Barack Obama, our next President

Barack Obama, our next President

There are 1431432 comments on the Hampton Roads Daily Press story from Nov 5, 2008, titled Barack Obama, our next President. In it, Hampton Roads Daily Press reports that:

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Hampton Roads Daily Press.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#816104 Dec 3, 2012
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong. The US is a Constitutional republic, not a democracy, Socialist or otherwise.
Right, US is a Constitutional Republic but a Socialist Democracy within the Constitutional Republic of Laws which a Democracy alone will not work.

Article 1 Section 8 advocates Socialism especially when the Federal Government has the power to take money from me to provide for others through the means of taxes.

http://www.shmoop.com/constitution/article-1-...
carol

Oviedo, FL

#816105 Dec 3, 2012
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>the Right, Republicans, and the So Called Conservatives including G.W. Bush call Socialist Democracy Compassionate Conservatism which I do not even consider Conservatism not even close.
Compassionate Conservatism
Compassionate Conservatism is a political philosophy that stresses using traditionally conservative techniques and concepts in order to improve the general welfare of society.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compassionate_co...
You lost me with a social democracy having anything to do with compassionate conservatism.

However, a much better description of compassionate conservatism is: Compassionate conservatism is the theory that the government should encourage the effective provision of social services without providing the service itself.

Just the opposite of a social democracy where the government wants to provide for everyone's needs until the taxpayers run out of money. Then you have Greece. A good example of social democracy.
concerned American

Georgetown, KY

#816106 Dec 3, 2012
Eman wrote:
<quoted text>Tax cuts aren't the problem. Spending is. Heard on levin today that in todays dollars, clinton spent something like 2.3 trillion. Thats how he got a surplus.
If they would cut fraud on s.s.i. and food stamps etc! And quit giving our tax dollars to these country's. That don't like us anyway. And get out of Afghanistan. We would have plenty of money!!!!!
John Galt

Temecula, CA

#816107 Dec 3, 2012
Anonymous of Indy wrote:
<quoted text>Right, US is a Constitutional Republic but a Socialist Democracy within the Constitutional Republic of Laws which a Democracy alone will not work.
Article 1 Section 8 advocates Socialism especially when the Federal Government has the power to take money from me to provide for others through the means of taxes.
http://www.shmoop.com/constitution/article-1-...
Article 1, Section 8 provides very limited taxing power.

The government could not take money from you to give to others until ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment in 1913

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#816108 Dec 3, 2012
LOL......

Dick Armey - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dick_Armey - Similarto Dick Armey - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Richard Keith "Dick" Armey (/&#712;&#593;rmi/; born July 7, 1940) is a former U.S.... and Paxon were to present Gingrich with an ultimatum: resign, or be voted out..... by The Tea Party Patriots, a national co-partner of Dick Armey's FreedomWorks,...

Early life, education and career - US House of Representatives - Political positions Exclusive: Dick Armey Quits Tea Party Group in Split Over ... www.motherjones.com/mojo/2012/12/dick-armey-r...

5 hours ago ... Dick Armey, the folksy conservative leader, has resigned as ... But it isn't that I got my nose out of line because we should've done better." ...
Dick Armey: The Tea Party's 1/2-Million-Dollar Man - Esquire www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/dick-armey-sal...

Oct 3, 2011 ... Dick Armey: The Tea Party's 1/2-Million-Dollar Man .... It will not seek out someone to tell it that what it really saw was a duck walking down the ...

Since: Nov 11

Westerville, OH

#816109 Dec 3, 2012
Can any liberal tell me why Obama is hiding his college transcripts?

Let's hear the silence because they do not know but we conservatives KNOW!!!

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#816110 Dec 3, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
You lost me with a social democracy having anything to do with compassionate conservatism.
However, a much better description of compassionate conservatism is: Compassionate conservatism is the theory that the government should encourage the effective provision of social services without providing the service itself.
Just the opposite of a social democracy where the government wants to provide for everyone's needs until the taxpayers run out of money. Then you have Greece. A good example of social democracy.
I agree, Greece is a good example of a Social Democracy where the people were able to vote themselves Government Social Benefits & Money and people of Greece proved Ben Franklin right when he said "When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." and we seen that with G.W. Bush but he called it Compassinate Conservatism and when he signed into law Medicare Part D by adding 7 trillion Dollars to the Federal Deficit which I agree I dont call it conservatism either, but True Conservative are all about self reliant.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#816112 Dec 3, 2012
John Galt wrote:
<quoted text>
Article 1, Section 8 provides very limited taxing power.
The government could not take money from you to give to others until ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment in 1913
Exactly, and that is what alot of people dont understand before the 16th amendment taxes had to uniform throughout the United States then not anymore after the adoption of the 16th amendment.

The Real Problem Is The 16th Amendment

The 16th amendment more or less declares that all of our income is the property of the Federal government. Any amount they let us keep is the result of the benevolence of Congress. The Courts have ruled as such throughout the history of the income tax. This includes any income, from gifts to fringe benefits. If your employer pays for a business lunch, the Federal government can tax you for 100% of your lunch if they so desire. There are of course loopholes and all sorts of deductions and write offs. But those are all by the grace of Congress. According to the Courts and the 16th amendment Congress doesn’t have to write any deductions into law. They’re entitled to everything.

The income tax was sold to the American people by progressive Republican President William Howard Taft as a tax on corporations and rich people. Prior to the amendment taxes had to be apportioned to the states according to the census. As such most taxes the Federal government collected were Tariffs and various excise taxes. When it was sold to the American people, the idea was to tax the rich. Within 5 years of its passage the top rate was 77%. After a generation, most Americans were stuck paying income taxes. Now we’ve gotten to the point where government is calling a healthcare fine a tax. And why not? If everything belongs to the government what is to stop them from taxing us in fines?

http://stevenbirnspeaks.com/2012/06/29/the-re...

Adoption of the 16th Amendment

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteenth_Amendm...
sonicfilter

United States

#816113 Dec 3, 2012
EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"sonic"
Well at least you answered, with some one else's verbiage, but an answer non the less. I would still like an answer in your words as to why you think anyone should pay a higher or lower tax rate than you do. I understand in your mind that the government is the answer. Penalize those who work hard and produce. Reward those who are less successful, those who do not have the desire to excel, those with their hand out.
Peace
those who do not have the desire.

is that the only reason someone would need help from the government?

give me a break.

let's be honest: i can't answer a question that is so obviously biased in any way that you'll agree with. your mind is set and you just want a punching bag. i'd think you'd know better by now.

have a nice night.
sonicfilter

United States

#816114 Dec 3, 2012
Daniels and the 47% Remarks

Mitch Daniels reflected on Republican failings, but didn’t go quite far enough in his explanation of why the Romney 47% remarks were so wrong. He said:

A chronic disease of the Republican Party is the insistence on speaking in abstractions, or worse yet in language that offers no clue, no argument that the principles of liberty are far better for people at the bottom than the statist alternatives.

Daniels correctly understands that disparaging 47% of the people as irresponsible victims because they don’t pay income tax was incredibly insulting and politically disastrous, but in the comments in this report he doesn’t touch on how these remarks contradicted an appeal based on principles of liberty. A Republican candidate interested in promoting a message of liberty wouldn’t see the non-payment of a certain kind of federal tax as a moral failing or proof of dependency and irresponsibility. On the contrary, he would have been pleased that the tax burden is so relatively light, and he would have understood that the lightness of that burden was a legacy of decades of his party’s policies. The Romney vision was that people ought to aspire to paying income tax, as if it were a marker of some sort of virtue, and that there was nothing else in what he was proposing that would cause them to support him. Naturally, a vision that stunted and focused on nothing but material reasons for political loyalties was never going to appeal to anyone outside guaranteed core supporters. The problem in that case was not that Romney’s language was too abstract, but that it was extremely specific and detailed about the people that he was writing off.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/lariso...
sonicfilter

United States

#816115 Dec 3, 2012
Why don’t 47 percent of Americans pay federal income taxes? One major reason: Tax credits that were passed with major bipartisan support — namely the Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Tax Credit. And there’s a wealth of research showing that both of these tax breaks have been effective at lifting these Americans out of poverty and encourage them to move from welfare to work.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/...

Since: Feb 12

Location hidden

#816116 Dec 3, 2012
martinezjosei wrote:
Can any liberal tell me why Obama is hiding his college transcripts?
Let's hear the silence because they do not know but we conservatives KNOW!!!
You know only what Fox tells you that you know. It is very clear.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#816117 Dec 4, 2012
Cousin DuPrees Cousin wrote:
<quoted text>
You know only what Fox tells you that you know. It is very clear.
Clear as mud. Where in the hell were you born? mediamatters?
PDUPONT

Westfield, MA

#816119 Dec 4, 2012
Aphelion wrote:
<quoted text>
So your answer is to spend our way out of debt? With this type of logic one has to wonder can any of you liberals even balance your checkbooks?
You right wing morons just can't wrap your heads around the concept of return on investment. Let's put it more concretely . I f you spend money on a fancy entertainment center for your home then that money you've spent will not give you any return for the few hours a week you actually use it. If you take that same money and invest in energy efficient appliances , more efficient windows or insulation then you realize savings in your energy bills. If a company spends money on redecorating executive offices it doesn't add anything to the bottom line but if they put that money into more machinery and/or more employees it brings more revenue as a result of improved productivity.
Tax cuts, two wars and Medicare part D didn't add anything to the GDP. The Bush tax cuts for the top 5% cost $11.6 million every hour of every day and contrary to GOP dogma haven't added any jobs as a result.
costoftaxcuts.com/about/
The war in Iraq cost $3 trillion and the only thing we got in return was over 4000 service people coming home in body bags and tens of thousands more maimed both bodily and emotionally who need to be cared for years to come at taxpayer expense.
www.washingtonpost.com › Opinions
Medicare part D was a sop to Big Pharma and resulted in seniors paying more for their medications and again increased the deficit with no return to GDP.
www.forbes.com/.../republican-budget-hypocris... ...
Why is it that deficits are only a problem when a Democrat is in the White House?
PDUPONT

Westfield, MA

#816120 Dec 4, 2012
Aphelion wrote:
<quoted text>
Your ignorance shows in the fact that you cannot spell ignorant.
Post from Aphelion #815591;
"More losers clamboring for that which they did not have the intellect or the motivation to achieve themselves."
You're too ignorant to know how to spell "clamoring".
Mister Kettle, Mister Pot on line one.
PDUPONT

Westfield, MA

#816121 Dec 4, 2012
flack wrote:
<quoted text> Another moran who thinks the 'rich' keeps there money in a vault in the basement. Where do you people come from?
No stupid, they keep them in offshore accounts in the Cayman Islands, Bermuda and Switzerland.
www.thenation.com/blog/168711/whats-romneys-o...
What cave have you been living in?
Aphelion

Melbourne, FL

#816123 Dec 4, 2012
PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
No stupid, they keep them in offshore accounts in the Cayman Islands, Bermuda and Switzerland.
www.thenation.com/blog/168711/whats-romneys-o...
What cave have you been living in?
Spoken like a person who knows nothing of investments let alone has any.
LIBERAL_DRIVEL

Montgomery, AL

#816124 Dec 4, 2012
When people that can afford a $100K television room...

"IRS aims to clarify investment income tax under healthcare law"

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/03/us-...
Orangelion

Chester, UK

#816125 Dec 4, 2012
Obama invests in tax, first the poor, now the rich. He is trying to cutback again on the poor, so he can increase the riches money, so after that, he can go back to the poor again with the excuse that the rich wasn't enough, so it doesn't look like he is just scrounging for tax. He also supports the PBS, which allows unmonitered material on television and onto our children, as well as having biased news articles unchecked. He is allowing the DREAM act bill, which allows illegal immigrant children to progress and take peoples jobs and damage america. He also allows murderous abortion, as well as condoms which is decreasing our population, as well as encouraging more teens to have sex and increasing teen pregnancy. He is also allowing gay marriage, which will turn children into sexual deviants and gay converts, as well as destroy the american family.
TheIndependentMa jority

United States

#816127 Dec 4, 2012
Nj raider 1 wrote:
<quoted text> Your an idiot, honestly! How is it fair that a person making $30,000 a year pay the same tax rate as a person making 1,000,000 a year? You do know percentages don't you? You do realize instead of trying to bleed the middle class & poor, you should be thankful because the middle class is the motor that runs america. Did I mention that your arguing nonsense being the people have spoken? 2/3 of americans agree on the 3.6% tax hike on the rich. Honestly, your worse than john boehner. Their job is to do the will of the people. Instead ya'll plan is to do what helps you all pockets. Ya'll became accustom to shitting on the lower classes & finally someone with common sense was elected & decided this country needed change. Now look at ya'll, all rosy in the cheeks! Obama was re elected. THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN! Stop whining!
And here's some REALITY-
The taxation system was based on a system called the "honor" system, and raising the rates on the higher above table income earners won't be a drop in an eyedropper in a bucket full of water won't change, because ABOVE the tables WORKING class taxpayers are ALREADY the ones that PAY their fair share. People paying taxes out of loyalty and honor is almost obsolete anymore, due to unconstrained abuses of the many loopholes, credits--AND neglect by many who never even bothered at all to contribute anything.

REAL honor can NOT be bought OR purchased, it is NOT something that others "owe" to others...it has to be EARNED, and these days...people would rather take, take, take..many of whom are CLUELESS, that all their UNearned entitleMENTAL taking as well, has now DEPLETED this nation to near dry.

The ONLY thing that will amount to anything is CAPPING and CURBING corporate, financial market AND givverment welfare, and/or FLAT federal sales taxing EVERYONE across the boards, and to think anything else would is just ignorance.

Hense WHY the voices of the REAL AMERICA have risen a few decibels in the past few years.

The T(AXED) E(NOUGH) A(LREADY drained dry) Party.
CAP, CURB, BUDGET, BALANCe and Live within ones OWN means again--ALL across the boards, because America can no longer support the massive gravy train lines of fweeDUHM riders.

Welcome to OUR geneRATIONAL reality!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 1 min GEORGIA 2,057
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 2 min GEORGIA 3,178
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 min Mothra 61,458
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 min Ricky F 103,603
News BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 5 min Dr Guru 225,437
News Bad Axe Throwing, Vegan Vortex, and more things... 30 min former democrat 1
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr Red_Forman 9,517

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages