Uh-huh, and you know this how?'Her function?' Who was her master if she was the functionary? Obama? Satan? Willard did his one-trick pony routine of interrupting the President and he chose to make a misstatement which Ms.Crowley, whose job it was to moderate the debate as she saw fit rather than to your satisfaction, decided required correction lest it be perceived as truthful.<quoted text>
The plant began participating in the goddam debate, dufus. Her function was to keep Obama on script. Then, Obama was being caught in a lie, so she snuck a punch to the back of the head on Romney.
The whole debate was scripted. That was obvious.
It was also obvious Romney was the only participant that didn't get a copy of the script.
If Willard had been a skilled debater he would have, a. smacked Ms. Crowley down for interfering or make a joke out of her participation in the debate thereby diffusing instantly whatever her point may have been. b. Laughed the whole thing off and gone on with business. However, that would've required some independent thought and the ability to respond instantly. Neither of these are skills much present in Mormons or republicans of any stripe. Willard got a debate coach. The coach told him repeatedly, "Don't let him catch his stride. Interrupt whenever possible and at odd moments. It doesn't matter what you say as long as you say it with conviction." These are probably useful instructions to a high schooler but to a Presidential candidate, not so much.
Have you ever watched a debate in the British Parliament. It is a structured and ordered affair governed by various rules and conventions but I assure you, once the thing gets going if you can't think on your feet you will be eaten. What right do you have to ask for less than the ability to think on your feet from a man who could theoretically become the leader of the free world, whatever that is? Not that I'm trying to stir the pot here or anything, but, are you saying a mere woman threw another spanner in the works for the men again?