Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1508079 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#828223 Dec 24, 2012
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
The police are not our friends, regardless of race.
are you one of those Occupy wingnuts?

peppered sprayed college student?

1 of 200 who showed up at the last Tea Party 'rally'?

grouchy old fart who keeps getting the law called on you because you won't shut the curtains when you're 'watching' the FOX Victoria's Secret bimbos?

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#828224 Dec 24, 2012
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
David Gregory violated the D.C weapons law on "Meet the Press" yesterday.
Prosecute the criminals.
How so?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#828225 Dec 24, 2012
WND Floats Armed Resistance to Obama Administration

Earlier this week, WorldNetDaily columnist and regular Fox News guest Erik Rush tweeted a video arguing that President Obama orchestrated the Sandy Hook and Aurora, Colorado shootings in order to cover-up a massive government scandal, forcibly disarm Americans, put people in concentration camps and start a civil war. Of course the conspiracy theory is complete nonsense, but Rush doesn’t think so.

Today in WND, Rush effectively suggested that people should begin an armed revolt against the government:“There are also Americans – some misguided, some ideologues – who work every day of the week in the cause of compromising our liberties,” Rush writes,“I suppose suggesting that we shoot them wouldn’t be taken very well – although that is precisely what it came down to 236 years ago.”

Rush, who hoped that a Romney administration would imprison liberals and journalists, like in the conspiracy video warns that the Obama administration is using the school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, to “divert attention from its own abject criminality,” crack down on gun ownership, do away with the Constitution and require “compulsory periodic assessments of citizens by government psychologists.”

http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/wnd-flo...

so which one of you nutjobs has been writing for WND?

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#828226 Dec 24, 2012
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
David Gregory violated the D.C weapons law on "Meet the Press" yesterday.
Prosecute the criminals.
Figures with the retarded web sites you frequent.
Homer

East Stroudsburg, PA

#828227 Dec 24, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
WND Floats Armed Resistance to Obama Administration
Earlier this week, WorldNetDaily columnist and regular Fox News guest Erik Rush tweeted a video arguing that President Obama orchestrated the Sandy Hook and Aurora, Colorado shootings in order to cover-up a massive government scandal, forcibly disarm Americans, put people in concentration camps and start a civil war. Of course the conspiracy theory is complete nonsense, but Rush doesn’t think so.
Today in WND, Rush effectively suggested that people should begin an armed revolt against the government:“There are also Americans – some misguided, some ideologues – who work every day of the week in the cause of compromising our liberties,” Rush writes,“I suppose suggesting that we shoot them wouldn’t be taken very well – although that is precisely what it came down to 236 years ago.”
Rush, who hoped that a Romney administration would imprison liberals and journalists, like in the conspiracy video warns that the Obama administration is using the school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, to “divert attention from its own abject criminality,” crack down on gun ownership, do away with the Constitution and require “compulsory periodic assessments of citizens by government psychologists.”
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/wnd-flo...
so which one of you nutjobs has been writing for WND?
Wasn't Homer.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#828228 Dec 24, 2012
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>
We dont even need to deport that puscee, British phag. Just send him to me here in AZ, and I will give him regular beatings on my chain gang. The Brits need to have the crap kicked out of them anyway for continuing something as worthless as the "royal retard family"....:-)
People like you is the reason that Americans are hated. You're an embarassment to this country.
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#828229 Dec 24, 2012
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Police often are criminals. Even if not "criminal" they are often abusive.
Federal law enforcement is likely to become the Obama Gestapo, with Holder playing the role of Heinrich Himmler.
lol! Well how odd! I keep watching LaPierre calling for more police intervention in schools to "protect" our kids.

And so here you are saying you're letting criminals with guns into schools.

Playing both sides of the line again.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#828230 Dec 24, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
WND Floats Armed Resistance to Obama Administration
Earlier this week, WorldNetDaily columnist and regular Fox News guest Erik Rush tweeted a video arguing that President Obama orchestrated the Sandy Hook and Aurora, Colorado shootings in order to cover-up a massive government scandal, forcibly disarm Americans, put people in concentration camps and start a civil war. Of course the conspiracy theory is complete nonsense, but Rush doesn’t think so.
Today in WND, Rush effectively suggested that people should begin an armed revolt against the government:“There are also Americans – some misguided, some ideologues – who work every day of the week in the cause of compromising our liberties,” Rush writes,“I suppose suggesting that we shoot them wouldn’t be taken very well – although that is precisely what it came down to 236 years ago.”
Rush, who hoped that a Romney administration would imprison liberals and journalists, like in the conspiracy video warns that the Obama administration is using the school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, to “divert attention from its own abject criminality,” crack down on gun ownership, do away with the Constitution and require “compulsory periodic assessments of citizens by government psychologists.”
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/wnd-flo...
so which one of you nutjobs has been writing for WND?
Oh wow, 2 nutcases named Rush. What are the odds?
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#828231 Dec 24, 2012
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
David Gregory violated the D.C weapons law on "Meet the Press" yesterday.
Prosecute the criminals.
lol! Watching LaPierre getting grilled by Gregory was entertaining.

LaPierre is for trying "anything", unless it has something to do with weapons!

It's always someone else's problem. LaPierre looked like a radical idiot... which he is!
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#828232 Dec 24, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
WND Floats Armed Resistance to Obama Administration
Earlier this week, WorldNetDaily columnist and regular Fox News guest Erik Rush tweeted a video arguing that President Obama orchestrated the Sandy Hook and Aurora, Colorado shootings in order to cover-up a massive government scandal, forcibly disarm Americans, put people in concentration camps and start a civil war. Of course the conspiracy theory is complete nonsense, but Rush doesn’t think so.
Today in WND, Rush effectively suggested that people should begin an armed revolt against the government:“There are also Americans – some misguided, some ideologues – who work every day of the week in the cause of compromising our liberties,” Rush writes,“I suppose suggesting that we shoot them wouldn’t be taken very well – although that is precisely what it came down to 236 years ago.”
Rush, who hoped that a Romney administration would imprison liberals and journalists, like in the conspiracy video warns that the Obama administration is using the school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, to “divert attention from its own abject criminality,” crack down on gun ownership, do away with the Constitution and require “compulsory periodic assessments of citizens by government psychologists.”
http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/wnd-flo...
so which one of you nutjobs has been writing for WND?
They still believe in taking pages from their nazi cousins....
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#828233 Dec 24, 2012
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Police often are criminals. Even if not "criminal" they are often abusive.
Federal law enforcement is likely to become the Obama Gestapo, with Holder playing the role of Heinrich Himmler.
It's not fair to say that they are all criminals. Police are necessary; it's the culture of entrapment that creates mistrust in communities. There are many good cops, the bad ones make them all look bad.
It's just like the good kids at the highschool lamented in a news story that the bad kids who represent only less than 1% of the school population get all the news, bad news, and the good kids get no press. We like bad news; it's kind of sick. Wonder what the country would be like if we completely gave no attention to the killers and criminals and only printed or talked about good news?
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#828234 Dec 24, 2012
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>Wasn't Homer.
LOL! Merry Christmas Homer!

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#828235 Dec 24, 2012
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! Well how odd! I keep watching LaPierre calling for more police intervention in schools to "protect" our kids.
And so here you are saying you're letting criminals with guns into schools.
Playing both sides of the line again.
When they're on their heels the psychosis rises to the forefront.
Homer

East Stroudsburg, PA

#828236 Dec 24, 2012
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! Merry Christmas Homer!
Bah! Merry Christmas Lily!
Homer

East Stroudsburg, PA

#828237 Dec 24, 2012
Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
When they're on their heels the psychosis rises to the forefront.
Peppy wears lifts in lieu of heels.
PDUPONT

Westfield, MA

#828238 Dec 24, 2012
Fenris the Big Bad Wolf wrote:
<quoted text>
Morning Frenchy!! U slopping hogs again today?
Do you want to argue on facts or is that beyond your limited intellect?
Yeah

Honolulu, HI

#828240 Dec 24, 2012
Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
When they're on their heels the psychosis rises to the forefront.
lol! I've noticed that too. Romney was a great example. I thought he believed he could wrap up his presidency on the first day and cruise the balance of his 4 years!

He clearly had no concept of what he was promising... but the people did!

“Constitutionalis t”

Since: Dec 10

Baker, LA

#828241 Dec 24, 2012
OldRaider wrote:
<quoted text>
Any rifle that isn't a lever action or bolt action SHOULD be defined as an assault rifle. That was easy, problem solved.
So, you're saying the police can use only lever or bolt action rifles, right?
Or, you're saying the police exist for some other reason than to protect us, and it is vital for that reason for them to be significantly better armed than those members of the masses not included in the governing elite, right?
If the police need a weapon to protect me, why don't I need that weapon, too? After all, I have every right to protect myself. The police merely determine what instrument is necessary for my protection.
You don't have to answer this. We know the Democrats are trying to install a police state where the citizenry has a gun held to its head to ensure compliance with whatever the elite government class demands for themselves.
impeach Congress

Norcross, GA

#828242 Dec 24, 2012
Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! I've noticed that too. Romney was a great example. I thought he believed he could wrap up his presidency on the first day and cruise the balance of his 4 years!
He clearly had no concept of what he was promising... but the people did!
He STILL doesn't have a clue. He thinks President Obama won because he was "giving away free stuff" roflmao
Jimmy

Hamden, CT

#828243 Dec 24, 2012
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you want to argue on facts or is that beyond your limited intellect?
Speaking of intellect, how is it that you can argue on a fact, bright one? Do you stand on it while arguing? Most of us argue about the facts, but you really need to show us how you do it "on" them. Is this some new far left loon concept?

Wow - you are really bright. Are you an excecutive?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 19 min tuffet 239,269
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 47 min They cannot kill ... 10,491
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr Mister Tonka 105,049
managers at Steak N Shake sell Passports 11 hr Nuri Harrigan dik... 1
Graduation in Detroit. 17 hr Another Chance 1
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) 17 hr Dudley 8,065
News Man charged with shooting near 26/Cal courthouse 19 hr former democrat 1

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages