Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story
carol

Orlando, FL

#818538 Dec 8, 2012
And then there was Saddam's nuclear scientist...Saddam Hid Biological and Chemical WMD...on Al-Fayhaa TV in 2004.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#818540 Dec 8, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay--ever heard of the tunnels of Iraq?
Look it up sometime--great system for moving WMD and such.
But the guns and ammo used in the Libya conflict--that'll be another story.
(SEE: boats into syrian ports-Sept 2012)
The only tunnels are the ones meth cut into your brain, you loser!!

----------

George W Bush had 'sickening feeling' over WMD lack

The revelation comes in his memoir, "Decision Points", set to be published next week.

He also reveals that he temporarily considered replacing Vice President Dick Cheney, calling him the "Darth Vader of the administration".

But he has no comment on his successor in the White House, Barack Obama.

The 64-year-old former president defends his decision to invade Iraq in his autobiography, which was obtained in advance by the New York Times.

He argues that Iraqi citizens are better off without the former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, whom he calls a "homicidal dictator", adding the US is also better off without Mr Hussein pursuing biological or chemical weapons.

But Mr Bush admits that he was shocked when no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq.

"No one was more shocked and angry than I was when we didn't find the weapons," he writes.

"I had a sickening feeling every time I thought about it. I still do."

----------

Even after Bush an dCheney admit there were no WMD's in Iraq, nitwits like you and Carol continue to repeat the lie.

Makes you a liar. But we already knew that.

You and Carol have no brains, only ignorance and repetitive lies.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#818542 Dec 8, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
From a former Iraqi military officer, Gen. George Sadas, in these two interviews.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =e-JcN72kxVIXX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
He was Saddam's #2 advisor in the Iraqi Air Force who also supported his removal from power.
You can take his word or not. Doesn't change the fact that if anyone should know, he would.
This is just too precious~!!

Now Carol will take the word of one of Saddam's Officers over the words of both George W. Bush and Dickless Cheney.

You go to amazing lengths to lend credence to your lies.

But an Iraqi Air Force Officer who worked for Saddam?? And who you claim 'supported his removal from power'. At what point did he support it?? He'd have been dead if he supported it before the invasion. After the invasion, what else could he say?? Are you so stupid you believe a story like that??

Gotta give it to ya, Lorac. Accepting the word of one of Saddam's murdering Officers over George Bush is one thing I never expected of you.

But it is funny!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HA
carol

Orlando, FL

#818543 Dec 8, 2012
And for you who don't believe me about weasels - who they are and what they said - about Saddam...



Straight from the weasels' mouths.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#818544 Dec 8, 2012
TheIndependentMajority wrote:
<quoted text>
No, the TEA Party is REAL.
Would you like to see their webpage links?
You poor lil ignotoad.
The Tea Party is like you - dead from the neck up.

Dick Armey took $8 million and ran, knowing th eTP is finished after this election.

Or didn't you notice how badly TP candidates fared??

Quit smokin' that meth, you'd be more aware of the world around you, not the tunnels in your brain!! LOL

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#818545 Dec 8, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
Fiscal Cliff, Day 31: A GOP Entitlementís Huge Price Tag
Democrats are the party of entitlements, but an overlooked irony in the fiscal cliff stand-off is that itís the Republican-designed Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit that threatens to explode entitlement costs, by as much as $1 trillion in 10 years.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/12...
Thanks a lot obamacare

"In 2011, Part D cost $65.8 billion, or about 11.6 percent of total Medicare mandatory outlays. But over the next 10 years, the cost of Medicare Part D is poised to explode, thanks to the pre-existing trends, and because Obamacare expands the coverage."

Since: Apr 09

Elmont, Long Island NY

#818546 Dec 8, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
From a former Iraqi military officer, Gen. George Sadas, in these two interviews.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =e-JcN72kxVIXX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
He was Saddam's #2 advisor in the Iraqi Air Force who also supported his removal from power.
You can take his word or not. Doesn't change the fact that if anyone should know, he would.
I'm guessing you believed "Curveball" too

BTW I have a bridge for sale....you interested its between Brooklyn and Manhattan

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#818547 Dec 8, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
I rooted for Nixon in 1968 in high school but then turned against him when he accelerated and then delayed ending the war until after he won his second election. I was happy Carter won in 1977 but didn't become a registered voter until 1980 when Reagan ran again (he lost the first time around) and when it became clear Democrats didn't have a clue what they were doing.
It was never the kind of blood sport with so much hatred and distrust towards fellow Americans during either Carter's or Reagan's presidencies. Neither Bush Sr.'s and even Clinton's - until he screwed the pooch in his second term, so to speak.
So, basically, Clinton's gross lack of character and democrats defending it is where it all started. Just answered my own question.
Far better to have a President who chases women than one who starts wars he cannot pay for and plunges the nation into an economic depression; we're still climbing out of.

But then, you're very good at defending atupidity. You have it in spades.
carol

Orlando, FL

#818548 Dec 8, 2012
If anyone has 40 minutes to kill, this documentary about interrogating Saddam is extremely interesting and well made.



Extremely compelling...so much so, you'll have to excuse me while I finish watching it. Can't break away.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#818549 Dec 8, 2012
carol wrote:
And for you who don't believe me about weasels - who they are and what they said - about Saddam...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =WxLw3YC5MTUXX
Straight from the weasels' mouths.
We don't believe you about anything, Lorac.

You have a track record of lying and repeating nonsense you hear on FAUX. Too bad you don't understand any of it.

The US Government, under George W. Bush, admitted there were no WMD's in Iraq. Case closed.

Colin Powell quit his job working for Bush because he'd been lied to and used.

Get over it. Stop the stupidity. You're too dumb to quit when you're behind.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

#818550 Dec 8, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said politics wasn't a dirty business. I said it was never the kind of outright hatred towards fellow Americans that it is now.
Try and keep up...oh wise one.
I belong to three civic orgs__they are all front loaded with conservatives, some hard right and even racist. I don't see any hatred when we gather, a lot of tongue biting and snickering but no hatred.

Obviously you aren't intelligent or mature enough to involve yourself in politics beyond this racist anonymous thread.

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#818551 Dec 8, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
That's like saying going after Hitler in WWII would mean "innocent people will die."
The fact that even more innocent people would die in gas chambers, massacres, scientific experiments and would suffer unimaginable deaths simply can't be grasped by Democrats.
Is dying to end evil atrocities worse than dying because of them?
There you go again with your idiotic analogies.

We didn't go to war with Hitler because he was a 'bad man'.

We didn't go to war against Hitler because he was gassing Jews, even though we knew about it.

We went to War with Hitler to defend our allies and ourselves.

Hitler was on the offensive, having taken over most of Europe before we got involved.

If Iraq was justified, why not Myanmar?? North Korea?? Syria, Libya, Egypt, Saudi Arabia??

You hang your whole defense on the fact that Saddam was a bad man. Well, we sold him the chemicals he used to gas the Kurds, we supported him in the War with Iran, he was our ally until 1989.

Yet suddenly he must be removed??

You're as crazy as the neocons. Difference is, they've admitted Iraq was a mistake.

You're dumb enough to continue to defend a complete debacle for the USA.
Lincoln Duncan

United States

#818552 Dec 8, 2012
carol wrote:
And then there was Saddam's nuclear scientist...Saddam Hid Biological and Chemical WMD...on Al-Fayhaa TV in 2004.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =PXX
EDn0bWWeng
Youtube is for people who can't read books
Lincoln Duncan

United States

#818553 Dec 8, 2012
carol wrote:
If anyone has 40 minutes to kill, this documentary about interrogating Saddam is extremely interesting and well made.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =-dTjj4yNVisXX
Extremely compelling...so much so, you'll have to excuse me while I finish watching it. Can't break away.
Libraries are open and have books ....
Nj raider 1

United States

#818554 Dec 8, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
In case the poster, Chicago, hasn't said this yet.
The Senate voted to approve The Joint Resolution to Authorize the Use of United States Armed Forces Against Iraq with the support of large bipartisan majorities on October 11, 2002, providing the Bush administration with a legal basis for the U.S. invasion under U.S. law.
It cited the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998, the resolution signed by former President Clinton, that it should be the policy of the United States to remove the Hussein regime and promote a democratic replacement.
Who do ya'll think the United States is? I dont care if the senate vote & approved the bill. That is a sovereign nation & it takes an act of war for 1 country too invade another under UN policy & agreement of all cooperating countries. Otherwise whats stopping any other country from invading the US? Did I mention the fact that bush flat out lied to congress about his reasons for invading iraq? The while thing sinks to high heaven & your 1 of the 3 blind mice for believing & supporting his thoughtless decision. & ya'll want to ride Obama for benghazi. You got to be kidding!

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#818555 Dec 8, 2012
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks a lot obamacare
"In 2011, Part D cost $65.8 billion, or about 11.6 percent of total Medicare mandatory outlays. But over the next 10 years, the cost of Medicare Part D is poised to explode, thanks to the pre-existing trends, and because Obamacare expands the coverage."
Time to correct the huge mistake Bush made.

Medicare MUST be allowed to get competetive pricing from drug companies, something th eBush Medicare rule did not allow.

But the VA can negotiate prices. Which is why they spend far less on medicines per patient than does Medicare.

If you weern't so busy with your 9-9-9 stupidity,you might have figured it out for yourself!!

HAHAHAHAHAHA
Fenris the Archangel

United States

#818556 Dec 8, 2012
Nuculur option wrote:
<quoted text>
Time to correct the huge mistake Bush made.
Medicare MUST be allowed to get competetive pricing from drug companies, something th eBush Medicare rule did not allow.
But the VA can negotiate prices. Which is why they spend far less on medicines per patient than does Medicare.
If you weern't so busy with your 9-9-9 stupidity,you might have figured it out for yourself!!
HAHAHAHAHAHA
Are you still here, you doddering old phag? Did they finally evict you from the stalls at the bus depot? Maybe your fellow tub of goo "dem" will take you as his wife (or hubby, whichever the case may be).

Get used to it; Obama will accomplish very few of his 2nd term goals (because the House wont allow it).

Enjoy, polesmoker....

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#818557 Dec 8, 2012
sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
seeing as how Reagan raised taxes 11 times, your point just went to shyte.
and i think that's how Bush got a surplus to spend down. you know, when Bill raised taxes on the rich.
talk about not getting it.
"The effects of increasing taxes on Treasury receipts can be seen in the Clinton and Democrat-controlled congressional tax increase of 1993, one of the largest in history. Despite a more robust job market following a recession, the 1993 tax increase didn't accomplish what Democrats expected. The tax increases added very little to treasury receipts despite their magnitude. Reports from the Congressional Budget Office, the Office of Management and Budget, and the Internal Revenue Service all agree.

In fact, the balanced budgets of the Clinton years didn't occur until after a Republican Congress passed and the president reluctantly signed a 1997 tax bill that lowered the capital gains rate from 28% to 20%, added a child tax credit, and established higher limits on tax exclusion for IRAs and estates.†"

“Often imitated”

Since: Jul 07

never duplicated

#818558 Dec 8, 2012
Lincoln Duncan wrote:
<quoted text>
Being bipartisan will help in the reducing taxes on 98% of Americans.
Republicans seems to be coming around.
98%? How is that possible when 47% already don't pay federal income taxes?

Since: Sep 10

Location hidden

#818559 Dec 8, 2012
carol wrote:
If anyone has 40 minutes to kill, this documentary about interrogating Saddam is extremely interesting and well made.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =-dTjj4yNVisXX
Extremely compelling...so much so, you'll have to excuse me while I finish watching it. Can't break away.
Translation from Loracspeak;

""I'm getting beaten up on my Iraq defense ignorance. Time for me to leave for awhile. Sure wish Bush hadn't admitted there were no WMD's""

Run off, Lorac. It's what you do when you've been caught in a series of lies and back yourself into a corner with them.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 12 min SpaceBlues 50,250
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 20 min Jacques Ottawa 183,699
abby 1-26 36 min cheluzal 22
'Charlie Hebdo' staff defends Mohammed cover 1 hr Don Imus 11
Mushrooms Tomas from the Old Barn (Apr '11) 1 hr old barn fan 3
Why are White men obsessed with Latina women? (Feb '10) 2 hr FirmcuntGood 166
Teachers union president vows to fight cuts to ... (Feb '14) 2 hr ShouldBPres 7
anybody know Glen Musielak? Glentech? (Mar '13) 21 hr Irving 74
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:04 am PST

NFL10:04AM
Richardson was suspended for two Colts playoff games
ESPN10:58 AM
Colts won't commit to RB Richardson for 2015
Yahoo! Sports11:49 AM
League conducts nearly 40 interviews into 'deflate-gate'
Yahoo! Sports11:50 AM
NFL: No decision yet on deflated balls
NBC Sports12:54 PM
Grigson goes silent on NFL investigation into Patriots