Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#834464 Jan 6, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
You just said the same.
No, you "interpreted" what I said. What I did was lay out the difference between debt and spending and you tried to spin it into some judgement on debt.

Judged:

19

19

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#834465 Jan 6, 2013
Professor Ayreshire wrote:
<quoted text>SonicFilter stop the silly nonsense! People buy guns to collect them just like people collect stamps, coins, knives etc.. etc.. When you start telling people what they can and cannot have then you have a socialist Government. Why don't we make cocaine, meth and LSD illegal? That will surely take them off the streets! Do you think? If banning guns worked, Washington, DC and New York City would be the safest cities in the country. Since 1976, it's been illegal in Washington, DC to own any handguns or to keep any type of gun in your home unlocked and fully assembled. However, Washington, DC is the murder capital of the United States next to Detroit.
New York City has had severe gun control laws since 1911, yet it also ranks among the most dangerous places in the country. In both cities, violent criminals can easily obtain the most deadly weapons on the streets within minutes.
A follow-up to Heller, Heller v. District of Columbia (known as “Heller II”) challenged laws prohibiting large-capacity ammunition magazines and assault weapons. In October 2011, the D.C. Circuit Court ruled 2-1 to uphold those bans as constitutional, remanding certain registration requirements back to the lower court for further review. Judge Douglas Ginsburg, delivering the opinion of the court, used the logic of the first Heller to conclude some restrictions on the Second Amendment are constitutional. He says these restrictions must pass an “intermediate scrutiny test”— and the court found the assault weapons ban in question did.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar...

nice to know that the Constitution promotes socialism.

now that would put a smile on Reagan's face.

Judged:

20

20

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#834466 Jan 6, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't believe in the myth of the "living wage"?
You should know better.

Judged:

19

19

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Professor Ayreshire

Santa Fe, NM

#834467 Jan 6, 2013
SATANS BIG HAIRY BALLS wrote:
<quoted text>
SURE YOU IS, AN' SURE YOU DID. YOU VOTED FO' AN EVANGELICAL DRUG BURNOUT IN THE POCKET OF BIG BIDNESS. YOU OWN IT, CRACKER. LEMME TELL YOU WHAT A SPINELESS COWARD IS: IT'S A GROUP OF FRIGHTENED STOOPID PEOPLE WHO START A WAR BY FABRICATING INTELLIGENCE, THEN PROSECUTE IT LIKE THE HAM-FISTED RURAL MORONS THEY IS, THEN LOSE IT AFTER HAVING KILLED THREE TIMES AS MANY PEOPLE AS THE "DICTATOR" THEY WENT THERE TO CONFRONT, THEN THEY COME BACK AFTER HAVING LOST AND NOT PAID FOR THE ADVENTURE AND BLAME THE OTHER GUY. THAT'S WHAT A SPINELESS COWARD IS, SOMEONE WHO WILL LET YOU TAKE THE FALL FOR THEIR OWN INCOMPETENCE.
How woulf you knoe waht satan's balls look like!

Judged:

20

20

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
holycrapbatman

Russellville, KY

#834468 Jan 6, 2013
Professor Ayreshire wrote:
<quoted text>According to official IRS data, the top 1% of income earners paid $84 billion more in federal income taxes in 2007 than in 2000 before the Bush tax cuts were passed, 23% more. The share of total federal income taxes paid by the top 1% rose from 37% in 2000, before the Bush tax cuts, to 40% in 2007, after the tax cuts.
In contrast, the bottom half of income earners paid $6 billion less in federal income taxes in 2007 than in 2000, a decline of 16%. The share of federal income taxes paid by the bottom 50% declined from 3.9% in 2000 to 2.9% in 2007.
The Bush tax cuts also included a doubling of the child tax credit from $500 per child to $1,000 per child. Because of that, and the 33% cut in the bottom tax rate, nearly 8 million more people dropped off the federal income tax rolls entirely, paying zero federal income taxes. Indeed, under the Bush tax cuts, the bottom 40% of all income earners not only paid no federal income taxes, as a group on net. By 2009, they were being paid cash by the IRS equal to 10% of all federal income taxes.
These Bush tax cuts did not explode the deficit, as Obama and his echo chamber have alleged. By 2007, the deficit was down to $160 billion, less than 15% of Obama’s deficits today. Total federal revenues soared from $793.7 billion in 2003, when the last of the Bush tax cuts were enacted, to $1.16 trillion in 2007, a 47% increase. Capital gains revenues had doubled by 2005, despite the 25% capital gains rate cut adopted in 2003. Federal revenues rose to 18.5% of GDP by 2007, above the long term, postwar, historical average over the prior 60 years. CBO was projecting surpluses to return indefinitely in 2012 through the end of its projection period in 2018.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012...
According to IRS data 93% of ALL the NEW income since the 2008 collapse has went to the TOP 1%. 93%!!!!!!!!! Of all the raises in income !!!!!!!!!!

Judged:

19

19

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#834469 Jan 6, 2013
Professor Ayreshire wrote:
<quoted text>Look it up Clown!! Stop the silly nonsense! Look it up since it's obvious you have the internet!!
one minute you wingnuts are complaining that we pay too much, and in the next you want more.

so who's confused here?

Judged:

22

22

21

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Professor Ayreshire

Santa Fe, NM

#834470 Jan 6, 2013
entrenched wrote:
5 points for control.. Media. Military, Education, Economy. Politics...who controls those controls the world. Now do homework on who owns the Biggest Media corps, do homework on who owns the companies that the military hires to build their weapons of mass destruction, do your homework on who controls education politics and military and you somehow come to the conclusion that the same 5 or 6 corporations own all of these. Weve been bamboozled by a very tiny % of the elite who in reality own about half the wealth of the world. Namely ROTHSCHILDS< DUPONTS<WALTONS<ROCKEFEL LERS< ETC......
Unsolved UFO sightings, 9/11 conspiracies, Conspiracies of Zionist Companies that own the media, the world and all the world's money supply?? Do you ever watch MSLSD, MSN, CNN, NBC, FOX, CBS?? Do they start out telling you they are Zionist controlled and give you the Zionist Message of the day!! If you listened to MSLSD, CNN, NBC, they are hardly in favor of ZIONISTS (WHO HAPPEN TO BE JEWS) and ISRAEL!! WHEN YOU GO TO A BANK DO YOU SEE SIGNS THAT STATE "FEEL SECURE!! OH YOSSI, EAT YOUR LOX AND BAGELS YOUR MONEY IS BACKED BY ZIONISTS MEMBERS OF THE FDIC?? My guess is, you know full well you can't actually support your position with fact, so you won't rule out BS as a valuable tool to keep your ideology healthy. I've a friend who recently got into believing all this BS. They're supposed to be the head of The Illuminati, yeah right? Some people can't face the fact that the world is a random chaotic mess. Governments, countries and civilizations come in and out of power through a series of fortuitous or unfortunate events out of people's control. Some people want to believe there are people behind it all pulling strings and driving our world in a certain direction. They end up joining dots where there is none and linking events which are unrelated. The rich and the powerful end up getting the brunt of this. They're either Satan incarnate, members of shady, ancient organizations or reptilian overlords. Anti-Semites can only imagine the Rothschild's get the brunt of their end prophecy nonsense because they are Jews. I have been reading a lot lately about how the Rothschild's rule the world and Central Banks. Can anyone point me in the direction of actual evidence for this?

Judged:

21

21

21

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Professor Ayreshire

Santa Fe, NM

#834471 Jan 6, 2013
holycrapbatman wrote:
<quoted text>What reason do you Repubs think it is that the top 20% of America pays 80% of all taxes? It's because the top 20% of wage earners receive 80% of ALL the income. duh..........
According to the yearly Forbes List of the Richest 400 in America, they have more combined wealth than the first 150 MILLION Americans. 6 of these 400 paid NO Federal taxes in 2010.
Hey clown! Some in democrat Hollywood are some of the richest!

Judged:

21

21

21

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
SATANS BIG HAIRY BALLS

Shibuya, Japan

#834472 Jan 6, 2013
Professor Ayreshire wrote:
<quoted text>According to official IRS data, the top 1% of income earners paid $84 billion more in federal income taxes in 2007 than in 2000 before the Bush tax cuts were passed, 23% more. The share of total federal income taxes paid by the top 1% rose from 37% in 2000, before the Bush tax cuts, to 40% in 2007, after the tax cuts.
In contrast, the bottom half of income earners paid $6 billion less in federal income taxes in 2007 than in 2000, a decline of 16%. The share of federal income taxes paid by the bottom 50% declined from 3.9% in 2000 to 2.9% in 2007.
The Bush tax cuts also included a doubling of the child tax credit from $500 per child to $1,000 per child. Because of that, and the 33% cut in the bottom tax rate, nearly 8 million more people dropped off the federal income tax rolls entirely, paying zero federal income taxes. Indeed, under the Bush tax cuts, the bottom 40% of all income earners not only paid no federal income taxes, as a group on net. By 2009, they were being paid cash by the IRS equal to 10% of all federal income taxes.
These Bush tax cuts did not explode the deficit, as Obama and his echo chamber have alleged. By 2007, the deficit was down to $160 billion, less than 15% of Obama’s deficits today. Total federal revenues soared from $793.7 billion in 2003, when the last of the Bush tax cuts were enacted, to $1.16 trillion in 2007, a 47% increase. Capital gains revenues had doubled by 2005, despite the 25% capital gains rate cut adopted in 2003. Federal revenues rose to 18.5% of GDP by 2007, above the long term, postwar, historical average over the prior 60 years. CBO was projecting surpluses to return indefinitely in 2012 through the end of its projection period in 2018.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012...
UH-HUH. IT LIKE WATCHIN' A CHICKEN CONFRONTING THE MYSTERY OF A BRAND NEW DAY. THE, UM, TOP 1% OF WHAT? THEY PAID HOW MUCH MORE? WHY YOU SWITCH FROM PERCENTAGES TO DOLLARS RIGHT THERE? BUT LES' NOT TRIFLE OVER DETAILS... AT LEAST NOT YET. SO, UM, WHERE THAT ADDITIONAL 84 BILLION COME FROM? GOD? OUTTA THIN AIR? IT HAD TO COME FROM SOMEWHERE, WHERE IT COME FROM? SCROLL DOWN IN YOU OWN POST FO' THE ANSWER, NIMROD.

Judged:

20

20

20

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Professor Ayreshire

Santa Fe, NM

#834473 Jan 6, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
A follow-up to Heller, Heller v. District of Columbia (known as “Heller nd the court found the assault weapons ban in question did.
http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar...
nice to know that the Constitution promotes socialism.
now that would put a smile on Reagan's face.
Gun Control.... Myths, Lies and downright stupidity!

On 20/20, ABC anchor John Stossel discussed the self-defensive benefits of gun ownership, debunking the myth that "gun control reduces crime."
The segment aired during 20/20's recurring series, "Myths, Lies & Downright Stupidity," based on Stossel's book of the same title.
Citing the recent Federal Appeals Court for DC ruling overturning Washington, D.C.'s ban on gun ownership, Stossel talked to the pro-gun plaintiff
in the case, Tom Palmer, and pointed out that the murder rate in D.C. increased after the city's gun ban:
"Since Washington's gun law passed, the murder rate actually increased, even while America's murder rate dropped.
It's because guns can also save lives, says Palmer, as one saved his years ago in California."

Great Video!!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch ...

Judged:

21

21

21

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
SATANS BIG HAIRY BALLS

Shibuya, Japan

#834474 Jan 6, 2013
SO, UM, NOW YOU QUOTIN' THE IRS, HUH? AIN'T THAT KINDA LIKE YOU FOLKS QUOTIN' THE UNITED NATIONS AS A JUSTIFICATION FO' THE FAILED INVASION OF IRAQ?

Judged:

20

20

20

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#834475 Jan 6, 2013
maddmaxx7 wrote:
<quoted text>
I repeat:
Just the facts ma'm:
, Budget Deficits
http://www.fms.treas.gov/index.html
2002 FY Budget Deficit $158 Billion
2003 FY Budget Deficit $365 Billion
2004 FY Budget Deficit $412 Billion
2005 FY Budget Deficit $319 Billion
2006 FY Budget Deficit $248 Billion
2007 FY Budget Deficit $161 Billion
2008 FY Budget Deficit $455 Billion <---- Democrats control Congress
2009 FY Budget Deficit $1.4 Trillion
2010 FY Budget Deficit $1.3 Trillion
2011 FY Budget Deficit $1.6 Trillion
2012 FY budget deficit $1.3 trillion
2013 est. deficit $1.1 trillion
I bet you know a little math, wanna calculate how much it will cost service a debt of $21 trillion dollars?
And then double the interest rate.
Have you gotten anyone to believe your malarkey about republicans being the big spenders yet? Anyone?
Yeah, go ahead and change it to stupiddmaxx7 if all you can do is toss an unqualified "liar" and trot out the above which has already been shot down.

'cause ya know, that's what stupid people do and you do it well.

Judged:

21

20

12

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Professor Ayreshire

Santa Fe, NM

#834476 Jan 6, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
one minute you wingnuts are complaining that we pay too much, and in the next you want more.
so who's confused here?
One minute you Left wingnut whack jobs are complaining that the rich don't pay enough while you lazy clowns are collecting freebees from those same people AND THE MIDDLE CLASS! Did little Mary have two lollipops and you had only one?? What a crying shame! Get job and get a life!!

Judged:

20

20

20

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#834477 Jan 6, 2013
In response to the Occupy Wall Street protests, some leading conservatives have begun referring to themselves as "the 53 percent"--a reference to their view that the 47 percent of mostly lower-income Americans who don't pay income taxes are getting an undeserved break. Conservatives also argued against closing tax loopholes for the richest Americans and for corporations.

Which is why it's interesting to see President Ronald Reagan, a conservative icon, laud the passage of the 1986 Tax Reform Act--whose 25th anniversary is this week--by declaring that under the new law, "millions of the working poor will be dropped from the tax rolls altogether" and that rich people and big corporations would "pay their fair share."

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/reagan-la...

you can't be a present day conservative without being a hypocrite.

and they wonder why they lost the election?

Judged:

20

20

20

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Professor Ayreshire

Santa Fe, NM

#834478 Jan 6, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, go ahead and change it to stupiddmaxx7 if all you can do is toss an unqualified "liar" and trot out the above which has already been shot down.
'cause ya know, that's what stupid people do and you do it well.
Yeah! Go ahead and prove him wrong clown!! You're the one that is clueless!

Judged:

16

16

16

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Lily Boca Raton Fl

Boca Raton, FL

#834479 Jan 6, 2013
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
You should know better.
How was the movie?

Judged:

18

18

18

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
SATANS BIG HAIRY BALLS

Shibuya, Japan

#834480 Jan 6, 2013
Professor Ayreshire wrote:
<quoted text>Unsolved UFO sightings, 9/11 conspiracies, Conspiracies of Zionist Companies that own the media, the world and all the world's money supply?? Do you ever watch MSLSD, MSN, CNN, NBC, FOX, CBS?? Do they start out telling you they are Zionist controlled and give you the Zionist Message of the day!! If you listened to MSLSD, CNN, NBC, they are hardly in favor of ZIONISTS (WHO HAPPEN TO BE JEWS) and ISRAEL!! WHEN YOU GO TO A BANK DO YOU SEE SIGNS THAT STATE "FEEL SECURE!! OH YOSSI, EAT YOUR LOX AND BAGELS YOUR MONEY IS BACKED BY ZIONISTS MEMBERS OF THE FDIC?? My guess is, you know full well you can't actually support your position with fact, so you won't rule out BS as a valuable tool to keep your ideology healthy. I've a friend who recently got into believing all this BS. They're supposed to be the head of The Illuminati, yeah right? Some people can't face the fact that the world is a random chaotic mess. Governments, countries and civilizations come in and out of power through a series of fortuitous or unfortunate events out of people's control. Some people want to believe there are people behind it all pulling strings and driving our world in a certain direction. They end up joining dots where there is none and linking events which are unrelated. The rich and the powerful end up getting the brunt of this. They're either Satan incarnate, members of shady, ancient organizations or reptilian overlords. Anti-Semites can only imagine the Rothschild's get the brunt of their end prophecy nonsense because they are Jews. I have been reading a lot lately about how the Rothschild's rule the world and Central Banks. Can anyone point me in the direction of actual evidence for this?
BOY, YOU ARE A PINHEAD AIN'T YOU. THE ISRAELIS ARE CURRENTLY HOLDING UP THE APPOINTMENT OF THE UNITED STATES SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, CHUCK HEGEL, A FUCKING REPUBLICAN. NOT SURE IF THE ROTHSCHILDES ARE IN THERE SOMEWHERE BUT WHO CARES REALLY? WHAT WE DO CARE ABOUT IS WHY THE UNITED STATES IS OBLIGED TO CONSIDER ISRAEL'S WISHES IN FORMING ITS OWN GOVERNMENT? THEY DON'T IN FACT. LET'S CUT ISRAEL OFF THE US TIT NOW. LET 'EM GO TRY AND CONVINCE THE CHINEE THAT JUDAISM AND THE FALUN GONG HAVE A CENTURIES OLD SHARED TRADITION. IS EVERYBODY HERE IN JEWPIX HAPPY TODAY?

Judged:

17

17

17

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#834481 Jan 6, 2013
Professor Ayreshire wrote:
<quoted text>One minute you Left wingnut whack jobs are complaining that the rich don't pay enough while you lazy clowns are collecting freebees from those same people AND THE MIDDLE CLASS! Did little Mary have two lollipops and you had only one?? What a crying shame! Get job and get a life!!
so what would be your right wing blogger take on the red states loving their welfare?

the blue states would like to know why they're paying out.

Judged:

18

18

18

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#834484 Jan 6, 2013
maddmaxx7 wrote:
<quoted text>
Not true, the vast majority of the deaths were from terrorists killing their own people. And the arab fanatics from other lands.
It continues to this day. Do you see that in your news source?
Really, was that BEFORE or DURING and AFTER our occupation and our destabilization of the country?

Judged:

15

15

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
W Church

Edison, NJ

#834485 Jan 6, 2013
Professor Ayreshire wrote:
1 Only in America could the rich people – who pay 86% of all income taxes – be accused of not paying their “fair share” by people who don’t pay any income taxes at all.
2 Only in America could people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when they have a black President, a black Attorney General, and roughly 18% of the federal workforce is black while only 12% of the population is black
3 Only in America could they have had the two people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner, the head of the Treasury Department and Charles Rangel who once ran the Ways and Means Committee, BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor of higher taxes.
4 Only in America can they have terrorists kill people in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash.
5 Only in America would they make people who want to legally become American citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege while we discuss letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just ‘magically’ become American citizens.
6 Only in America could the people who believe in balancing the budget and sticking by the country’s Constitution be thought of as “extremists.”
7 Only in America could you need to present a driver’s license to cash a check or buy alcohol, but not to vote.
8 Only in America could people demand the government investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public because the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S. oil company (Marathon Oil) is less than half of a company making tennis shoes (Nike).
9 Only in America could the government collect more tax dollars from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a Trillion dollars more than it has per year – for total spending of $7-Million PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn’t have nearly enough money.
10 Only in America could politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a $35,000.00 a plate campaign fund-raising event.
Only in America could those who consistently make bad decisions consider be regarded as victims. Historically speaking or presently in third world countries, they'd have starved to death. Here they have air conditioning, cable and are usually obese.

Judged:

16

16

14

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 15 min IBdaMann 48,531
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 25 min Mandela 70,613
Da Mayor Wins...........BIG 1 hr Eric Dieson 1
giuliani defends self from charges of "white su... 1 hr monkeyzhou72 4
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr loose cannon 180,817
After Ferguson the Protest Should Move to Chicago. 3 hr Madblogger 7
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr edogxxx 98,685
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 8:28 pm PST

NBC Sports 8:28PM
Report: Washington to start Colt McCoy on Sunday
Bleacher Report 8:34 PM
Report: Redskins to Start McCoy over RGIII
NFL 8:42 PM
Redskins planning to start McCoy over RGIII on Sunday
Bleacher Report 8:59 PM
Bears' Jared Allen Just 1 Sack Away from Joining All-Time Top 10
Bleacher Report 9:14 PM
Redskins vs. Colts: Complete Week 13 Preview for Washington