Barack Obama, our next President

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ... Full Story

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#815425 Dec 2, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
You didn't mention the women in Afghanistan under the Taliban rule.
Punishments against women by the Taliban in Afghanistan were often carried out publicly either as formal spectacles held in sports stadiums or town squares or spontaneous street beatings.
In October 1996, a woman had the tip of her thumb cut off for wearing nail varnish.
In December 1996, 225 Kabul women had been seized and punished for violating the sharia code of dress. The sentence was handed down by a tribunal and the women were lashed on their legs and backs for their misdemeanor.
In May 1997, five female CARE International employees were forced from their vehicle by members of the religious police. The guards used a public address system to insult and harass the women before striking them with a metal and leather whip almost 5 feet in length.
In 1999, a mother of seven was executed in front of 30,000 spectators in Kabul’s Ghazi Sport stadium for allegedly murdering her abusive husband. She was imprisoned for three years and extensively tortured prior to the execution, yet she refused to plead her innocence in a bid to protect her daughter (reportedly the actual culprit).
When a Taliban raid discovered a woman running an informal school in her apartment, they beat the children and threw the woman down a flight of stairs (breaking her leg) and then imprisoned her. They threatened to stone her family publicly if she refused to sign a declaration of loyalty to the Taliban and their laws.
An Afghan girl named Bibi Aisha was promised to a new family through a tribal method of solving disputes known as baad. When she fled the violence girls often suffer under baad, her new family found her and a Taliban commander ordered her punished as an example, "lest other girls in the village try to do the same thing". Her ears and nose were cut off and she was left for dead in the mountains, but survived.
Failure to comply with Taliban's threats led to women being shot and killed as was the case of 22-year old Hossai in July 2010.
Many punishments were carried out by individual militias without the sanction of Taliban authorities as it was against official Taliban policy to punish women in the street.
...You're on the wrong side. Of just about everything.
Empathy is a word and only a word to Tenzing types. Describing the loss of political/economic freedoms or the torture of innocents to many Liberals is like trying to describe a disembowelment to a blind deaf mute. You can't reach into the depths of a shallow mind.
carol

Orlando, FL

#815426 Dec 2, 2012
Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
You didn't ask a question. You framed a statement as a question, a laughable ploy frequently employed by our friends at Fox "News". Figures you'd pick up on it and parrot it.
The question was clear...will unemployment benefits go on indefinitely...considering jobs will be more scarce when taxes and regulations increase next year.
GOPidiotsx

Chicago, IL

#815427 Dec 2, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
President Eisenhower's economic policy was a series of initiatives to strengthen the market-based and market-directed economy and enhance personal freedom.
Under the Eisenhower administration the economy had greatly expanded with the Dow Jones Industrials stock market index more than doubling (from 288 to 634).
Under Eisenhower there was a large governmental economic stimulus in the form of legislation establishing the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways.
The Eisenhower years were marked by low unemployment and low inflation. And the national debt indeed declined further.
So, basically, no comparison.
Imagine all that, even with a top marginal tax rate of 90%. How did all the 'job creators' survive?

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#815428 Dec 2, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
President Eisenhower's economic policy was a series of initiatives to strengthen the market-based and market-directed economy and enhance personal freedom.
Under the Eisenhower administration the economy had greatly expanded with the Dow Jones Industrials stock market index more than doubling (from 288 to 634).
Under Eisenhower there was a large governmental economic stimulus in the form of legislation establishing the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways.
The Eisenhower years were marked by low unemployment and low inflation. And the national debt indeed declined further.
So, basically, no comparison.
Your stupid shines through as usual. No comparison?

Just the fact that the DJIA doubled under Obama's four years as opposed to Ike's eight and that a "large governmental economic stimulus" was the hallmark of Obama's first term practically begs no comparison at all!

Ike saw 7.5% unemployment during the 1958 recession.

Don't know where you copied and pasted this from but you should get a different source.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#815429 Dec 2, 2012
Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Exactly, a broad rejection of the Republican Party. Time to regroup and come up with a realistic face for the party. This comic book shi t they've been playing on Fox for the last fifteen years don't play anymore.
A classic display of wanting to shoot the messenger for bringing the message. Fifteen years of hearing the truth has left you with migraines. The only thing worse than exposing you to the truth would be to sprinkle Holy Water on your Liberal-Possessed Orc body.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#815430 Dec 2, 2012
GOPidiotsx wrote:
<quoted text>
Paul had a significant following among young voters too, but the GOP thinks young voters are stupid and don't vote. Oops. With all the talk about the evils of contraception, those young voters will be Democrats for life.
Probably.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#815431 Dec 2, 2012
Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
If you were smart you'd have copied and pasted the post to which you refer because nobody's gonna go back and look for it.
But, you're not smart ...
Realtime and I were discussing the failure of charter schools. Let him do his own damn homework.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#815432 Dec 2, 2012
GOPidiotsx wrote:
<quoted text>
Imagine all that, even with a top marginal tax rate of 90%. How did all the 'job creators' survive?
They didn't have multi million dollar packages for CEO's; corporations reinvested in their own companies.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#815433 Dec 2, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Considering the choice of leadership - a proven failure on economic policies and a proven success - it should have been a no brainer.
Out of over 120 million voters, winning by only 3 million isn't earth shattering.
Hurricane Sandy turned the tides more than anything else.
Yet, people are still suffering in New York and New Jersey despite the "presidential" photo ops and the opportunity for Obama to "look" presidential.
You learned that Obama was a "proven failure" from the fiction out of Fox "News". Raw economic data said the opposite. I tried to tell you but you always fall back on the last thing Fox told you. Really, you should buy one of those TV's that get more than one channel.
lily boca raton fl

Boca Raton, FL

#815434 Dec 2, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Considering the choice of leadership - a proven failure on economic policies and a proven success - it should have been a no brainer.
Out of over 120 million voters, winning by only 3 million isn't earth shattering.
Hurricane Sandy turned the tides more than anything else.
Yet, people are still suffering in New York and New Jersey despite the "presidential" photo ops and the opportunity for Obama to "look" presidential.
You're a simpleton if you think anyone can wave a magic wand and everything is fixed in one day so you can go on to the next story.
People are still suffering in New Orleans despite Bush photo ops.

It was the anti women rape talk. Made people sick inside.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#815435 Dec 2, 2012
High Tax Rates Won't Slow Growth

We're not close to the top of the Laffer Curve. Raising tax rates is part of a sensible deficit reduction strategy.

....will raising top tax rates significantly lower economic growth? In the postwar U.S., higher top tax rates tend to go with higher economic growth—not lower. Indeed, according to the U.S. Department of Commerce's Bureau of Economic Analysis, GDP annual growth per capita (to adjust for population growth) averaged 1.68% between 1980 and 2010 when top tax rates were relatively low, while growth averaged 2.23% between 1950 and 1980 when top tax rates were at or above 70%.

Neither does international evidence support a case for lower growth from higher top taxes. There is no clear correlation between economic growth since the 1970s and top tax-rate cuts across Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405270...
carol

Orlando, FL

#815436 Dec 2, 2012
Tenzing wrote:
<quoted text>
Lincoln never wrote or said that but figure you to swallow it hook, line, and sinker.
Rev. William John Henry Boetcker authored a pamphlet entitled "The Ten Cannots" that emphasized freedom and responsibility of the individual on himself. The error attributing them to Lincoln stemmed from a leaflet titled "Lincoln on Limitations" where authentic Lincoln quotes were published with the "The Ten Cannots" also listed.

However, these 10 truths bear repeating.

You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
You cannot help little men by tearing down big men.
You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.
You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
You cannot establish sound security on borrowed money.
You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than you earn.
You cannot build character and courage by destroying men's initiative and independence.
And you cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they can and should do for themselves.

...You cannot deny the truth.

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#815437 Dec 2, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Considering the choice of leadership - a proven failure on economic policies and a proven success - it should have been a no brainer.
Out of over 120 million voters, winning by only 3 million isn't earth shattering.
Hurricane Sandy turned the tides more than anything else.
Yet, people are still suffering in New York and New Jersey despite the "presidential" photo ops and the opportunity for Obama to "look" presidential.
Oh, and he won by 4.5 million votes which is about 4 million more than the margin by which W. won in 2000.

I know, its embarrassing but you need to embrace it as the new reality.
GOPidiotsx

Chicago, IL

#815439 Dec 2, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Considering the choice of leadership - a proven failure on economic policies and a proven success - it should have been a no brainer.
Out of over 120 million voters, winning by only 3 million isn't earth shattering.
Hurricane Sandy turned the tides more than anything else.
Yet, people are still suffering in New York and New Jersey despite the "presidential" photo ops and the opportunity for Obama to "look" presidential.
Another idiotic bit of drool from Lorac. Obama was defeating the robot in the polls before Sandy. With the exception of 1 week following the 1st debate, Mittens always trailed Obama, but you wouldn't know that swallowing Dick Morris' verbal ejaculations.
So, homes and businesses flattened down to their foundation should be rebuilt by now? What, is POTUS supposed to have 'I dream of Jeannie' powers?

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#815440 Dec 2, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
How exactly is Obama going to make those cuts? Do you even know?
What we do know is Geithner suggested $1.6 trillion in tax increases but showed minimal or no interest in spending cuts.
When congressional leaders went to the White House three days after the election, Obama talked of possibly curbing the explosive growth of food stamps and Social Security disability payments. But since Geithner didn’t mention them, those reductions appear to be off the table now.
It's pretty much about spending and taxing. No cuts to speak of.
I am convinced the Boy Messiah is intentionally pushing us off the cliff with a smile on his shit-eatin' face. This evil needs to be countered with the reason, empathy and fortitude of working Americans. The Takers? F*ck 'em. They can play with their free cellphones as the world burns around them.
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#815441 Dec 2, 2012
Conservative Media Promote Myths To Shield Wealthy From Tax Hikes

http://mediamatters.org/research/2012/11/23/c...

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#815442 Dec 2, 2012
shinningelectr0n wrote:
<quoted text>
Empathy is a word and only a word to Tenzing types. Describing the loss of political/economic freedoms or the torture of innocents to many Liberals is like trying to describe a disembowelment to a blind deaf mute. You can't reach into the depths of a shallow mind.
To Carol, "empathy" doesn't apply to brown people. She's sure there's another word for that sort of thing. Perhaps "pity"?
sonicfilter

Fishers, IN

#815444 Dec 2, 2012
Conservative economist,“We need to raise taxes.” Fox Host,“You’re a Communist.”

http://freakoutnation.com/2012/11/17/conserva...

lol

Since: Dec 10

Location hidden

#815445 Dec 2, 2012
carol wrote:
<quoted text>
The question was clear...will unemployment benefits go on indefinitely...considering jobs will be more scarce when taxes and regulations increase next year.
Its your Fox "News" driven assumption that jobs will be scarcer next year. Where's your empirical data that indicates that jobs will be scarcer next year? Fox's "Stands to reason" isn't empirical data.

“My Life Is A Shell Game”

Since: May 07

Lapeer, MI

#815446 Dec 2, 2012
Lily Boca Raton Fl wrote:
<quoted text>
They're all millionaires on here!!
And sober, drug-free ones, too, Ms. Washrag.
The million part of the millionaire you present is something precious, valuable and morally sound. They have conscience.

Something you envy and will never possess.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Chicago abandons plan to name high school after... 10 min X-TREME BIAS 2
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 11 min Scrutiny 178,169
Ask Amy 9-21-14 13 min Cass 4
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 15 min OzRitz 46,797
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 21 min Larissa Hernandez 4,719
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 1 hr Yumpin Yimminy 68,521
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 2 hr Frijoles 69,414
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr Mister Tonka 98,239
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••