcohol, but not to vote.
8 Only in America could people demand the government investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public because the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S. oil company (Marathon Oil) is less than half of a company making tennis shoes (Nike).
9 Only in America could the government collect more tax dollars from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a Trillion dollars more than it has per year – for total spending of $7-Million PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn’t have nearly enough money.
10 Only in America could politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a $35,000.00 a plate campaign fund-raising event.
What reason do you Repubs think it is that the top 20% of America pays 80% of all taxes? It's because the top 20% of wage earners receive 80% of ALL the income. duh..........
According to the yearly Forbes List of the Richest 400 in America, they have more combined wealth than the first 150 MILLION Americans. 6 of these 400 paid NO Federal taxes in 2010.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 769,981 - 770,000 of1,077,709
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

92 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 10 min Learn to Read 174,390
Amy 7-22 11 min Mister Tonka 9
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 13 min well 48,818
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 22 min TRD 67,831
vote blank in 2016 unless you support Hillary. 35 min VeganTiger 4
Abby 7-22 1 hr PEllen 2
Thousands march in downtown Chicago in support ... 1 hr bensleys thoughts 3
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••