Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1508079 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

#834451 Jan 6, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Going with the old rape and torture room justification again Carol? Well stupid, they were still in full swing after the invasion under new management and being paid for on our dime.
www.globalresearch.ca/cia...in-iraq-torture-a...
Sadaam Hussein was never a threat to anyone after the first Gulf War nitwit, his army rape torture and ethnic killings going on. It was all about oil.
Only an idiot would think that we did any good for the Iraqi people.
Your beloved Democrats voted to use force in BOTH wars as well! Unlike Bush, their hero Obama did not get Congressional Approval when he took us into Libya and then called for a Stand Down as one of our U.S. Ambassadors was murdered along with other embassy personnel and those that tried to save them!! Bush was in office less than 8 months before 9/11 and it was Clinton's 8 years in office that eased up on National Security! Not taking out Osama when he had the chance and Firing missiles at a baby milk factory did not hack it! Most Americans agreed with George Bush and for taking out terrorist training camps in Afghanistan responsible for almost 4,000 American deaths on 911 but not these clowns! Then we have Iraq and their no WMD's nonsense? What the hell do you call nerve agents Saddam used on Iranians and his OWN people as hundreds of thousands died from it? Kool- aid?? IT'S KNOWN FACT THAT HE HAD WMD'S!! What is so hard to understand that?? What did Saddam do with them? Archeologists many years from now will probably find them buried thousands of feet underground or he simply had them shipped off to Syria prior to the war! Take your pick! Furthermore, Saddam continually violated U.N. Resolutions from the First Gulf War and that in itself gave us every right to go back in!

Judged:

22

22

21

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

#834452 Jan 6, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
In Heller, a 5-4 majority, led by Justice Antonin Scalia, held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a gun so as you can see, the opinion of a wingnut will have little bearing on a assault weapon ban.
SonicFilter stop the silly nonsense! People buy guns to collect them just like people collect stamps, coins, knives etc.. etc.. When you start telling people what they can and cannot have then you have a socialist Government. Why don't we make cocaine, meth and LSD illegal? That will surely take them off the streets! Do you think? If banning guns worked, Washington, DC and New York City would be the safest cities in the country. Since 1976, it's been illegal in Washington, DC to own any handguns or to keep any type of gun in your home unlocked and fully assembled. However, Washington, DC is the murder capital of the United States next to Detroit.
New York City has had severe gun control laws since 1911, yet it also ranks among the most dangerous places in the country. In both cities, violent criminals can easily obtain the most deadly weapons on the streets within minutes.

Judged:

22

22

20

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: May 11

Waynesboro, PA

#834453 Jan 6, 2013
moshx wrote:
<quoted text> name me one gun that gets up all by it self and shot anyone without a criminal holding it.
Name one source of alcohol that forces itself down the throats of those that drive drunk. We control alcohol sales & consumptions.

Judged:

19

19

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#834454 Jan 6, 2013
Professor Ayreshire wrote:
There are by some estimates, 45 to 47 percent in this country that pay no income tax what-so-ever so that leaves the middle class and rich to pay a majority of taxes. Those at the high end are paying 35 to 40 percent of their income to taxes. Large and small businesses are the job creators in this country and supply most of the jobs in the private sector. So what’s Obama's solution? Let’s tax them some more until it reaches a point where they cannot operate, cannot invest in new equipment or new technology, cannot hire new employees and all at the same time trying to meet Union Demands and NOW OBAMACARE! They will eventually take their business elsewhere or simply close their doors and there is nothing you can do about it. Then what do we have? A government that has nothing coming in by way of taxes except from the middle class. Washington would have to close its doors as well which might just be a good thing!!
only 45 to 47 percent?

Reagan wouldn't be happy.

pretty cool how a far right meme actually belongs to the right. but as we all know, our current crop of 'conservatives' will never qualify as historians.

Judged:

22

21

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

#834455 Jan 6, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
In Heller, a 5-4 majority, led by Justice Antonin Scalia, held that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a gun unconnected with service in a militia, and to use the gun for traditionally lawful purposes, such as in the home for self defense. The decision invalidated the District of Columbia's handgun ban so as you can see, the opinion of a wingnut will have little bearing on a assault weapon ban.
Gun Control.... Myths, Lies and downright stupidity!

On 20/20, ABC anchor John Stossel discussed the self-defensive benefits of gun ownership, debunking the myth that "gun control reduces crime."
The segment aired during 20/20's recurring series, "Myths, Lies & Downright Stupidity," based on Stossel's book of the same title.
Citing the recent Federal Appeals Court for DC ruling overturning Washington, D.C.'s ban on gun ownership, Stossel talked to the pro-gun plaintiff
in the case, Tom Palmer, and pointed out that the murder rate in D.C. increased after the city's gun ban:
"Since Washington's gun law passed, the murder rate actually increased, even while America's murder rate dropped.
It's because guns can also save lives, says Palmer, as one saved his years ago in California."

Great Video!!!

Judged:

22

22

21

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
SATANS BIG HAIRY BALLS

Tokyo, Japan

#834456 Jan 6, 2013
maddmaxx7 wrote:
<quoted text>
No one on here is for getting our soldiers killed far from home, I certainly never got a vote. Back before Iraq, if the dems hadn't proven themselves such spineless cowards afraid of being on the wrong side, they would have voted against the wars.
But they didn't and here we are.
SURE YOU IS, AN' SURE YOU DID. YOU VOTED FO' AN EVANGELICAL DRUG BURNOUT IN THE POCKET OF BIG BIDNESS. YOU OWN IT, CRACKER. LEMME TELL YOU WHAT A SPINELESS COWARD IS: IT'S A GROUP OF FRIGHTENED STOOPID PEOPLE WHO START A WAR BY FABRICATING INTELLIGENCE, THEN PROSECUTE IT LIKE THE HAM-FISTED RURAL MORONS THEY IS, THEN LOSE IT AFTER HAVING KILLED THREE TIMES AS MANY PEOPLE AS THE "DICTATOR" THEY WENT THERE TO CONFRONT, THEN THEY COME BACK AFTER HAVING LOST AND NOT PAID FOR THE ADVENTURE AND BLAME THE OTHER GUY. THAT'S WHAT A SPINELESS COWARD IS, SOMEONE WHO WILL LET YOU TAKE THE FALL FOR THEIR OWN INCOMPETENCE.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

#834458 Jan 6, 2013
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Going with the old rape and torture room justification again Carol? Well stupid, they were still in full swing after the invasion under new management and being paid for on our dime.
www.globalresearch.ca/cia...in-iraq-torture-a...
Sadaam Hussein was never a threat to anyone after the first Gulf War rape torture and ethnic killings going on. It was all about oil.
Only an idiot would think that we did any good for the Iraqi people.
Get a clue!! Some clowns are stuck on this war for oil nonsense! As if they don't drive a car, heat their homes, fly in an airplane, take a train, take a bus? Well I hate to tell you this but they all need oil and there is no way around it until someone comes up with an alternative!! Did we steal someone's oil and if we did, how much? I'd really like to hear your answer? Most wars had nothing to do with oil but had a lot to do with taking out murdering madmen, terrorists, Hitler and I could go on and on but you clowns are stuck on your war for oil nonsense.

Judged:

22

22

22

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
holycrapbatman

Rochester, KY

#834459 Jan 6, 2013
W Church wrote:
<quoted text>Show me a society that does NOT have a class of people at the top who have
1)Built wealth by taking risk and hard work
2)Inherited wealth
3)Stolen their wealth by taking it from someone else either by military action or by government redistribution
The difference between America and any other country is that everyone here has the opportunity to build weath through their own achievements. And then they can pass it on to their heirs.
Unfortunately, Obama's ideology has a problem with methods #1 and #2 and is transforming America by #3.
What you have posted, "whitey still out for whitey," shows you are held back by your culture. A culture which sat back while letting liberals destroy the family unit by encouraging out of wedlock births. And now you have a majority of single mothers dependent on the government to redistribute wealth. Your only problem is you think the successful should pay more money for this government ghetto-ization program.
The best economic times in America was when not everyone was trying to build wealth and become rich. Most everyone was trying to have a middle class life. Trickle Down started the middle class decline. Then the rich CEOs of 27,000 American factories decided to ship all jobs to China for slave labor.

Judged:

20

19

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
SATANS BIG HAIRY BALLS

Tokyo, Japan

#834460 Jan 6, 2013
"BUST A KNIFE IN YOU ASS?" NAH, THAT DON' WORK EITHER...

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

#834461 Jan 6, 2013
SATANS BIG HAIRY BALLS wrote:
<quoted text>
SURE YOU IS, AN' SURE YOU DID. YOU VOTED FO' AN EVANGELICAL DRUG BURNOUT IN THE POCKET OF BIG BIDNESS. YOU OWN IT, CRACKER. LEMME TELL YOU WHAT A SPINELESS COWARD IS: IT'S A GROUP OF FRIGHTENED STOOPID PEOPLE WHO START A WAR BY FABRICATING INTELLIGENCE, THEN PROSECUTE IT LIKE THE HAM-FISTED RURAL MORONS THEY IS, THEN LOSE IT AFTER HAVING KILLED THREE TIMES AS MANY PEOPLE AS THE "DICTATOR" THEY WENT THERE TO CONFRONT, THEN THEY COME BACK AFTER HAVING LOST AND NOT PAID FOR THE ADVENTURE AND BLAME THE OTHER GUY. THAT'S WHAT A SPINELESS COWARD IS, SOMEONE WHO WILL LET YOU TAKE THE FALL FOR THEIR OWN INCOMPETENCE.
According to official IRS data, the top 1% of income earners paid $84 billion more in federal income taxes in 2007 than in 2000 before the Bush tax cuts were passed, 23% more. The share of total federal income taxes paid by the top 1% rose from 37% in 2000, before the Bush tax cuts, to 40% in 2007, after the tax cuts.

In contrast, the bottom half of income earners paid $6 billion less in federal income taxes in 2007 than in 2000, a decline of 16%. The share of federal income taxes paid by the bottom 50% declined from 3.9% in 2000 to 2.9% in 2007.

The Bush tax cuts also included a doubling of the child tax credit from $500 per child to $1,000 per child. Because of that, and the 33% cut in the bottom tax rate, nearly 8 million more people dropped off the federal income tax rolls entirely, paying zero federal income taxes. Indeed, under the Bush tax cuts, the bottom 40% of all income earners not only paid no federal income taxes, as a group on net. By 2009, they were being paid cash by the IRS equal to 10% of all federal income taxes.

These Bush tax cuts did not explode the deficit, as Obama and his echo chamber have alleged. By 2007, the deficit was down to $160 billion, less than 15% of Obama’s deficits today. Total federal revenues soared from $793.7 billion in 2003, when the last of the Bush tax cuts were enacted, to $1.16 trillion in 2007, a 47% increase. Capital gains revenues had doubled by 2005, despite the 25% capital gains rate cut adopted in 2003. Federal revenues rose to 18.5% of GDP by 2007, above the long term, postwar, historical average over the prior 60 years. CBO was projecting surpluses to return indefinitely in 2012 through the end of its projection period in 2018.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012...

Judged:

22

22

21

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

#834462 Jan 6, 2013
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
only 45 to 47 percent?
Reagan wouldn't be happy.
pretty cool how a far right meme actually belongs to the right. but as we all know, our current crop of 'conservatives' will never qualify as historians.
Look it up Clown!! Stop the silly nonsense! Look it up since it's obvious you have the internet!!

Judged:

20

20

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
holycrapbatman

Rochester, KY

#834463 Jan 6, 2013
Professor Ayreshire wrote:
1 Only in America could the rich people – who pay 86% of all income taxes – be accused of not paying their “fair share” by people who don’t pay any income taxes at all.
2 Only in America could people claim that the government still discriminates against black Americans when they have a black President, a black Attorney General, and roughly 18% of the federal workforce is black while only 12% of the population is black
3 Only in America could they have had the two people most responsible for our tax code, Timothy Geithner, the head of the Treasury Department and Charles Rangel who once ran the Ways and Means Committee, BOTH turn out to be tax cheats who are in favor of higher taxes.
4 Only in America can they have terrorists kill people in the name of Allah and have the media primarily react by fretting that Muslims might be harmed by the backlash.
5 Only in America would they make people who want to legally become American citizens wait for years in their home countries and pay tens of thousands of dollars for the privilege while we discuss letting anyone who sneaks into the country illegally just ‘magically’ become American citizens.
6 Only in America could the people who believe in balancing the budget and sticking by the country’s Constitution be thought of as “extremists.”
7 Only in America could you need to present a driver’s license to cash a check or buy alcohol, but not to vote.
8 Only in America could people demand the government investigate whether oil companies are gouging the public because the price of gas went up when the return on equity invested in a major U.S. oil company (Marathon Oil) is less than half of a company making tennis shoes (Nike).
9 Only in America could the government collect more tax dollars from the people than any nation in recorded history, still spend a Trillion dollars more than it has per year – for total spending of $7-Million PER MINUTE, and complain that it doesn’t have nearly enough money.
10 Only in America could politicians talk about the greed of the rich at a $35,000.00 a plate campaign fund-raising event.
What reason do you Repubs think it is that the top 20% of America pays 80% of all taxes? It's because the top 20% of wage earners receive 80% of ALL the income. duh..........
According to the yearly Forbes List of the Richest 400 in America, they have more combined wealth than the first 150 MILLION Americans. 6 of these 400 paid NO Federal taxes in 2010.

Judged:

19

19

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#834464 Jan 6, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
You just said the same.
No, you "interpreted" what I said. What I did was lay out the difference between debt and spending and you tried to spin it into some judgement on debt.

Judged:

19

19

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#834465 Jan 6, 2013
Professor Ayreshire wrote:
<quoted text>SonicFilter stop the silly nonsense! People buy guns to collect them just like people collect stamps, coins, knives etc.. etc.. When you start telling people what they can and cannot have then you have a socialist Government. Why don't we make cocaine, meth and LSD illegal? That will surely take them off the streets! Do you think? If banning guns worked, Washington, DC and New York City would be the safest cities in the country. Since 1976, it's been illegal in Washington, DC to own any handguns or to keep any type of gun in your home unlocked and fully assembled. However, Washington, DC is the murder capital of the United States next to Detroit.
New York City has had severe gun control laws since 1911, yet it also ranks among the most dangerous places in the country. In both cities, violent criminals can easily obtain the most deadly weapons on the streets within minutes.
A follow-up to Heller, Heller v. District of Columbia (known as “Heller II”) challenged laws prohibiting large-capacity ammunition magazines and assault weapons. In October 2011, the D.C. Circuit Court ruled 2-1 to uphold those bans as constitutional, remanding certain registration requirements back to the lower court for further review. Judge Douglas Ginsburg, delivering the opinion of the court, used the logic of the first Heller to conclude some restrictions on the Second Amendment are constitutional. He says these restrictions must pass an “intermediate scrutiny test”— and the court found the assault weapons ban in question did.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar...

nice to know that the Constitution promotes socialism.

now that would put a smile on Reagan's face.

Judged:

20

20

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#834466 Jan 6, 2013
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Don't believe in the myth of the "living wage"?
You should know better.

Judged:

19

19

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

#834467 Jan 6, 2013
SATANS BIG HAIRY BALLS wrote:
<quoted text>
SURE YOU IS, AN' SURE YOU DID. YOU VOTED FO' AN EVANGELICAL DRUG BURNOUT IN THE POCKET OF BIG BIDNESS. YOU OWN IT, CRACKER. LEMME TELL YOU WHAT A SPINELESS COWARD IS: IT'S A GROUP OF FRIGHTENED STOOPID PEOPLE WHO START A WAR BY FABRICATING INTELLIGENCE, THEN PROSECUTE IT LIKE THE HAM-FISTED RURAL MORONS THEY IS, THEN LOSE IT AFTER HAVING KILLED THREE TIMES AS MANY PEOPLE AS THE "DICTATOR" THEY WENT THERE TO CONFRONT, THEN THEY COME BACK AFTER HAVING LOST AND NOT PAID FOR THE ADVENTURE AND BLAME THE OTHER GUY. THAT'S WHAT A SPINELESS COWARD IS, SOMEONE WHO WILL LET YOU TAKE THE FALL FOR THEIR OWN INCOMPETENCE.
How woulf you knoe waht satan's balls look like!

Judged:

20

20

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
holycrapbatman

Rochester, KY

#834468 Jan 6, 2013
Professor Ayreshire wrote:
<quoted text>According to official IRS data, the top 1% of income earners paid $84 billion more in federal income taxes in 2007 than in 2000 before the Bush tax cuts were passed, 23% more. The share of total federal income taxes paid by the top 1% rose from 37% in 2000, before the Bush tax cuts, to 40% in 2007, after the tax cuts.
In contrast, the bottom half of income earners paid $6 billion less in federal income taxes in 2007 than in 2000, a decline of 16%. The share of federal income taxes paid by the bottom 50% declined from 3.9% in 2000 to 2.9% in 2007.
The Bush tax cuts also included a doubling of the child tax credit from $500 per child to $1,000 per child. Because of that, and the 33% cut in the bottom tax rate, nearly 8 million more people dropped off the federal income tax rolls entirely, paying zero federal income taxes. Indeed, under the Bush tax cuts, the bottom 40% of all income earners not only paid no federal income taxes, as a group on net. By 2009, they were being paid cash by the IRS equal to 10% of all federal income taxes.
These Bush tax cuts did not explode the deficit, as Obama and his echo chamber have alleged. By 2007, the deficit was down to $160 billion, less than 15% of Obama’s deficits today. Total federal revenues soared from $793.7 billion in 2003, when the last of the Bush tax cuts were enacted, to $1.16 trillion in 2007, a 47% increase. Capital gains revenues had doubled by 2005, despite the 25% capital gains rate cut adopted in 2003. Federal revenues rose to 18.5% of GDP by 2007, above the long term, postwar, historical average over the prior 60 years. CBO was projecting surpluses to return indefinitely in 2012 through the end of its projection period in 2018.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrara/2012...
According to IRS data 93% of ALL the NEW income since the 2008 collapse has went to the TOP 1%. 93%!!!!!!!!! Of all the raises in income !!!!!!!!!!

Judged:

19

19

19

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#834469 Jan 6, 2013
Professor Ayreshire wrote:
<quoted text>Look it up Clown!! Stop the silly nonsense! Look it up since it's obvious you have the internet!!
one minute you wingnuts are complaining that we pay too much, and in the next you want more.

so who's confused here?

Judged:

22

22

21

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

#834470 Jan 6, 2013
entrenched wrote:
5 points for control.. Media. Military, Education, Economy. Politics...who controls those controls the world. Now do homework on who owns the Biggest Media corps, do homework on who owns the companies that the military hires to build their weapons of mass destruction, do your homework on who controls education politics and military and you somehow come to the conclusion that the same 5 or 6 corporations own all of these. Weve been bamboozled by a very tiny % of the elite who in reality own about half the wealth of the world. Namely ROTHSCHILDS< DUPONTS<WALTONS<ROCKEFEL LERS< ETC......
Unsolved UFO sightings, 9/11 conspiracies, Conspiracies of Zionist Companies that own the media, the world and all the world's money supply?? Do you ever watch MSLSD, MSN, CNN, NBC, FOX, CBS?? Do they start out telling you they are Zionist controlled and give you the Zionist Message of the day!! If you listened to MSLSD, CNN, NBC, they are hardly in favor of ZIONISTS (WHO HAPPEN TO BE JEWS) and ISRAEL!! WHEN YOU GO TO A BANK DO YOU SEE SIGNS THAT STATE "FEEL SECURE!! OH YOSSI, EAT YOUR LOX AND BAGELS YOUR MONEY IS BACKED BY ZIONISTS MEMBERS OF THE FDIC?? My guess is, you know full well you can't actually support your position with fact, so you won't rule out BS as a valuable tool to keep your ideology healthy. I've a friend who recently got into believing all this BS. They're supposed to be the head of The Illuminati, yeah right? Some people can't face the fact that the world is a random chaotic mess. Governments, countries and civilizations come in and out of power through a series of fortuitous or unfortunate events out of people's control. Some people want to believe there are people behind it all pulling strings and driving our world in a certain direction. They end up joining dots where there is none and linking events which are unrelated. The rich and the powerful end up getting the brunt of this. They're either Satan incarnate, members of shady, ancient organizations or reptilian overlords. Anti-Semites can only imagine the Rothschild's get the brunt of their end prophecy nonsense because they are Jews. I have been reading a lot lately about how the Rothschild's rule the world and Central Banks. Can anyone point me in the direction of actual evidence for this?

Judged:

21

21

21

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
Professor Ayreshire

Albuquerque, NM

#834471 Jan 6, 2013
holycrapbatman wrote:
<quoted text>What reason do you Repubs think it is that the top 20% of America pays 80% of all taxes? It's because the top 20% of wage earners receive 80% of ALL the income. duh..........
According to the yearly Forbes List of the Richest 400 in America, they have more combined wealth than the first 150 MILLION Americans. 6 of these 400 paid NO Federal taxes in 2010.
Hey clown! Some in democrat Hollywood are some of the richest!

Judged:

21

21

21

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 10 min tuffet 239,269
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 38 min They cannot kill ... 10,491
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr Mister Tonka 105,049
managers at Steak N Shake sell Passports 11 hr Nuri Harrigan dik... 1
Graduation in Detroit. 17 hr Another Chance 1
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) 17 hr Dudley 8,065
News Man charged with shooting near 26/Cal courthouse 18 hr former democrat 1

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages