Funny how you're reduced to arguing about the pre-election polls after your side lost the election!! What's with that??<quoted text>
Watched the whole thing. No nervous breakdown. Rove was being cautious after what happened with Bush before all the Ohio votes were counted.
He was fine and dandy when Obama won regardless.
The New York Times’ John Cassidy was convinced the hurricane secured the win for Obama. He wrote:
“After being behind in the national polls for most of October,[Obama] has now re-established a narrow lead. While there are a number of possible explanations for this turnaround, the most convincing is the simplest: his handling of Sandy has raised his standing, and his poll ratings.”
Reflecting a national trend of the numbers going in Obama’s favor since the hurricane, Obama’s lead on the east coast jumped from 9 to 21 points.
A Pew poll taken before the hurricane showed Romney and Obama neck-and-neck at 47% but the same polling firm had Obama ahead of Romney 48%-45% post-Sandy.
You lose. I win.
As you're so fond of saying 'That's one man's opinion, and one Poll's opinion.'
If you won, why is Obama President??
After all, you believed the lies from FAUX once again. Huffpost and Nate Silver never showed Romney to have a lead.
FAUX was dead wrong, liberal media was completely correct.
So there, miss farty pants. There's my 'one man's opinions'.