Barack Obama, our next President

Full story: Hampton Roads Daily Press

"The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep," Obama cautioned. Young and charismatic but with little experience on the national level, Obama smashed through racial barriers and easily defeated ...
Comments
753,121 - 753,140 of 1,095,955 Comments Last updated 4 min ago
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815052
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Republicans couldn't have been any more clear they were ready to sit down and compromise.

Obama sent Geithner to deliver his decree - I mean, plan - and then took off again somewhere.

Point to any president in history who, in a time of crisis, didn't sit down with the opposition to negotiate a deal that would be acceptable to both sides.

You won't find one. This is the only one. He always has more important things to do.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815053
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
He proposed the same spending budget that was rejected by his own Democrats in 2008.
Why wouldn't the GOP reject it this time too?
let them reject it. they're screwed no matter what.

the reject, they get called out for obstructionism. they accept, they get called out for being turncoats.

or have you forgotten the day one GOP agenda? and how about the Tea Party and it's castigation of those who don't walk the imaginary line?

bummer.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815054
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Yeah wrote:
<quoted text>lol! You need to talk to one of your own idiots son.
He doesn't believe we sell loans to China!
That the best you have, Yeahoo? You better start paying, you're proximity to Red China is closer than mine. Whose Administration added more to the debt than any of the previous Administrations? Why that would be the Barack Hussein Obama Administration?? Even Terrible Timmy Geithner couldn't stop these spend thrifts? He's on Fox right now, making excuses?? He even lies with a straight face??
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815055
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

4

3

3

sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
he doesn't have to worry about what republicans want.
Of course, it would presumably be better for Obama’s legacy if the economy were to improve during his second term. But he managed to get re-elected once despite failing to turn around the economy. And he doesn’t have to stand for re-election again.
(And did I mention Republicans would be blamed for anything bad that happens?)
The fix is in. Democrats control the presidency, the senate, and the mainstream media. Elections have consequences; they hold the cards. Republicans control the House — just enough levers of power to allow them to be blamed for obstruction.
Republicans are so screwed.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/11/30/on-the-fisc...
the general consensus.
you FOXbots are so screwed.
He presented another laughable budget and expects the GOP to cave so he can blame them again if they don't.

Wake up. Obama is playing the worst kind of politics - the narcissistic/in-your-face kind.

The GOP are more than willing to compromise. Obama is just no where to be found.

Since: May 11

Loysville, PA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815056
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

carol wrote:
Republicans couldn't have been any more clear they were ready to sit down and compromise.
Obama sent Geithner to deliver his decree - I mean, plan - and then took off again somewhere.
Point to any president in history who, in a time of crisis, didn't sit down with the opposition to negotiate a deal that would be acceptable to both sides.
You won't find one. This is the only one. He always has more important things to do.
We've known this was coming for a year. We know Republicans never budged off their demand for tax cuts for the wealthy. I mean, after all, f*ck the country, their Norquist pledge is more important.
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815057
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

3

2

2

sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
let them reject it. they're screwed no matter what.
the reject, they get called out for obstructionism. they accept, they get called out for being turncoats.
or have you forgotten the day one GOP agenda? and how about the Tea Party and it's castigation of those who don't walk the imaginary line?
bummer.
The Democrats rejected the same friggin' budget in 2008! Not one Democrat vote in the Senate supported it!

Are you always this thick-headed??
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815058
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
He presented another laughable budget and expects the GOP to cave so he can blame them again if they don't.
Wake up. Obama is playing the worst kind of politics - the narcissistic/in-your-face kind.
The GOP are more than willing to compromise. Obama is just no where to be found.
once again, you're being a hypocrite.

so when will the GOP signal that they're ready to negotiate in good faith?

like...never? oh but maybe you can show us all some examples of Republicans playing nice with Obama? actually saying they will concede something substantial to get what they want?

so when will we get any details on the counter offer? like...never? and let's not make the first offer on cutting entitlements.'We have to let Obama do that so no on will think it was our idea.' way too late for that as their reluctance signals.

i can assure all of you wingnuts....the deal will not be to your liking. not that majority will care. just check the unskewed polls, or just check the election results if you like.

Since: Oct 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815059
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
He presented another laughable budget and expects the GOP to cave so he can blame them again if they don't.
Wake up. Obama is playing the worst kind of politics - the narcissistic/in-your-face kind.
The GOP are more than willing to compromise. Obama is just no where to be found.
Ain't it the truth? We're seeing now just how experienced this guy is running anything, Bet his wife doesn't let him touch the family checkbook??
PDUPONT

Chicopee, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815060
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
If they do that, they will become the scapegoats and labeled the party of "no".
They need to become the party of "you own it". It would paralyze a lot of democrats since many are seeking reelection, unlike Obama.
This gridlock hurts republicans more than democrats. They should say "since no one's listening to us, we're outta here" and make sure the American public knows which party is the only one playing this no-win game.
If the majority want what the democrats offer, let them have it. All of it. The republicans can say we didn't have a thing to do with it. They can offer the same solutions that were rejected.
It's going to have to get really bad before people realize their mistake. Blaming republicans are what democrats are counting on.
That's what they do.
Republicans can't be blamed if they tell Americans, "We went along with what the majority wanted...but maybe now you'll listen to us."
Sure stupid, it was a big mistake to reject a plan where the wealthy get even wealthier on the backs of the middle class and the poor. A plan that cuts education, veterans benefits, infrastructure repair and maintenance , research and development , voucherizes Medicare putting the elderly at the tender mercies of private insurance and slashes Medicaid leaving the most vulnerable without healthcare.
Only a complete imbecile would consider the rejection of this nihilistic slash and burn policy a disaster.
Blaming Republicans is what Democrats do? Almost every day some right wing whack job you included blames the deficit on Democrats who took a slim control of Congress in 2007 without being able to come up with a single piece of legislation that caused that much damage and escaped Bush's veto pen.
When I place the blame on Bush as the majority of the American people do, I cite concrete examples.
You're a goddamned hypocrite Carol.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815061
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
The Democrats rejected the same friggin' budget in 2008! Not one Democrat vote in the Senate supported it!
Are you always this thick-headed??
this is not 2008. going back just signals that you have nothing to go forward with.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815062
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
He presented another laughable budget and expects the GOP to cave so he can blame them again if they don't.
Wake up. Obama is playing the worst kind of politics - the narcissistic/in-your-face kind.
The GOP are more than willing to compromise. Obama is just no where to be found.
GOP's Anti-Obama Campaign Started Night Of Inauguration

According to Draper, the guest list that night (which was just over 15 people in total) included Republican Reps. Eric Cantor (Va.), Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), Paul Ryan (Wis.), Pete Sessions (Texas), Jeb Hensarling (Texas), Pete Hoekstra (Mich.) and Dan Lungren (Calif.), along with Republican Sens. Jim DeMint (S.C.), Jon Kyl (Ariz.), Tom Coburn (Okla.), John Ensign (Nev.) and Bob Corker (Tenn.). The non-lawmakers present included Newt Gingrich, several years removed from his presidential campaign, and Frank Luntz, the long-time Republican wordsmith. Notably absent were Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio)-- who, Draper writes, had an acrimonious relationship with Luntz.

For several hours in the Caucus Room (a high-end D.C. establishment), the book says they plotted out ways to not just win back political power, but to also put the brakes on Obama's legislative platform.

"If you act like you're the minority, you're going to stay in the minority," Draper quotes McCarthy as saying. "We've gotta challenge them on every single bill and challenge them on every single campaign."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/25/robe...

and that should be the last word on Obama intransigence. i realize for you that it won't, but you're evidently heavily invested in a FOXbot fantasy world.

but maybe you'll surprise me and say that the GOP was wrong for doing that.
GOPidiotsx

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815063
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

1

Impeach Obama wrote:
<quoted text>Wrong! She LIED under orders from the administration to help Obama conceal his incompetence. They thought the public would fall for it and forget about the incident, but even after Fox News reported the truth three days later, the administration continued the coverup and the lies. This is why Susan Rice should never be nominated for anything and Obama should be removed from office as soon as possible.
FOX News? The network that predicted a Romney landslide on election night based upon their polling? HAHAHAHA
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815064
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Some on the left are suggesting that Obama adopt a strategy of confrontation and conquest. Reject the Grand Bargain approach. Take the country over the fiscal cliff and blame it on the Republicans.

Obama could probably triumph in pushing higher tax rates on the rich that wouldn’t even produce enough revenue to cover a tenth of the deficit.
But he’d sow such bitterness that it would be the last thing he’d pass for the rest of his term.

The person who wrote this, David Brooks, should have stopped there. It's all there is to say.

"...higher taxes wouldn't even produce enough revenue to cover a tenth of the deficit."
GOPidiotsx

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815066
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Do winning presidents also say in their victory speeches they will be sitting down with the losing opponent in the weeks ahead to talk about how to move this country forward?
Thought Obama knew how to do that. He won. Why is he interested in Romney's input? He certainly isn't interested in any other republicans' input.
Yes. It's called being a gracious winner, as opposed to declaring a mandate and spending political capital.
Linda

Edison, NJ

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815069
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

EasyEed wrote:
<quoted text>
"silly"
BULLMANURE!!
Peace
BullManure must have been in the drinking water and guzzled in early November. Not everyone made the same mistake twice, but many voters did and we are now going to get the Banana Republic government we deserve with this president who is still out campaigning instead of working.

But people weren’t paying attention. Those are the people now surprised that President Obama is still stridently campaigning instead of doing the real work of governing.

Even some who voted for him last month are puzzled as he threatens to take the nation off the fiscal cliff if Republicans don’t give him the tax hikes he demands now and puts off entitlement reform until later. He even wants to increase spending.

I’ve talked to people who supported him, and their surprise is surprising.

“I thought he was going to move toward the center after the election,” one stunned Obama backer told me. Another said he believed the president’s positions were opening gambits and he would compromise.“It’s the first round,” he insisted.

Both are smart, accomplished men, but I’m baffled that they didn’t see this coming. Where, exactly, is the evidence that Obama is willing or able to work with people who disagree with him? Tick, tock, time’s up — there isn’t any evidence, because he’s not.
Again and again, the first term revealed Obama’s idea of bipartisanship: Dissenters are unpatriotic and must surrender.

Compromise is a one-way street for him.

As polarizing and ineffective as that approach was, he was rewarded with four more years. A different man might see that as a mulligan — a second chance to get it right.

Not Obama. His behavior now is even more troubling.

That he’s willing to risk sending the economy back into recession and killing even more jobs leads me to believe his second term will be far more radical than the first. A stranger to humility, he thinks re-election confers a blank check.

His demand that spending cuts and entitlement reform be put off, while Republicans give him the tax hikes and the stimulus he wants, suggests he’s not serious about facing the mountain of debt. In that case, no progress is possible as the nation hurtles toward disaster.

The fear is reinforced with his sudden bid to have sole and permanent authority to raise the debt limit. As it stands, Congress’ power to set the ceiling serves as a practical check and balance.

His effort to eliminate it is something that happens in a banana republic. Is that where Obama wants to take America?

Sadly, many Americans believe the answer is yes, and its too late now to do anything about it.
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815071
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

PDUPONT wrote:
<quoted text>
Sure stupid, it was a big mistake to reject a plan where the wealthy get even wealthier on the backs of the middle class and the poor. A plan that cuts education, veterans benefits, infrastructure repair and maintenance , research and development , voucherizes Medicare putting the elderly at the tender mercies of private insurance and slashes Medicaid leaving the most vulnerable without healthcare.
Only a complete imbecile would consider the rejection of this nihilistic slash and burn policy a disaster.
Blaming Republicans is what Democrats do? Almost every day some right wing whack job you included blames the deficit on Democrats who took a slim control of Congress in 2007 without being able to come up with a single piece of legislation that caused that much damage and escaped Bush's veto pen.
When I place the blame on Bush as the majority of the American people do, I cite concrete examples.
You're a goddamned hypocrite Carol.
What part of "higher taxes wouldn't even produce enough revenue to cover a tenth of the deficit" don't you understand?

It's one simple concept. Perhaps you should read it again.
Realtime

Deltona, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815073
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The Golden Rule

Due to the UN vote Israel is withholding the transfers of tax revenues to the Palestinian districts and is pushing ahead with settlements in the disputed areas.
carol

Orlando, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815074
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

2

2

1

sonicfilter wrote:
<quoted text>
this is not 2008. going back just signals that you have nothing to go forward with.
Apparently, Obama is repeating the past. It's the same plan.

Do you know the spending cuts Obama keeps talking about in his "balanced approach" to raising taxes?

Nobody else knows. Maybe you do.
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815076
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
What part of "higher taxes wouldn't even produce enough revenue to cover a tenth of the deficit" don't you understand?
It's one simple concept. Perhaps you should read it again.
yes, we already know that principal stands for nothing in GOPland.

that and we wouldn't want FOX to say he broke a campaign promise, now would we?
sonicfilter

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#815080
Dec 2, 2012
 

Judged:

2

1

1

carol wrote:
<quoted text>
Apparently, Obama is repeating the past. It's the same plan.
Do you know the spending cuts Obama keeps talking about in his "balanced approach" to raising taxes?
Nobody else knows. Maybe you do.
well geez carol, let's just drive off the cliff. we spend way to much on the military complex as it is. and what about all those tax cuts that will expire?

maybe you just need some right wing clarity.

GOP Between A Cliff And A Cave
they have been weighed and measured and found wanting

From inside the negotiations the picture looks even more grim:

“Republicans want the president to own the whole offer upfront, on both the entitlement and the revenue side, and that’s not going to happen because the president is not going to negotiate with himself,” the official said.“There’s a standoff, and the staff hasn’t gotten anywhere. Rob Nabors [the White House negotiator], has been saying:‘This is what we want on revenues on the down payment. What’s you guys’ ask on the entitlement side?’ And they keep looking back at us and saying:‘We want you to come up with that and pitch us.’ That’s not going to happen.”

This is not a hard nose bargaining position. It is an ultimatum. This is how you do business with someone you don’t like, you don’t respect, and most of all, you don’t fear.

http://www.redstate.com/2012/11/30/gop-betwee...

now you can expound on how much the GOP likes, respects, and fears Obama.

this whole thing of getting back what you've been getting sure does have you FOXbots crying foul. it's the funniest thing i've seen out of you wingnuts since you all made Trump your birther icon.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting... (Jan '09) 4 min Sgt Prepper 176,788
Amy 8-21 20 min Toj 12
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 22 min Toj 97,823
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 2 hr Doug77 4,636
last post wins! (Apr '13) 2 hr Concerned_American 320
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 3 hr bushi 49,259
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 3 hr andet1987 555

Search the Chicago Forum:
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••