Barack Obama, our next President

[John Galt]

dont know nothin wrote:

<quoted text>so i cannot pay myself to think so i'm intellectually bankrupt? what ? i'm sorry good sir but the only idiot around here seems to be the one that cannot put a sentence into context, namely you.

Intellectually bankrupt twaddle from an idiot.

[Yeah]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
2.4 Government Finance and Spending
All persons are entitled to keep the fruits of their labor. We call for the repeal of the income tax, the abolishment of the Internal Revenue Service and all federal programs and services not required under the U.S. Constitution. We oppose any legal requirements forcing employers to serve as tax collectors. Government should not incur debt, which burdens future generations without their consent. We support the passage of a "Balanced Budget Amendment" to the U.S. Constitution, provided that the budget is balanced exclusively by cutting expenditures, and not by raising taxes.

lol! What? No CIA? No FBI?

No Air Force?

No Coast Guard?

Wow. What else are you eliminating son?

[John Galt]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! Sorry son.

Talk to Patrick, your kind.

[Tinka]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! I see. Because you can compete at a higher level, you drop to a lower one.
Makes sense.

LOL that's a good one...

And so anyone that has achieved a level of greatness should drop a level or two or three now and then...you know to remind themselves how things are real things as real things are...

like dropping a dress size many find pleasure in that accomplishment true surviving...

Which really makes me think what is the survival rate in America amongst the starving?

[Tinka]

Yeah wrote:

<quoted text>lol! What? No CIA? No FBI?
No Air Force?
No Coast Guard?
Wow. What else are you eliminating son?

Ask that the Citizen Soldier of Porn...

He chases them down oh wait of Prostitution that is he chases them down then turns it lose on Utube and turns them in so the cops really have nothing left but to get fat too...

Time to drop a size for them too...

Maybe...

Take back the rights established and un...

Anyway it's not up to some yahooligan savior of the neighborhood to say what or who's f'ing for pay etc...

[Yeah]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
Talk to Patrick, your kind.

I have no idea what you're talking about.

And I surmise you don't either.

[dont know nothin]

John Galt wrote:

<quoted text>
By the way, I take no claim for the Libertarian Party platform, even though I agree with same.

bankrupt twaddle this bankrupt twaddle that .... lol .. typical repititive response frome a republican who just got a little slice of the truth.

[HOW LOW WILL YOU GO]

Exclusive: Democrats Drop 'God' From Party Platform

Guess what? God’s name has been removed from the Democratic National Committee platform.

This is the paragraph that was in the 2008 platform:

“We need a government that stands up for the hopes, values, and interests of working people, and gives everyone willing to work hard the chance to make the most of their God-given potential.”

Now the words “God-given” have been removed. The paragraph has been restructured to say this:

“We gather to reclaim the basic bargain that built the largest middle class and the most prosperous nation on Earth – the simple principle that in America, hard work should pay off, responsibility should be rewarded, and each one of us should be able to go as far as our talent and drive take us.”

WAKE UP YOU FAKE CHRISTIANS!!!!!!!!!!

[Obama 2016]

killtaker wrote:

Gun bans in Australis DID NOT WORK...
"According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, there was a slight drop in the percent of murders committed with a firearm between 2001 and 2007 (16.0% and 13.4%, respectively). However, the percentage was highest in 2006 (16.3%) and remains higher than the low of 8.9% in 2005. There is no difference in the use of a firearm in robbery: Guns were used in 6.4% of all robberies in both 2001 and 2007."
CASE CLOSED.
http://pjmedia.com/blog/gun-control-fails-say...

We're not in Australia. The demographics are much different here. A total gun ban in America would reduce crime significantly. I believe President Obama knows this and will propose his plan for a total gun ban sometime in 2013. It will start with voluntary compliance and a buy-back program. After that the Department of Homeland Security may be called on to finalize enforcement of the new law.

[PDUPONT]

DBWriter wrote:

<quoted text>
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
Taxes.
Who will pay these taxes?
If you taxed the top 10 percent at 100 percent and made them destitute, you still wouldn't have enough money to pay for Obama's government. So...
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
So far, nobody in the world has been able to answer this question. Anybody here got an answer?

It's not Obama's government you abysmally ignorant piece of crap, it's our government. It's a government that not only provides military security but protects the air we breathe, the water we drink and the food we eat. It sets rules that protect workers so that going to the job isn't an exercise in survival. It the government that maintains the infrastructure needed for commerce.
The reason we have this enormous debt is The policies of the previous administration. The Bush tax cuts alone increased the deficit by $1812 billion and the two wars by another $853 billion. Along with other spending Bush increased the deficit by $5.1 trillion. That debt didn't just disappear when Bush left office, we still owe that money plus interest, largely to China. Where were you idiots when Bush was running up that debt? The projected cost for Obama's policies until 2017 is $983 billion. It would be less if the Bush tax cuts on those making over $250,000 a year had expired and if we didn't have to spend money repairing our infrastructure which the previous administration ignored and also the continued cost of two wars that Obama inherited.

[Waxman]

PDUPONT wrote:

<quoted text>
It's not Obama's government you abysmally ignorant piece of crap, it's our government. It's a government that not only provides military security but protects the air we breathe, the water we drink and the food we eat. It sets rules that protect workers so that going to the job isn't an exercise in survival. It the government that maintains the infrastructure needed for commerce.
The reason we have this enormous debt is The policies of the previous administration. The Bush tax cuts alone increased the deficit by $1812 billion and the two wars by another $853 billion. Along with other spending Bush increased the deficit by $5.1 trillion. That debt didn't just disappear when Bush left office, we still owe that money plus interest, largely to China. Where were you idiots when Bush was running up that debt? The projected cost for Obama's policies until 2017 is $983 billion. It would be less if the Bush tax cuts on those making over $250,000 a year had expired and if we didn't have to spend money repairing our infrastructure which the previous administration ignored and also the continued cost of two wars that Obama inherited.

Bunk, terdface. It's your president, not our government azzwhole. You idiots and "your" O-Barry the jive-ass punk are buliding debt like a stereotypical ghetto thief.

Now O-Barry has inhereted his own economy. Stop lying, moron. You are a liar and a fking moron, scumbagger.

[TheIndependentMa jority]

Death of Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
Where in that did Iraq attack the US?
The Constitution tasks the federal government with the nation's DEFENSE!

Next time get the HISTORY right.

Catalyst one: OIL
PROBLEM one/Catalyst two: SADDAM

NOT "Bush".

"But we don't need no stinking domestic continental oil pipelines"

IDIOTS.

U.S. launches missile strikes against Iraq
Missile Strike

September 3, 1996
Web posted at: 7:40 a.m. EDT (1140 GMT)

WASHINGTON (CNN)-- The United States launched missile strikes against Saddam Hussein early Tuesday in retaliation for his army's assault on Kurdish areas in a United Nations "safe haven" in northern Iraq.

Dole responds

Republican presidential candidate Bob Dole issued a statement, praising U.S. troops and pushing for "decisive action" against Saddam.

"America and its allies and friends around the world can no longer tolerate Saddam's repeated attempts to erode the restraints that have been placed on his regime, and to violently reassert his authority," Dole said.

[TheIndependentMa jority]

PDUPONT wrote:

<quoted text>
It's not Obama's government you abysmally ignorant piece of crap, it's our government. It's a government that not only provides military security but protects the air we breathe, the water we drink and the food we eat. It sets rules that protect workers so that going to the job isn't an exercise in survival. It the government that maintains the infrastructure needed for commerce.
The reason we have this enormous debt is The policies of the previous administration. The Bush tax cuts alone increased the deficit by $1812 billion and the two wars by another $853 billion. Along with other spending Bush increased the deficit by $5.1 trillion. That debt didn't just disappear when Bush left office, we still owe that money plus interest, largely to China. Where were you idiots when Bush was running up that debt? The projected cost for Obama's policies until 2017 is $983 billion. It would be less if the Bush tax cuts on those making over $250,000 a year had expired and if we didn't have to spend money repairing our infrastructure which the previous administration ignored and also the continued cost of two wars that Obama inherited.

WRONG.

The PROBLEM is TOO much mid east OIL dependency, and the rogue DICtatators and Jihadist pshycoTic nutcases thereof.

KEYSTONE (local JOBS) duhmazz?
BETTER FDA regs--LESS EPA strangulation for no good reasons--other than "whimisical DREAMS" of alternate energy and the BAIL outs and FAILouts (Now MORE USELESS DEBT) thereof.

You people are sickening anymore-nothing but an abundance of IGNORANCE.

Get A DAMN B-U-D-G-E-T so this nation can move on.

Slight tax raises on the wealthy aren't going to hurt JOBS at all-and CAPPING the BLED dry entitleMENTAL programs (like babymama givverment drawing WELFARE slcakerTics--that need to QUIT having litters--especially ones that they do NOTHING to contribute to the raising of--except Suck off of everybody else, for starters)and then send that damn God awful, robbinghoodieTic rotten apple cart before broke back mule healthcare debacle BACK to the tables until it resembles something LOGICAL and do-able, rather than just MORE thieving out of peoples pockets for nothing!!!!!!!!!!
Like implement a Fed point of SALES tax-ALL across the boards, so EVERYONE pays-NOT just the "working class" OR just the "wealthier".

And use the US military to support SAFETY in schools! Instant job placements -ALL across this nation!

WORKING class, Broke back T.E.A.!!!!!!!!!

Welcome to OUR geneRATIONAL realities!

[TheIndependentMa jority]

Obama 2016 wrote:

<quoted text>We're not in Australia. The demographics are much different here. A total gun ban in America would reduce crime significantly. I believe President Obama knows this and will propose his plan for a total gun ban sometime in 2013. It will start with voluntary compliance and a buy-back program. After that the Department of Homeland Security may be called on to finalize enforcement of the new law.

DREAM on. They'd gather a whole new Whitehouse admin first.

SANE people will NOT give the CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS to SELF protection, so the theives and GHETTO THUGS can have even more of heyday!!!

America is already SICK and TIRED of the predominance of it.

[TheIndependentMa jority]

new yawk wrote:

LOL!
You have a stalker.
And she's a SuccuBus.
A kiss a$$ AND a suck up.
Whole lotta suckin' goin' on !!
Psychological Thumb Sucking T00 ! ;)
<quoted text>

Yeah I know.

Flippin' lunaTic nutcase-ought to be locked up behind bars for life.

[TheIndependentMa jority]

Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:

<quoted text>How will we know, unless we try it?
Don't be a taker, be a maker.
:)

Time to heed your OWN advise.

Start PAYING for that which you have been doing nothing but taking.

[TheIndependentMa jority]

Nuculur option wrote:

Don't answer my posts.
You're far too stupid for me.
If Tenzing chooses to deal with idiots, that's his business.
<quoted text>

Translate : Nutcaseular is Another one that can't handle FACTS.

Tough. Get used to them.

[impeach Congress]

TheIndependentMajority wrote:

<quoted text>
DREAM on. They'd gather a whole new Whitehouse admin first.
SANE people will NOT give the CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS to SELF protection, so the theives and GHETTO THUGS can have even more of heyday!!!
America is already SICK and TIRED of the predominance of it.

Which "America" are you referring to? Certainly not the America that "Re-Elected" our wonderful president! Must be talking bout the stupid losers!

[OldRaider]

HOW LOW WILL YOU GO wrote:

Exclusive: Democrats Drop 'God' From Party Platform
Guess what? God’s name has been removed from the Democratic National Committee platform.
This is the paragraph that was in the 2008 platform:
“We need a government that stands up for the hopes, values, and interests of working people, and gives everyone willing to work hard the chance to make the most of their God-given potential.”
Now the words “God-given” have been removed. The paragraph has been restructured to say this:
“We gather to reclaim the basic bargain that built the largest middle class and the most prosperous nation on Earth – the simple principle that in America, hard work should pay off, responsibility should be rewarded, and each one of us should be able to go as far as our talent and drive take us.”
WAKE UP YOU FAKE CHRISTIANS!!!!!!!!!!

Most rational people recognize the need to separate church and state in a FREE society. Man made religions are set up to control the masses by claiming to interpret what they believe God wants them to do. God gave me the sense to avoid anyone who claims to speak for Him. All you have to do to see the way organized religion has been used a tool of evil is to read some history.

[TheIndependentMa jority]

Death of Tenzing wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not an independent and we're only a two party nation because y'all want it that way.
There is also strawberry.

What a clueless statement.

You damn sure aren't-we don't take kindly to nothing but divide and destroy partisan, CLUELESS MORONS.

Proudly registered as an INDEPENDENT-the REAL deciders based on PRINCIPLES, NOT SUCKING UP Voters of this nation.

Idiot.