Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1275760 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

#819760 Dec 11, 2012
Homer wrote:
<quoted text>Homer celebrates Christmas hence Christmas presents, what holidays do you celebrate?
Thanks Homer, so do we.
carol

Orlando, FL

#819761 Dec 11, 2012
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you please send him down to the Principal's Office?
Thank You.
A good teacher is hard to find nowadays:>
When I was in the classroom, very rarely did a principal want to be bothered with an unruly student. But, fortunately, I had a fail proof discipline system based on rewards and consequences. An entire bulletin board was taken up just for student names and five little nails beside each name. The first infraction resulted in the student having to come to the front of the room and put a red check by their name (made out of laminated circles) while everyone watched and I stopped talking (just for effect). The first check was a warning. The second red check resulted in sitting by the fence and missing 10 minutes of recess. The third check was sitting by the fence during the entire recess. The fourth check resulted in the student having to write a note themselves to their parents explaining their unacceptable behavior that day with my signature.

And this is the clincher....

Every student knew that if the note wasn't returned the very next day with their parents' signature - no exceptions, no excuses - they had a choice of either a whack on the bottom (if the parent had signed a corporal punishment agreement with the office) or a two page essay on how to correct their behavior. I only caught one student who tried to forge their parents' signature.

Students with no checks or only one check by their name at the end of the day - the other side of the laminated red check circles had a happy face sticker - got to come up one at a time and put up their happy face. At the end of the week, students who had 4 out of 5 happy faces that week got a sticker on their desk. After 10 stickers were accumulated, they were treated to something special - like ice cream in the lunchroom during classtime, for example, or playing games in the back of the classroom on Friday afternoon while the other students had to do an assignment.

You'd be surprised how many students begged to be whacked on the bottom instead of having to write an essay.

In all my years of teaching, I only had to give 3 students a whack on the bottom. Each time I would say, "Do I have your attention now?"

My students loved me, by the way. And I them. They respected having a fair and consistent learning environment and, therefore, they all learned.

I probably would have had to tell nuc to bend over and grab his ankles on a routine basis. But that kind of gives me the creeps.
Homer

Bethlehem, PA

#819762 Dec 11, 2012
Chicagoan by Birth wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks Homer, so do we.
Cheers. Merry Christmas!
carol

Orlando, FL

#819763 Dec 11, 2012
Sorry about the last post. Got carried away.
Fenris the Archangel

United States

#819764 Dec 11, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
You embarrassed yourself.
Tell me again.
What is the difference if the University gives their President a $10K check & puts $2500 in the President's with holding and giving the President a $12,500 bonus where they with hold $2500 & give him a check for $10K.
What is this huge monumental difference?
You really ARE this fckng stupid (amazing). Did you read the link, mental midget? Its an amount above & BEYOND the university's publically approved compensation package that is hidden in other line-item expenditures and given expressly for them to avoid paying their fair share (while they advocate for higher taxes on everyone else).

Stick to what you know, leftist phlegm (ie "nothing").....
carol

Orlando, FL

#819765 Dec 11, 2012
lily boca raton fl wrote:
<quoted text>
O'Reilly?
Actually, no. Someone else on Greta who pointed out the dangers of republicans simply allowing us to go over the cliff without reaching some kind of agreement with an AWOL president who's still on the campaign trail.

Obama is perfectly happy about the cliff. Which is another reason republicans have to at least try and save the day for all of us and then get blamed for it - as usual.

You really don't have even an inkling about what's going to happen if Obama gets his way, do you? You wouldn't like it. But you also don't seem to care.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#819766 Dec 11, 2012
Is Conservative Media One Big "Racket"?

As Republicans continue to try to make sense of their recent election losses, the finger pointing is becoming more intense.

In recent days, prominent conservatives Bill Kristol and Joe Scarborough have leveled a new allegation: Major players have allowed their pursuit of personal wealth (and ego) to take precedence over larger political goals; that elements of the conservative movement resemble a me-first, moneymaking "racket," where lining ones pockets stands out as the key objective.

The nasty "racket" accusation highlights what's happened as Republicans have handed over more and more of their branding and marketing to media personalities whose ultimate barometers of success (ratings and personal income) differ from those who run political parties (getting candidates elected to office).

In the business of media self-promotion, and particularly the carnival barker variety that powers so much of the conservative movement via Fox News and AM talk radio, it's inevitable that the goals of the "conservative entertainment complex," as writer David Frum dubbed it, would collide with the retail politics of the Republican Party.(Frum has charged the complex with having "fleeced and "exploited" its followers.)

Remember when Glenn Beck charged fans $125 to sit through the taping of his radio show? Or when he charged $500 if they wanted to attend a meet-and-greet before the show? And that was after Beck banked $32 million the previous year. More recently, conservative pundits and outlets have rushed to cash in on election spending by renting their emails lists, while Fox News' Karl Rove lightened wealthy donors' bankrolls by $300 million via his failed political groups.

It's conservatism as an ATM.

http://mediamatters.org/blog/2012/12/11/is-co...
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#819767 Dec 11, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, no. Someone else on Greta who pointed out the dangers of republicans simply allowing us to go over the cliff without reaching some kind of agreement with an AWOL president who's still on the campaign trail.
Obama is perfectly happy about the cliff. Which is another reason republicans have to at least try and save the day for all of us and then get blamed for it - as usual.
You really don't have even an inkling about what's going to happen if Obama gets his way, do you? You wouldn't like it. But you also don't seem to care.
Elections Matter: The President Will Get What He Wants

In fact, the president holds all the high cards in this game. If no deal is reached, all taxpayers will face an increase in income tax ratesófrom the Bush levels of 10 to 15 percent for the lowest earners, and from 35 to an effective level of 43 percent for the highest. Taxes on capital gains will rise from 15 to 20 percent, and on dividends from 15 to as high as 39.6 percent. These increases to be accompanied by an additional Obamacare tax of 3.8 percent on the investment income of high earners.

Thatís when the elastic ropes come in. The president immediately introduces a bill to lower tax rates to Bush levels on all but the high earners, and dares the Republicans to vote against it. Result: rates on high earners are up, rates on 98 percent of taxpayers are back where they started from. Campaign promise fulfilled, egalitarian ideology satisfied.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/elections...

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#819768 Dec 11, 2012
Fenris the Archangel wrote:
<quoted text>
You really ARE this fckng stupid (amazing). Did you read the link, mental midget? Its an amount above & BEYOND the university's publically approved compensation package that is hidden in other line-item expenditures and given expressly for them to avoid paying their fair share (while they advocate for higher taxes on everyone else).
Stick to what you know, leftist phlegm (ie "nothing").....
So, what was the difference? You forgot to tell us.

Your original post claimed that professors were not paying income tax. Yet income taxes were paid.

Now you want to make it about hiding income from the public?

All income taxes were paid - all of them. Their fair share was paid.

WTF are you b*itching about here. No taxes were avoided at all.

You really aren't too smart.
Nj raider 1

United States

#819769 Dec 11, 2012
Aphelion wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for this adept demonstration of your ignorance and our failed public school system.
Say what ya'll want. You can't learn this in no classroom! If the system fails the family of that young boi, I guarantee justice is sought in the streets. The streets where topix talk is cheap as copper. I never said I would do anything to that man, but I know some hungry young boys that will give him exactly what he deserves &i won't feel sorry in the least bit. Ya'll want to treat this asshole like a victam. He started the confrontation with a boy not a man. That asshole deserves life in prison. Black panthers already put 20, thousand on his head. Like I said,"he better hope they lock his ass up!
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#819770 Dec 11, 2012
The Journalís Tax Advice

William Kristol

The Wall Street Journal editors are unhappy about the present correlation of political forces. Who isn't? They're also, I gather, unhappy about "Beltway sages" who, facing the fact that the Bush tax cuts expire at the end of this year, have suggested Republicans accept a modest increase in tax rates for the wealthy while leading the charge to keep taxes from rising for 98 percent of the American people.

It would be great if the Journal editors had a better idea of what Republicans could do. They don't.[....]

If we go over the cliff, there won't be damage to Obama's chances of second-term success. Quite the contrary. What Republicans will have done is to make Democrats the party of tax cuts and Obama a president fighting for economic growth.

As I say, it won't happen. Most Republicans will go along soon after January 1 with what will now be the Democrats' tax cutting agenda. If the House Republicans now follow the Wall Street Journal editors over the cliff, the only effect, I'm afraid, will be to turn a manageable tactical retreat in December into a panicked strategic rout in January.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/journal-s...

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#819771 Dec 11, 2012
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
None are so blind as those who do not want to see.
Put a plastic bag over your head.
Tightly.
8^o

No, no way...

" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erotic_asphyxiat... ;

....he might enjoy it too much!

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#819772 Dec 11, 2012
Obama 2016 wrote:
<quoted text>If guns were an effective method of preventing crime then Mcdonalds employees and gas station attendents would carry them. Instead they're prohibited by their employers from carrying them. Proof that they are not effective in preventing crime.
I suspect you are low in amino acids. Do yourself a favor and visit your local health food store.
carol

Orlando, FL

#819773 Dec 11, 2012
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
You're going to go back to your old lie that the federal government needed some kind of permission to go in to the affected areas. They didn't stupid. Once a federal emergency was declared no permission was needed. Where was Bush when Katrina was bearing down on the area? He was on one of his many vacations at his ranch. Where was President Obama? In Washington keeping tabs on developments and coordinating with the various governors.
Do some research. I did. That's how you get to the truth.

Look up Teaching the Levees. You'll find an extensive timeline
including:

September 2
*President Bush sends 10.5 billion request for emergency relief aid to Congress
*Military convoy arrives in New Orleans
*President Bush meets with Governor Blanco and Mayor Nagin on Air Force One
*Blanco decides not to allow president to federalize relief efforts

(Make sure you read that last one again)

September 5 - Nagin criticizes Blancoís decision not to allow federalized relief effort

September 7
*10,000 people continue to resist orders for complete evacuation
*Governor Blanco criticizes Mayor Nagin for what she considers questionable and ineffective enforcement methods

...Let's not forget Blanco knew the levees could not withstand a hurricane 5 but the state government used that funding elsewhere.

...Or the parking lot full of school buses that weren't used because Nagin didn't plan far enough ahead to use them for evacuating.

The difference is Bush publicly took part of the blame. Blanco and Nagin kept blaming each other and Bush.

Kind of a synopsis and overview of the two parties.
carol

Orlando, FL

#819774 Dec 11, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
Bill OíReilly thinks heís figured out who started the imaginary War on Christmas: gays and women
Comment of the day on YouTube:
Ok, the WAR ON CHRISTMAS is the queers fault? Dude, Iím gay and have 3 Christmas trees. Who the hell do you think is buying all these decorations? My house looks like Rudolph pooped Christmas cheer all over my house. Christmas rocks! Stop blaming the gays for all your problems.
http://freakoutnation.com/2012/12/07/bill-ore...
O'Reilly said no such thing. Stop being so gullible. It's embarrassing.
carol

Orlando, FL

#819775 Dec 11, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
Elections Matter: The President Will Get What He Wants
In fact, the president holds all the high cards in this game. If no deal is reached, all taxpayers will face an increase in income tax ratesófrom the Bush levels of 10 to 15 percent for the lowest earners, and from 35 to an effective level of 43 percent for the highest. Taxes on capital gains will rise from 15 to 20 percent, and on dividends from 15 to as high as 39.6 percent. These increases to be accompanied by an additional Obamacare tax of 3.8 percent on the investment income of high earners.
Thatís when the elastic ropes come in. The president immediately introduces a bill to lower tax rates to Bush levels on all but the high earners, and dares the Republicans to vote against it. Result: rates on high earners are up, rates on 98 percent of taxpayers are back where they started from. Campaign promise fulfilled, egalitarian ideology satisfied.
http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/elections...
It will surely hit the fan if Obama and the Democrats eagerly take us over the cliff in having their temper tantrum to get their way.

In fact, that's what they're hoping. You should probably be aware that everyone's taxes are going up on January 1 if no agreement is reached and the only spending cuts are gutting defense spending.

Taxes will go up on EVERYONE. Look it up if you don't believe me.
Fenris the Archangel

United States

#819776 Dec 11, 2012
RealDave wrote:
<quoted text>
So, what was the difference? You forgot to tell us.
Your original post claimed that professors were not paying income tax. Yet income taxes were paid.
Now you want to make it about hiding income from the public?
All income taxes were paid - all of them. Their fair share was paid.
WTF are you b*itching about here. No taxes were avoided at all.
You really aren't too smart.
STUPID FCK: the UNIVERSITY is paying taxes FOR them with monies above & beyond their compensation package. The Presidents are avoiding paying one thin DIME in taxes (whle advocating higher taxes on everyone else). If you cant see the difference, there is something seriously wrong with you.

Were you involved in an industrial accident, or kicked in the head by a horse?

“fairtax.org”

Since: Dec 08

gauley bridge wv

#819778 Dec 11, 2012
AmericanMan wrote:
<quoted text>Americans rejected the Republican's message of hate, fear and greed. That's not who the majority of us want to be like.
Yeah, okay. Stand back and watch what happens. It's crash and burn time!

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

#819779 Dec 11, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
It will surely hit the fan if Obama and the Democrats eagerly take us over the cliff in having their temper tantrum to get their way.
In fact, that's what they're hoping. You should probably be aware that everyone's taxes are going up on January 1 if no agreement is reached and the only spending cuts are gutting defense spending.
Taxes will go up on EVERYONE. Look it up if you don't believe me.
So, if Republicans refuse a rate increase, its the Democrat's fault that no deal is reached.
Jimmy

Newington, CT

#819781 Dec 11, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
Bill OíReilly thinks heís figured out who started the imaginary War on Christmas: gays and women
Comment of the day on YouTube:
Ok, the WAR ON CHRISTMAS is the queers fault? Dude, Iím gay and have 3 Christmas trees. Who the hell do you think is buying all these decorations? My house looks like Rudolph pooped Christmas cheer all over my house. Christmas rocks! Stop blaming the gays for all your problems.
http://freakoutnation.com/2012/12/07/bill-ore...
?

I'm glad I don't count on you for anything.

Your ability to perceive reality and fact is lacking. You are the quintessential believe anything Obama voter, for sure.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 18 min Jacques Ottawa 197,009
DONALD TRUMP REVEALED as NIGERIAN PRINCE ! ..bi... 23 min TRUMP ADMENSTRUATION 1
Loan shark, loan lender, Apply for loan offer 47 min MonicaJ 1
Fast loan needed for urgent purpose?. Apply now. (Apr '14) 48 min MonicaJ 2
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 2 hr litesong 54,512
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 2 hr Deez--Nuts 6,416
Hillary fires up crowd in Iowa. 6 hr Pianolegs blows GAS 5
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages