Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Read more
PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

#830446 Dec 29, 2012
DBWriter wrote:
When fully half of the top 1% of the wealthiest people in the entire United States live next to Washington, D.C., that should be a sign nobody can ignore that the government is consuming way, way too much money from the economy.
Stop the insanity.
The fiscal cliff was the only sane thing that our government did in the past 4 years.
Now, no more debt. Not for any reason. Make the government grow up and live within the means the economy can realistically be expected to afford.
Yeah stupid, and a lot of them are lobbyists like Grover Norquist.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#830447 Dec 29, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? 28mil in comp is a lot for "nothing" then.
So, how about, Wrong answer. Try again, till the Truth comes out.
Perhaps the greatest crime against any embassy in the history of Yugoslavia was committed not by evil Serb protesters, but by the United States military.
On May 7, 1999, at the height of the 78 day US-led NATO bombing of Yugoslavia, the US bombed the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, killing three Chinese citizens, two of them journalists, and wounding 20 others. The Clinton administration later said that the bombing was the result of faulty maps provided by the CIA (Sound familiar?). Beijing rejected that explanation and alleged it was deliberate. Eventually, under strong pressure from China, the US apologized and paid $28 million in compensation to the victims' families. If the US was serious about international law and the protection of embassies, those responsible for that bombing would have been tried at the Hague along with other alleged war criminals. But "war criminal" is a designation for the losers of US-fueled wars, not bombers sent by Washington to drop humanitarian munitions on "sovereign territory."
Same story theme, different place.
???

So you also want to re-write all the history so that the Germans "invaded" Britain in WWII?

Sorry, entitled to your own opinion, not your own facts.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#830448 Dec 29, 2012
new yawk wrote:
When did Obama try this?
When he spent 2 years drafting HIS Health Care Plan and cut the Republicans and their input totally out of the process?
When he stated The Republicans can come along but they have to ride in the back of the bus?
When he spent his whole presidency villianizing Republicans?
When he's continued to blame Republicans, STILL blaming President Bush for his repeated and continued failures?
When his minions, from The Labor Unions to his Eric Holder have done nothing but demonized Republicans?
He hasn't tried jack shyte regarding reaching across the isle of partisanship to work with Republicans.
He's so scared sightless of Rush Limbaugh ...
That's why there's a Topix thread that bears the title:
"Barack Obama to GOP Dump Rush Limbaugh".
He's just a little man who fears and perceive all who oppose him as his enemy to be silenced.
HA! He's just a scared sissy a$$.
Afraid of a Republican talk show host.
He needs some saddle shoes to go with his Mom jeans, the big baby!
<quoted text>
Rush Limbaugh??

Perhaps the news hasn't gotten to your little backwater, but Obama won the election and Rush is still losing sponsors and audience!! DUH

Seems the Repubs are deathly afraid of Obama, the guy they were convinced would be a one termer.

Remember this:

""Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader and the man who came to represent the partisan gridlock that marked much of the President’s first term in office after an election night comment in which he vowed to prioritize making Obama a one-term president, has commented on the failure of his stated mission on the eve of Obama’s re-election.""

----------

So who was villianizing whom??

With attacks from birthers, calling him a muslim, socialist, communist, post colonialist, etc

Revenge is sweet, after the Repubs tried to destroy him for 4 years.

He's kicking Boehner's and McConnell's butt all over Washington!!

His approval ratings are at all time highs!! The American public suppports him over the Repubs on the tax issues by a large margin!!

Try taking your head outa yer butt, the stench is making you crazy(er)!!

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#830449 Dec 29, 2012
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
When you cut revenues they have to be matched by cuts in spending. Bush not only didn't do that but increased spending with two wars and his gift to Big Pharma, Medicare part D which among other things prohibited Medicare from bargaining with pharmaceutical companies for lower drug prices. Got that nitwit?
No, I guarantee he didn't get it.

Waste of time and when you can say a thing on Topix is a "waste of time" it really is A WASTE OF TIME!!!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#830451 Dec 29, 2012
Barry Obozo -hell yeah wrote:
<quoted text>
Every year we spend 600 billions on our military . You do the math :)
But it's the Repubs who refuse to cut the defense budget.

Dems want to cut it seriously.

Your argument is with your own party, but you're too stupid to realize it.

Oh yeah, you're all intellectually superior!! LOL

But only to a dead fish.

You lost this discussion.

If you actually had a brain, you'd walk away while you're behind.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#830452 Dec 29, 2012
Barry Obozo -hell yeah wrote:
<quoted text>Serbs never terrorized our country nor killed Americans muslims did why the cost varies .
You seem to enjoy making a complete fool of yourself.

Further proof of your superior intelllect,I assume??

BWAHAHAHAHAHA

So why'd you change your screenname??

More of what really intelligent folks do when caught in their own web of lies??

I thought so.
new yawk

Tonawanda, NY

#830454 Dec 29, 2012
Perhaps your post should be addressed to the Rush Limbaugh experts on this thread then.
You know, the liberals that can tell you everything he's been stating of late.
Yeah, they're really good with those C&P on Limbaugh Speak.

Are you preaching, again??

Save your strokes. I've heard it all before.

But really, a United States president addressing the GOP and telling them to dump a Republican talk show host?
My, how petty, thin skinned, and frightfully pubescent of Obama.

About Limbaugh sponsorship, I wouldn't know and don't care.
Thanks for the info just the same.
However, I believe Limbaugh has enough wealth to sponsor himself if need be.
He could buy and sell you for triple the cost of his golden microphone alone.

BUT, the post WASN'T "about" Limbaugh.
It was with regard to Obama's fears.
And what a petulant child he is.

That's All ...
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Rush Limbaugh??
Perhaps the news hasn't gotten to your little backwater, but Obama won the election and Rush is still losing sponsors and audience!! DUH
Seems the Repubs are deathly afraid of Obama, the guy they were convinced would be a one termer.
Remember this:
""Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader and the man who came to represent the partisan gridlock that marked much of the President’s first term in office after an election night comment in which he vowed to prioritize making Obama a one-term president, has commented on the failure of his stated mission on the eve of Obama’s re-election.""
----------
So who was villianizing whom??
With attacks from birthers, calling him a muslim, socialist, communist, post colonialist, etc
Revenge is sweet, after the Repubs tried to destroy him for 4 years.
He's kicking Boehner's and McConnell's butt all over Washington!!
His approval ratings are at all time highs!! The American public suppports him over the Repubs on the tax issues by a large margin!!
Try taking your head outa yer butt, the stench is making you crazy(er)!!
PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

#830455 Dec 29, 2012
Waxman wrote:
<quoted text>
OK - I know your head is thicker that the vaults at Fort Knox, but I'll try.
Obama and the Democrat Party leanings are more European and "socialistic" than America has traditionally had. Your allies are socialists and communists and it's no secret, many in your party of "Democrats" (you really should pick a new name) do not like capitalism.
Socialists/Communists have indeed told people where they can live and what they can do for work. They even mandate vacation time and work hours like in France. Carol provided one example and I can tell you about a friend of mine that is a Cardiovascular Surgeon. He is from Germany and while in Medical School there, was told what specialty he could go into which he did not like, so he came to the USA and is happy here due to our freedom. Similar to Carol's example that went over your head, my German friend came here due to our Freedom and the system you Democrats are trying to eliminate.
Do you know anyone from the former U.S.S.R. or Europe that experienced such a situation or limit of freedom? You must live in a bubble and not be very educated.
I know another person that left the USA for work related reasons and does not want to come back due to Obama and the Democrats class warfare - tax aspirations.
Obama and the Democrats have also passed new regulations that make doing business more difficult. I have seen them first hand in my business an cannot believe the Democrats passed such useless, stupid rules and I could see why people would just say forget it if trying to start a business.
Why are you so stupid, PDUPONT? Listen to Carol a little harder. She can teach you people of limited intellect a few things.
Well "Nosewax" your argument is so full of holes that you could strain pasta through it. We're not Germany or France and no one has even suggested where people can live, work or what they do for a living. I'm not even sure they do that there and suspect you're pulling it out of your anal orifice. Anecdotal stories about people you claim to know aren't proof of anything. We do have regulations on work hours that mandate time and a half over 40 hours and I'm sure working people don't consider that to be a burden.
Carol and you live in some kind of bizarre alternate universe.
DUTCHESS OF CORNHOLIO

Luxembourg

#830456 Dec 29, 2012
Barry Obozo -hell yeah wrote:
<quoted text>
Every year we spend 600 billions on our military . You do the math :)
I HAVE. IN TEN YEARS WE COULD SAVE 5 TRILLION DOLLARS BY COMPLETELY ELIMINATING THEM AND PUTTING THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR "DEFENSE" BACK WHERE IT BELONGS: ON THE STATES AND THEIR MILITIAS. WE'LL NEED THE OTHER TRILLION DOLLARS TO TAKE CARE OF ALL THE CRIPPLES - MENTAL AND PHYSICAL - THAT BUSH AND HIS LEAVE-IT-TO-BEAVER CRONIES CREATED WHILST MAKING THE REST OF THE WORLD SAFE FOR DEMOCRACY, WHICH, AS SO MANY OF YOU HAVE POINTED OUT, IS NOT WHAT THE UNITED STATES IS, BUT NO MATTER. 5 TRILLION IS 5 TRILLION. GOTTA PAY TO PLAY, HONEYS... WHAT? YOU MEAN THIS AIN'T THE BIG GAME?
TheIndependentMa jority

Hazard, KY

#830457 Dec 29, 2012
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Trillion$??? Stay the fk on topic K?
I just copied and pasted it, I didn't write that, Dammit.
new yawk

Tonawanda, NY

#830458 Dec 29, 2012
Gelding?! I like that word, eunuch!

That's what I did to YOU!

AHaHaaHaaa ...!

< snip, snip, chop, chop > !!

G'Bye ...
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you make that up all on your own, gelding?
TheIndependentMa jority

Hazard, KY

#830459 Dec 29, 2012
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Since your teabaggers took the House spending has increased $340 billion.
Pretty sweet huh?
http://alphabetsforkids.net/Alphabets/alphabe...

Here...find the ones that look like this--

1. D

2. R

THEN we'll count the Congressional seats accordingly!!
DUTCHESS OF CORNHOLIO

Luxembourg

#830460 Dec 29, 2012
BUT, IN FACT, THE REAL NUMBER IS MUUUUUUUUUCCCCCCCH LARGER THAN THAT. THE ACTUAL SAVINGS TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OVER TEN YEARS BY ELIMINATING THE DEPARTMENT OF "DEFENSE," IS MORE LIKE 10 TRILLION DOLLARS BECAUSE, OF COURSE, MOST OF THEIR BUDGET IS HIDDEN WITH THE BUDGETS OF OTHER FEDERAL DEPARTMENTS. WHO ARE WE "DEFENDING" OURSELVES AGAINST ANYWAYS? THE RUSSIANS?, THE NORTH KOREANS? THE IRANIANS? THE CHINEE? WELL, IF WE HAVE TO "DEFEND" OURSELVES AGAINST THEM THEN WHY ARE WE DOING BUSINESS WITH THEM? I AGREE, IT'S TIME TO ELIMINATE THE DEBT AND BRING FISCAL SANITY BACK TO THE NATION. LET'S START WITH ITS MOST DISPOSABLE MEMBERS, SHALL WE?
DUTCHESS OF CORNHOLIO

Luxembourg

#830461 Dec 29, 2012
WHAT SENSE DOES IT MAKE TO SUPPORT A MILITARY ESTABLISHMENT THAT VILIFIES OUR TRADING PARTNERS? THEY EITHER ARE OUR ENEMIES OR THEY'RE NOT, RIGHT? LET'S CUT 'EM LOOSE AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS. AFTER ALL, WE'VE ALREADY TRIED INVADING THEM AND THAT DIDN'T WORK, DID IT? THE MILITARY ESTABLISHMENT IS A BIG BLOATED SOUTHERNER INFESTED MORASS OF STUPIDITY AND MEDIOCRITY. LET'S CUT IT OUT LIKE A TUMOR AND LET THE PATIENT REVIVE; OR, AT LEAST THE PARTS OF THE PATIENT WHICH DESERVE SURVIVAL.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#830462 Dec 29, 2012
Barry Obozo -hell yeah wrote:
<quoted text>
Every year we spend 600 billions on our military . You do the math :)
Now you're starting to sound like Carol, Galt and the other clueless fks on here.

Tell ya what muttinski__save your bullshyte for your pals at your main thread OK?
TheIndependentMa jority

Hazard, KY

#830463 Dec 29, 2012
Death of Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
???
So you also want to re-write all the history so that the Germans "invaded" Britain in WWII?
Sorry, entitled to your own opinion, not your own facts.
After that...look for the word

SEARCH on your web browser.

Type into it "Somolia, the Balkans (Kosovo aka Serbian raid) and Iraqi bombings" or similar "keywords".

The little bunches of groups of "letters" that will then follow, will all have bits of the SAME informative type of writings-called FACTS.

It all goes with the terriroty and pretty NONE of have been immune to it.
DUTCHESS OF CORNHOLIO

Luxembourg

#830464 Dec 29, 2012
NOW, TYPICALLY, MEN, I'D JUST COME RIGHT OUT AND SAY THAT THIS THREAD IS DEAD. BUT I LEAVE IT UP TO YOU, IS IT, OR ISN'T IT? I'D LIKE TO SUGGEST WE CREATE ANEW, HANDS? OR WOULD YOU PREFER TO RIDE IT DOWN LIKE CAROL ON RODEO WEEK AT THE STATE FAIR?
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#830465 Dec 29, 2012
Realtime wrote:
<quoted text>Trillions?
NATO=North Atlantic Treaty Organization__this is the one that the John Birch Society really hated___hated to the degree that it's members used "get us out of NATO" as a badge or signal.
UN=United Nations is something different.
How about you bone up and come back one day when your head is out of your azz, eh?
What a bunch of dumbasses.
TheIndependentMa jority

Hazard, KY

#830466 Dec 29, 2012
dem wrote:
<quoted text>
Your tooth fell out.
Awchit... and I'm outa super glue.

Got any gumballs?
new yawk

Tonawanda, NY

#830467 Dec 29, 2012
I agree The Republican Party is divided.
I don't think cutting The Defense Budget is wise.
There are a lot of programs and entitlements that should be cut.
They are either excessive in spending on what is more than sufficient or frivilous programs that are failures right out of the gate, also repeatedly proven to be so.

The Republicans want to cut too many necessary and needed services to many who are legitimately in need of help and assistance.
The Democrats want to keep spending money we DON'T have on too many unnecessary and superfluous programs and services.
And ALL Americans should be concerned about how their tax dollars are being spent OR squandered.
And IMO, The Government actually KNOWS very little regarding Economics and Managing other peoples' money, OURS!
Yet Democrats want to hand over MORE! when they haven't even proven they can wisely manage what they already pillaged from our pockets!!
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
But it's the Repubs who refuse to cut the defense budget.
Dems want to cut it seriously.
Your argument is with your own party, but you're too stupid to realize it.
Oh yeah, you're all intellectually superior!! LOL
But only to a dead fish.
You lost this discussion.
If you actually had a brain, you'd walk away while you're behind.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 5 min Cold Front 69,618
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 10 min Earthling-1 52,729
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 57 min Jacques in Orleans 187,009
obama our next president 5 hr bale wayne 3
News Animal brothels prevalent in Chicago? 8 hr News Junkie 1
News Ultra Foods in Crestwood offers array of prepar... (Jun '12) 11 hr J T L U K 19
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 12 hr Red_Forman 856
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]