Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

Since: Nov 09

Pharr, TX

#821746 Dec 14, 2012
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>Unions are a scam and have out lived their usefullness.
1) Labor unions often harm the well-being of the worst-off by making entry into low-wage work more difficult, raising the bottom rung of the wage ladder above the marginal productivity of outsiders.
2) This provides the unions institutionally with a kind of control over access to labor market rents, which contributes to hierarchical power relations within unions that can be highly problematic.
3) Unions have often contributed to making their firms or their industries uncompetitive; they lack a built-in check that would keep them from killing the goose. This may be an even worse problem when they are faced with temporarily oligopolistic or monopolistic firms– the big traditional airlines, the Big Three automakers, traditional AT&T— which are themselves prone to become vulnerable overcommitted dinosaurs over time, and which are happy enough to lock in medium-term labor peace with contracts that put the firm one transformative competitor away from disaster.
4) Public sector unions have, under some conditions, a considerable ability to capture both sides of the bargaining table and seriously weaken public sector budget restraint.
5) Unions bureaucratize work relations in ways that can be both unpleasant and counterproductive for all concerned; they create rigidities and inflexibilities that can prevent cooperative improvements.
6) Labor unions form the organizational core of political parties and movements that seek to do more than bargain in the workplace; they’ve been a major force for social-democratic political economic organization. And the politics they shape is not especially prone to be liberal along cultural, social, or constitutional dimensions.
7) Unions– their leadership, their membership, their supporters– are capable of significant bullying that easily spills into immoral coercion against outsiders, nonmembers, and dissenters; the charge of “scab” is often an accusation of punishable treason against a cause that the accused never signed up for.
There are costs in negotiating and enforcing a contract. Ensuring a safe working environment and lobbying for remedies to work related problems takes time and money. Protecting against management abuses of power such as nepotism and favoritism requires oversight. No reasonable person believes that each individual is better off bearing the burden of these tasks themselves.
Don't fool yourself, non-union workplaces use models developed through union efforts and non-union workplaces also benefit from the competitive salaries generated by union contracts.
Its naive to say unions have outlived their usefulness.
Obama 2016

Virginia Beach, VA

#821747 Dec 14, 2012
ObamaRezcoDoddReal estate wrote:
<quoted text>
You'll be another Obama Muslim lover hiding in a brand new Mosque built by the Unions!
I'll be safer there than in my local mall or movie theater.
Obama 2016

Virginia Beach, VA

#821748 Dec 14, 2012
gun nuts wrote:
<quoted text> they will get all the ammo befor getting the guns.
I think Cook Countie's 5 cents per round "violence tax" should be implemented nationwide. Let the gun nuts fix the deficit since there responsible for most of Americas health care costs.
Obama 2016

Virginia Beach, VA

#821749 Dec 14, 2012
gun nuts wrote:
<quoted text>bann libtards ,they cause much worse damage than guns
Typical racist republican. Wants to bann free speech.
ole_47

Blanchard, OK

#821750 Dec 14, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
Blah Blah Blah
If all employers treated their employees with respect & paid a fair wage, unions would not exist.
Ethics realdave...
Laws and 'unions' won't change idiots into einsteins or a-holes into angels...
carol

Orlando, FL

#821751 Dec 14, 2012
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes Carol but the GOP is rejecting tax increases on the wealthiest advocating cuts only.
Under the Democratic proposals middleclass taxes will stay the same.
You keep believing that.

On the Health Care Bill alone, in 2013 everyone's medicare tax will go from 1.45% to 2.35% no matter how much you make in salary.

http://ireport.cnn.com/docs/DOC-427107

NBC News:

Rising prices, higher taxes in store for Americans in 2013.

NEW YORK - Consumers will have to dig deeper into their pockets next year to pay for costlier healthcare, more expensive grocery bills and higher taxes, an extra drag on the country's already slow-moving economy.

http://www.nbcnews.com/business/economywatch/...
RUSH10ME

Chase City, VA

#821752 Dec 14, 2012
Obama 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>I think Cook Countie's 5 cents per round "violence tax" should be implemented nationwide. Let the gun nuts fix the deficit since there responsible for most of Americas health care costs.
You are clueless as to how this country was founded and the true cost of freedom , the second amendment shall not be infringed upon , the tree of liberty need be watered with the blood of patriots and tyrants alike from time to time . Now get back to the drive thru window .
Obama 2016

Virginia Beach, VA

#821753 Dec 14, 2012
RUSH10ME wrote:
<quoted text>You say you want a revolution , the people are ready its long over due anyway .
A bunch of fat alcoholic tobacco-chewing redneck goobers up against the highly trained U.S. military and Homeland Security forces. HAH!!! That would be fun to watch. I hope they televise it live.
carol

Orlando, FL

#821754 Dec 14, 2012
Lincoln Duncan wrote:
<quoted text>
Fox taught us all that Romney was going to win in 2012.
MSM thought it would be Obama.
Who do you trust?
All but one contributor on Fox predicted a close election - even Rove - and everyone was skeptical of that one person's prediction.

Obama won because of Romney's 47% remark, Obama's campaign lies, Obama's imaginary culture wars, a decline in societal standards and hurricane Sandy.

The liberal machine is a well-oiled machine. The unions and ACORN were out en masse getting voters out to reelect this president as well as other corrupt liberal organizations.

So Obama basically won because of corruption, lies and a devastating storm.

Sort of like the perfect storm - the nation being the Andrea Gail.
Obama 2016

Virginia Beach, VA

#821755 Dec 14, 2012
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Most people work for corporations that are non-union. Salaries and benefits are driven by competition for the best employees.
Individuals are compensated based on their individual worth.
Ever talk to a classroom teacher about their feelings about being paid the same as a gym teacher or librarian who does a fraction of the work that they do?
How do you know how much work librarians and gym teachers do? Are you a librarian or gym teacher? No, your not. You dont know nothing.
Obama 2016

Virginia Beach, VA

#821756 Dec 14, 2012
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
I just kicked your adolescent tush.
Your knee-jerk reaction is "Who cares?"
Hee, Hee. I rest my case:>
Go play in that corner I put you in.
Who cares? Your an idiot.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#821758 Dec 14, 2012
entrenched wrote:
<quoted text>take one zero off , its 6.2 million not 62.2 million
You are right, I was wrong.
Obama 2016

Virginia Beach, VA

#821759 Dec 14, 2012
Obama 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>The unions did not cause Hostess' demise. Hostess caused their own demise by producing fattening, unhealthy food. Their junk food is banned in many public schools.
Walmart is trying to buy the now defuct Hostess foods company. Now they cannot only kill their overworked slave laborers with poor working condition, low pay and no benefits, they can poison them to death too. And Walmart sells guns and ammo. It's time for the goverment to take a close look at Walmart. Their practices would not be tolerated in most countries.
Obama 2016

Virginia Beach, VA

#821760 Dec 14, 2012
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe you should blame Obama for throwing Susan Rice under the bus.
Maybe Obama didn't want Susan Rice in the first place, but lacked the balls to tell her so and needed Republican help.
Maybe the folks at Goldman Sachs wanted someone else.
Susan Rice withdrew herself from consideration because she was tired of the sexist, racist attacks from Republicans. She was tired of being the prime target of the republican's "War on Women" and "War on Blacks".
Obama 2016

Virginia Beach, VA

#821761 Dec 14, 2012
RUSH10ME wrote:
<quoted text>You are clueless as to how this country was founded and the true cost of freedom , the second amendment shall not be infringed upon , the tree of liberty need be watered with the blood of patriots and tyrants alike from time to time . Now get back to the drive thru window .
Don't you have a KKK rally or Tea Party riot to attend?
TheIndependentMa jority

Somerset, KY

#821762 Dec 14, 2012
Sister Kathryn Lust wrote:
<quoted text>I'm right enough to whip your anti-union ass into a lather. Guess that's proof enough.
:)
Prove right-to-work ever results in a move up the ladder for the working man.
G'head, as deb likes to say.
:)
Americans for Prosperity believes in defending workers’ right to a secret ballot. However, union organizers and liberals want to take this right away. This would make it easier for union bosses to pressure workers into joining unions.

Are they right? Let’s take a look at the issue and some data.

An article by Robert Reich, President Clinton’s Secretary of Labor, discusses two key points through which to view liberals intentions on this issue.

1) The only way to get the economy back on track is to boost the purchasing power of the middle class by expanding unions so workers get higher wages.

2) Create a Utopian view of life in 1955 (1/3 of workers belonged to unions and wages were high) and says now because less that 8 percent of the private sector is union, wages are low & impossible to form unions.

Conservative Perspective on Forced Unionization:
* It is a myth that government can make people rich by propping up wages. If you force wages to be artificially high you are going to force companies out of business.
* You will also make other people unemployed.
* You price people out of the labor market.
* These are the policies that extended the Great Depression.
* People today understand that unions aren’t beneficial.
* It would be great to see unions work with companies to make them better and more profitable—they offer no value and shouldn’t be able to force people to join.
* They should find a way to appeal to workers where they would actually want to join.
* Powerful union makes it hard to fire employees and discourage businesses from investing.
* Union companies have to invest in more equipment to get more out of each worker since wages are so high.
* Productivity growth has actually been slightly HIGHER in the right-to-work states on average than the union shop states, showing that the workplace restrictions imposed by unions may be counterproductive...

Aphiemi. Facts On Right-To-Work Vs. Forced Union States. WordPress. 2/2009.
------

EVERYthing has pros AND cons!!
RUSH10ME

Chase City, VA

#821763 Dec 14, 2012
Obama 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>Don't you have a KKK rally or Tea Party riot to attend?
No I don't, but I do have some reloading to do , gonna do a few hundred copstoppers a day for awhile , don't you have cars piling up in the drive thru?
TheIndependentMa jority

Somerset, KY

#821764 Dec 14, 2012
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
You sound like a stay-at-home mom scrubbing hubbie's shoes. Get out much? Bingo?
I once worked in a union shop where the company and the union leaders slept together. Horrible working conditions and low pay.
I left.
Your naivete can't be hidden beneath that Burqua, babe.
Oh grievance no..say it aint so lol.
TheIndependentMa jority

Somerset, KY

#821765 Dec 14, 2012
Obama 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>Susan Rice withdrew herself from consideration because she was tired of the sexist, racist attacks from Republicans. She was tired of being the prime target of the republican's "War on Women" and "War on Blacks".
No, she knows the Benghazi stuff isn't going to "puff the majik dragonally" just "go away"...and why should she have to be the SCAPEGOAT for OTHERS IGNORANCE and stupidity.

Smart move on her part--GOOD for HER!!!!!!!!!!
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

#821766 Dec 14, 2012
The Amazing Hypocrisy of the "Right To Work"

In terms of practical economic impacts, I think the right-to-work controversy set off by Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder's decision to undertake a lame duck flip-flop is perhaps overstated. If you compare Montgomery County in labor-friendly Maryland to Fairfax County in right-to-work Virginia, your overwhelming impression will be that these are very similar affluent suburbs of the same city. But apples-to-apple comparisons are hard to find and since union rules are highly correlated with other political indicators it's easy to cherry pick points. The conservative parts of America are generally poorer than the liberal parts, but also faster-growing. So if you want to claim that right-to-work laws are immiserating or growth-friendly, you can help yourself to whatever statistics you like.

But what's not murky is the absurd hypocrisy that has to go into making the case for right-to-work legislation.

The way this works is that if there's a labor union at a given business establishment that's bargaining for some higher pay or benefits or better work-rules or whatever it's rapidly going to find that there's a free rider problem. Everyone in the relevant class of workers gets the benefits whether or not they join the union. So something the union is often going to want to bargain for is some kind of rule stating that everyone hired in the relevant class has to join the union, or has to pay dues to the union, or something else along those lines.

Now naturally an employer's not going to want to agree to that. But he's not going to want to agree to higher pay or more vacation days either. That's why it's a negotiation. A right-to-work law is a law banning employers from making that concession.

The impact, obviously, is to make it hard to form strong unions in a given jurisdiction and thus make it a more business-friendly jurisdiction. But note that this same trick works across the board. You could just ban pay raises in general. Any one firm, after all, faces a dilemma. On the one hand it would be more profitable to pay people less. On the other hand, it's also unprofitable to have everyone quit to go work for some other higher-paying company. So a law against pay raises would make everyone more profitable, spurring crazy business investment and job creation. Except nobody does that because it would be (a) insane and (b) obviously unfair. And yet the proponents of right-to-work laws are generally exactly the people most inclined to stand up for freedom of contract under other circumstances.

http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2012/12/1...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 54 min red and right 50,351
daughter/father appropriate physical contact (Mar '12) 54 min chanelle 20
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 1 hr Barack the Yellow 183,801
amy 1-27 1 hr tiredofit 13
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr Mister Tonka 98,974
abby 1-26 3 hr Mister Tonka 45
Word (Dec '08) 5 hr Red_Forman 4,961
anybody know Glen Musielak? Glentech? (Mar '13) Sun Irving 74
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:04 am PST

NFL10:04AM
Richardson was suspended for two Colts playoff games
ESPN10:58 AM
Colts won't commit to RB Richardson for 2015
Yahoo! Sports11:49 AM
League conducts nearly 40 interviews into 'deflate-gate'
Yahoo! Sports11:50 AM
NFL: No decision yet on deflated balls
NBC Sports12:54 PM
Grigson goes silent on NFL investigation into Patriots