So, according to you, if Chris Christie lied about the help he was getting or if he refused the federal help & allowed his people to suffer, Romney would have won?<quoted text>
Nope. Chris Christi sabotaged the election. Without Chris Christi sabotaging the election, Romney wins. That 5 point swing you observed in the last week of the election was the result of Christi's sabotage. Without Christi sabotaging the election, Romney wins. Even with Christi's sabotage and the 5 point swing, the vote was 50 - 50.
Now, how about we talk about the hippy popedream government the Democrats created that there is no possible way to pay for.
And, let's talk about the latest proposal from the Democrats to generate revenue that is right out of Karl Marx's "Das Kapital".
Yup, it's rediculous to call Obama a Marxist, isn't it?
I've been saying he was a Marxist communist since the day after Super Tuesday in 2008.
Looks like I'm being proved right... again.
All that would happen is to provide more proof how the Republicans politicize a crisis in order to try to gain votes. Obama would cite the aid given pr cite how Christie refused help to cost Republicans even more votes by proving just how pathetic they were.
Christie did the right thing. Show that politics really don't matter. People like that. But they way the Republicans had a fit cost them votes. If they would have backed Christie, they would have gained votes.