Barack Obama, our next President

[THE DEBIL]

nanoanomaly wrote:

<quoted text>You are a worm.

KEEP UP YOU DUMB BITCH. I WILL HAVE MY POUND OF FLESH.

[Independent]

THE DEBIL wrote:

WOULDN'T IT BE GREAT IF THERE WAS SOME SPIRIT IN THE SKY WHO WOULD FORGIVE YOU FOR SUCKING THE COCKS OF THE ENTIRE FOOTBALL TEAM IN HIGH SCHOOL IF YOU JUST BELIEVED IN HIM LIKE PETER PAN?(PUN INTENDED.)

Dude get OFF THE NARCOTICS!, GET HELP SOON. REAL SOON BEFORE YOU HURT YOURSELF OR WORSE, SOMEONE ELSE.

[shinningelectr0n]

THE DEBIL wrote:

<quoted text>
OH, THAT'S TASTY. YOU MEAN... A VETERAN? I SAID A MAN, NOT A MOUSE.

That's cheap, LowLife.

[shinningelectr0n]

THE DEBIL wrote:

<quoted text>
HOW DO YOU KNOW HE NEVER "CAVED?" BECAUSE HE TOLD YOU SO? JOHN MCCAIN SUCKED CONG-DICK. AND HE DID SO WILLINGLY. AS YOU DO. DID YOU NOT SEE THE CANCER IN THE MAN'S CHEEK? THAT'S FROM SWALLOWING TOO MUCH CUM. YOU LOVE YOUR HEROES DON'T YOU, BOY? IT MAKES YOU FEEL BETTER ABOUT... BEING NO ONE.

You've got about as much humanity inside you as a Parking Meter does.
Let's hope you soon go Expired.

[shinningelectr0n]

THE DEBIL wrote:

<quoted text>
I AM A KILLER. THERE'S A DIFFERENCE.

You are a worm eating in a dead man's grave. You don't kill. You are parasitic, opportunistic and a scavenger. You groan for your own burial to meet your next of kin.

[PDUPONT]

Stoneman wrote:

<quoted text>
The balanced budget had to be shoved down Clinton's throat by the Conservative Congress. BJ Clinton even shut down the gubbermint for weeks, trying to force them to accept liberal-business-as-usual buying votes with Welfare.
Now you Socialist/Democrats want credit for reforming Welfare?
The budget took a dive when liberal Republicans replaced the conservatives in early 2000, then exploded when Princess Pelosi and the entitlement kings on the left took BOTH houses of Congress in 2006.
If you want balanced budgets, kick out the Socialist/Democrats and liberal Republicans, replace them with Conservatives.
By the way, do you think Lord Obama will EVER have a budget? It's been years since the federal gubbermint operated with one. Seems like Lord Obama doesn't want to be constrained to ANY budget.

Well nitwit, even Fox says you're full of crap on this one.
www.foxnews.com/.../two-legacies-from-bill-cl... ...
Clinton didn't shut down the government you goddamned liar, it was the Republican Congress under Newt Gingrich and in the end they lost, and Clinton was reelected in a landslide.
Liberal Republicans took over in early 2000? Hey stupid! 2000 was an election year and the new congress wasn't seated until 2001. What liberal Republicans moron? Darryl Issa, Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor? If anything the House became more right wing in 2000.
You right wing whack jobs keep blaming the Democrats who had a slim lead in the House and one vote in the Senate for exploding the deficit but can't name one piece of legislation that somehow escaped Bush's veto pen that caused it.
You're an idiot!

[PDUPONT]

Chicagoan by Birth wrote:

<quoted text>Who cares, He may have been born in 1961, but the place of birth is wrong, Impeachment is looming, Watch out...

No one but cosmically delusional whackos like you are buying the birther crap anymore.
Impeached for what moron? Benghazi? The more facts that come out demonstrate that there's nothing there that the President can be held accountable for. The House may be Republican but not crazy and realize that the American people aren't going to tolerate a partisan side show when real work needs to be done. You're also forgetting that the Democrats hold the Senate by a comfortable margin
You're an idiot!

[PDUPONT]

carol wrote:

<quoted text>
Why would Obama make a point of telling the American public he would be sitting down with Romney in the weeks ahead right after he won the election?
And then met with him the first time just three weeks after the election?
There's no other reason a newly elected president would be so open-armed to a former opponent or his press secretaray underscoring Obama's interest in what Romney had to say.

Well Carol you just can't wrap your pea sized brain around the fact that the President was just being a gracious winner. The American people judged the Romney/ Ryan plan and rejected it.

[Nj raider 1]

This is deeper than just any old meeting Carol! It's tradition! Look it up all the presidents since like the 1930/40s met with their opponent right after the election. Mostly because the loser was considered the leader of the opposing party, but in romney's case ya'll threw him under the bus the minute he loss. Obama could've shitted on romney knowing he really was know leader & had no leverage in bargaining chips with the republicans. Mad him feel less than a man! The 1st presidential opponent to not be invited for the meeting, but if you haven't noticed, the president has much more class the that. I may be off on the year Carol, but I aint wrong on the facts. He was just doing what a good negotiator does. Feeling just how much leverage he has so he can move forward with his agenda!

[GOPidiotsx]

PDUPONT wrote:

<quoted text>
Well Carol you just can't wrap your pea sized brain around the fact that the President was just being a gracious winner. The American people judged the Romney/ Ryan plan and rejected it.

Sigh. Carol really needs some help. EVERY President meets with the loser. It's an honored tradition, nothing else.

[carol]

GOPidiotsx wrote:

<quoted text>
Sigh. Carol really needs some help. EVERY President meets with the loser. It's an honored tradition, nothing else.

Do winning presidents also say in their victory speeches they will be sitting down with the losing opponent in the weeks ahead to talk about how to move this country forward?

Thought Obama knew how to do that. He won. Why is he interested in Romney's input? He certainly isn't interested in any other republicans' input.

[carol]

THE DEBIL wrote:

OH, HONEY, I'M SO FAR FROM BEING "NUTS" AS TO BE IRREDEEMABLY FRUITY. YOU NEED TO READ MY POSTS CAREFULLY, I AM THE MASTER AND THERE'S A REASON FOR THAT. WE ARE NOT ALL THE SAME. YOUR VALUE SYSTEM IS BASED ON FANTASY. MINE, ON REALITY. BUT I'M SURE IF JESUS EVER DOES COME BACK HE'LL TAKE YOU FIRST.

You posted 20 posts in a row that offered nothing but garbage.

What is WRONG with you?

[Impeach Obama]

RealDave wrote:

<quoted text>
She said what the intelligence community indicated.

Wrong! She LIED under orders from the administration to help Obama conceal his incompetence. They thought the public would fall for it and forget about the incident, but even after Fox News reported the truth three days later, the administration continued the coverup and the lies. This is why Susan Rice should never be nominated for anything and Obama should be removed from office as soon as possible.

[GhostofRaygun]

carol wrote:

<quoted text>
Do winning presidents also say in their victory speeches they will be sitting down with the losing opponent in the weeks ahead to talk about how to move this country forward?
Thought Obama knew how to do that. He won. Why is he interested in Romney's input? He certainly isn't interested in any other republicans' input.

I'm sure a few months in re-education camp is going to help you with all this hate.

[Impeach Obama]

GhostofRaygun wrote:

<quoted text>FEMA doesn't set power poles or repair gas lines dumbdumb.

They organize and oversee the recovery effort. They haven't organized anything because a majority of people there are white Republicans.

[carol]

Nuculur option wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny how when your side is repudiated TWICE in a row, you have the stupidity to tell others to wake up.
If you didn't live in the bubble of lies that is FAUX News, you might have a clue.
But you drank the kool-aid and watched as the American People rejected the lies and propaganda offered by FAUX.
Like the phony 'War on Christmas' tha only FAUX seems to be aware of!!
They may be the most watched cable news outlet, but it sure didn't help your side when election day came, did it??
Turns out the 3% of nitwits like you who rely on FAUX were suckered, just like the guys in high school fooled you when they said they wouldn't come in your mouth!!

Seems the majority drank the kool-aid. That's the problem.

Obama won approximately 58,720,700 (50.1%) of the popular vote.
Romney won approximately 56,145,950 (48.4%).

That means a lot of Americans - pretty much half - didn't drink the kool-aid. That's all it means.

By the way Obama and a lot of you act, you'd think there were only 6 conservatives left on the planet. More than 56 million of us made our voice heard loud and clear. We are not going to remain silent just because a margin of 1.5% drank the kool-aid.

The president is supposed to represent the entire country - to sit down with the representatives of the other half of the country who did not elect him - not just those who gave him a 1.5% margin.

Just in case you...and he...forgot.

[Impeach Obama]

PDUPONT wrote:

<quoted text>
Well Carol you just can't wrap your pea sized brain around the fact that the President was just being a gracious winner. The American people judged the Romney/ Ryan plan and rejected it.

The people who voted him in by a very slim margin could care less about his plan. They only voted for him because he's black. That's the ONLY reason he ever got elected to anything. If he was white he'd have never even been elected Senator.

[GhostofRaygun]

Impeach Obama wrote:

<quoted text>They organize and oversee the recovery effort. They haven't organized anything because a majority of people there are white Republicans.

NO. FEMA provides emergency food and shelter. They cannot force electric companies to work faster.
Here is the mandate of FEMA:
While on-the-ground support of disaster recovery efforts is a major part of FEMA's charter, the agency provides state and local governments with experts in specialized fields and funding for rebuilding efforts and relief funds for infrastructure by directing individuals to access low interest loans, in conjunction with the Small Business Administration. In addition to this, FEMA provides funds for training of response personnel throughout the United States and its territories as part of the agency's preparedness effort.
.
.
Like I said. FEMA doesn't set power poles.

[sonicfilter]

carol wrote:

<quoted text>
Do winning presidents also say in their victory speeches they will be sitting down with the losing opponent in the weeks ahead to talk about how to move this country forward?
Thought Obama knew how to do that. He won. Why is he interested in Romney's input? He certainly isn't interested in any other republicans' input.

he doesn't have to worry about what republicans want.

Of course, it would presumably be better for Obama’s legacy if the economy were to improve during his second term. But he managed to get re-elected once despite failing to turn around the economy. And he doesn’t have to stand for re-election again.

(And did I mention Republicans would be blamed for anything bad that happens?)

The fix is in. Democrats control the presidency, the senate, and the mainstream media. Elections have consequences; they hold the cards. Republicans control the House — just enough levers of power to allow them to be blamed for obstruction.

Republicans are so screwed.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/30/on-the-fisc...

the general consensus.

you FOXbots are so screwed.

[conservative crapola]

Barack Hussein Obama Inauguration Day January 20th, 2013.

Public ceremony January 21st.

Justice Roberts, practice your lines.

hahahahahahahahaha