Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Comments (Page 38,443)

Showing posts 768,841 - 768,860 of1,036,702
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
proud2bwhite

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832036
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

WaxWhiner wrote:
<quoted text>
Its not working Waxturd/goober/Nostrilfuk/Jimm y/.... All the regulars here can easily see the multiple log-ins you use to write posts to yourself that support your other log-in posts and your manipulation of the Judge-its you load up to stroke your ego. Maybe if you eliminate your use of the "racy" judge-it, a dead give away that its you, then you might disguise your scam a little better.
Keep trying puss.
all this from someone who just posted useing a fake name. How ignorant is that?
Homer

Effort, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832037
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

carol wrote:
MSN Money - January 2, 2013
WASHINGTON (AP)- While the tax package that Congress passed New Year's Day will protect 99 percent of Americans from an income tax increase, most of them will still end up paying more federal taxes in 2013.
That's because the legislation did nothing to prevent a temporary reduction in the Social Security payroll tax from expiring. In 2012, that 2-percentage-point cut in the payroll tax was worth about $1,000 to a worker making $50,000 a year.
The Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan Washington research group, estimates that 77 percent of American households will face higher federal taxes in 2013 under the agreement negotiated between President Barack Obama and Senate Republicans. High-income families will feel the biggest tax increases, but many middle- and low-income families will pay higher taxes too.
Households making between $40,000 and $50,000 will face an average tax increase of $579 in 2013, according to the Tax Policy Center's analysis. Households making between $50,000 and $75,000 will face an average tax increase of $822.
"For most people, it's just the payroll tax," said Roberton Williams, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center.
http://money.msn.com/taxes/news.aspx...
Wasn't that nice of Obama and Reid? In a time of borderline recession with people still jobless and/or struggling, we're all going to have to give them more of our own money to waste.
Think I'm gonna cry...literally.
Wow 11 bucks a week, just how poor are you? Get together with your husband and get your finances in order! You blame Obama and Reid yet the Senate voted 90% and the Republican controlled House also passed.

Bottom line we have to pay for Bush's wars.
NATTY BUMPOFF

Zagreb, Croatia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832038
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Always have, always will.
AN WE GET 'EM TOO. YOU CAN KEEP YOU OYSTERS, HOWEVER.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832039
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Go back to the birfer thread, nitwit.
Obama won. There will be no more discussion of this nonsense.
You lost.
Deal with it!!
You seem to be avoiding answering these questions. Perhaps you're losing your ability to remain organized and focussed on a subject. I'll give you soem help. Here's the questions again:

Please define "mulatto"
Then, please tell us who Obama's mother was.
Then, please tell us why you don't call Obama white?
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832040
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

6

6

6

According to MSN: The income threshold covers more than 99% of all households exceeding Obama's claim according to the Tax Policy Center.

(Of course, we can thank Republicans for that.)

However, the increase in payroll taxes will hit nearly every wage earner.

(But perhaps a little good news...)

Obama and Congress reduced the share of Social Security paid by workers from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent for 2011 and 2012 saving a typical family about $1,000 a year.

(In other words, the government can give and the government can take away. And does that mean the Social Security savings in 2011 and 2012 will continue in 2013 and that we should be grateful for anything they let us keep?)
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832041
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

NATTY BUMPOFF wrote:
HEY, UH, I'M PUTTING TOGETHER A LITTLE EXPEDITION TO DRIVE DOWN TO PALM SPRINGS AND BUMPOFF THE FAT RADIO SHOW HOST. ANYBODY WITH ME? HEY... DO YOU THINK TOPIX IS READING MY POSTS BEFORE I POST THEM? WOW! THAT'S MIND BOGGLING! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZ... HUH? WHERE WUZ I? OH YEAH, TOPIX IS A PROSTITUTION RING RUN BY ORTHODOX (WINK, WINK, NUDGE, NUDGE) JEWS. 10... 9... 8....
Ghost has another fantasy, rounding up the homies from Moreno Valley
NATTY BUMPOFF

Zagreb, Croatia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832042
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

proud2bwhite wrote:
<quoted text> all this from someone who just posted useing a fake name. How ignorant is that?
IF YOU'RE SERIOUSLY ASKING, IT'A ABOUT AS IGNORANT AS CALLING YOURSELF, PROUD2BWHITE.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832044
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Gaff the DWEEB!! We've played him long enough!!
You fell right into that trap, moron!!
We've already got the Bakken and shale plays all over the USA, and you're unaware of it all!!
The Eagle Ford, Barnett, Marcellus, Utica, Woodford, Fayetteville, Haynesville Shale plays, to name a few.
Yet you speak of CA, which will not allow offshore drilling!!
You've proven once again that you are a liar and a poseur.
Go back to the birfers!!
""U.S. to become biggest oil producer - IEA
The United States will overtake Saudi Arabia to become the world's biggest oil producer before 2020, and will be energy independent 10 years later, according to a new forecast by the International Energy Agency.
The recent resurgence in oil and gas production, and efforts to make the transport sector more efficient, are radically reshaping the nation's energy market, reported Paris-based IEA in its World Energy Outlook.
North America would become a net exporter of oil around 2030, the global organization said Monday.""
We've always been in the top one or two hydrocarbon producers, dufus. The problem is, our consumption exceeds our production, dufus.

How about you put some numbers in your post to back up your ignorant statements.
??? x BOE exported.
??? y BOE imported.

y - x equals net BOE imports.

How about some numbers, dufus.
NATTY BUMPOFF

Zagreb, Croatia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832046
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Ghost has another fantasy, rounding up the homies from Moreno Valley
TO EACH HIS HOME.

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Spring, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832047
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
It's been answered.
Too bad you've got birferism, it blocks out all forms of intelligence.
What's the answer, dufus?

Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
So far, nobody in the world has been able to answer that question.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832048
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

carol wrote:
MSN Money - January 2, 2013
WASHINGTON (AP)- While the tax package that Congress passed New Year's Day will protect 99 percent of Americans from an income tax increase, most of them will still end up paying more federal taxes in 2013.
That's because the legislation did nothing to prevent a temporary reduction in the Social Security payroll tax from expiring. In 2012, that 2-percentage-point cut in the payroll tax was worth about $1,000 to a worker making $50,000 a year.
The Tax Policy Center, a nonpartisan Washington research group, estimates that 77 percent of American households will face higher federal taxes in 2013 under the agreement negotiated between President Barack Obama and Senate Republicans. High-income families will feel the biggest tax increases, but many middle- and low-income families will pay higher taxes too.
Households making between $40,000 and $50,000 will face an average tax increase of $579 in 2013, according to the Tax Policy Center's analysis. Households making between $50,000 and $75,000 will face an average tax increase of $822.
"For most people, it's just the payroll tax," said Roberton Williams, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center.
http://money.msn.com/taxes/news.aspx...
Wasn't that nice of Obama and Reid? In a time of borderline recession with people still jobless and/or struggling, we're all going to have to give them more of our own money to waste.
Think I'm gonna cry...literally.
The reduction of a tax dedicated to a failing Social Security program never made any sense, unless the Social Security were also reduced.
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832049
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

10

9

9

Homer wrote:
<quoted text>Wow 11 bucks a week, just how poor are you? Get together with your husband and get your finances in order! You blame Obama and Reid yet the Senate voted 90% and the Republican controlled House also passed.
Bottom line we have to pay for Bush's wars.
Maybe things have changed with my husband's company now that a deal was struck. But employees were sent a memo last week stating both federal income and social security taxes would increase this year to the tune of $120 a month.

Maybe you have $120 a month you don't need, but some of us would rather keep it.

The wars were once the Democrats wars too - before they became weasels.

They're Obama's wars now. What could you possibly be thinking, Homer? That the past four years of wars which have no end in sight are cost free?

It's the grotesque wasteful spending in government that's the problem.

Say that out loud at least three times a day for the next four years.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832050
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

carol wrote:
According to MSN: The income threshold covers more than 99% of all households exceeding Obama's claim according to the Tax Policy Center.
(Of course, we can thank Republicans for that.)
However, the increase in payroll taxes will hit nearly every wage earner.
(But perhaps a little good news...)
Obama and Congress reduced the share of Social Security paid by workers from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent for 2011 and 2012 saving a typical family about $1,000 a year.
(In other words, the government can give and the government can take away. And does that mean the Social Security savings in 2011 and 2012 will continue in 2013 and that we should be grateful for anything they let us keep?)
You could always terminate Social Security and save the entire 6.2%.
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832051
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

8

John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
The reduction of a tax dedicated to a failing Social Security program never made any sense, unless the Social Security were also reduced.
Trying to make any sense out of this administration's policies is an exercise in futility.
John Galt

Temecula, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832052
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

10

10

10

DBWriter wrote:
<quoted text>
What's the answer, dufus?
Where will the money come from to pay for Obama's government?
So far, nobody in the world has been able to answer that question.
Your children and grandchildren.

Party on and f*ck the future!
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832053
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

9

9

9

Thanks in large part to a law signed by Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R), which cut early voting opportunities in that state, many Florida voters endured six hour lines simply to cast a ballot. These lines did not wind up costing Obama Florida’s electoral votes, but, according to an Ohio State University study, they reduced the president’s margin of victory by thousands of votes in Central Florida.

This suggests that Obama’s margin over Romney in Florida could have been roughly 11,000 votes higher than it was, based just on Central Florida results. Obama carried the state by 74,309 votes out of more than 8.4 million cast.

http://thinkprogress.org/
Homer

Effort, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832054
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

John Galt wrote:
Environmentalists are now killing the homeless in Los Angeles. They forced/persuaded the city to allow concrete drainage channels like the Los Angeles River to return to their natural state, with sandbars, trees, and other vegetation. Now the homeless find these drainage channels to be better places to live than taxpayer-funded shelters. So, when a heavy rainfall occurs, the homeless are swept away.
Sounds like win win if you are a Republican.
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832055
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

8

8

8

John Galt wrote:
Democrats are celebrating over continuation of the Bush tax cuts for 99+% of Americans, as well as continued funding of the military-industrial complex.
What a country?
The spending cuts - including defense cuts - are the next major hurdle over the next 60 days with the raising of the debt ceiling looming once again.

Obama and the Democrats will be feeling the pressure.
NATTY BUMPOFF

Zagreb, Croatia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832057
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

WELL, TO BE FRANK, THE BUSH TAX CUTS BASICALLY DESTROYED THE COUNTRY. WHY WE DON'T JUST THROW THEM AWAY IS BEYOND ME? IT'S LIKE CONSERVATIVES HAVE A 20 MINUTE ATTENTION SPAN - THOUGH I'M SURE THEY'LL STILL BE BABBLING ABOUT BENGHAZI 100 YEARS FROM NOW AS OPPORTUNITIES ARISE FOR GLASS BOTTOM BOAT OWNERS TO MAKE A KILLING ON WALL STREET.

THE BUSH TAX CUTS CAME AT A TIME OF WAR(S) STARTED BY THE SAME GUYS WHO INSTITUTED THE TAX CUT. WHO THOUGHT THAT WAS A GOOD IDEA? WELL, CAROL, APPARENTLY, BUT WHO ELSE? YOU INVADE TWO COUNTRIES HALFWAY AROUND THE WORLD, "PAY FOR IT" BY SUPPLEMENTALS, WHICH ARE UNFUNDED IOU'S, AND THEN ACT ALL SURPRISED WHEN THE WHOLE IDIOTIC PILE OF SHIT BLOWS UP IN YOUR FACES AND CREATES AN ECONOMIC VOID SO DEEP WE MAY NEVER GET OUT OF IT... AND, AFTER ALL THIS, CAROL AND THESE OTHER HALFWITS HAVE THE GALL TO COMPLAIN ABOUT TRYING TO TAKE THE SCORE BACK TO ZERO? HEY, LOUIE, DO WE KNOW ANY HITTERS IN ORLANDO?... SOMEBODY FAMILIAR WITH THE WHORES DOWN THERE...
RUSH10ME

Warsaw, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#832058
Jan 2, 2013
 

Judged:

5

5

5

lily boca raton fl wrote:
Thanks in large part to a law signed by Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R), which cut early voting opportunities in that state, many Florida voters endured six hour lines simply to cast a ballot. These lines did not wind up costing Obama Florida’s electoral votes, but, according to an Ohio State University study, they reduced the president’s margin of victory by thousands of votes in Central Florida.
This suggests that Obama’s margin over Romney in Florida could have been roughly 11,000 votes higher than it was, based just on Central Florida results. Obama carried the state by 74,309 votes out of more than 8.4 million cast.
http://thinkprogress.org/
Whats the difference ? Old news lyely.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 768,841 - 768,860 of1,036,702
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

58 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 16 min Catfish Hunter 96,275
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 16 min Religionthebiglie 47,174
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 27 min Eric 65,547
Music Artists A to Z 36 min _Zoey_ 99
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 38 min litesong 43,160
Abby 4-23 1 hr PEllen 29
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Jacques from Ottawa 167,716
Amy 4-23 2 hr cheluzal 40
ask amy 4-22 8 hr Sublime1 69
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••