Barack Obama, our next President

[RealDave]

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
Hahaha.."we spent something like 130 billion in 2011.". Are all liberals as stupid as the 2 realputz on here? Can one of you more intelligent liberals explain to this putz "we" spend a hell of a lot more than that in a year.

We were talking about the wars in Iraq & Afghsnistan, dumbasss.

Try to keep up.

[Realtime]

flack wrote:

Syria fires SCUD missiles. Chemical weapons have been deployed. Going to be a great Christmas!!!

Pretty sure that this post of Flacks says what it says.
Have no clue where the fk he found it__and no one here is willing to share.
Maybe the great Christmas part will come true because the rest is bullshyt chili on steroids__Flack style.

[Eman]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text> A sad excuse. We had ban once.

" The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention studied the "assault weapon" ban and other gun control attempts, and found "insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws reviewed for preventing violence."

A 2004 critical review of research on firearms by a National Research Council panel also noted that academic studies of the assault weapon ban "did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence" and noted "due to the fact that the relative rarity with which the banned guns were used in crime before the ban ... the maximum potential effect of the ban on gun violence outcomes would be very small...."

The United States Department of Justice National Institute of Justice found should the ban be renewed, its effects on gun violence would likely be small, and perhaps too small for reliable measurement, because rifles in general, including rifles referred to as "assault rifles" or "assault weapons", are rarely used in gun crimes"

[Eman]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
We were talking about the wars in Iraq & Afghsnistan, dumbasss.
Try to keep up.

No, stupid fck, we were talking about spending in general. Wow!

[Eman]

Realtime wrote:

<quoted text>Pretty sure that this post of Flacks says what it says.
Have no clue where the fk he found it__and no one here is willing to share.
Maybe the great Christmas part will come true because the rest is bullshyt chili on steroids__Flack style.

Tell me you playing ignorant. You can't be this stupid. A simple google of "syria scud" displays many different sources.

[six]

finding wrote:

<quoted text>Like bommie and nancy rammed the health care law, we don't want it and you won't either, unless you are one of the free loaders.

Its not about what we want its about what we can live with. Everyone lives with Obama's plan and cant be denied medical coverage. Example, my son needed a transplant, and just like every PARENT Reading this, I wanted the best team for the job. I was in the military at the time. Can you believe that after the Dr.'s informed the insurance company of the severity of the case ( my son was 3 weeks old and laying on his death bed)These people Tri-Care Refused to send him because the team was not in their network and we found this out after the team contacted us and told me and my wife. The insurance company was willing to let my son DIE for a Fucking NETWORK issue. So if it wasnt for that great transplant team in Alfred I Dupont taking the initiative and flying a helicopter from deleware to Florida SMH. Somebody got on the phone with me and stated we will be there to pick your son up in a few ours, dont worry about the bill, we will eat it before we let your son die.(Bush was in office)when will human life mean more than politics?

I was in the military serving my country, paying my bills and providing for my family, so as you see, its not about freeloading because I dont think minorities were winning astronomical law suits for coffee being to hot at Mcdonalds.

[six]

Cardinal of the Kremlin wrote:

<quoted text>YOUR HISTORY STARTED WITH OBAMA lololol,you were asleep so long it is just plain to see D,D, BLIND 85% follow the leader sheep

SMH, wow , so sad, no pimp, that was just the day you realized shit was about to change and you been disgruntle ever since lololol I love it. lol

[Realtime]

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
Tell me you playing ignorant. You can't be this stupid. A simple google of "syria scud" displays many different sources.

Looking for the part about the chemicals__put up or shut up fkfce.

[six]

Cardinal of the Kremlin wrote:

<quoted text>BECAUSE you are MYSTIFIED by the FLESH YOUR LORD OBAMA lolololhahahah AND OH MY GRANDMA TAUGHT F WHAT THEY SAY WORDS ARE WINDS so if you can't handle words grab OBAMAS hand and ALL 3 of YOU can go over the cliff doesn't matter to me I ain't A BEGGAR,

oh I see, smh, guess you told me......

[six]

Cardinal of the Kremlin wrote:

<quoted text>BECAUSE you are MYSTIFIED by the FLESH YOUR LORD OBAMA lolololhahahah AND OH MY GRANDMA TAUGHT F WHAT THEY SAY WORDS ARE WINDS so if you can't handle words grab OBAMAS hand and ALL 3 of YOU can go over the cliff doesn't matter to me I ain't A BEGGAR,

Bet you really made her proud :)
So when will I see you do something great? I am really looking forward to reading your book, or hearing your song, reading your plan that got you that statue on the courthouse steps, or ,,or wait Im sorry you havent told me yet. when will you be recognized for something truly great?

I'll wait.......

[six]

Mistified, nah
More like proud, now name me someone you are proud of in the DumbsAss race so we can have something in common. You know? being proud of those who represent the people in a manner to be talked about for generations to come.

[six]

Cardinal of the Kremlin wrote:

<quoted text>YOUR HISTORY STARTED WITH OBAMA lololol,you were asleep so long it is just plain to see D,D, BLIND 85% follow the leader sheep

And you never answered the question either. Do you need to think about it, its cool if you do.
I figured u were just trying to be funny but since no one laughed, answer the question.

How could the economy be turned around in 4yrs after the oath?

[Eman]

Realtime wrote:

<quoted text>Looking for the part about the chemicals__put up or shut up fkfce.

Keep looking stupid fck. It's there too.

[six]

dueces!

[Anonymous of Indy]

finding wrote:

<quoted text>Like bommie and nancy rammed the health care law, we don't want it and you won't either, unless you are one of the free loaders.

I dont want current healthcare delivery system either that Left establish in 1942 either by the Stabilization Act of 1942. Besides the Right should be for Obamacare because it was modeled after the Rights Conservative Hertiage Foundation "Assuring Affordable Health Care for All Americans" by Stuart M. Butler, Ph.D. which I dont care for.

Stabilization Act of 1942

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stabilization_Ac...

Assuring Affordable Health Care for All Americans

http://www.heritage.org/research/lecture/assu...

[Eman]

Realtime wrote:

<quoted text>Looking for the part about the chemicals__put up or shut up fkfce.

I just realized something. You don't know what "deployed" means. Hahahaha. You are an illiterate stupid fckn liberal

[RealDave]

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
No, stupid fck, we were talking about spending in general. Wow!

Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
"2 wars? Putz needs to quit living in the past. Leaving iraq did nothing to the deficit and neither will leaving Afghanistan."

I replied

"So, Spending less money has no effect on the deficit.

You are truly brilliant!!!

We spent something like 130 billion in 2011, about 30% less than was spent in 2008.

So, if cutting spending as no effect on the deficit, WTF are you constantly screaming about cutting spending? "

Now, lets see if the bigmouth Eman can apologize.

[RealDave]

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
" The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention studied the "assault weapon" ban and other gun control attempts, and found "insufficient evidence to determine the effectiveness of any of the firearms laws reviewed for preventing violence."
A 2004 critical review of research on firearms by a National Research Council panel also noted that academic studies of the assault weapon ban "did not reveal any clear impacts on gun violence" and noted "due to the fact that the relative rarity with which the banned guns were used in crime before the ban ... the maximum potential effect of the ban on gun violence outcomes would be very small...."
The United States Department of Justice National Institute of Justice found should the ban be renewed, its effects on gun violence would likely be small, and perhaps too small for reliable measurement, because rifles in general, including rifles referred to as "assault rifles" or "assault weapons", are rarely used in gun crimes"

The point being that if they were banned, there must have been a definition which counters the argument that you can't define what constitutes an assault weapon.

In 2004. Look at the shootings we see today. Bot the assault rifles & the larger clips have been in the news.

Bring back that ban.

[Realtime]

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
I just realized something. You don't know what "deployed" means. Hahahaha. You are an illiterate stupid fckn liberal

I know precisely what deployed means__maybe that's the problem for a mutt like you.

When posters use hahaha and bwaaa and childish sht like <:-o I always think of my pal Mike Reed who created the Flame Warriors site to describe morons and pretenders such as yourself.

If I were you I'd just go ahead and let Flacko do his own splainin because you're ringing up FAIL.

[Fenris the Archangel]

Obama 2016 wrote:

<quoted text>Mary Jo Kopechne was an alcoholic bimbo gold-digger who knew of his reputation. She knew he was married and what she was getting into. She just wanted some of his money. Her greed is what got her killed.

In three straight posts you virulently defended:

1)Murderers
2)minority hate groups
3)mysogyn

Typical leftist psycho.

You should be legally sterilized, tied to a tree in town square and horsewhipped...