Barack Obama, our next President

[THE DEBIL]

I'M TALKIN' ABOUT THE WET WILLIE WHERE YOU SUCK YOU FINGER AN' THEN PUT IT IN HER EAR... WHAT'D YOU THINK I MEANT? NO, NO, NO, YOU GOT TO GET THEM LAUGHIN' I KEEP TELLIN' YOU. WE DRIVE THEM CRAZY BUT WHEN WE FUNNY THEY STILL LOVE US, THEY CAIN'T HEP THEYSELVES...

[THE DEBIL]

THEY SMILIN' NOW... ONLIEST ONES WE WANT HERE ANYWAYS...

[GhostofRaygun]

carol wrote:

<quoted text>
Even though Romney didn't think through his comment made in private and admitted the next day he was "dead wrong" about lumping the 47% who receive some kind of government subsidy with the much smaller percentage who manipulate the system, the point he was making to the small group of campaign contributors he was addressing - however broad-based - was that the 47% probably wouldn't vote for him because of being afraid of losing whatever government subsidies they receive - for whatever reason.
He obviously went too far lumping them altogether and admitted as such, but the reality of the 47% not voting for him was correct.
We have, in fact, become a nanny state. The problem, of course, is Obama couldn't be happier. The more the merrier. By continuing to stifle the private sector, there will be a lot of merriment in this White House.
"Vicious cycle" couldn't have a more clear meaning.

You need to read the transcript of what he said. He said the 47% pay no taxes. There is only one 47% in America that pay no taxes. 22% include those on SS and troops deployed. The gift takers.

[GhostofRaygun]

shinningelectr0n wrote:

<quoted text>
If the economy crashes, the Jerk-In-Chief will blame it on Hurricane Sandy, Syria, Benghazi and the those damned Republicans who waited too long to cave. Count on it that if he can't come up with a plausible excuse, David Letterman, the NY Times, Oprah and Vladimir Putin will come out to find excuses for him.

And if it does NOT crash I'm sure you will give Obama all the credit.

[THE DEBIL]

FIRST THING WE NEED IS A MISSION STATEMENT.... HMMMMMM... NUTHIN' TOO GRANDIOSE OR CENTERED ON PUBLIC SERVICE OR NUTHIN'... HOW BOUT SUMTHIN' TO DO WITH... LOVE?

"WE HOL' THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF-EVIDENT THAT ALL MEN ARE VERY DEFINITELY NOT EQUAL AND SHALL NOT PERISH FROM THIS EARTH AS LONG AS WE HANG OUT TOGETHER. FURTHER, WE HOL' THAT ALL WOMEN ARE NOT EQUAL EITHER AN' THAT MANY OF THEM ARE SOOOOO DAMN CUTE AS TO BE IRRESISTIBLE AN'; THE RES' OF THEM WOULDN'T BE TOO BAD IF THEY JUS' TOOK A L'IL PRIDE IN THEYSELVES! FURTHER, NO MAN SHALL KISS A WOMAN'S ASS UNLESS SHE WILLS IT, REGARDLESS OF RACE CREED OR COLOR OR THE OVERALL CUTENESS OF HER SMILE. LIKEWISE! NO MAN SHALL ALLOW HISSELF TO BECOME GROSSLY FAT OR PICK HIS NOSE IN THE CAR WHERE THE WHOLE DAMN NEIGHBORHOOD CAN WATCH HIM DO IT!"

I JUS' PUTTIN' IT OUT THERE AN' WELCOME CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM PARTICULARLY FROM THE CUTE GIRLS WHO STILL LOVE DEBIL.

[THE DEBIL]

AW C'MON, I OFFERIN' YOU THE WORL' HERE... WHEN WE GON' GROW UP IF NOT NOW?

[Eman]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
Raise Taxes on Rich to Reward True Job Creators
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-12-07/r...

Nice fluff piece but it doesn't answer my question.

[shinningelectr0n]

PDUPONT wrote:

<quoted text>
Of course you're going to say Brooks should have stopped there because up to that point he seemed to be parroting the right wing. But then he goes on to affirm that the President faces an intractable GOP House. He also states;
"The fiscal-cliff talks are just the first chapter in this long process. In this first episode, the Democrats should get higher revenues from the rich (elections have consequences) and the Republicans should get some entitlement reform. But the main point is to lay the predicate for the bigger deals to come."
Are the Republicans going to listen to the American people who by a two to one margin want the wealthiest to pay more in taxes or are they going to be beholden to an unelected millionaire lobbyist, Grover Norquist.

The Wisdom of Crowds is nothing but a cheap consumer myth. Mass delusion is a common thread throughout history and we've seen it again with this past Presidential Election.

Americans did not want to engage the "European Problem" prior to WWI but Roosevelt dragged us in because of his vision - an individual's vision. Churchill was spurned by the British voters before and even after WWII. A considerable percentage of Americans believe in ghosts, UFOs, "Professional" Wrestling, winning lotteries and Liberalism. Go figure.

And here comes little PeeDePoop to prance about detailing the Wisdom of Crowds and how the Republicans should fall in line.

This makes you a Fool leading a Fool's Parade.

"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
----- Winston Churchill

[HateToBother]

sonicfilter wrote:

How Obama Shouldn’t Back Down Vs. the GOP
Elections are supposed to have consequences. So why does the GOP think it can strong-arm the president into compromising on entitlements without first giving in on taxes?
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/11...

Because elections DO have consequences and the democrats only carried the Senate - they didn't win the House.

Personally - I say Santa won fair and square - give him everything he wants and when he is finished wrecking the country it will be decades before another democrat could get elected dog catcher.

Congrats on the win - now do something. What happened to the holy Obamessiah bringing everyone together. Are his powers not up to the challenge on the very first issue? He won the election but he won't be able to do anything - kind of like the last four years. Sorry you had your hopes up about that shining new future - it appears it isn't coming.

[Eman]

sonicfilter wrote:

How Obama Shouldn’t Back Down Vs. the GOP
Elections are supposed to have consequences. So why does the GOP think it can strong-arm the president into compromising on entitlements without first giving in on taxes?
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/11...

Why does obama need to be strong armed into compromise?

[Lincoln Duncan]

sonicfilter wrote:

<quoted text>
Raise Taxes on Rich to Reward True Job Creators
http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-12-07/r...

Republicans are running out of country club types

[THE DEBIL]

I, FOR ONE, FEEL NEW HOPE. I AM INSPIRED TO BETTER MYSELF... OH, AN' NO TEXANS, EXCEPT DENNY. I THINK WE CAN ALL AGREE THAT TEXANS ARE BASICALLY ON A SINKING SHIP AND WE SHOULD CUT THEM OFF AND LET THEM DUKE IT OUT WITH MEXICO. THIS COUNTRY WAS FOUNDED ON SOMETHING OR OTHER, AND DESPITE CLAIMS TO THE CONTRARY, WE ARE UNLIKELY TO GO BACK TO EATING MASTODONS AND LIVING IN CAVES. AND NO MORE GODDAM STRUGGLING!!!! RAISE YOU HANDS IF YOU WANT PIZZA? I KNOW, I KNOW, IT'S FATTENING, BUT THIS IS A SPECIAL NIGHT.

[Eman]

Nuculur option wrote:

<quoted text>
Retard Fred and DBWriter have not been seen since election day!!
Nobraina is back as John Galt, Floriduh is back as Carter. I think Gunner bcame back as 'orangelion' for awhile, but he fled just as quickly when his alias was busted.

Where'd you go? Was it something you said or replying as your sock?

[THE DEBIL]

shinningelectr0n wrote:

<quoted text>
The Wisdom of Crowds is nothing but a cheap consumer myth. Mass delusion is a common thread throughout history and we've seen it again with this past Presidential Election.
Americans did not want to engage the "European Problem" prior to WWI but Roosevelt dragged us in because of his vision - an individual's vision. Churchill was spurned by the British voters before and even after WWII. A considerable percentage of Americans believe in ghosts, UFOs, "Professional" Wrestling, winning lotteries and Liberalism. Go figure.
And here comes little PeeDePoop to prance about detailing the Wisdom of Crowds and how the Republicans should fall in line.
This makes you a Fool leading a Fool's Parade.
"The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter."
----- Winston Churchill

FOR ONCE IN YOU LIFE CAN YOU JUS' BE A MAN INSTEAD OF PRETENDIN' YOU CHARLES ATLAS? YOU GOT TO LISSEN TO THE DEBIL CAUSE HE TELL YOU THE TRUTH: YOU-GET-THE-WOMEN-LAUGHIN'-AN' -THE-WORL-BE-A-BETTER-PLACE. STOP TRYIN' TO COMPETE WITH ME! I DON' WANNA PLAY.

[THE DEBIL]

OH, AN' WINSTON CHURCHILL WAS A FAT DRUNK NOBODY LIKED, THOUGH HE DID HAVE A SMALL TALENT FO' PAINTING. THE WORLD IS AWASH IN AMBITIOUS MEN AND WOMEN AN' WHAT GOOD HAS IT EVER DONE ANYONE?

[Anonymous of Indy]

Lincoln Duncan wrote:

<quoted text>
Republicans are running out of country club types

Republican Party knows their Power Grab is in Trouble.

[THE DEBIL]

Eman wrote:

<quoted text>
Why does obama need to be strong armed into compromise?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHA... YES, UM, THAT'S IT.. YOU ABOUT TO HAVE YOU FACES PUSHED DOWN INTO THE MUD YOU MAKE YOUSELVES AN' NOW YOU ALL SENSITIVE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF MINORITIES... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ..

[shinningelectr0n]

PDUPONT wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes stupid, he was taking his case to the people that matter, the voters. Those are the ones the GOP should be listening to not Grover Norquist and his ilk.

It is the PeeDePoops of this world that love to lead the Hanging Mob to the tree with rope in hand. They call it "leadership".

[THE DEBIL]

IN LIFE, AS IN LOVE, "WINNING" IS NOT AN OPTION. THERE IS NO MAN OR WOMAN WITH ANY ANSWERS BUT WE ALL GOT GENITALS. SO LOOK AT IT FROM MY POINT OF VIEW: WHEN YOU BEEN HANDED THE KEYS TO THE KINGDOM OF HAPPINESS WHY YOU OUT LOOKIN' FO' THE COMBINATION TO THE HOLY GRAIL OF ENLIGHTENMENT? CAROL, GET DEBIL A BEER WHILE YOU UP, WOULD YOU, DEAR?

[shinningelectr0n]

PDUPONT wrote:

<quoted text> At least when you put extra money in middle class workers' pockets which Obama did,they spend it and stimulate demand and growth.

Fool. This you say while 23 million Americans are out of work.

You've got more lies than lice, Idiot.